Thank you, an unbiased legal analyst Sara Azari - Wonderful!!!! Thanks for bringing her on Brian Entin!! I started with you from the very beginning of this case - out in the cold.
She is usually heavily defense oriented to the point of annoying. Not so bad today because the defense is wasting time on a “Motion to Reconsider” a prior finding by the court. Although Sara was reminding listeners viewers that “new” evidence is a prerequisite to filing such a motion, moving parties rarely pay due respect to that rule. What the may claim is new info quite often isn’t. Instead it’s a novel way of spinning facts already established or known.
Aweee I love that your dogs are all cozy in their beds behind you, Brian , you can tell how much they are a part of your life and I love that, and I hope you feel better real soon, it’s going around, I was sick for an entire two weeks with the same thing.
Exactly.. prosecution wanted to avoid Preliminary because they have lack of Evidence that would not pass with preliminary trial.. so they pulled Grand jury that would indict a ham sandwich.
There’s no proof , zero. You can’t even place him there and that’s what the prosecutors fear . That will become obvious if the info we know doesn’t change.
I love you Brian! First saw you in Idaho on ‘News Nation’ reporting on the 4 beautiful students who were ‘horrifically slaughtered’ in Nov of 2022! You are an excellent reporter/journalist! & have the nicest personality! & such a handsome guy! God Bless you 🙏 Stay Safe & Get Well…😘
The defense has consistently asked for motions to be sealed. They shouldn't be able to have it both ways. This is more time wasting IMO. Also, one reason for sealing motions having to do with the grand jury is BECAUSE THE GRAND JURY TESTIMONY IS SECRET. Things they talked about at the grand jury will NOT COME OUT NOW BECAUSE IT IS SEALED FOR GOOD. Defense keeps asking for the indictment to be tossed because grand jury testimony is not "beyond a reasonable doubt". They keep harping on that. DUH---That is NOT the standard for the grand jury! Beyond a reasonable doubt is the standard for CONVICTION in a TRIAL.
@@trisha4797 that's ann Taylor.. saying she claims she has exculpatory evidence.. but it's nonsense. She wants to pick at the timeline to search for more Avenues to explore..its just what attorneys do. When asked by prosecution what she's talking about. She can't answer. Cuz its bs... if she says she knows beth has exculpatory evidence. How would she know? bk was never there he claims 😆
It gives the impression that he has said these things in hopes of creating doubt on potential jurors, since this case has such a following. But so far his alibi stinks. And he seems guilty, imo. It's not like he's a popular, beloved guy. He has been socially awkward and creepy towards women for years. This should be an interesting trial.
@@jazzyg530 right... if he had a legit alibi he wouldn't have been charged.. he refused to give his dna and they had to get a warrant to take the dna from his mouth swab. that's very telling, he's just a coward imo and just going to run this until the wheels fall off
I think he said that to intimidate the witness. The public is going after her as it is. So if she has valuable information it would only get worse. If she knows anything i would bet she recognized him after he was arrested and he wanted to neutralize her testimony.@@trisha4797
Long drive my himself isn’t too far fetched, personally, I do it all the time and I know some people that do the same. No it doesn’t help for having to give an alibi in this case, but, it could be the truth. (Not saying he’s innocent or guilty)
When you go for long drives by yourself, do you usually drive down the same dead end street 4 times in a different town? Of all the streets in Moscow and Pullman BK could have chosen, he just happened to drive past a house where 4 murders took place that night. That sounds far fetched.
@@johnmoon7028 and also coincidentally had his DNA appear under a victim’s body. Compelling and pretty darn straight forward. Yet, Probergers are continually challenged by the “confusing” details of this case!
still not confirmed whether that was his car seen at the house, besides there would be alot of cameras in pullman capturing his car yet no evidence of that....@@johnmoon7028
Hope you feel better!! I watch you all the time and you look so much younger than I thought you were!! You work so hard, I guess that’s where the early gray hair came from. Feel better soon, Brian. Get some rest if you can.
There is no way they will dismiss the indictment. Even if there is prosecutorial misconduct, the remedy would be to throw out that specific evidence, not dismiss the charges. my guess is this is just housekeeping and nothing eventful.
O they're just gonna throw out Bethany Funkes' exculpatory evidence, huh ? That ain't right. Should've been a FAIR pre trial as was initially agreed upon.
