they're not film critics. They are activists. They are stuck. If they fairly review it, they give oxygen to something they dislike politically. And if they give a negative review to a film that is broadly accepted as good, then they expose themselves as activists.
Salient thoughts. Thank you for speaking out, and doing it so articulately. Many modern critics can't even structure a cogent thought, much less make a reasoned argument for their point or establish a unique, enlightened perspective.
Critics are biased all to heck and maybe they are too close to Hollywood. Too many examples like Ghostbusters (2016) which critics loved at 74%, while the audience didn’t at 49%. Critics apply a social credit score rather than a score based in entertainment or acting merit.
@@devinboonma I know what it means, dingleberry, I wanted you to expand on your statement using something other than slang with big kid words, if you are capable.
this movie was a piece of shit. the audience reviews are full of newly created account that have only reviewed this movie ergo bots. if you take the politics out of this movie you have nothing. its hard to make something funny when youre so busy trying to cram your beliefs down someones throat.
"if you take politics out of this movie you have nothing." It was a documentary... about political ideas 😂. That's like going to see a marvel film and saying "If you take superheroes out of this movie you have nothing." lmao
