The rig Veda does not mention anything about aryas arriving in saptasindu. It states that Geogrophy of the land of aryas which was near the Saraswati and sindhu River. The rigveda was not written down when aryas arrived. Rigveda was written long after the civilization was settled, no mention of a migration into a new land, talks about the Indian subcontinent as their Homeland. You are adding your own words to things that have never been stated in the rig veda
@@stealthtomcat4739 so you are telling me that they hid the fact that they are foreigners despite being white, having different language, culture and gods? What next? Harappans also built a wall to defend illegal immigrants?
@@chirucapoeira5191 Dead bodies found in Harappa showed that their was an invasion. There are axe marks found in the neck of some bodies which have not straight mark but horizontal which indicates it was done with a horse. And no horse was found in Indus Valley civilization.Horses were brought by Aryans.
Hitler never used the word Swastika to refer to the Nazi symbol in his book Mein Kampf, he called it Haken-Kreuz, which in German means Hooked Cross, cross is a symbol of Christianity, but the English translators of the book maliciously translated Haken Kreuz as Swastika, which means Well Being in Sanskrit Su means good and Asti means existence in Sanskrit.
@Turtle Kingdom BITCH Show me ONE primary source calling Haken Kreuz as svastika or , even the word svastika used in primary sources from Germany before the 19th century. Accept my challenge. If you cannot, then shut up, mr scientist. And latter part of your statement is nonsensical.
@Turtle Kingdom BITCH Than why did not scientists find R1A1 gene in those skeletons of Indus valley civilization . In Rakhigarhi excavation site Two skeleton were founded by the excavation team of Indus valley site . The female skeleton has more DNA similarities with " Iranian farmer-gatherers " And Male skeleton DNA has more similarities to the " Irula tribal " group population in the Nilgiri mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu . And they did not find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site .
Hahaha So,a group of nomads with no place of origins wrote the Vedas which contain immense spirituality and then forgot to mention their homelands😂😂😂 and also refered to indian rivers as mother😂
LOOOL go read the vedas, they do mention their homeland and origin. You can even read Tilaks "artic homeland in the vedas" for all the direct verse citations
@@harryjester282 so why still arguing ? Vedas mentioned Afghanistani and Tibet as Homeland ( Tibet as Homeland of early humans ) and Afghanistan as Homeland of Aryans
@@harryjester282 Lol i am an Indian Brahmin and i guess i don't need need a Christian named Harry Jester to tell me what is written in the vedas.Cheers mate🍻
@@brutalfox1590 bro if you are bramin means you know about Vedas please tell me is Aryan invasion written some where in Vedas . Iam south Indian and IAM vishwa karma .
Obviously you don't know nothing, ancient Sanskrit is 99% similare to serbian language, Serbs are Slawic ppl Slawic are Europeans.. Aryans goes all the way from Balkan to far Himalayas
3:11 wait a minute. Vedas not contemporary? Are you kidding. Vedas themselves tell about Aryans coming and they are not contemporary. Also Rigveda never says that aryans came in 3000 BC or anything like that. You are exaggerating that. Also the whole Dasa concept is not mentioned in Rigveda. Not at all. You are putting everything to Rigveda which yourself admitting it was not a political book. Nope these are your assumptions. Also the dasas were Indus valley civilization has no evidence.. and they actually fought has no evidence. From where on earth you got to know about 25 generations ? This video is vague. It's not at all researched. Even Rigveda is not researched and lots of other things are put up in name of Rigveda
False information. British propaganda. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Astronomical dating confirms mahabharata to have taken place prior to 3000 BCE. Don't take some part of the Rig Veda and quote it without stating the context. And dāsa doesn't mean anything you defined it as. Dāsa refers to devotee. Disgusting mistranslation and misinterpretation. Signs of rising Kali yuga.
Astronomical dating by who? 🤣🤣 can’t accept that major religion in this country was brought by outsiders? wait till you study evolution and how humans went from one place to another
Aryan means people who inhabit Iran. Iranians have always called themselves Aryans, never Persians. Aryan who came to India called themselves noble over the native Indians.
@@shoobror8291 They were part of same tribe that separated and created their own identity, much like the Russians, Ukrainians, and Belarusians, Poles, Czechs etc, but they still share a lot of culture. Tajiks and Afghans speak a variant of Persian.
@@nsaurabh25 Yes. But Aryans is the ethnic family group that Persians, Afghans, kurds, lurs, gilakis, tajiks and more people originate from. Persians just claimed the name "aryan" for themselves. But they are not more aryan than the kurds or tajiks.
@@shoobror8291 I was just saying that Aryans doesn't mean anything except the people who originated from the area in and around Iran. It doesn't mean noble people. Likewise Arabs are the people who originated from the Arabian peninsula. Aryans in India always try to distort their origin story and claim that they have always lived in India, but they didn't. They came from that area and practiced a totally different language, religion, and culture in comparison to the Indus valley civilization people.
I search om google.where from aryan word come from. Then result is The name Aryan is derived from the Sanskrit (ārya) meaning "noble, high-born". Im proud to be Sanskrit religion hindu and aryan
In 5000 yrs everything is been mixed up including the genes, one can't single out the aryans vs dravidians to run his political and ideological agenda. Aryans descendant are everywhere in Indian subcontinent including south.
@@bhanupratap1063 The best example is Indus Valley civilisations. We share nothing common with them. They practised different cultures and they were not Hindus. Even our DNA is different from theirs. It shows our ancestors came after the decline of the Harrapan civilisation.
Hindu sanatan dharma was the relegion of India even before Aryans arrived...there is full proof evidence of harrapan society praying "pashupati shiva" which was even before early Vedic period.
Hindu sanatan dharma is a really vast, complicated and sophisticated gamut of ideology. In harappa, evidence of shivlings were found... but that is a very early, lost form of belief and was so even when Aryans arrived. Exactly as I tell in the video, assimilations happened... and they didn't just happen overnight... they took more than a thousand years...the difference between vedas, upanishads and puranas capture that... the hindu sanatan dharma we know today is a result of lots of assimilation of ideas and communities and what harappans followed its not categorised as that
@@HistoriaMaxima you cannot tell assimilation,but reforms is perfect word for it , sanatan dharma flourished and reformed as per our environment, landscapes ...so it is the relegion of land and guides each and every community with respect to their climatic conditions how to live and spent their life in a best of the way.
The Indian subcontinent is the origin of R1A (near the NW Himalayas). Also, it is more common and diverse in India than in Polish-Russian and other European countries. They spread traditional religion and Sanskrit in Eurasia.
There are many differences between the Harappan civilization and the early Vedic society that is described in the Rig Veda. Too many to list here but there is good reference material out there where lots of evidence is given. Also there are more differences between Shiva and the person in the "pashupati" seal of Harappa than there are similarities. You can check for the same. Probably when the Aryans came into India they picked up a lot of influences from the later Harappan people including the idea of a "pashupatinath" being.
But hitler read, Vedas and Indian scriptures, he called special Sanskrit translators and understood our texts. He took our Swastika and just renamed and tilted it. He wanted to built his own religion from our knowledge but his teachings. It is said that he made a time machine by reading our texts and escaped in that. The pictures of his time machine are also available.
