Тёмный

Which one would you like? Kinetic F-16A (2022) vs Tamiya F-16CJ (2007) 

Callsign Cooger
Подписаться 9 тыс.
Просмотров 7 тыс.
50% 1

[4K UHD] Kinetic 1/48 F-16A vs Tamiya 1/48 F-16CJ
Comparison between Kinetic and Tamiya
Kinetic 1/48 F-16A MLU NATO Fighter - K48100 (2022 All New Tooling)
Tamiya 1/48 F-16CJ Block 50 - 61098 (2007 All New Tooling)
★ Cooger Modelling Club Membership : / @callsigncooger
★ Partnership & Sponsorship Inquiries : cooger73@gmail.com
Callsign
Cooger
#StopTheWar #PrayForUkraine #F16FightingFalcon

Хобби

Опубликовано:

 

11 апр 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 32   
@davidwhiteley3879
@davidwhiteley3879 9 месяцев назад
Brilliant - wish more channels would feature this kind o comparison!
@raymadani270
@raymadani270 Год назад
Thank you for the comparison Mister Cooger Tamiya all day long
@TheModelGuy
@TheModelGuy Год назад
Having build both of these kits, I have to give the edge to Kinetic. It goes together really nice and has great decals out of the box. The only two negative things I can say is no seat belts/pilot and that weird 1980s engine piece. Otherwise the Kinetic detail surpasses Tamiya. Which I hope it would if you are doing a kit 16 years later.
@jayhendrix7343
@jayhendrix7343 8 месяцев назад
Im building the KG kit atm and the model is gorgeous but these instructions are great for toilet paper lol
@cfranko1860
@cfranko1860 6 месяцев назад
To tell you the simple answer, if I wanted to build a NATO MLU viper I'd buy Kinetic and if I wanted to build a USAF viper I'd buy Tamiya. I've heard good things about the Kinetic one and I've already build the Tamiya ANG version, which was excellent.
@bobkrulish732
@bobkrulish732 3 месяца назад
I am currently building the Tamiya kit and really enjoy the detail and the amazing fit. Such a pleasure to work with.
@shengyi1701
@shengyi1701 7 месяцев назад
I have the 2022 RSAF and Texas ANG F-16Cs from Kinetic in 1/48 and all the Tamiya 1/48 F-16s from 2007 and on. Still haven’t built them. Still got a partially-built kinetic F-16D kit (old mould) but this vid will make me wanna build them at the same time!
@user-kb6lm2ls6s
@user-kb6lm2ls6s Год назад
각자 장단점이 명확하게 보이는 리뷰네요. 고생하셨습니다. 저는 좋은 추억을 가진 타미야 카트로 가보겠습니다. 개인적으로 디테일이 좋더라도 분할이 제대로 되어있지 않다면 의미가 없다는것을 멩 f--35를 만들면서 절실히 느꼈거든요
@tonydrake462
@tonydrake462 Год назад
I'd got kinetic - if it builds as well as their F104 it'll be brilliant.
@jdcookiemonster
@jdcookiemonster Год назад
Tamiya for fitment but nice looking details on the kinetic kit.
@benchlife9375
@benchlife9375 Год назад
