Where's the LOVE? - An Engage Retrospective 

The most common defense of the emblem rings I get is “these aren’t the same characters you have to treat them like their own character.” Like we are supposed to see emblem Lyn as a completely different character as og Lyn for example But then you can’t have it be fanservice if it’s a completely different character. You can’t have it both ways….so I don’t understand that defense.

I felt that the game wasn't a game celebrating all the previous entries of the series, but rather is a love letter to Fire Emblem Heroes, which is now their biggest moneymaker. This might as well be their "mainline game" from a corporate standpoint! Lyn, Eirika, Lucina, etc... are all the flanderized versions of these characters the way they are portrayed in Heroes, not in their actual original entries. The way how you call upon the powers of all these characters from other worlds, Sombron's story being about opening portals to other worlds and all that.

Engages biggest flaw was being an anniversary title and putting that at the for front rather than going after subtle approach like awakening the swan song

I see a lot of people talking about how Erika and Lyn have been seriously mischaracterized by Engage, but I feel like we need to also talk about how butchered Lucina has been ever since Heroes first came out. I mean, even before that she was basically flanderized into a tiny demure mouse for fanservice and to waifu-inize her, but as a result we never get to see any of the bite she displays during Awakening's main story. I know that she can act pretty silly during her supports with the other child characters, but those moments of humor were to contrast against her seriousness in the narrative. She doesn't feel like the fierce warrior who sacrificed everything, watched her kingdom be torn to shreds by Satan, but still persevered against the immeasurable odds against her. She's just kinda... nice and silly now. Like that's all her character has been turned into. Hell, you could argue that most of the plot of Awakening is kickstarted by Lucina, and then experienced by Robin and Chrom who have to deal with the repercussions of her actions, but we never to get to feel like she was /that/ important to the game anymore. What I mean is, Lucina feels so unlike herself now that she feels like a complete afterthought to Awakening and its story, like the developers don't know how to write her and only chose her to represent the game because she's marketable. That might sound a bit weird, but it's genuinely how I think of her now. "Awakening is Chrom and Robin's game, oh and I guess Lucina is there." Except it's like someone else parading around in a skin suit of her. I swear to God, she doesnt even look like herself anymore either, she's been waifu-inized too many times to the point she's practically unrecognizable.

I was one of the few people who actually was extremely excited about the concept of engage. I kind of baked up an image in my head of a very fate like world where these new characters can bounce off these old established ones. I was imagining a lord who had Marth as a mentor figure. A character who has lost their father and is using Sigurd as a surrogate. A sheltered noble with a character like Ike to challenge their worldview. This could even go for villains, imagine a character trying to use the dark arts to get their family back and Nergal as a devil on their shoulder pushing them to a point of no return. I also wish there was more than just the Lord's that got brought back. Maybe a set of Christmas Cavaliers but the red one has Abel and the green one has Cain. I have a problem with putting my expectations way too high and getting disappointed when it wasn't to my unrealistic expectations...

Engage tried to be an anniversary game but forgetting why fans love the series in the first place. Sure it has amazing gameplay however they half assed everything else. Supports story, new game +, dlc and especially the characters. One of the biggest issue with engage is how unmemorable this game is. The fact discussion for this game is pretty much dead since there’s not much we can discuss to the point where even fan engagement is low like fan art memes etc. this game has a identity crisis it doesn’t know who it wants to appeal to newcomers or veterans. They added the emblem ring of popular lords however that’s something veterans would like newcomers won’t know them especially due to how bad they are implemented in the game. They rarely talk about themselves or their history. The fact smash bros does a better job of referencing these character in trophies makes me think they got added as a an afterthought. Heck many of the characters feel way too anime trope heavy since they focus on a single trait especially in the early supports Supports to me felt like a chore. Many of these characters in their c support do a poor job explaining these characters since many of their c and even b support don’t do anything but focus on a single trait. Celine for example so many of her early support talk about her stupid tea. Other thing that sucks is the first impressions of the cast many of them you can’t even tell who they are since they get so little screen time or simp for alear. Heck some characters got very unlucky like kagetsu who only has two sentences in the Main story and it doesn’t describe him or his personality only that he complimented a ring ands his join chapter is a escape mission where you won’t be focusing on killing just escaping (though the retainers all suffer but I feel kagetsu got the worst since you learn nothing about him and his join chapter is a horrible way to introduce him)