Hitler didnt steal the swatika from india. That symbol has been used by almost all cultures, for thousands of years. Even the native americans have a version of their own. Really should do some proper due diligence before making these videos
Persian used Indian warriors in their conquest of Greek/Macedonia. Since Persians and Indians were culturally same they transmitted fables among various things in newer lands. Couple of centuries later when Alexander came knocking at the gates of India, he was shocked to see Indians worshiping Greek God's which by the way were Indian God's to begin with.
if you are saying that hellenism spread by persians you are completly wrong. the oldest migration from india to europe is from druhyu clan i.e druids of western europe. they were about a millenia earlier than any parshwa[persian] state ever created.
Pakistan is the actual historic india ironically. The India today is not where most of the invasions took place. Recently, many statues and a whole civilization is discovered un swat ( KPK ) Pakistan
@polka-dot man You're again saying something as if the earliest civilization belonged to you. Obviously the people living in those areas where things like these are discovered are the descendents of Aryans or whatever you call it.
@polka-dot man hmmm but India country say Kya patah na hoo Pakistan say ho. Indian - subcontinent tab bhi naam ta jab Pakistan part ta aur ab bhi Tum logo ki country ka naam india hay. Jis regions may ziada invasions aur civilizations hay wo Pakistan he hay
@Turtle Kingdom BITCH What? Where do Maharashtra and chhatishgarh come in then? And what is this type of incorrect writung nOrTh iNdiAn? Did you have a stroke?
@Turtle Kingdom BITCH Why are you so fed up? Because you hate being considered as a part of same geographical identification. You're definitely from North like HP, UK, Punjab i know. And despite all your coping, UP is North India. And Bihar too. Some of their regions could be called Central or Middle india.
Please tell which forest in india had wild horses(can you see one of them in Himalayas )or any fossil found in forest site excavations , horses came from Central Asia also wheel and chariots.Now we called the country India inhabitants are Dravida.
@@homea2z454 ROFLZ, so your entire theory is based on the origine of horses? Good good. India didn't even have elefants and lions and tigers and birds cause you weren't there to see them. Lol
@ʏᴇᴛɪ Boss, a lot of far more intelligent people have already looked into it. Researched and have regularly concluded that except for some superficial observations, everything about this theory is just fiction. The best proof had come in the form of Genetic Studies of the region. the DNA of skeletons found in this region does not follow from the DNA of steppes.
Pakistan is the actual historic india ironically. The India today is not where most of the invasions took place. Recently, many statues and a whole civilization is discovered in swat ( KPK ) Pakistan
Aryans were brown people not white blond people There is Lebanese and Turks with blond hair but they're not Aryans North Indians have a unique look which is a brown semite look not a white skin look Aryans were not warriors or hunters. Indians don't have a warrior nature. They produced vegetarian people and Buddha. The Scythians were a warrior people and ate meat. In America, people don't consider Indians as white people. They'll even consider lebanese and Turks as white before a North Indian.
How did the conversion mafia plant the Aryan & Dravidian divide that helped conversion and British policies of divide and rule. Here's the story in Tamil on this one deceit that caused the MOST damage for India.
Hinduism is basically Aryan and Dravidian mixed Sikhism is basically Scythian and Hinduism mixed. The Punjabis were Mleccha races to the Ganges upper caste Aryan people. The Aryans were brown people with sharp features. They were not blond hair and blue eyes. The blue eye people you see in the Punjabis are Scythian mixing.
@@AliAhmed-ve5xl Punjabi are Indo Aryan... including pashtun, Tajiks...baloch... Iranian, Kurds.....mittani empire of Assyria was literally Indo Aryan including religion and culture...
Arya is a Sanskrit word and Aryan is an English word. It is common practice in English to add 'n' or 'an' onto the end of a name to indicate belonging: America = American Mongolia = Mongolian Kenya = Kenyan Arya = Aryan Avesta = Avestan Your argument is like a German person saying Germans don't exist because Germans call themselves Deutsch and none of the German language literature mentions Germans
The Vedas were not written down. It was orally handed down. The so called Aryans were nomadic wandering louts. The Indus valley civilization,a Dravidian city civilization that was very advanced and traded with Egypt, mesopotamia. The Aryans just lived in huts made of wood and straw. The magnificent ancient ruins that are present today we're the handiwork of the descendants of the Indus valley civilization. The Aryans had nothing to boast about. Everything in India today is the legacy of the ancient Dravidians.
@@vineethjoshy4819 And? Almost nobody did. They all took from the phoenicians. Besides what works from IVC have survived? Their language is still yet to be decipherd. It's not a Dravidian one. Neither a semitic or Elamite one. Dravidians have no claim to IVC.
@@user-ld7ch1er6j : What works have survived from IVC? The whole of India today, including all the intellectual achievements usurped by the descendants of the wandering invaders as their own, by naming the discovery or invention after a mythological, bald-headed block ( with a small tuft at the back), bare chested with a thread across his chest. From the swastika sign (usurped by the Aryans as their own symbol) to six-faced dice, belong to IVC. The Indus Valley developed a sophisticated knowledge of astronomy and evaluated the pureness of gold still used today. Of course, their well-planned cities will always be a mute testimony to their engineering marvel. They traded with Mesopotamia and Egypt sailing in ships. They invented cotton. The bricks they used were of uniform measurements for the entire civilization spread around a vast area. They used common weights to measure. They developed agriculture and grew wheat, rice and barley. That is when the super-intellectual vedic Aryans were roaming around without a proper home, not knowing how to build a hut, eating horse meat, the inhabitants of IVC lead urban city-life wearing cotton clothes, eating dishes made from rice, wheat and barley, residing in double-storied houses with baths attached. Archaeologists say Indus Valley was like Switzerland on a giant scale. On what basis did you say that Dravidians have no claim to IVC? Because it belonged to Vedic Aryans? The Indus Valley civilisation have always been identified as a Dravidian civilization and never an Aryan or Vedic civilization (except by certain people in this country). Researchers Henry Heras, Kamil Zvelebil, Asko Parpola and Iravatham Mahadevan have cited cultural and linguistic similarities being strong evidence for a proto-Dravidian origin of the ancient Indus Valley civilisation. The discovery in Tamil Nadu of a late Neolithic (early 2nd millennium BCE) stone implements marked with Indus signs have been considered by some to be significant for the Dravidian identification. In 1924, when announcing the discovery of the IVC, John Marshall stated that (one of) the languages may have been Dravidic. Yuri Knorozov surmised that the symbols represent a logo-syllabic script and suggested, based on computer analysis, an agglutinative Dravidian language as the most likely candidate. Linguist Asko Parpola writes that the Indus script and Harappan language are "most likely to have belonged to the Dravidian family". Parpola led a Finnish team in investigating the inscriptions using computer analysis. Based on a proto-Dravidian assumption, they proposed readings of many signs, some agreeing with the suggested readings of Heras and Knorozov (such as equating the "fish" sign with the Dravidian word for fish, "min") but disagreeing on several other readings.
@@vineethjoshy4819 Amigo, reading comprehencio non accurado. Let me simplify for you, what Intellectual works as i asked before. You don't propose that Vedas, Purana and the hundreds of other texts were plagiarism, do you? Maybe you have a time machine and so give me an invite too. Anyway, wall of text notwithstanding. You have not presented any proof of IVC being dravidian, but only likelihoods. Besides the language is still untranslated. One or two words resembling does not mean the original tongue is already Dravidian. Sumerian has a lot of sanskrit words but sumerian is not an Indo-aryan language. You're not going to present Brahui people as the proof of remnant Dravidian population in that region next, i hope. The case is still open. And your oldest written literature has full of devotional invocations and prayers to Indo-aryan gods who were not in IVC. Such sophisticated people from IVC that their own culture was remade in the image of a horse-riding nomad people.
