Thank you for making videos how they are suppose to be. You come right in talking about what we came for and keep the video times minimal with maximum information.
To me, there’s a reason most software vendors worked out that having versions of an application encompass all of the features of the lower tiers as you go up the food chain is a good a cohesive thing. Disparate features (FX for example) in different versions, weird strategy
Tracktion Waveform DAW is now available for free, or for $119 you get the Pro version with both Melodyne and Antares Auto Tune. This is a great deal because the DAW is superb and the tools are worth more than the price of admission. Note that Melodyne can be used on any DAW, but Antares license will only work in Waveform. That’s fine because you can save your final track to a WAV file and import it into any DAW.
Have you had any personal experience with that? You sure making it an already processed wav vocal and importing that into a daw, putting effects on it, won't change the mix compared to if u would do everything in the same daw as a chain?
im stuck between autotune pro or artist, if theres anyone with experience I'd love for a weigh in on these questions: 1) How does pro comapre to melodyne (since I already use melodyne)? Does it have pretty similar graphical features? 2) What's the graphical workflow like? I find melodyne pretty clunky to be honest, I'd hope this one requires less click and mouse movement to work? 3) What do you think, worth getting pro if I already own melodyne? Thanks to anyone reading
If u are a singer (or rapper) and u just wamna rap in real time than get autotune artist. If u actually are more towards the engineering side and u like manually pitching notes than go with pro because obviously Artist doesn’t have graph mode. I don’t like graph mode because I find it unnecessary. If a note is off why not just re do it again? Itll sound more than authentic and natural (plus it makes you a better singer)
Thanks for this video! I currently have waves tune real time and am thinking about switching to antares auto tune. I find it difficult to choose between pro and artist. artist is perfect but the pro is literally built in with melodyne or flex pitch just like in logic pro and I don't like the quality of flex pitch in logic. Did you try out the graph mode? What are your thoughts on this compared to for example melodyne? Thank you!
I compare Flex Pitch to Auto Tune Pro to Melodyne in another video! AT Pro is fantastic. I highly recommend it (both auto and graph mode) but I also use Melodyne often for manual work. You should also check out my autotune vs. Melodyne videos (there’s 2!) That will answer a lot of your questions.
Thumbs up to you for this tutorial. Where in the vocal chain do i add an auto tune plugin? Do i add it on the first insert before EQs compression reverb and delays? Thank you.
Hey, not sure if you or anyone can answer my questions, I don't know much about this stuff but my 10 year old son is right into this autotune thing and is pretty musical and tech savvy. I was looking at the antares efx. What additional items are required? Does it allow him to create his own beat? Melodies etc? Can he mess about with it by singing along to common songs by artists like with some of the playstore apps? Would he need a mic and headphones? Can it be used with teenage engineering pocket operator etc? Cheers
Antares Auto-Tune is a pitch correction software, meaning it's designed to receive a singing voice and correct it to certain pitches. It is not designed for making beats. To use it he will require a DAW to host the software. He will need a microphone and headphones.
I have not used it! I don’t have any UAD stuff. I would assume it performs similarly, but cannot confirm. I’ve only used Auto-Tune within the DAW itself, Pro Tools and Logic. If you’re in the UAD eco system, maybe it helps with latency and workflow. Not necessarily a make or break thing for me, personally. It’s always a “post” production element for me.
@@RoyThompsonAudio Thanks for the prompt reply! Yeah, I knew that they both had low-latency mode just wondering if they read as "identical latencies" since they're slightly different pieces of software. and saw another video comparing the two; unfortunately, they never went into the latency tab or show the difference in CPU usage.
I don’t believe it goes to 0 samples - try EFX instead! I always use it well tracking. If I need more control like vibrato or graph mode, then I’ll switch over to Pro.
After downloading the demo. The CPU usage is the same in both and Pro's latency is slightly better at 2.31ms compared to Artist's at 2.54ms - (In FL STUDIO)
I'm an Artist with little knowledge about auto-tune, looking to buy one of these products, I've been told to buy the Artist version of this buy i'd also like the EFX as well to distort my voice etc.. which would anyone recommend?
i've been using antares autotune on audacity for a while now and there are some certain songs that i haven't been able to autotune like "way back into love", mainly because all of the keys that i select don't apply to it, why is that?
was wondering which version of autotune has the graph that i can manually pitch my vocals with. Unfortunately, its the most expensive version, but your video was straight to the point and informed me very quickly. thank you for not wasting my time!!
It’s worth it! Graph mode is POWERFUL! And you still have all the awesome features of Auto mode. If you want cheaper manual tuning - check out Melodyne assistant. Or even waves tune!
I use Auto-Tune Pro with no issues..I am a little behind though -- on Mac OS Mojave 10.14.5 at the moment with Pro Tools 2019.6 ...Haven't used it in Logic recently.
@@RoyThompsonAudio Thanks, Roy, for sharing your insights. Yeah, I have Melodyne. I think it's important a good idea to have both. Also, I watched your two videos about it. I was amazed at how clear the sounds Auto-tune in comparison with Melodyne. Great content. Have a wonderful week.
Do they sound different. I saw a video where a person said that artist to then sounds better for some reason. Like why the fuck. I have autotunepro but I’ve been supremely disappointed on how it sounds, it doesn’t give me a good autotune effect like the warble autotune effect suer noticeable and if I max it out it doesn’t automatically pitch some notes still I’m like wtf this shit really fuckin sucks I can’t express certain notes with this and I noticed autotune version 4 or 3 I think, it really lets you hit the notes I saw some old videos on them. So I’m convinced that autotune artist or efx+ have a better sounding autotune to it. What do you think ?
Seems like you might have found my other video on this question-I do think Logic has a great built-in editor, but Auto-Tune graph mode is much, much more powerful. Logic's is a great start if you're new to it, though!
I wanna start making my own music. I am thinking about buying Logic Pro X cuz I am using a Macbook. I definitely wanna get AutoTune but I dont know which version I should get. I am a student so I can't pay too much for that. Can u guys help me out?
@@RoyThompsonAudio Okay thanks for your fast respond :) I‘m definitely gonna check this out. I got one more question though. Do you think Antares AutoTune Access would be a good plugin for beginners? Or should I save my money to buy a better version like EFX or Artist.
I bought both access and artist and the midi keyboard option is super glitchy (will pitch up a note without notice) and would not correct vocals as good as my FREE autotune plugin MAutopitch. Extremely disappointed and just waste of money, gonna check out waves.
If the source audio is polyphonic, Auto-Tune isn’t a good option. You would want to use Melodyne. If the horns are individual monophonic tracks, any version of Auto-Tune would work.
I’m paying £22.99 a month for Antares ? What I am paying for I’m so confused I’ve had it for about 2 years so I’ve paid like £500 towards this shit and haven’t even used it
Ha! It is kind of funny. Graph mode is the "pro" feature, IMHO, though. Effects are relatively easy to create with EQ, distortion, reverb/delay with stock plug-ins. It would be a nice bonus to have some of those features inside of Pro...but it would probably muddy up the interface and not work quite as seamlessly as it does in EFX+. Thanks for watching, Brent!