Very much agree but unfortunately, we, as spectators, carry very little power when it comes to "death penalty" prosecutorial and defense procedures. Still waiting and wanting to know what we don't know yet is frustrating to the hilt. Gotta be patient I guess and realize that every tiny detail the defense wants to argue almost has to be granted in order to lessen the chance of any appeal based on ineffective counsel ... I guess
WTF are you talking about? You want justice? How about the Prosecution handing over all the evidence they have. How about they f-ing run their family tree bull with the other 3 unidentified male dna found near the victims. You really think 1 single person was responsible for the killing of 4 young adults, 1 being a 6’4 male well over 200 pounds? Come on! The roomies were in on it and it will eventually come out. LE s stupid a**es put all their eggs in one basket, similar to Delphi. SMH 🤦♀️
Hi from Liverpool UK 🇬🇧 ' Oh I hate this lol 😂 We are 9_10 hrs ahead of you: WILL IT LIVE IN COURT? I have to stay up most of FRIDAY night to wait for you to report 😅 one eye open & dozing off" or get up at 3>4am to watch what is happening 😂 Love watching your channel in UK 🇬🇧 Thank you for all your incredible videos * keeping us all updates 😊 😊 Hope you & your family 👪 get beaten soon ❤ 😊 x
Could Dylan Mortensen have looked out her window and saw someone get in and drive away in an Elantra? Her window was on the side of the house and the car was parked a little uphill from there. She had to have seen blood on carpet outside her room in the morning when she came out to the restroom by Xana's room and there was supposedly a footprint outside her door. Xana had to have turned on a light to get the doordash order. If a camera picked that up, it might give some answers. Justice for Idaho 4.
According to my POV about Idaho case ALL HIS CELLPHONE PINGS AND HIS TRACE FOR BEING AROUND THAT HOUSE FOR MANY TIMES AND FOR BEING THERE AROUND THE MURDER TIME ALL IS CORRECT BUT, as I have thought and told continuously he followed the activities of that house for a period of time AS A THIRD PARTY OBSERVER AND NOT THE KILLER! But the prosecutors wants to relate all those signs of his presence there to the murdering the students. The reason for presenting that alibi by Ann Taylor is “ok he has the habit of driving around at night” WHICH IS NOT A CRIME 🤷♀️for now until the trial comes up and BRYAN HAS A PROPER MOMENT AND NOT BEHIND THE CLOSED DOORS TO RELEASE MANY UNEXPECTED EVIDENCE THERE, IN ORDER NOT TO LEAVE ANY CHANCE FOR THE PROSECUTORS TO MANIPULATE THE EVIDENCE AND INFORMATION. Otherwise, if the defendant tells whatever he knows about the case before trial and in an inappropriate “time”, in fact he had given the prosecutors the opportunity to manipulate and cover up the evidence! SURPRISE!!!!!!!!!
Wasn't the IGG work STARTED but not finished since they obtained BK's father's DNA from the trash in PA and were able to get a partial match to BK? In other words, IGG was NOT used to identify BK. It COULD have been used but wasn't since it wasn't necessary.
No, courts docs state they did use IGG to ID Kohberger. From there they got the trash and matched his father to suspect. They can't use IGG in court because it isn't a legit way to ID someone, and I'm sure Anne will school us all on that.
18:36 - WHAT!? THE BURDON OF PROOF IS ON THE PROSECUTION! Not the other way around. If a defendant can place a witness on the stand proving his whereabouts in aid to his defense - he should be allowed to do so. I thought defendant have the right to defend themselves AND keep the burdon of proof WHERE IT BELONGS!!
Poor Brian, am sorry you are sick again, you work so hard get well soon. BK guess he has alot of input on his hearings. Go figure 28 yrs 🤔 , that seems a little out there. Sara you are so informative, &Brian make a good team. 😊
People frequently talk about noises heard, that may have come from the murder scene. Noises pick-up on nearby video surveillance cameras. Noises such as, a dog bark, a thud..but why has the sounds of screaming & or yelling never mentioned, or recorded?? Surely with such brutal murders of 4 people, their voices, their screams were not heard?? Why is no one mentioning this? ?
do you have to protect defendants' rights "especially" with a death penalty case? I'd think you have to protect all defendants' rights vociferously, I wonder if equally
Isn’t Sara cute? Grounded, nice, smart and classy! This trial is not coming soon enough. It’s another reminder that we may be looking at 2025, is painful for everyone. It’s a process!
12:55 - Hopefully its the ELECTROPHEROGRAM CHARTS they used to claim their sample matches the defendant. The law should allow the FULL TRANSPARENT RELEASE of all Electropherogram Charts & subsequent analysis used to attain the arrest warrant. I love that prior to Dec 29th the I.G.G was consequential enough for a Judge to issue an arrest warrant based on those IGG results. BUT THEN POST DEC 29TH - SUDDENLY IT ALL FLIP - and now the I.G.G is "totally inconsequential" and its "just a tip." There is so clearly corruption happening in this case. THAT ALONE is the only possible explanation for all these unnecessary, unprecedented, harmful, and HISTORIC seals of Secrecy. If everything is on the up & up then lets see an OPEN TRANSPARENT PRELIMINARY HEARING! Should be no problem if theres nothing to hide right!?
Why doesnt the book that idaho university president wrote and released before trial violate the gag order? Can the release of such a book by the university president in some way be considered jury tampering considering that it was released before a jury was even picked? this case is taking place in state also? How could they allow this book to be released prior to trial legally?
Why is everybody conceding due process if grand jury gets wrong instructions than you drop charges and refile I.e … PRELIM and change of venue emminint!