Indian subcontinent is the origin of R1A (near the Himalayas). Also, it is more common and diverse in India than in Polish-Russian and other European countries. They spread traditional religion and Sanskrit in Eurasia.
Rigved book 10, Hymn 75, but which verse? You didn't mention verse. There's no such verse anywhere in 9 verses of book 10 hymn 75. Also, it is nowhere mentioned that "so called Aryan RACE" was 'TALL, FAIR SKINNED' people ... Stop this concoction
@Dhrub Bose get yourself educated. The theory has been debunked multiple times. There was no ArYaN domination over dravidians. No evidence whatsoever for inVasiOn/DomiNation/MiGraTion of Aryans into india in 1500 BCE.
@Dhrub Bose are you dumb ? Dravidian culture flourished in South India and Vedic culture in North India... And there hasn't been fight between these two. Just because two different cultures existed in a subcontinent, it doesn't mean there has been Invasions, wars and conflicts. The "Sangama Literature", the oldest tamil literature praises vedic culture and literature. And vedic has tonns of evidence that proves that Aryans are indians and not some outsiders. The Aryans Invasion theory is a false History that has been taught to us... Get yourself out of that crap. And face the reality.
@Dhrub Bose you're victim of propaganda and you have a confirmation biase that "ohh Aryans INVADED". vedic culture is present in South India...so what???? It doesn't even remotely prove that there was an INVASION 🤷
@kaustabh yes, but I am talking about the Saraswati river. Others are just named after the original river was died up. Even during Akbar's time when Raja Todarmal measured the area, it was mentioned as Saraswati river area. All this has been distorted after the British/ Europeans invented this distorted theory. For Islamists and Communist the theory became convenient as well. Hence it remains in the text book
History is re-written by winners i.e who are in power alike current winning government ( recent research ). E.g north eastern tribal's use forest product as medecine without knowing about Ayurveda .. but we call every natural medecine as ayurvedic .. thus tribes may become backward and other got fake credit.. again history distorted ..
@@souravmisra4080 Saraswathi is a Aryan vedic myth written in European language In Rakhigarhi excavation site Two skeleton were founded by the excavation team of Indus valley site . The female skeleton has more DNA similarities with " Iranian farmer-gatherers " And Male skeleton DNA has more similarities to the " Irula tribal " group population in the Nilgiri mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu . And they did not find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site .
@@aspirewot8408 lmao. what a clown. if UP lower caste phenotypes are proof of aryan migration, why isnt pakistani scheduled tribes who literally are white with blond and red hairs proof against AMT? and since greco-indic times, the upper castes have been travelling from places to places across india and marrying people from swat valley, who are btw indic-caucosoid. hence you see high amount of skcythian [not aryan] phenotypes amongst upper castes. and just last week the greeks published 100 DNA samples from the era of heroes from bronze age crete. guess what, 6% of their DNA is onge which is not even tamil but andamanese. this only proves that indians were migrating to greece during their early hellenic era having greater AASI genes. this very findings pushes mahabharata era to atleast 1200 bc, because of the indian gray langurs paintings on greek pottery and karna-achiles, krishna-hercules like myths are formed in that area. and the peacock ornaments with ivory carvings and saffron milk are typical harappan culture which was shown gifting it to greek goddess by a gray langur. this not only debunks aryan migration to india during 1500 bc but also hardens the hindu claim of mahabharata being true. wait till they draw a link between aalina vedic tribe and hellenes. in case if you are interested: the studies that i relied on to make these observations are 1. sothern arc paper 2. www.nature.com/articles/s41559-022-01952-3/
@@aspirewot8408 why twinkle khanna? i would show you a whole tribe who looks like tamannah. is kalash tribe enough for you? if they were aryans, why are they not upper caste but scheduled tribe? did racist brahmins actually excluded the most "Aryan" looking folk from joining upper caste? and for the sharp feautures, you dont need steppe gene for it. the Iran_N or anatolian genes are enough, which is known as brown/caucosoid feautures. steppe or white population didnt have sharp feautures, the sharp feautures come from middle east and indian subcontinent. just look at polish or nordics with corded ware genes unmixed with steppe ones. they have broad square like face with snubbed nose unlike middle eastern or harappan phenotypes which has sharp feautures. bruh, what are you smoking. its them who are mixed, not us. we had the caste endogamy, not islamised western india. the genetic difference amongst western indians are less than 0.6718 while the konkan brahmin vs orissa dalit is about 1.08** something. so a brahmin aryan became chaiwala and dalit caste in pakistan?🤡 hey idiot, how would a post mahabharat era of karna's forgetfull curse, sunborn armour, krishna-hercules serpant slay, have anything to do with pre vedic aryans? chronology naam suna kabhi? lmao, those articles are from harvard and swedish universities who infact claim steppe to be homeland. im just pointing out the mistakes and bigotry in those articles. these are the same articles authors like tony joseph and romila thapar uses btw. hence i gave you your own. but it just shows how empty headed you are. just dont say to anyone that nature and cell are hindu nationalist magazines. because its their own 2016 paper which you very own argument is based on.
@@aspirewot8408 and if you are qualified enough, we can talk about specific genes such as 1. Swat_low steppe : supposed aryan gene 2. swat_IA : the admixture of aryan + IVC 3. IRan_sahirsokta : the gene responsible for caucosoid feautures 4. tyagi_up : your fake aryan upper caste etc. if you dare, let me know. but before that, just give me a single reference to steppe gene in india before 900 bc. and if you are thinking about roopkund, beware, those are matrilineal steppe gene which means indians moved out and brought steppe wives as they traded. so good luck finding male mediated steppe gene in india before 700 bc.
@@aspirewot8408 yes i can. the same ones, an average indian have now. the sharp feautures, with defined nose, big eyes and caucosoid skull. you can refer to official reconstructed images of harappan skulls for proof. and some would indeed look like onge, even the post vedic texts have onge like people. krishna being one of them. and you seem confused. come to point. and yes you babboon. indians did move out and brought women as wives while they were years away from india for trade via central asia and arabian sea. the source of tin for both egypt and mesopatamia was northern pakistan which traded tin with as far as crete and actually helped establish a monarchy and start bronze age in middle east, the oldest settlement in israel has gangetic rice and cotton fragments. and the afghan swat valley gene [that 3 steppe out of 14 IVC one] is matrilineal. which means it comes from females. edit : i asked you a question before, but i guess you cant answer it. predictable.
We are not migrated just come from one part of aryavarta to another part.bcoz india is not small like now its borders covers most of the whole Asia..great and everyone should accept it. Proud to be Indian 🔥🙏
India was far bigger than today, Pakistan was Part of India until the partition. India back in ancient times stretched all the way to Korea and Vladivostok. The name Indonesia is Indian. Many Iranians have Indian names. It is also noted that the Zoroastrians who were persecuted in Iran fled to India and thus why we have aryans in India ..but the latter part of this sentence isnt true. They fled to India because there ancestors were from india originally. Just look at south america and america -they were native Indians. Indians have been travelling this/the world for thousands of years!
ARYA( the aryans) went outwards to the central asia and Europe not vice versa. Our earliest kin or breed used the word Arya was IKSHVAKU KUL from which Ram Ji originated and these kind of rulers ruled and spread SANATAN DHARMA across the globe.
