Rhino is great at accuracy, but not great at fixing how artists build and alter as we go. Rhino likes a straight-forward plan. You often start building something, make a decision, and then re-start from scratch with the math in mind. Watching that process, and how fast you work even when starting from the beginning, is very informative, especially once you're deep into a project and the dang boolean fails. "Just start again..." isn't a disaster to the project with your working method.
Master, If we want that Pipe as same diameter from everywhere, Should draw two Polylines from TOP view at the irregular overlapping then Trim it and Blend both surface ?? I learnt it from your another videos only 🙏😌 thank you
@@PJChenJewelryDesign so the first two cases seems actually to be a rhino bug. You provide a solution but you loose accuracy. I have a lot of times problems with rhino booleans. I end up manually explode split delete and join again individual surfaces. But in cases like yours that's extremely complicated.
Is it only me who thinks that shifting object 0.001 unit is not a good solution? Maybe I am expecting to much from a CAD software (eg. to be precise)? Can anyone with more experience comment on that?