Built both ...both great kits ...I give tamiya a slight edge for weapons and kinetic a slight edge for exhaust nozzle. The detail on both are close but the kinetic one is a lil more detailed. I got my kinetic F-16C FOR 39+ SHIPPING and Tamiya CJ for 42 + Shipping . I would recommend both but if you can only get one go for the kinetic C for 39 and dig in the stash for aim 120 and aim 9 ...both are not great on the kinetic kit but the gbu and tanks are nice. You also get a sniper pod in the kinetic Falcon 👍 along with the jammer and older pods. I think the Kinetic A and D are around 72$ + shipping. All great kits to have a blast with HAPPY SCALING 👋.
@rogust76
@rogust76 Год назад
옆에 대놓고 분석하니 너무 신랄하게 까이는데요. ㅎㅎ
@paingain9057
@paingain9057 Год назад
건프라는 반다이, 밀러터리,에어로는 타미야.
@LTModels
@LTModels 5 месяцев назад
As far as accuracy, kinetic energy. But fitment and enjoyment….. Tamiya. Kinetic requires a little elbow grease but its a great choice as well.
@ck1737
@ck1737 Год назад
저는 만약 나의 인성 과 실력을 실험해 보고 싶다면 카네틱을, 나는 오늘 좀 그냥 멍 때리고 시키면 시키는 데로 한다면 타미야를..
@mkkim0425
@mkkim0425 Год назад
키네틱 렌딩기어 베이를 타미야에 이식 가능할가요?
@CallsignCooger
@CallsignCooger Год назад
GE엔진 사양의 부품을 세팅하면 얼추 될 것 같은데...엄청난 삽질을 할 것 같아서 좀 두렵습니다. ^^;
@CallsignCooger
@CallsignCooger Год назад
복좌형 키트 구입하게되면 한번 해볼께요 ^^
@apov6744
@apov6744 3 месяца назад
More detailed is kinetic but i prefer Tamiya up to 30years as a plastic models, rc electric, rc with nitrous etc! Love Tamiya ❤
@fidelrincon2993
@fidelrincon2993 Год назад
Tamiya
@jaehyungahn691
@jaehyungahn691 Год назад
쿠거님의 확인사살..
@soap_II
@soap_II Год назад
음... 저는 키네틱이 더 끌리긴 하네요... 키네틱의 몰드가 더 선명한거같고, 타미야는 고증은 좋을지언정, 너무 몰드들이 뭉개진거같다는 느낌을 주네요... 일부 오류야 메꾸고 다시 그려주면 되고... 타미야 패널라인 싹 다시 파주는것보단 키네틱이 낫네요... 단점은... 키네틱의 무장 분할인데, 무장이야 잔뜩 쟁여놓다보니 저한테는 단점도 아니군요...
@user-bs2yy9sn3s
@user-bs2yy9sn3s Год назад
パーツ単体で見るとキネも良いけど、組んだ時のF-16らしさはタミヤ製。
@royalmace9386
@royalmace9386 Год назад
불철주야 지갑을 지켜주셔서 감사합니다 🫡
@user-zs3gw9zt7x
@user-zs3gw9zt7x Год назад
2022년이 2007년을 이기지 못하는.. 휠베이 쪽의 '일부' 디테일을 제외하면 키네틱의 완패로 보입니다. 가격 메리트라도 있으면 몰라도...
@user-ct4oo9vp3f
@user-ct4oo9vp3f Год назад
저는 비싸도 무조건 타미야 ㅎㅎ
@Jolly-Rogers
@Jolly-Rogers Год назад
에어로의 명가 타미야에 한표 던집니다
@user-fo6ud3zs2o
@user-fo6ud3zs2o Год назад
.....подождемммм MINIBASE....-сравнимммм.....
@ashby1672
@ashby1672 Год назад
디테일도 그렇지만 오래 살고 싶어서 타미야 선택할 겁니다. 키네틱 건들면 수명 줄어들 거 같아요...
@andrewivan9954
@andrewivan9954 7 месяцев назад
Tamiya ever best! ❤❤❤ Kinetic is so-so brand... 😊
@Steve-jl2wi
@Steve-jl2wi Год назад
Tamiya
@darkwood777
@darkwood777 2 месяца назад
Tamiya
Далее
Tamiya's 1/48 F16C/N Aggressor | Full Build | HD
22:17
Stay on your way 🛤️✨
00:34
Просмотров 4,3 млн
Я ВЕРНУЛСЯ 🔴 | WICSUR #shorts
00:57
Просмотров 339 тыс.
ACADEMY USAF F-16A 1/48 Full Build Part 1
21:56
Просмотров 4,6 тыс.
The Brief But Controversial Battle Of The Aegean, 1974
19:50
Tamiya 1/72 F16CJ Wild Weasel Build log and Reveal
15:31
Inside the B-17 Ball Turret
18:59
Просмотров 2 млн
F-16 CJ Fighting Falcon - Tamiya 1/48
18:54
Просмотров 73 тыс.
Amazing
0:37
Просмотров 36 млн
Сыграл на опережение #юмор
0:20
Нашел котенка 😭
0:53
Просмотров 2,1 млн
Платье для богинь на свадьбу
1:00