@@user-ld7ch1er6j Than why did not scientists find R1A1 gene in those skeletons of Indus valley civilization . In Rakhigarhi excavation site Two skeleton were founded by the excavation team of Indus valley site . The female skeleton has more DNA similarities with " Iranian farmer-gatherers " And Male skeleton DNA has more similarities to the " Irula tribal " group population in the Nilgiri mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu . And they did not find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site .
Sir i have a question if aryans(brahmin/kastritya/vashiya) were from outside of india and they started vedic-religion 🕉️ also aryans were white/fair skinned then why south Indian brahmins/kashtriyas/vashiyas are dark/ black skinned ......... Also why there are no proofs of resistance from original habitatnts of Indians towards aryans And if aryans were fair skinned they why did they pray to krishna( krishna was dark skinned) 😅😅😅😅😅 please clear my doubts
Rig Veda hasn't mentioned any of the things you have mentioned. Rig veda didn't talk about migration, exodus, annihilation of the natives. so please stop spreading the canard of Aryan migration, you are talking the language of colonists.
Unfortunately it appears that Bahartvanshi have failed to comprehend their beginning. Arya or Aryavartha is born of Jambusweepam (aka Entire Europe and Asia) which includes the Nabhivarsha or Bharatvarsha so named after the son of Lord Rishabhdev Chakravartin Samrat Bharat. India as it is today is not the original Bharatvarsha which was compromised of 43 nations (like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Tibet, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Philippines, Indonesia, Java, Sumatra, Bali, parts of China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Iran, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Brunei, parts of Turkey, Malaysia, Singapore, Jakarta, Syria, small portion of Iraq, Armenia etc...) including India. Originally sons and daughters of Sawayambhu Manu ruled the entire earth aka Jambudweepam and Cronchdweepam etc.... however over an extremely long passage of time the Arya or Aryavartha decreased to Bharatvarsha only and now India. The word originates from the ancient Sanskrit the language of the gods aka Tridev, and Indra, Surya etc etc. Even in one of the Irish mythology The female deity named Danu with unknown origin links to Daksh Prajapati's daughter who was divine of origin.
@@jaishivji3246 Most north Indians are brown, and many South Indians are fair too. Doesn't proof shit. I was born Fair as milk, I stayed in South India, and I browned. Because the climate is literally fricking tropical over there. Skin colour has a lot to do with geographical region too
And Bookman, your question is exactly correct. If dasa and dasyus was a word used to describe native indians who Aryans were conquering, why was the Bharata King who came victorious and is known for founding kuru Polity, called "Divodasa" lmao. These whites and pseudo Indians are so 😬
Aryans were indian who migrated to europe not vice versa, if it's other way around just tell me how India has highest ra1a1 genes than entire europe. Stop dividing us. We are one diverse race. Both Dravidian and Aryans are our beloved ancestors stop using our beloved ancestors to divide us.
Aryan were totaly indigenous to ancient India , indus pasupati seal ( date back 2700bce,proto may be 3500bce ) , same depiction found in nordic celtic mythology ( cernunnos= pasupati, a vedic diety, which later bacame shiva as know today ) celtic mythology only date back 1000bce
British manuplated the name of sarswati river says it is never was river to ancient India and it is mythological river not real , but it is hindu kush river ,saraswati= haraxvati ( in Avestan ) ,= hirmand ( pastun ,urdu ) = Helmand ( in English ) , which still exist
MLBA steppe is extracted autosomoal DNA gene extracted from 25 central Asia bronze age archeological site dating 4000BC-1500BC and these MLBA absent among ancient indus valley civilization, Mesopotamia, Egyptian and European dating 7000BC-2000BC. Now these MLBA found high among brahmin among hindus(25%-75%) apart from Jat(50-80%) and rors(60%-85%). South Indian non-brahmin have very less to nil MLBA gene(5-0%) and most has exact similar gene to indus valley civilization people(AASI-45%+IRANIAN FARMERS-45%), north india intermediate caste and lower caste has less MLBA(10-5%). NOW IF BRAHMINS HAVE OUTSIDERS CENTRAL ASIAN GENE WHICH IS NOT FOUND AMONG INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION. THE HOW WOULD ARYAN WERE NATIVE TO INDIA?
@charvaka dharma Haha another dravidian nationalist found,agni indra are all vedic gods written in rig veda which was written in 1500BCE. Tolkappiyam was written in 500BCE😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@xeonquantum3966 Indian subcontinent is the origin of R1A (near the NW Himalayas). Also, it is more common and diverse in India than in Polish-Russian and other European countries. They spread traditional religion and Sanskrit in Eurasia.
6:00 - They were not from Europe, some of the steppes branch of people migrated to Europe. 6:09 - please give the reference (text and verses) of Patanjali mentioning pingala kesini/ hiranya kesini.
Yes.there was a myth .In ancient times the lord parashurama decided to kill the all kshethriyas and they migrated to various part of the world some of the group went to Europe and Iran .
@@user-sx6ug2es5w Than why did not scientists find R1A1 gene in those skeletons of Indus valley civilization . In Rakhigarhi excavation site Two skeleton were founded by the excavation team of Indus valley site . The female skeleton has more DNA similarities with " Iranian farmer-gatherers " And Male skeleton DNA has more similarities to the " Irula tribal " group population in the Nilgiri mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu . And they did not find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site .
Arw You idiot or what Muslims And christians are Foreigner Bcoz Thats the true history 100% documented And the aryan Inavsion is just a theory Do you even know the meaning of theory And principle😏you Idiot
There are solid, hard historical records to show they are not foreigners but converted by foreigners and that too recently. So what's your game, Abdul Puncture ?
I don't care if i am aryan or not. People were tend to migrate. This is how hûmanity evolved. If anyone say i am aryan. I am proud to be that. Don't make aryans a abuse. The muslim came from arabia turkey persia etc they been there since centuries. Now they are one of us. If we don't call them outsiders we can't call aryans outsider either
3:21 - where was it mentioned that they have migrated? They simply describe the place. That too from east to west. If they had migrated from outside, their description should have been in reverse. Do not add interpretations as recorded in Vedas. Again, there is no mention of they being tall, fair people.
@@doityourselfpakistan6535 Aryan word itself is derived from Aryas mentioned in the Vedas. Apart from Hindu and Zoroastrian texts Aryans are not mentioned anywhere else. Germans are not Aryans. Only the branch of people around Iran and Indian subcontinent were Aryans.
@Ankit R LOL. I simply told what arya means. Go ask any person who knows Sanskrit. Why you became so mad? Calling me uneducated… Hahahaha. WTF is 'aryan tongue'??? Do people in your Communist village always talk nonsensical like this?
@Ankit R Oh boy! This is a lost cause, consider these my last words for you. You called me uneducated so let me also tell you that you are fool and a pretender of top order, nothing more. The focus word was *aryan in 'aryan tongue'. The whole concept of aryan people is fake. When there are no such people then how can they have a language/tongue was the point, which your thick 'brahmin' brain didn't notice. Aryan word itself is cooked up by foreigners with a Christian agenda. Real word is arya, aryan is fakery. Bye now!
