Why Apple Won't Put M2 in the iPhone 14 

🔥 Go to skl.sh/reneritchie01221 and first 1,000 will get a 1 month FREE trial of Skillshare! 📱 iPhone 14 leaks: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LPXx_0Tzw1o.html 🤔 Why do people keep asking about M1 for iPhone? Apple hype? Silicon is tough?

I love the Ted Lasso clip. “No.”

I honestly don't ever expect an iPhone to receive any M-Series, at least not for a long while, unless they decide to implement some kind of system or architecture where you essentially dock an iPhone and turn it into a portable Mac running some kind of OS that can dynamically scale and transition from iOS to MacOS depending on if it's docked or not.

You’re really doing a great job with your videos, thanks. You deserve much more followers.

These videos are always amazing. And so, so informative! Thank you!

Fantastic video Rene. Your videos are a perfect mix of education and entertainment.

Why doesn’t google put 12900k and 3090ti in pixel 6?

Love the video!!! Very good points made!!!

M2 on my iPhone 14 the heat generated from it can fry an egg 😂

Thanks…I enjoyed your video! Blessings on your day.

Wait, people actually want an m1 inside of the iPhone? That's one of the most stupid things I have heard, no offense.

I have always liked your videos up until now. With the new b-roll, I now LOVE your videos. Great work! Oh, and the analysis is good too ;)

Great video! Loved the references. Can’t wait for iPhone 14 Pro or Pro Max. I’ll be picking one up this Fall.

Rene you are the best !

Technology trick! Excellent discovery Sir😀

Just for Thunderbolt (USB-C) would be great 😀

You need the palatine “no.. NO..”

Good content as always

a16 bionic chip single core : 1932-2000 multicore : 5638-6000 based on 4nm process node shrink or change to armv9 architecture

Will there be good mid tier level phone or Mini?

Any reason why Rosetta couldn’t work on an iPhone and IPad to allow windows apps to run?

You sneaked in the Dr Who ‘Stone Angels’ blink reference Rene👍

Love the "Blink" reference/clip

iPhone Pros need a faster transfer rates for those big files.

Hi Rene, the link says free course but then after logging in it says as “This payment method does not support a free trial, so please enjoy 30% off and a 30-day money back guarantee for starting your membership today.” irrespective of any payment method. This is the second time seeing this error. Anyway , keep up your good work as always. Cheers, from India.

The simple fact is the thermal and power tax of a full sized desktop CPU in a phone is not only overkill but a bottleneck in a mobile device. Sure, tablets are more forgiving due to the pure surface area to dissipate heat and clocking tricks to keep the device performant and last long enough, but hell no on a phone unless apple seriously overhall their thermal silicon solution to tackle the power draw and have the battery to keep up.

How did people think M1 chip would come on the iPhone?

Loved Rocket Raccoon clip!

Very well done 👍 Better explained than I ever could (tried and failed 🤪)

i think apple might want to release all version of M1 1st before anything comes out with M2 it would be weird if they release new architecture of M2 but still release version of M1 aftr that - be it M1 pro max superman we still hv mac mini pro, imac pro, n mac pro with possible M1 architecture.. which may as well leads M2 towards the end of the year

The back-to-back-to-back “NO”s of Craig Federighi, Darth Vader, and Michael Scott 😂😂😂

Great video, tocayo.

I really thought that the newer Mx systems would be using a 3nm by September onwards, given even greater efficiency.

Imagine if Apple made a magic keyboard mini for the iPhones lol

I remember some six or seven years ago the first time I've been roasted for a comment on a youtube video. And oh yeah, it's happened a ton since then lol. But I mentioned how my iPad Air 2 was faster than my Dell XPS 11, especially when browsing the web. The Air 2 as we know had the A8X, which was a generational leap in performance at that time (and the A9X an even bigger leap!), and the XPS 11 had an i5 'y' series processor (i think third or fourth gen). I was told in all caps, 'NO WAY YOUR iPAD IS FASTER THAN A CORE i5!!' This is all to say, many of us did not understand the importance of single core speed (not to mention storage speed) on a device. It's so, so important to the overall feel of 'fast.' That's why a $800 M1 Mac Mini can browse the web faster than the most expensive Mac Pro. This is all to say --- the M1's cores no longer provide the latest and greatest single core speed (nor multicore speed for that matter). I just feel personally, in my own humble opinion, that it would be a disappointment if we get a variant of the M1 in the next iMac Pro. I really hope the 12-core CPU rumor somehow, in some way I don't understand, means the iMac Pro's processor will be a variant of at least the A15. And we know Apple had to stunt the A15, as it did for the A14, in the iPhone due to the requisite cooling which is limited by such a small form factor (and a lack of a great cooling solution, let's be honest). So I think an A15 Turbo, or M2 Pro/Pro Max, will just make we tech fans feel better about our purchase. I know Apple's using, re-using and re-re-using the M1 in different variants is an important cost saving measure, and that this has resulted in the generous pricing we have received as compared to other OEMs, but selfishly, if I'm spending $5,000 for a computer, I really want the bleeding edge of tech, and not something that an Intel furnace (as you so eloquently put it, Rene, lol) beats in multicore, and especially single-core, speed.