I kind of get what the devs were going for- celebrating a big anniversary of Fire Emblem by "bringing back favorite characters" and trying to give each game some representation, while still doing its own new story. But man... I'm right with you. This ain't it. The worst part is I don't hate the new characters. I don't think a lot of them have an engaging amount of depth (pun intended), but there's enough charm generally that I'm not upset, and it's not like Fire Emblem needs every character to be a favorite anyways. But the old Ring characters? They're tools, and little more. Old motivations are not to be found here, and the inevitable flanderization from existing outside their original context is usually the BETTER treatment over given generic conversations. Like you said, Lyn had her parents die in front of her. She should have STRONG sympathy and emotions for someone talking about missing their own. And especially about killing someone else's, without even getting a choice. But no. The Emblems are there for pep talks and fighting for all eternity, no matter the happy ending they fought for. I'd rather just have talking legendary weapons from the old games, personally. At least then they wouldn't be wearing the skin of characters I still like.

I think one of my biggest gripes with the new characters is their designs. They all look like they're youtubers going to a Ren Faire, not actual military combatants. It doesn't help that they literally had a Vtuber model artist known for eye-stabbingly colourful designs, and then gave them zero information on the characters they were designing for. She mentioned, for example, not knowing all the characters from Solm were from there, or else she would have designed them with the desert in mind. That just tells me they cared more about making eye-grabbing designs that would appeal to younger audiences, than actually having any parts of the designs reflect the characters or setting. Damn shame, how much the world building and characters are kinda ass.

Miciahs paralog was done dirty all because there where no ledges for 3 13

Love was left at the door in order to tap into the gatcha market.

Lyn is a blight upon FE7's reputation. She's not actually bad in the game(well combat wise she struggles), but her use as the default FE7 representative in crossovers is a problem. She's used for fanservice reasons alone and has basically no personality (can't have pesky loyalty to her family and friends getting in the way of the player's imaginary connection to her) which paints the game on the whole in a really poor light. Engage's use of former games heroes is actually just a soulless plug for Heroes and nobody will convince me otherwise. My favorite FE7 map is Battle Before Dawn. I can't help but laugh at the idea of Lief's Emblem giving you a chance to get money when killing enemies. The game where you specifically steal stuff from enemies rather than getting money and sellable items commonly, and its main lord gives you a chance to randomly gain money... it has to be a joke.

Fuck the guy who decided to make Leif the Vantage guy, made me cry

the FE6 map section I feel like is the strongest part of this video, It's crazy how lazy Lyn's map is compared to all the references and love put into something like Sigurd's map.

Thank you for saying what's been on my mind ever since I got the game. As someone who got into the Fire Emblem series through Path of Radiance and Radiant Dawn, it hurts to see how far the characterization and story telling in the series seems to have fallen. As much as I enjoy seeing Ike, Sorren and Micaiah again, there's a lot to them in their home games that is largely forgotten about. Plus, it seems like Intelligent Systems couldn't make up their minds on Ike and Sorren. They're meant to represent FE 9 specifically, but everything from their designs, to their music on maps is from FE 10, and while those two games are directly connected, it just feels like they're trying to please everyone. Engage already has Micaiah to represent Radiant Dawn, so wouldn't that mean Ike should be his younger and less experienced self then? The gameplay's fun, but I also enjoy Fire Emblem for its worlds, characters and stories. Engage misses that.

Tokyo Mirage Sessions did already the idea of having Fire Emblem character as stances already and in my opinion, it was better done than this.

The problem with engage is not that the story is simple that most people either defend or destory when using it on their side of the argument. Simple stories can be great if they are executed well. But i wouldn't call it good in general Gameplay wise probably the best early maps I've played for fe with how fun the puzzles are to the game. After chapter 5 ir falls for me. Level scalers worst idea ever added. They should give hard levels for the maps especially the dlc where chapter 12 is where the dlc get harder while before you can play them and they don't level up. Don't know who likes this type of play where nothing you do matters.

yooooo smt4a boss theme

Bought this game day 1 and never finished it, gameplay elements aside the sheer contrast in character from the emblems never sat right with me

I've always been narrative driven with Fire Emblem, which helps me enjoy the combat. I agree with how the story and characters (or lack thereof) created a disconnect with the combat, limiting the enjoyment. Granted, I'm sure there are two teams working on the gameplay and the story, so they probably weren't built together. Anyway, because of that disconnect, I had a tough time really enjoying the gameplay as I didn't like most of the characters and their motivations and how narrow the Emblem Rings were. Thanks for the analysis. I look forward to seeing the other ones.