"The Eurasian steppe nomadic Saka were not immigrants from the Near East but direct descendants of Andronovans, and the mixed character of the Indo-Iranian-speaking populations of Iran and India is the result of a new population spreading among aboriginals with whom a new language is probably to be associated. This conclusion is confirmed by the evidence of Indo-Iranian tradition. The Aryans in the Avesta are tall, light-skinned people with light hair; their women were light-eyed, with long, light tresses... In the Rigveda light skin alongside language is the main feature of the Aryans, differentiating them from the aboriginal Dáśa-Dasyu population who were a dark-skinned, small people speaking another language and who did not believe in the Vedic gods... Skin color was the basis of social division of the Vedic Aryans; their society was divided into social groups varṇa, literally ‘color’. The varṇas of Aryan priests (brāhmaṇa) and warriors (kṣatriyaḥ or rājanya) were opposed to the varṇas of the aboriginal Dáśa, called ‘black-skinned’..."
@DIGVIJAY SINGH nope you can look at Wikipedia chart r1a also found in low caste and outcaste 30 to 48 percent , brahmin have both r1a(Ukrainian, south Asian) and r1b ( north Europeans )
Please don't take Wikipedia as your source of information. Because wikipedia is not accurate, as it has been infiltrated and impliented. Ask yourself these questions: Where was the capital of Aryana? Was it in Iran or Afghanistan? Where were the kings of Aryana residing? Iran or Afghanistan? Where was the city of the education where all of our philosophers were educated? Was it in the city of BALKH of Afghanistan or somewhere in Iran? Where were our philosophers like Rumi, Ibn Sina, Nasir Khusraw, Jowezjani ,Alberooni etc was borne and educated? In the city of BALKH of Afghanistan, or Iran? Where were the capital cities of Aryana actually located? In Iran or Afghanistan? What were the names of these ARYANA cities? What was the name of Afghanistan before they named it Afghanistan? The answer to all of these questions is all recorded in history books and in the historical ancient citings of the historic cities of Afghanistan where Afghanistan was called ARIANA!! The capital cities of Ariana were in three histric cities of Afghanistan called Balkh, Ghazni Herat Kandahar, and now Kabul! All our philosophers were borne in these three historic capital cities of Afghanistan! All the Aryan kings were residing in these four historic cities of Afghanistan! This is why the type of Farsi Iranian speaking is not the ancient type. We Afghans we speak the ancient type of Farsi, as we call it DARI! Dari means in short "DARBARI" because it was the type of Farci the people of DARBAR used to speak, and still do speak till this day! While Iranians can not speak this type of Dari, they can not, they need to go to the university to learn it to speak it? Dari is an ancient and very clear type of Farsi, which Iranians can not even pronounce it? Its the types of the DARBARIANS language! All the people and the philosophers of Dari/ Darbari are not like Iranian Shia. Instead, we are all Sunni muslims. All of the Aryan kings and philosophers were Sunni muslims who spoke Dari! And lastly, ask yourself this: Where was the capital of Aryana? It was Balkh, Ghazni and Herat, then why did Iran claim to be the Aryana? What was the ancient name of Afghanistan? It was Aryana, then why did Iran claim to be Aryana while never been called by this name historically? The actual fact is that Iran was just a territory of Aryana, not actual Aryana! That is why they can't even speak Dari/ Darbari of the Darbarians! Because ALL the Darbariabs were Sumni muslims, while Iran has always been Shia! Before islam the capital of Zardasht was also in Afghanistan, not Iran! Afghanistan/ Aryana was used to be fire worshipers, and the king at the time called Zardasht, and this king's kingdom was in Aryana/ Afghanistan! Not Iran. Iran is stolen name of the same territory where they belonged to Aryana, current Afghanistan! If any of you, our Indian brothers and sisters, have any doubt about our history, please ask your parents or grand parents they know the real history of Aryana Afghanistan? Because it was us who brought the language of Farsi to India, and the Taj Mehal, schooling, the train line, and the Urdu language! Not the Iranians? It was us who were the real Aryans not Iran, Iran was under our rule, my brother and sisters. Please do your research from real sources, or yiur grand parents will tell you the truth, not Wikipedia? Good luck.
The definition of Aryan and their migration to India is now an outdated theory. Please study more and check the recent research papers in this regard. 1) If the Aryans came from anywhere out of India, why the Sanskrit language (which has been claimed to be introduced by the Aryans in India) is only found in India and nowhere in the world? 2) It is claimed that Sanskrit language was created from Indo-European language. Is there any proof? It is unbelievable that Sanskrit was created from Indo-European or any Middle Eastern or any Central Asian language because Devanagari script has no match/resemblence with those languages/scripts. 3) Why the Aryan Culture & Religion (Hindu Religion) is only seen in India and nowhere in the world with the same antiquity? It is not possible for the whole Aryan race to come to India without leaving any people of their community at their homeland and without keeping their religious & cultural influence therein. 4) Why nothing has been mentioned in Rigveda about capture of the new land (India) and about their homeland? Had they lost their memories of their homeland after entering India?
Recent research shows that Sanskrit was first spoken in Syria in 4500 bce and later India in 1850 bce ;maybe Aryans migrated from middle eastern Caucasian route
@@parth-ian5027 Cause In the middle the persians have different monotheistic culture from since 4400 bce ;so after the rise of greeks and mongoloids the indo-ayrans greek tribes migrated from west to east towards India and merged with Dravidians even ved also tells us about Aryans
@@sujal4tech 1st m asking u r u indian? 2nd There is no mention of Aryan term in the whole vedas ,puranas etc. but has only mention of Arya which means noble man and can 1st need to be hindu and 2nd his work should be full of brahmcharya and he should be a Mahagyaani then he should be called Arya ,for ex. Adi Sankracharya
I want to know the source of this info because there are texts from the same book that is "Rigveda" which counters some of the things you mentioned. From historians there is more evidence that suggests that there wasn't that much of violence with the natives, they came from central Asia only, that does not include Europe as you mentioned at 6:00 , so i really am interested in knowing your sources and find out what are the rest of the historians doing in the world.
#1. Mohan jo Daro and Rakhigarhi are NOT pre-Arya. #2. Rigveda never says anything what is shown in the video. #3. There is NO archaeological or genealogical or written evidence of Aryas coming from outside the subcontinent. This video repeats the same completely refuted lies about the hypothesis of "Aryan Indvasion".
In the Mohan jo daro or the Indus were no traces of Aryans but Dravidian the 2. The rig Veda states that stealing the cattle from the blacks of Indus will give them sanity of life 3. It was very clear by the dna and ethnicity Indians are blacks and they don’t have white skin cos of high temperatures they don’t have fair skin and blond hair Aryans They’re are scientifically belong to Europe and north Iran (normadic pricks) called themselves high and enslaved whole India just by the name of god bro shiva doesn’t even eat non veg and mf sacrificed animals see the point
Aryan word came from the Sanskrit word Arya, or cultivated people. According to Bal Gangadhar Tilak the Aryans had their origin in the Arctic Circle of Russia before the last Ice Age, before 27000 BC. At the time of the Ice Age they came to India, which was Ice free but they lost everything during the flood that followed after the Ice Age, possibly in 17000 BC. They developed new civilization in India. In about 6000 BC some of them, called themselves Asuras, went out of India and went to Iran, Iraq, Syria, Armenia and Russia, Ukraine, Bulgaria and Greece. There are Genetic evidence. These civilzations are related. Western mainly the Anglo-American historians are propagating a false history that the Aryans came to India in 1500 BC. Thus, according to them all the characters of Ramayana and Mahabharatas are non-Aryans. Ramayana was about 9000BC and Mahabharata is about 7000 BC. Reference: Hall, HR ,1939, A Season of Work at Ur, Al-Ubaid, Abu Shahrain (Eridu) and Elsewhere:Being an Unofficial Account of the British Museum Archaeological Mission to Babylonia, London: Methuen Oak, N., 2011, Mystery of Arundhuti, Atlanta: Danphe Inc. Pravda, 2005, ‘Ancient Aryan civilization achieved incredible technological progress 40 centuries ago’, 16 July 2005 Tilak, Bal Gangadhara, 1903, The Arctic Home in the Vedas, Messrs. Tilak Brothers, Pune. Guseva, N. R. 1995. Induism: Aryi, Slaviane. Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology. Oak, N., 2011, When Did The Mahabharata War Happen?, Atlanta: Danphe Inc Oak, N., 2014, The Historic Rama: Indian Civilization at the End of Pleistocene, Scotts Valley, California: CreateSpace. Zharnikova, S. V. 1986. K voprosu o vozmozhnoi lokalizatsii sviashchennykh gor Meru i Khary indoiranskoi (ariiskoi) mifologii. Informatsionnyi bulleten’ Mezhdunarodnoi assotsiatsii po izucheniiu kul’tur Tsentral’noi Azii 11:31-44.
