Why did the Umayyad Caliphate Collapse? 

No,, Abd-al-Rahman I became Emir of "Emirate of Cordoba". Abd-al-Rahman III is the one became caliph

Wrong he became the Amir of Cordoba not the caliph because the only caliph is "the Abbasid caliph abi alabas The butsher"

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

I know the story , it' was like a thriller movie

It’s all propaganda fake history anyways, that’s all Islam is, the Abassids created Islam, there’s no historical evidence or record for it before the Abassids

Do you mean after they conquered half the roman Empire and all of Persia 😂

@@ibrahimmustafa2481 oh boy here comes rhe copium from arabs lol

@@shadowgod1797 Sounds like you are still trying to cope from the fact that Muslims owned the romans and ended them for good lol

@@shadowgod1797 no it's true tho

@@ibrahimmustafa2481 that doesn't make their comment any less factual, so what's your point exactly? you can conquer half of a country, then still lose key battles to said country that cause another country to wipe yours out because of those battles. unless you're trying to brag about one point in history, to which my question would be.. how'd that work out for you today?

The prophet is mostly wrong so they probably didn’t really believe it. That’s why the Umayyads caliphate only lasted a mere 100 years, it was them that organized Islam and the Quran(fixed some of the lies and added more lies)

​@@TopagendadollaYet another conspiracy theorist...🤦‍♂️

​@@History_Teller1250 No he isn't! There is no conspiracy theory in his words.

The Awaited Mahdi: What in God’s name? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I am Syrian, may God have mercy on our ancestors Hisham bin Abdul Malik, Abdul Rahman Al-Dakhel, Muslima bin Abdul Malik, and many grandparents 💔🇸🇾

seriously??? i didn't know that

where can i find evidence of that

Exactly

who

thats what im saying

Arabs were a minority ruling over a overwhelmingly non Arab population

Caliphate's main ethnicity was Arab

He talks about Muslims, Islam was new to them then, I even doubt it reached 10%

@@Teknite nope

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

@@ghostd69 yk how someone could proofread the video more easily? By seeing the sources given

@@ghostd69 anyone can edit on wikipedia

Ummayad weren’t great neither good they were mfs trash rulers

But losers do you mean us shiites ? Also which failures ? We aren’t failing in the current day , not in the slightest . We blame muawiya for and yazid for every bad thing today for preventing the rule of the imams ( and therefore would have established the messianic nation back then )

The loser?your means the grandson of Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, who was defeated by the Umayyads Sunni muslim☕️

@@Amen6magi he means the shiites since an imam ( i forgot which one ) said that there were many opportunities for the messianic nation to be established , but they were always ruined so far ( once by muawiya and once by yazid ) . But he was blaming the people not muawiya and yazid ( although they are both bad people as agreed by all shiites )

@@U.K.N he say (loser) the person lose infront of omayad

So True

Most of them converted to Islam and became Muslims; a minority still live in Iran in the city of Yazd, mostly and some went to India

Because this channel is a bit biased. Cherry picking information sometimes instead of the whole picture. Didn't say, mention anything about the help Constantinople received by Khan Tervel and the Bulgarian army who cleared the fields infront of the walls.

@@Thefendi- Iran did not become a Muslim majority until during Seljuk rule

​@@westsidermetalhead4997 Trevel khan and his blugars army did nothing important but rather than attacking an retreated army during their withdrawl and the army were suffering dieases and hungry and cold weather and greek fire playing big role destroying major army

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

Berber never fought umayyad for 70 years old it was just some battles and berber revolt was eventually crushed in battle al asnam and al qarn, algeria was remain under umayyad and people of tanger in morcco pledge of allegiance to handela ibn safwan who crushed berber revolt in battle al asnam in chlef modern algeria

Abbasids were Arabs bruh, they were descendants of uncle Abbas of prophet Muhammad,but tolerant towards non-arabs

"of Morocco"

@@ghostd69 handled bent safwan barely only partially maintained the rebellion and within years Sufrites of Warfjuma took over Kairouan deleting out the quraish family. At best Eastern Algeria had remained under their rule for a bit.

He was Persian Khorossani actually

والله جدا استغربت من المعلومات والمغالطات في هذا الفيديو. ونشرت تعليقا بالانجليزيه تقريبا نفس الكلام الذي انت نشرته. أغرب ما سمعت: "معاوية كان يخالف تعاليم الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم عندما كان كاتبا له". ما هذه التفاهات؟ ليته ذكر المصادر.... رضي الله عن معاوية وعن ابوه وعن أخوه.