There were a few moments in the story that could have had an impact, but they came way too late for any involvement to happen. Why should I care about the villain sob story in chapter 20? They have been bland and annoying throughout the story, but suddenly I should care bc they had it bad too? I might have, if they were built up alongside the heroes, so it actually would have felt like a conflict to kill them. The cast is mostly bland as well. Most have one trait that gets repeated at nauseam in almost all their supports. I liked 4 characters out of the whole cast. The rest was filler as units to take along. The emblems are boiled down to what people might know about them from Heroes or from others mentioning about their games. Just like you said with Lyn. When they say farewell at the end, I knew what they would say before they said it. For example how Corrin would say sth about paths and Lucina would talk about the Future bla blah blah. The last chapter loaded in and I turned to my partner: “You wanna bet that they drop Sombron’s tragic backstory on us before the last map?” Lol and they did. It was ridiculous. I liked the colourful hair. Yay. And the fact that they didn’t restrict names. Played with Protagonist named Slut. It was a gift that kept on giving and the only thing that brought me through all of it. Thank God I borrowed this from a friend, would have been mad to have given IS money for that.

I think Engage is a perfectly fine game for what it is, but the point about Lyn's voice performance is so real. I've only played up to Chapter 13 of FE7, iirc (it's been a while), but Lyn, to me, comes off as someone who is driven and has some bite to her bark. But Engage makes her sound so dry and it pisses me off.

7:08 Everything here is fucking facts, but please bro, BBD on maddening engage would be AIDS, PLEASE DONT GIVE THEM IDEAS 🙏 🙏

Three Houses also has some whack representation. What mechanics do you think to represent Houses. Combat arts? Gambits? Maybe he boosts class experience to represent his teaching? Nope, rallies and a super dance because that’s representative of Byleth. What about the map, maybe the chaotic three way of the battle of Eagle and Lion? No the crest stone map. Also the Edelgard, Dimitri, and Claude emblem didn’t even get a map. I have many beefs with Engage. But my biggest one is that it’s a BAD crossover game. You could replace the 12 emblems with the 12 crusaders from Genealogy and nothing would change.

yeah i think it's really rough, how engage actually turned out, it saddens me how weird and baffling some of it's mistakes are, i think some small changes could go a really long way, but that is just wishful thinking on my part

I had this problem too. I felt this way about all the Emblems, especially Hector. The only way I was able to power through the bastardization of the characters was to pretend that they were Einherjar. Soulless clones who have only a shred of the character they were based on. Engage is the only Fire Emblem game, possibly the only video game, where I sympathized and agreed with the main villain. Sombron just wanted to leave, same as I did.

3:51 Flanderization? Missing the point? Such is the fate of character is gacha game hell.

While i agree with most of your sentiments here in all fairness regarding Lyn we have a character who notoriously was sidelined in her own game... If we are going to complain about how she doesn't line up with her original game we have to acknowledge it wasnt a great portrayal to begin with. Actually, the fact that they felt the need to choose a fe6 map as her paralogue exactly shows how marginalized her role was in her own game... And honestly it was the right map they picked. Picking the pirate lane map or battle before dawn seems like it would only further the narrative that this game is a failure at celebrating the series, because those maps have no strong connection to just specifically...Lyn. moreover, i just want to defend fire emblem heroes for a sec. I dont play it, and never have, but personally ive quite enjoyed seeing how they portray the characters and the art/voice lines that come along with it. To me this whole "bastardization" and "flanderization" people have with specfic characters comes off like a bit of a virtue signal or a cope. Like bruh were talking about a character they went out of their way to add jiggle physics to in her og game in a era of unprecedented fan service. Another commenter on this video points how they like Lucina is being "waifu-ified' ... A character who her in og game can quite literally be S-supported... Anyways, i think alot of ideas of this game failed also, just wanted to get that off my chest.