@@imposter1721 this theory is complete bogus and has been proven wrong many times. The recent rakhigari puts an end to this debate. There is no aryan gene only Indian gene and that's it
dont misguide people. hitlers symbol and indians swastika are two different aspect. people watching this video can go into reports and analysis of this fact.
The Indian subcontinent is the origin of R1A (near the NW Himalayas). Also, it is more common and diverse in India than in Polish-Russian and other European countries. They spread traditional religion and Sanskrit in Eurasia.
@Utkal Janani rundia There is no concept of upper or lower caste in the Vedas. It is supposed that these started during the Gupta Empire for social and political reasons. But it is not related to the Vedic period.
Than why did not scientists find R1A1 gene in those skeletons of Indus valley civilization . In Rakhigarhi excavation site Two skeleton were founded by the excavation team of Indus valley site . The female skeleton has more DNA similarities with " Iranian farmer-gatherers " And Male skeleton DNA has more similarities to the " Irula tribal " group population in the Nilgiri mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu . And they did not find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site .
@@haga2177 Just to Show my Guts I have Sent MPs to Parliament for this Indian parliament have uninomasouly passed Resolution Regarding POK and COL Am just a Citizen We will not give 1 inch of Land to anyone it doesn't matter it is barren land or agricultural land it's matter of Self respect and Sovereignty of INDIA
@@alokkrmishra5643 I know right... We were taught as that since we are kids and it feels bad.... But, in reality those regions are with others and not with us. If you go out of India, all other countries shows India as that!
@Dr. Vivek Narayane what I mean is, when u go out of India to any country and check the world map, they show India as that, without POK and Aksai Chin.... Cuz, in reality, it is administered by Pakistan and China but, not by India!
The Indian subcontinent is the origin of R1A (near the NW Himalayas). Also, it is more common and diverse in India than in Polish-Russian and other European countries. They spread traditional religion and Sanskrit in Eurasia.
But i does not have doubt that i am dasa because i am belong to gond tribe from Central India In over gondi mythology asura and raksha was the name of king in our mythology that's why we worship hidimba and and ravan because they were our King who are evil and villain in Hindu mythology now I connect everything thank you 🙏🏻
@Turtle Kingdom BITCH The Indian subcontinent is the origin of R1A (near the NW Himalayas). Also, it is more common and diverse in India than in Polish-Russian and other European countries. They spread traditional religion and Sanskrit in Eurasia.
@@shingha9297 Than why did not scientists find R1A1 gene in those skeletons of Indus valley civilization . In Rakhigarhi excavation site Two skeleton were founded by the excavation team of Indus valley site . The female skeleton has more DNA similarities with " Iranian farmer-gatherers " And Male skeleton DNA has more similarities to the " Irula tribal " group population in the Nilgiri mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu . And they did not find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site .
@@दीपकनागर-थ5छ funny because the Indus river valley civilization died. It's almost like north india was invaded by Aryans from central Asia replacing the Indus civilization and ethnicity. Throught out Europe, iran and north india, there's a similarity in language and mythology. Its almost like they have a common Aryan heritage.
@@दीपकनागर-थ5छ north indians are related to and their ancestors are from the steppes bordering Europe in central Aisa. Another term for these people are Aryans that late became indo Aryans
I'm from tamilnadu... There is no aryans no dravidians.... I'm tamilan... I'm a hindu. I'm a indian.. That's my identity.... ❤religion and language is identity 🙏🙏🙏
Dasa means SEVAK that served Aryans without any fixed pay. SC, ST, OBC people are called DASAS. Even today they serve ARYANS branmin, Kshatriya, vaish. They are like worker honey bees.
Wastage theory. Europeans are shocked when they knew that there will be a great civilization before them and they were also intellectually and technologically more advance them. So they introduced this theory which showed them superior. Wastage theory.
In all this chaos of caste religion arayan Dravidian we forgot the primary and most important thing that we are humans. The whole earth is our home and all the people belonging from all the races are fellow humans so instead of bashing each other on the name of caste and religion we should love each other.
What is the Aryan Invasion/Migration myth? It is about language, not migration. The story is that a technologically superior race called Aryans created a super-language that spread all over Europe and Asia. It is imagined that Aryans originated in an area somewhere between Europe and Asia and fanned out like spokes of a wheel riding on chariots pulled by horses, conquering and imposing their language on Europe and India. Those languages became “Indo-European languages” spoken between Ireland and India. Why does it matter? Unfortunately, it matters most only to Indians because it erases and discards ancient Indian history. It does nothing to European history and European philologists (historical linguists) and historians have no problem with it. For them, it is a minor quibble that is being raised by a bunch of right-wing Hindus How does AIT affect Indians? It discards and denies Indian history on many counts. AIT claims that an Indian origin source, the Rig Veda mentions a people called “Aryans” who used to wage wars on chariots driven by horses. This is false. The adjective “Arya” meaning noble in the Veda has been modified to the noun “Aryan” - to indicate a race of people. The racial connotation has been denied but never erased. It is claimed this race could only have come from Eurasia where horses and chariots have been found in antiquity as compared to the sparse findings of the same in India. Who created the Aryan Invasion Theory ? AIT/AMT was almost wholly created by European historical linguists (philologists) who went ahead and wrote an entire history of how a mother language to modern “Indo-European languages” was created somewhere in Eurasia and spread around the old world. Even today archaeology and Indian or Zoroastrian textual evidence are rejected in favour of linguistic constructs. When is this Aryan Invasion said to have taken place? This is a critical point, but I will restrict the date to what is stated for India because it is this date which denies all Indian history prior to that date. The Aryan invasion is said to have taken place between 1500 and 1000 BCE. It cannot be older or more recent because other theories built up by linguists will fail if the date changes. Hence that date is defended like crown jewels Why is the 1500-1000 BCE date important for the theory? For European linguists - it cannot be older than 1500 BCE. In fact, if the date goes older than 1800 BCE then it will tear down the “evidence” claimed for the so-called ‘Hittite language” and the “Mitanni texts”. It will make Sanskrit (called Indo-Aryan by linguists) older than both those entities and kill thelanguage spread theory. For Indo-European linguists, the language spread theory is more important than Indian history. But for Indians, our history is either discarded as fake or compressed into a short 500 years by the theory. If the date is made more recent than 1000 BCE - then the language spread theory by linguists cannot survive. So the 1500 to 1000 BCE dates are critical to them and totally fake for Indians. Can the Aryan Invasion/Migration theory be shown to be false? Yes. But this is not a trivial exercise. In 200 years a lot of fake constructs have been made and tens of thousands of pages written in support of a theory essentially cooked up by linguists. I have written a lot on these issues but I will briefly mention the points that are either faked or denied Did the language that became Sanskrit come to India from somewhere else within the stated period on 1500-1000 BCE? There is absolutely zero proof for any such language at the point of origin. There is no text, tablet, pottery shard or narrative. The idea that the language started off from some