So, basically this video is worthless? Good to know. And thank god for google translate

جعلك الله مع معاوية وجعلنا مع علي آمين 🤲 ​@@Abdulrahman_Hi

​@@ElectronFieldPulse This video is very much worthless as they put a lot of emphasis on the unethicality of Muawiya. Within Islamic history, there are the Shia sources who extremely exaggerate the corruption of Muawiya and all other companions of the prophet peace be upon them all. To give you such examples, Shias claim historic accuracy of the following: - Omar burned down Fatimah's home. - Omar broke into Fatimah's home with brute force, making the door's nail shoot out toward Fatimah's pregnant belly, breaking her ribs, and causing her miscarriage. - Omar forced Ali to allow him to rape one of Ali's daughters. - Omar dragged Ali through on the dirt to force Ali's allegiance. All of Omar's presumable actions happened under the watchful eye of the very same Ali, the revered all-powerful Shia character. They claim the above (AND MANY MORE) without proof. They convert hearsay, hardly even a rumor, to facts. They have no chain of narrations, nor biographies of the person delivering these information, no proof. Now imagine taking your information for a historic video you are about to create from the very same people of make historic accuracy of the above mentioned incidents...

@@Anas.Irfan_481 هل ممكن نتناقش بأدب, حتى نتوصل لنتيجة ترضي الله سبحانه ةتعالى؟ هل ممكن نتناقش مسألة عصمة الإثني عشر؟ هل هم حقا معصومون؟ وما الدليل على ذلك من القرآن والسنه؟

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

@@ghostd69 I literally began to suspect that these channels depend on Wikipedia as the primary source of information The funny thing is that even Wikipedia says that the army that put the Abbasids in power was Arab "Most of the Khorasani soldiers who brought the Abbasids to power were Arabs.[160]"

​@@Faisal-pb5guthen who were khorashani???

@@rambikshprasad4648 Iranian and turks. But we talking about arabs tribes and army living in khoursan

@@ghostd69 Khorasani is a geographical description, like a Syrian or Iraqi description, not linked to a specific ethnicity

Hispania

Does it really matter bro?

​@@nuncasaberas5926Yup Hispania.

Hispania or Iberian Peninsula

​@@nuncasaberas5926Hispania is given by romans.

Are you talking about Wiz?

​@@MuffinManUSNwhat is wiz?

Ali infact never tried to remove anyone , he is well known for not revolting against Abu bakr even tho his relatives and followers told him to do so , he did not so the islamic world would not get into fighting eachother , the next rashudin calips were so unpopular that when 3 of them died people Asked ali to come rule , which he did and fighted many rebels.

Ali was treated unfairly as was his sons. 🤷‍♂️ It’s kind of ironic with how Muslims today, especially the concerts in America seem to become Arabized. They take Arab names and wear Arab clothing even though they live in NYC or Philly. Its ironic as it’s always been one reason for revolts in the past. The people didn’t like being forced to forget everything from before when they converted to Islam. It’s also ironic as historically, Muhammad’s family was treated unfairly. Ali and Fatimah as well as Husain and Hassan and the rest of the family were all treated unfairly and you can see that is the case for generations. Treated unfairly by rulers who didn’t like the attention they got. But now a day the history is ignored 🤷‍♂️ Muslims have always been their own worst enemies lol

Wow bro you couldn't have said it more. Most of Muslims today choose to follow the ways of the Ummayeds and Abbasid Islam rather the Islam of Muhammad and his ahul al bayt. That's why you see Shia fight for Palestinian while the rest watch, no some of them even help the zionist. ​@@YaakovEzraAmiChi

Changing teams and being "caliph" with violence. Being racist and murdering your political opponents Has nothing to do with Islam...

Technicaly No , cause they were not even connected to prophet himself

Of course it did 😏 Umayyads drove the final nail into the Sunni-Shia Schism 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 to bring an end to the Fitna Wars 🤪

@@tnrz5696 Do you understand my question?

@@sulemanmanaffabdul4699 yes i'm sure that my answer is good enough

Persian abumuslim killed six hundred thousand Arabs.

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

@@ghostd69 but he killed six hundred thousand Arabs.

Crazy How People Dont Know Even A Bit About History But Still Say Their Opinion As If They Are 100% Right

​@user-hv2jb1zq1r it's all an Op-Ed anymore

Crazy how humans attacks other religios groupe, but forget, that christians even killed, rape and Forced conversion. The juws are was the First one….