Engage also kinda looks worse imo because a different series 'love letter' was already written... Awakening (which saved the series). I feel like Engage took the safe route and made arbitrary decisions all over the place in an attempt to touch on so many different games. Here's a couple of them: 1. First and foremost, the Somniel is an inferior MyCastle/Monastery. MyCastle was customizable and there was strategy involved with placement, when to unlock stuff, who to build Corrin support with for class unlocks, etc. You could also just breeze through claiming the bonuses and barely spend time there. The Monastery (at least in Part 1) is an integral part of the 3H gameplay loop in a myriad of ways. The Somniel feels like they felt like they needed to do a Hub because the previous entries had one so they slapped some stuff in there. Most of the games obviously had no Hub. 2. They took the idea of the reclass systems and the skill systems from the recent prior games but tore them both to shreds. Units lost a lot of their "personal feel" with the ability to reclass into any class with few barriers. In Awakening/Fates, you were limited on class sets that only slightly expanded based on support choices (not even considering child units), but there was strategy on who to marry (both) and who to friend (Fates) for skill/class reasons. In 3H, there was vast reclassing available, but the characters had inherent proficiencies which threw wrenches into quick class changing (making Dimitri a Wyvern takes awhile, for example). I didn't like how the only bonus to reclassing in Engage was limited to secondary weapon proficiency in mixed classes (like Etie gets B bows in Warrior instead of C) Obviously the game from a mechanics perspective has come a long way since FE1, but overall the game feels like an attempt to be a safe middle ground to try and touch on as many games as possible, but in doing so feels very shallow touching on any in particular.

While I generally agree with what you’re saying in regards to they’re handling of the older characters, I was a little put off when you mentioned at around 1:13 how the “accessibility removes from FE’s strategic roots” as I genuinely believe engage has some of the funnest, most engaging (haha) gameplay in the series, as well as a maddening mode which actually felt well balanced. I do think it’s worth pointing out that they couldn’t give too much spotlight to the older characters, as they would steal the show from the new cast but, yeah, they all feel like shells of the original characters they’re supposed to be

i understand you so much, but this problem is more ¿universal? (sorry english is not my firt language so idk what word to use) than you think, im talking from a Ephraim fan.... (i dont think i have to explain more)

the celica outfit that you can put on alear is textured wrong and it bothers me a lot. the chestpiece is textured like fabric instead of metal, even though the sleeve bits are textured like armor. it's not a huge detail but it drives me nuts

The most common feedback I've seen the game being given is that it has decent map design and gameplay but shit story. Like Fates - specifically Conquest. People defend this game cuz of the good gameplay, not cuz of the writing. Sure, there's some good lines of dialogue in the main campaign (the lategame boss quotes go hard for no reason but I welcome it LOL) and some ok supports but everything else is insultingly bad for what is supposed to be an anniversary games. The devs have admitted intentionally going in a different direction from 3H in interviews for Engage and I'm hoping they at least put it in their skulls that people want both good gameplay AND good writing in their SRPGs. Basically, if they just go with the 3H/Jugdral/Tellius slant but with the decent gameplay of Engage/Conquest/New Mystery, they'll have something good on their hands. In my humble opinion, they've had games with both decent gameplay and writing before - just take a look at FE3 Book 2, 5, 6 (not so much the main story writing - moreso on the supports), and parts of RD. Due to 3H's explosive impact, I do think we're going to be okay on the worldbuilding front at the very least for the next non-remake.

When I first saw the title of the video I thought you were kinda crazy to say that hut after watching I do kind of agree. I haven't played many fe games so I didn't feel as attached to the emblems as you may have, so I totally understand how seeing Lyn from feh and not fe7 would be sad. I know the emblems are a big part of the game but I do still think the game has a lot of love in it just maybe not in all the right places lol

It was kinda odd how every paralouge just weirdly happens to look like a place were the rings come from i wish paralouges were more for getting new unit's items etc to add some more replay value Fates did that like they would utalize flesh out the various dynamics the fathers had with their kids with a little story etc not even talking about the customization there..here its like theres not much replay value it seems i guess you learn about an older game but lol

10:08, you don’t get it, they had to sell the Tiki DLC ring!!!! Aptitude on everyone instead of balanced growth boosters that differ per class type😢 (E.g. Mystical get the Ced scroll). I feel like the FCM mechanic would be easy to implement as a sync skill but what do I know🙄

2:38 Wow, that’s a rare sight to see.

Game animations 8/10 | Plot: 1/10 Customization 4/10 | Relationship dynamics: 6/10 Characters Design 3/10 | Music: 5/10 (I don't remember a single track but I don't think they were bad at all) Overall: 4.5/10 Almost not worthy.