area in Eurasia is completely imaginary. Note that some people nowadays claim that there was a language called Proto-Indo-European (PIE) spoken. But PIE is only a hypothetical language. Even linguistics reference texts do not claim that it was a spoken language. Without any proof of the language at the point of origin, it has been claimed that people brought IE language to India. How can linguists be so stupid as to make a patently false claim? Who is fooling whom? No. Linguists are not stupid. They claim that there is indirect proof of language. Rig Veda mentions “Horse, wheel and chariot” while there have been archaeological findings of horses, wheel and chariots in the Eurasian steppe. The language was found in India, but the archaeological link to items mentioned in all IE languages have been found in Eurasia. This is claimed as proof that the same language (or its precursor) was present in Eurasia. Incredibly, a mention of horses and chariots in the Rig Veda is equated with graves 4000 km away. This is simply an assumption with zero proof. It is one of the weakest links in the linguists' theories, the proverbial “elephant in the room” that basically weakens the current AIT based language spread theory. But isn’t it true that India did not have horses, chariots and wheels even by the time of the Indus valley civilization? This is totally false. It is an area where Indians will need to re-educate themselves. Horse bones of the true horse, Equus caballus have been found in Bagor in Rajasthan dating back to 3500 BCE. Horse bones dating well before 1500 BCE have been found in the Indian valley civilization. True horse bones dated to 2000 BCE have been found in UP. Toy wheels on carts and chariots have been found in the Harappan area from 3500 BCE. A complete war chariot from 2000 BCE has been found in Sanauli near Delhi. The world’s earliest painted images of chariots have been found in central Indian cave art dated back to the late microlithic and early Chalcolithic period (2500-1500 BCE). The 1500 BCE Daimabad bronze chariot was found in Maharashtra 2000 km south of the Khyber pass from a time when India was supposed to have no chariots or wheels. Is there any other positive evidence that the AIT dates are wrong? Yes. Two more. One is the Saraswati river evidence and the other is in archaeoastronomy What is the Saraswati river evidence? An entire book can be written about this. The Vedas and post Veda texts refer to a mighty river situated to the east of the Indus in north-west India.. Earlier texts speak of a huge river. Later texts speak of a river that dried up in the desert. The river is said to be the western border of a land called Aryavarta with the Himalayas in the north, Vindhyas in the south and Haridwar in the east. These are clearly Indian landmarks but there is almost no river today (only minor monsoon-fed streams exist). However modern satellite imagery, riverbed-core drilling and paleo-climatological studies have proven that there was just such a mighty river exactly in that area from 10,000 BCE but which started drying up by 6000 BCE and was pretty much dry by 2000 BCE. It so happens that the IVC/Harappan remains lie along the site of this mighty river, but the Vedic period was probably much earlier. How can I claim that the Vedic period was much earlier? The proof lies in Archaeo-astronomical references in ancient Indian texts. Herman Jacobi (1850-1937) was both a Sanskrit scholar and an astronomer, a unique combination of skills that allowed him to notice, in the Rig Veda, what linguists with no understanding of astronomy, or astronomers with little knowledge of the Vedas could never notice. Jacobi’s serendipitous discovery was a passage in the Rig Veda V.18-19 that described a full moon on the day of the winter solstice in the month of Phalguna. Jacobi correctly dated the event back to a time in the third millennium BCE or earlier. It turns out that another Indian scholar had actually discovered similar references in ancient texts even before Jacobi. In 1893, Bal Gangadhar Tilak had noted a reference in the Rig Veda of the occurrence of the vernal equinox in the constellation Orion, dating the event back to 4,000 BCE. More recently, people like Nilesh Nilakanth Oak have taken this work to new heights by examining every single archaeoastronomical reference in old texts to test for validity against modern astronomical knowledge. Oak is now showing dates that are astonishingly remote, and while the dates may be a topic of some disagreement, they are all older than the rigid 1500-1000 BCE dates demanded by linguists to support their theory via a fake Aryan myth story. What about genetics? Hasn’t genetics proven that there were migrations? In fact migrations from steppe around 1500 BCE? The Aryan Invasion theory is about language movement, not just people movement. It is not enough to show people movement, one must prove language movement. There are two important preconditions to make a claim that people from place A took their language to place B and introduced that language for the first time in place B. First there must be incontrovertible evidence that the migrants from place A actually used to speak the language that they took to place B in the prehistoric era that they migrated. Second, there must be evidence that the language they carried with them did not already exist in the “place B” to which they migrated. Anything less is conjecture. Not science. There is zero evidence of language in steppe or any other area to make the claim that it was brought to India. The horse and chariot ideas have been discredited and disproved. Any migration carrying IE language to India for the first time has to be shown to have occurred before 2500 BCE because, as mentioned above. there is powerful evidence of IE language having been in India by 2500 BCE and most likely for millennia prior to that. The 1500 BCE date fails on multiple counts and along with it the Aryan migration myth.
the recent developments in sanauli has already discarded this theory they found chariots buried there from pre aryan period which prove that there were horses and chariots in india the weapon found there were superiorto others in that period
@Anand Sharma Dasa means slave Kali dasa - means slave of god ! Dasa is a term used to indicate slaves. So when one calls himself a slave of god. They use the suffix with the God’s name ! Jeez !
@Anand Sharma Manusmriti 9.48 : yathā go'śvoṣṭradāsīṣu mahiṣyajāvikāsu ca | notpādakaḥ prajābhāgī tathaivānyāṅganāsvapi || 48 || As with cows, mares, she-camels, slave-girls, buffaloes, she-goats and ewes, it is not the begetter who obtains the offspring,-even thus it is with the wives of others-(48) What does Dasi mean here ?
@Anand Sharma Or perhaps you could tell what’s this : What’s the meaning of Dasa here : Manu smriti 4.253: ārdhikaḥ kulamitraṃ ca gopālo dāsanāpitau | ete śūdreṣu bhojyānnā yāścātmānaṃ nivedayet || 253 || His own ploughman, hereditary friend, cowherd, slave and barder,-among Śūdras; these are persons whose food may be eaten; as also one who offers himself.-(253)
Actually origins of aryans in India come from Iran and Middle East. With much similarities of characters of Shanamah with Hindu mythology. Does anyone agree?
@Turtle Kingdom BITCH May be it originated in Steppes. But Iranians are Aryans, and we too are same. Iranian people not only resemble us physically but their language similarities are in our language(hindi/urdu)
Most of the original bloodlines of Bharatvanshi are fair of colour, strong of body, tall and so on. But make no mistake that human body in accordance with Vedas is made up of original five elements and their respective 24 subsequent elements. The human body changes over time due several impacts of external or internal reasons. First of all Rig Veda doesn't talk about Arya invading or arriving in Bharatvarsha. To truly comprehend the origin and knowledge one must combine Vedas with Vedanta, Araynak, Vimana, Surya Siddhanta, Brahmad, upnishad, Smriti, Shruti, Samhita, Puran, itihaas etc... Aryan invasion is nothing but a stupid theory concocted by those who wish to rule by defining others inferior. It's unfortunate really to see that how people have swayed away from Sanatan Dharma's original meaning but I guess this is a reality today
Try reading Geographic study. Of bloodlines and dna dating. You'll see how humans migrated from Africa to each continent. And Aryan migration (it wasn't invasion but settlements). Maybe small wars.
