Why did Cadillac Lose Popularity? The company's history. 

They probably think nobody will notice. They only know about Datsuns and Toyotas.

These millennials/gen Z are all f’d up……get you to it

Drink glasses with magnetized bases.

@@jamesslick4790 I think those were only provided in the 1957-58 Cadillac Eldorado Brougham.

@@billolsen4360 Yep! That's true.

Not really have a 2011 dts platinum with a Northstar get complements from newer ct6 cadillacs allday

1) Most young men couldn't afford a Cadillac brand new. 2) Cadillac's reliability only became bad when they deviated from their proper luxury car specifications and tried to become like a foreign car. 3) Luxury cars did not have great re-sale value because a used car is not a luxury. 4) Before Cadillac tried to become foreign-illac, Cadillac dealers gave superb service. Cadillac started losing ground BEFORE those unfortunate developments.

@@RageHP-RageHorsePower Anything 2000 and after is NOT a Cadillac. After GM's rebranding of the division into a 'Euro-sport' model, only the name Cadillac remained. It was not and still is not the luxury car it once was and was famous for. Most of those 'old men' to which the OP refers switched to Lincoln. Mostly Town Cars. The United States hasn't made a true luxury car since The Lincoln Town Car ceased production in 2011.

@@michaelbenardo5695 YOUNG men were never meant to be able to afford a Cadillac. While many people today call the traditional Cadillac an 'old man's car' and while many old men DID in fact drive them, it was not only for them. Cadillac was a status symbol for either wealthy people or for professionals who had 'made it' and therefore, many owners were middle aged. In fact, when I was a boy, most of the people I knew who had Cadillacs were in their 40's and 50's. I remember my uncle (by marriage) bought a 1973 Eldorado brand new and he was only 41 at the time. Come to think of it, the only 'old' man I knew back then who had one was his father. As I got older, I DID know a couple of old men and women who had them, but they also had them when they were younger. Also I disagree with you on the resale value. The car itself is what was luxurious. Not the age of it or the fact that it was bought new or used. In fact, I knew a wealthy lady who bought a brand new Coupe DeVille every year. Always the same color. She had a deal set up at the dealership that every year come trade in time, a doctor would buy her old one. They were like showroom condition anyway and had perhaps only 5,000 miles on them when she traded them.

I really disagree with you about GM products. I've owned, if memory serves me correctly, 19 cars in my lifetime. All of them were GM's except for 4. Three were Lincoln Town Cars and one was a Jeep Grand Cherokee. The Jeep was a piece of junk which gave me problems starting on the second day of ownership (I bought it new). Two of the Lincolns were good but one gave me problems which could not be diagnosed and therefore, not fixed. All the GM's, mostly Cadillacs, had there issues but nothing major and nothing that could not be reasonably repaired. Did you ever hear the saying 'what's good for General Motors is good for the country?'