The worst thing said in this video is that your opinion may be controversial

Engage is very much like the Star Wars sequels, or Marvel Phase 4, or Disney's Wish: sure, there are redeemable qualities, but attempting to defend these products for those qualities is just trying to justify work done by a committee room that simply does not care. More effort is put into defending and justifying these soulless cashgrabs than the original creators put into making them. I am seriously vindicated by this video, especially when you recognized that "references =/= soul". Any company can regurgitate a reference bible that its fans can clap like disabled seals at, but something with actual love put in can use these references in a fun and interesting way rather than just exploiting them for "hey look, a thing you like". The closest Engage ever gets to doing the latter is in the gameplay of the emblems, which do have clever and fun callbacks to their origin games... until you get to Lyn and it's more regurgitated Heroes shit, but hey, Engage needs all the good points it can get, because it deserves very few.

I don't have a lot to say but just wanted to say this was a kino vid, keep it up :))

I keep acting like its actually a spin off instead of a mainline because what the hell is that

I agree about fe7, but I hate FE7 story and gameplay for personal taste on what I want in a FE, so it didnt bothered me how Lyn was treated . The only point I disagree is your map choices. I think Lyn's mode final map is a better fit in her story arc than battle before dawn. About Leif, what they did is mixing his FE4 and FE5 appearance. Having access to all weapons(except magic in engage) is a reference to the master knight class in fe4 and the skill adaptability is a referenece to fe4 bosses changing weapons.. Leif getting vantage represents the first game where vantage always attack first, except that it does have health% condition in engage to balance the skill. However, vantage ++ condition is being under 75%, being almost close to always activate from thracia.

A year back in speculation about the emblem of foundations' identity (most subscribed theory at the time was it was series creator Shouzou Kaga) I said this: "Cringegage did classic characters dirty, using them as literal tools for Mary Sue/Gary Stu Alear, constantly bootlicking them, then having them make the already a god Alear into the loving “Fire Emblem” and all kill themselves at the end to save a world no one gives a poo poo about due to the lovely characters and worldbuilding. Cringegage is far, far worse than the Star Wars sequels. If the emblem of foundations really is Kaga, what a way to gently caress over fans of the classics."

WHERE'S THE LLLLLOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm still ticked about them choosing Camilla over Azura as the fates DLC represenative, though I got Veronica so I don't actively complain that much

>filtered >cope and complain in youtube (lol.

Fire Emblem Engage and Sonic Generations have both the same problems: They are both anniversary titles, they both have good gameplay and music, but they both suffer from a bland story and poor characterization, the only difference is that Engage tries to take it self abit serious where Generations was.....just......there

My younger sister's first FE game was Path of Radiance. She bought the collect's edition for most of the FE games released after that(yes, even Fates). However, she absolutely refuses to buy Engage and I am worried about the future of the series. In the meantime, I am playing Fates Revelation and Warriors as a favor for a friend.

As someone who’s never played any FE games besides the Fodlan games, I can’t speak to any of the characterization of past lords. But I definitely don’t feel like I know them very well lol. I hear some people say there’s some lacking portrayals of Micaiah or Lyn, but again I wouldn’t know I think Byleth and the house leaders are done pretty well and clearly had a lot of love put into them, both mechanically and in bond convos Excited to hear your other thoughts on the series 🙏

If the entire cast didn't look like they were about to say dumb shit on Twitter after watching hasbin hotel while writing an article for the Chara defense squad from undertale. I'd give it a shot

In the gameplay mechanics and map design

The Xenoblade 3 comparison was something I didn't even think about. Seeing places I recognized from Xeno 1 and 2 was one of the most fun parts of that game. Even seeing how Shulk and Rex evolved from their OG games was cool. (except for like the fact that Mio is Rex's kid that's dumb)

I would recommend Unicorn Overlord! It gave me the “feeling” of playing FE on the GBA/Awakening for the first time. It’s strategic and plays more like Ogre Battle, BUT it was such an incredibly fun game