@@medretav lol how is chasing someone from their homeland a settlement that’s a invasion the Aryans forced now living as Dravidians out from Indus to south India
😂😂 i don't understand why you Hindu nationalist can't accept this simple Aryan migration theory, to me it looks like you are the ones who wants to have a sense of superiority 😂
@@medretav ik what uh are talking about blud . You are talking about genes that we shares the smae gene of ancient Africans like we all . But ever uh heard about DRAVIDIANS AND ARYANS . DRAVIDIANS WERE THOSE WHO SETTLED IN AFRICA THEY WERE ARYANS . LIKE THEY BOTH HAVE SAME ANCESTORS i.e hindus or SANATANI 🚩
English is an Indo European language of the West Germanic branch. English milk, Tocharian malke, Latin mulgeo, Old Irish melg, Greek amelgo, Russian moloko and so forth. Linguistic, textual, genetic and archaeological evidence for the Out of India Theory of Indo European Languages Baghpat Chariots, Weapons and the Horse in the Harappan Civilization - Dr. BK Manjul ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fZvKpjjTpgg.html Findings from the latest genetic study conducted by ASI in collaboration with the Reich Lab at Harvard using ancient DNA from Rakhigarhi slides at 29:00 mark ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Dio3Ep0nlv4.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-n4WFk0iEK5k.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-f0Lg1b_8N54.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE--wIu3dUsmtY.html Here are the tribes that spread the Indo European languages from South Asia to West Asia, Central Asia and to Europe Avestan) Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Sairima (Śimyu), Dahi (Dāsa). NE Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Nuristani/Piśācin (Viṣāṇin). Pakhtoonistan (NW Pakistan), South Afghanistan: Iranian: Pakhtoon/Pashtu (Paktha). Baluchistan (SW Pakistan), SE Iran: Iranian: Bolan/Baluchi (Bhalāna). NE Iran: Iranian: Parthian/Parthava (Pṛthu/Pārthava). SW Iran: Iranian: Parsua/Persian (Parśu/Parśava). NW Iran: Iranian: Madai/Mede (Madra). Uzbekistan: Iranian: Khiva/Khwarezmian (Śiva). W. Turkmenistan: Iranian: Dahae (Dāsa). Ukraine, S, Russia: Iranian: Alan (Alina), Sarmatian (Śimyu). Turkey: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Phryge/Phrygian (Bhṛgu). Romania, Bulgaria: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Dacian (Dāsa). Greece: Greek: Hellene (Alina). Albania: Albanian: Sirmio (Śimyu). Shrikant Gangadhar Talageri talageri.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-rigveda-and-aryan-theory-rational_27.html Five waves of Indo-European expansion: a preliminary model (2018) Igor A Tonoyan-Belyayev I. Tonoyan-Belyayev www.academia.edu/36998766/Five_waves_of_Indo-European_expansion_a_preliminary_model_2018_
The whole point of an unbiased study is that it is irrelevant what the nationality or ethnicity of the researching scholars is. Clearly, you are not happy with the actual unbiased study given in the video :)
@@HistoriaMaxima the reason why I am mentioning the nationality because our history is written by those scholars who hated India and our culture so they translated Hindu texts in such a way that's it favours them and show us as barbarians and inferior people which is complete bullshit maybe you need to study more about this by yourself then you will get my point:)
The oldest extant language in the Indian subcontinent is Tamil, not Sanskrit. The citizens of the Dravidian kingdoms in the southern part of India were culturally more advanced than the nomadic Aryans.
they were from Balkan, oldest swastica symbol comes from Old Danube Civilisation, oldest one, 8200 years ago! there is continuation in symbolism in todays Serbia....
Nice joke Swastika is found in all cultures throughout the World Its extremely Common And no the oldest civilisa Is only about 8000 years old and Serbia isn't one of them
Just stop and think for yourselfs Compare the looks of North Indians especially people like Hrithik Roshan with a South Indian actor like Mamooty You will see Hrithik looks more like Iranian or Indo-Scythian type, whereas the latter looks purely Dravidian Dravidians are different because they came from the region of Kush in East Africa thousands of years ago The Biharis and other dark people of North are the Dravidians who did not move south but retained their features of sharp nose, fair skin However we should all know that we are children of Adam and Eve and the one and Only God
I am from GILGIT, the north most point in sub continent, we use Das in shina language for some place where nothing grows (baren land). The Dardic people's physical appearance, features and color also show that they are of Aryan race (blonde hair, blue eyes, white skin). Our language shina is one of the oldest of the rig vedic languages. Our tribes occupy the north most India near the trans Hindookoosh, himalayas and Karakoram. We are the oldest and indigenous race of these Landa older then the afghans and the Mongols or the Macedonians. British Empire during its reign of subcontinent claimed that the oldest Temple in India are not the ones in Kashmir rather Sir E.F. Knight claimed that it was Gilgit where the first Hindu temple was built. India is country named and known by this word Hindu as it is also it's religion. The first people's bringing this religion to the land would have obviously built the temple in a place they were from or reached first and settled. It is my assumption and belief that GilgitBaltistan (aka Dardistan, Bolor, Paristan, Yaghistan, Dangaristan, BROOSHAL, Northern Areas (POK)) is indeed the oldest settlement of those Arians (aryas) who brought the Hindu beliefs to India. We in shina say "Sin" for river and in burusheski "sinda" until recent times nor in India or Pakistan people knew anything about us and dur to the toughest geography in the world we had been cut off from the rest of the world for thousands of years. We could not have learnt or adopted this word from any other language in sub continent. I believe the word sindhu or sindh to have originated from the shina language and word "Sin" and taken to other people's by this aria race or stock. As you said they traveled from north and Highlands to lower areas. We say Adit for Sunday and in sanskrit it is Aditya baar, boodo for Wednesday and in sanskrit it is bod baar and for Friday we say shookoro and to my knowledge it is shokor baar in sanskrit. Any further information will be much appreciated
Very Interesting bro. I will look up to your location. So you guys did not settle south or mix up with the rest like the rest? Do you know what your caste is by any chance? Are you a Punjabi Jatt?
This sounds really interesting. (if what your saying is true) Blond hair and blue eyes are really rare in India. I owuld love to see the people off your tribe.
@Historia Maxima Yes, Correct, The migration did happen, but they did not completely replaced the native people, as their genetic contribution to north india is only about 15% and 5% in South india.
@s w she has own agenda, she still don't reply me currectly when i ask where rishi patanjali said true brahman are golden haired, she clearly spreading hate against hindu and vedic followers
I have read this scroll article..and it says that indians do not want to accept this theory of aryan invasion as it jas propogated by bjp..rss etc that they had to be indegenious and it was a matter of pride ...it also says that dr. Riech of harvard says that this problem is only with India and not Pakistan and the rest of the world...but really scroll you need to question yourself why indians have their doubt about it ...in purana we have heard the stories of ramayan ,mahabharata..bhagwan shiv etc. All taking place in india ...(ram setu has even been proved scientifically)...now if aryans came only 5000 years ago...how could the they write... via vedas..puranas..these stories of india dated before their time ?