As far as I could tell, the iPad Pro is mighty powerful but ... we don't have a reason for such power. Doing this on the iPhone, I'd need a reason for such massive power and ... battery life drain.

A15 or M1 are the same chip modified. Look at single core performance so similar. I think maxtech channel got that IDEA. It will take some time until a new chip with better single core performance coming out

That was very confusing.

A14 tdp is 6W sustain. M1 tdp is 20-35W sustain And many people complain about battery and heat on phones nowadays and people still want to put M1 on it? No, buy a mac mini instead. Lmao

The only thing that leads me not to believe the rumors that the iPhone 14 pro will have a pill shaped notch is that Apple did say that the iPhone would have a three year lifecycle before being changed. Granted the regular 14’s will stay the same but something about that just doesn’t add up

This video made me hungry

The first 20 seconds deserves a like

I need that no clip in my life.

Maybe because M1 a 15W laptop cpu, and phones need to fit in a tighter power envelope.

It makes sense that iPhone would stick with A-series and M-series use a 2-year cadence. Apple needs to do something special with it's graphics cores though. It's being trounced in gaming & pro 3D and whilst this is small in marketshare, the propaganda wars are making it huge in mindshare. Let's hope those G15/G15X cores are packing some magic.

The only way to solve this is to delay iPhone altogether to align with Apple silicon 18-month refresh cycle, so the A16 will be renamed M3 mini, the first in M3 family. It shall be revealed alongside full M3 chip. This is due to the decline of iPhone demand as the silicon bubble resides. They can simply refresh A15 to a higher clock speed this year. So M3 séries chip should be the first to have hardware ray tracing acceleration in the form similar to Neural Engine, call it Ray Engine. Another reason to delay iPhone altogether is both A series and M series share exactly the same core architecture for both GPU and CPU. What I want for iPhone is to ditch efficiency core altogether as big cores are getting even more efficient, leaving 4 big cores only for iPhone. In regards of M series, the Mx Max chip should ditch efficiency cores altogether in favor of 16 big cores only to differentiate Mx Pro chips.

Ok, I can agree with almost everything you said-except for one thing. You tried to dismiss it at the very beginning. But really, weren’t successful. That is, Thunderbolt, or equivalent. I’ve been a big supporter of Lightning over USB C for the iPhone for several years now. But its time is now past, and Apple killed the last reason why it might still be viable. The lack of a need for high speed transfer. With the introduction of the various versions of Pro Rez for the iPhone, I can testify that there is right now, no viable way to get that off the phone in any reasonable amount of time. Sure, if you’re willing to let go of the phone for hours at a time while it transfers the data over, then yes, be that masochist. But most of aren’t willing to be. It’s not though I’m the only one commenting on this problem either. So, Apple needs to eliminate that bottleneck, which, even you have in other places, admitted exists. But you stayed away from that problem here. I would imagine, deliberately. But it won’t go away. We NEED much higher transfer speeds. Speeds that every Mac and iPad user can utilize, and even those Windows users who might want to do it (after all, the large majority of iPhone owners ARE Windows users!). This needs to addressed in the iPhone 14. So a chip that includes one Thunderbolt controller, or something else with a true high speed rate has to be included. Look, Apple themselves has now set us upon this road of expectations. They’ve disappointed us before by starting down a path and abandoning it. I hope they don’t do it again.

The answer is absolutely *NO* . Reason: battery size limitations and heat dissipation, even if the iPhone 14 goes with vapor chamber cooling. They'll use the A16 with the possible CPU cores derived from the ARMv9 design.

The amount of words spilled because A14X was named M1 M1 X's the iPhone chip, no X chips for iPhone, EZ

I still using my old iphone 5se , need upgrade to iphone 13 , hell no , I’ll wait for the 14 🤣

The battery health is terrible now imagine if it had M2 smh 😂.

iPhone doesn’t need M1 , iPhone already smokes all the competition with its current chipsets . Plus M1 would kill iPhone batteries

I am confused.

I would like to see a pro max iPhone with an M series chip that will run macOS when docked with a thunderbolt port. I think that it has the potential to sell like hotcakes. $1500 shipped with MacOS only when docked, standard iOS the rest of the time.