Engage’s remix songs and gameplay was totally peak

Yeah, FE5 and FE7 were definitely some of the more shafted games. But it could be worse. FE Warriors showed us what would happen if they tried to make the actual characters come together in a single story, and it wasn't great. FEH Lyn got added to that one as a post-game afterthought, and most games weren't represented at all. Keeping the connections to past games pretty simple was probably a good idea. It's definitely better than how the Awakening DLC presented past characters so inaccurately. I do think other games were represented with more love. FE4 and Tellius are the clear standouts to me, and I think they did them pretty well. But also I just found it really funny that Lyn's paralogue map wasn't from her game. I don't think FE7 has many iconic maps tbh. Battle before dawn maybe, but Lyn doesn't have high stakes there. Dread Isle maybe, since she has a small connection with Uhai, but the map itself is meh. The distant plains makes the most sense, but without weather that map would take no time at all, and nobody would want weather in Engage. Noble lady of Caelin would also make sense, but it's another pretty bland map. I really don't think they should've gone with an FE6 map just because it's Sacae, but they didn't have any great options in FE7 for her in my opinion.

Weird you say Engage doesn't have any FE5 nor FE7 flavor, since it has what it matters the most from them, thier essence of being terrible games!

Ah yes, the anniversary game that released *checks notes* 3 years after the 30th anniversary, where they celebrated by releasing FE1 in english for the first time. Makes perfect sense! I feel like both of the major "critiques" in this video feel more like nitpicks than actual criticism. Like, i really don't think lyn is THAT mischaracterized to begin with (still a bit mischaracterized), much less why they would need to add thracia mechanics in a game that really doesn't need them.

If FE7 had anything special or unique in it, they’d have represented it. Boring ass game. And Lyn is just as boring in Engage as she is in FE7. Engage having to use an FE6 map for Lyn is more of a testament to how FE7 doesn’t have anything to do with Lyn, other than the boring tutorial mode with maps much too simple to be used.

It is impossible for a design by committee game like modern FE to have love in it, because nobody is actually responsible for a game like this. Even for 3h, most of the content is fannon not cannon.

We truly stan Disengage hate.

Only here because I’ve seen so many posts about this vid 😭 Imo engage has sovl and agree to disagree

Oh... look at that. The Disengage simps are going apeshit over this video because their "pwecious wittle" game is being "abused"...

It's truly disheartening to witness the direction the series has taken. However, for fans like myself who hold the Tellius duology dear, it's important to acknowledge that those games, along with Kaga's era remakes, struggled so much that the series was on the brink of collapse. Regrettably, what revitalized it were the introduction of dating sim elements, waifus, and other divisive features starting from Awakening onwards. Now, with the undeniable financial success of the mobile game and its inclusion of bikini costumes, we're forced to come to terms with the fact that the Fire Emblem we once cherished is a thing of the past.

I didn't like Xenoblade Chronicles 3. It's all a massive sandbox and each area is just the same. Thats without bringing up how much potential the story could have but never reaches it each time. ONLY thing i remember is the accents being so heavy Gameplay wise wish they let you use partner skills to make break combos better. 3 i like they gave ys 7 units to play with. The dlc is pretty much bait. Especially to the rex defenders who think a sequel dlc sequel fixes his bore of a character somehow. Yeah if a sequel game can write an mc better than his base game it means the game sucked and that's before 2 having such a bad system.

Lyn is honestly better in engage than in Fe7. At least lyn has a character in engage. Also I can’t disagree more with your video. I’ve played every game in the franchsie spin-offs Includes and I love how all the emblems were handled with a few exceptions like Ephraim. My word of advice fam? Don’t use clickbait titles like this. It detracts people from watching a generally well made video.

Dumb video. It's just you complaining about Thracia and Blazing sword

I remember seeing Eirika after so long playing through Engage, which I basically just look at my phone whenever any cutscenes happened. And then I realize, it was... THAT Eirika. The goody two-shoe scared little princess who is nervous around her brother. You know, THAT Eirkia, from Heroes. I remember Eirika for being a secluded, princess badass who feels like while fighting is pointless, she has to do it and have to accept it. And usually like to clash with Ephraim as equal instead of being inferior to him. But still very naive and flawed deep down. THAT Eirkia, which obviously, isn't profitable. Waifunize Eirkia pretty much has hard as Lyn or Celica to me. But yeah, this is my personal example from my personal favorite game. Great video, always feels like the "representation" in Engage feels... shallow sometimes. And this proves my thoughts about it. PS: My god, FE 5 is also a GOAT and man, Leif and his own damn game has been done so dirty.