I my best guess is iPad will be able to operate MacOS . The only those who need Mac will be who needs extreme. Power like M100

I'll switch to the iPhone 14 Pro Max if Apple switches to USB-C.

All iPhones need right now is better and better battery management/savings and heat reduction. We really don’t more speed, for now.

A16 Bionic 5 core GPU is as fast as M2 10 core GPU

Of course it’s not coming to the iPhone. Are you planning a video about why Apple isn’t going to put an A15 in the watch series 8? 😆

M1 in an iPhone? It’s based on the A14, an iPhone 12 chip….

Apple need to focus on SOFTWARE SOFTWARE SOFTWARE SOFTWARE. Did I say SOFTWARE.

We’re gonna get to a point where there is more and more diversions between the phones and computers. They need a new phone chip every year. Soon we’re going to be at a point where the macs only get new chips every 2-3-4 years, remember Intel anyone. The phone can’t be better than a Mac. And it can’t be all GPU.

… Why does this need an explainer? Is there anyone out there who ever thought the M1 would fit in a phone?

Need to sort out how long iPhone battery last after a charge in this day and age they are crap

Portland, JAMAICA in the Building !!!!!!!

I’m not asking for M1. Just USB-C That’s it

Well said Rene! The iPhone doesn’t need an M chip!

We don’t want the jr we want the the real thing

The one movie le seul

An M chip on an Iphone is asking for too much already

M1 in the iphone ? Give me a break !

Don’t Give a hoot what chips are in the phone. Just bought the M1 iPad Pro, and really regret it! Apple of course didn’t bother to tell me that my external Usb-C SSD disks wouldn’t work on it! Now it us quite useless to me! The typical arrogance of Apple!

The special affects is garbage

Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 has a performance close to A14 but the wattage is close to M1, so M1 in an iPhone is technically doable lol

I like your videos, your content but, hell, i hate your ad at the end of your every videos !

i really hope they add M2 to the iPhone's❤️🔥

Apple A16 processor exposure: 4nm process, CPU single core upgrade back to 20%+ Sep 26, 2021 in Apple, News, Tech Gaint 0 Apple A16 Bionic Processor Exposed: What Are The Details ! (image credit : TechnoSports) Performance of the A15 Bionic Processor on the iPhone 13 is average. The GB5 CPU single core is around 9% faster than the A14 due to an increase in main frequency of 8%. Furthermore, multi-core is 15% quicker than single-core. GPU performance is uncompromised, the version with 5 cores showing a 38 percent gain in overall performance. Apple has lost A-series chip team executives in the last two years. As a result, the CPU design of the A14 Bionic and A15 Bionic CPUs is nearly identical. The Apple A16 Bionic chip is slated to undergo core replacement at this level. According to reports, the A16 bionic chip is manufactured using TSMC’s 4nm process. Larger CPU cores are upgraded to Avalanche, while smaller cores (efficiency cores) are upgraded to Blizzard. Process-level transistor advancements are limited. These are the replacements for the A14 Bionic Firestorm + Icestorm and A15 Bionic Firestorm + Icestorm combos, respectively. Until to the A13 Bionic, each iteration of Apple’s A-series processors saw a 20 percent increase in single-core performance. Starting with the Apple A16 Bionic chip, similar advancements are predicted. Despite the fact that the A15 processor has 27% more transistors than the A14, the transistor density (number of transistors per square millimeter) under the N5P (5nm enhanced version) has only increased by 1%, according to agency calculations. ADDITIONALS → The 4nm Process To Be Used In The Apple A16 Bionic. Apple’s iPhone 12 series smartphones were the company’s first to have 5nm CPUs. At the same time, network sources claim that the company is already planning a technical process improvement for future new items. Experts from the analytical firm Trend Force stated this in a recent study, naming the projected release dates for the first American-branded chips made utilizing the 4nm manufacturing technology. The report also includes an estimate for 2022, when Apple is expected to convert to 4-nanometer technology for producing microcircuits at a Taiwanese chipmaker’s facilities. The Apple A16 Bionic will be the first CPU of the new generation. It’s probable that the ARM family of Apple M1 CPUs for laptops will see similar improvements

Too many movie memes are crammed in this video, it's distracting IMO!

M 1st

Yawn!!!

Rene, I’m really sorry to be annoying and I know it’s one of your favorite mannerisms, but this has been bugging me. If they shipped a new iphone “every year, on the year,” it would be shipping on January first. “Every hour on the hour” means at the top of the hour. So “every year on the year” would imply at the beginning of the year. Or at the very least, at the same time each year. Which is not always true, they don’t always ship things at consitantly the same time every year. So it’s not “on the year,” it’s just every year. Thank you for indulging my pedantry.

Tone your voice down