He clearly mentioned that the majority of the Umayyad population were non-Muslims and that's the Umayyads were tolerant to other faiths.. The 'violence' mentioned in the video was suppressing revolutions... Because well allowing them would break the country into pieces

@@MazyarGheidi Yeah totally agree with you.

What do you expect from ignorant people North Africa Barbaria or Tamazgha was the graveyeard of Arab armies. Also the Battle of Tours and Poitiers in which many Umayyad soldiers died had an impact on the Umayyads

@@mauromaurito532 All those revolt was crushed Berber berber revolt was eventually crushed in battle al asnam and al qarn, algeria was remain under umayyad and people of tanger in morcco pledge of allegiance to handela ibn safwan who crushed berber revolt in battle al asnam in chlef modern algeria and battle of tour or poitiers is same battle it was skrmkish and party raid didn't impact on umayyad and umayyas was countine with raid into francia after that battle

@@ghostd69 no not true Tunisia remained under Arab authority but the whole of Algeria and Morocco and Mauretania was ruled by Amazigh tribes the Kutama and Senhaja tribes ruled eastern Algeria the Fatimids who ousted the Aghlabids were helped by the Kutama who lived in Eastern Algeria

@@ghostd69 no after the Battle of Tours and Poitiers which was due to the arrogance of the Arab racistst never never dared the Muslims go north to France or Belgium there is even a large graveyeard called Balat Al Shuhada look it up. The Warfajuma berbers also attacked North Tunisia

​@@mauromaurito532 East algeria was also under umayyad and battle al asnam took place in west algeria crushed berber and also abd rahman al fahiri marched into west algeria and entered telemcen and cities around chasing down rest of berber rebles. Kutama and sanhaja was also crushed by abbasid general mohamed ibn al ash't al khouzai

Nah they only attacked after the Romans did no less than 100% of the work

The Bulgars just saw a way to get some loot.

@@westsidermetalhead4997 Trevel khan and blugars army didn't do anything they didn't apporach consantinople wall till arab withdrawl, blugars attacked umayyad during their retreat they didn't help in raise of siege on city

You literally look like a redditor, what would you know 😂​@@SamBrockmann

Look it's a western wannabe.

Oh the berbers, the pioneers of human freedom...oh wait they were a slaver nation

​@@Based_Beeastlook it's an "eastern" sigma wannabe

​@@valeriodelaurentiis5614At least he is a sigma not gay.

@HH-yj3jc At least his alfa not a pedophile

mainly due to greed, umayad refused to arabize and islamize locals(genocide/eviction/conversion) just so they can tax more and not "waste" money while they did it. as harsh as it is, those are one of the absolute necessities to ensure long term unity.(even today arabs have far less dna relations than french/english/germans)

😁... because they face civil wars

@@major2707 they were evil and racist

Cry ajam😂😂

@@xirvt you forgot Abu Muslim khorasani and buyids 😂😂

@@shia_pan_iranist keep worshipping 12 Arab men

In the ancient world, Asia's borders ended with China, no one in the heart of world knew what was beyond that

​@@Alqoaity Lol, so everyone was scared of going beyond the unknown lands?? 😂

@@LexlutherVII Europe colonized and enslaved your people. No one is afraid of you

He was mentioned in the video and even claimed that he was the one who defeated the Umayyads in Zab, although all Arab sources state that the one who defeated the Umayyads was Abdullah bin Ali, a member of the Abbasid dynasty.

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

true abu muslim regreted he helped arabs that he should have helped his fellow persians to take over persia again instead of helping abbasids what a shame

@@shadowgod1797 He did not regret that he helped the Arabs He regretted killing thousands of Muslims. You can read the correspondence between him and Caliph Al Mansur. He did not talk about Arabs, Persians, or any of the modern nationalist nonsense. In any case, he died as a scum begging pardon for his life from the Caliph

@@shadowgod1797 Helping arabs ? Without abbasid support abu muslim wouldn't do anything he was mawali to arab tribe working to them as an clothing trader and thanks to arab tribes who revolt aganist umayyad and delcaring in thrid fitna before abbasid start their revolt, he tried to take over persia but abu jafar al mansour stopped him plus he wasn't nationlist he was just Pledge of allegiance to abbasid

The video did not point anything about the Persian man who overthrow Umayyid caliphicate...

@@he4620 Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

Zaaar we poorsians defeated ummayad 😂😂😂😂😂 learn history poorsian

That's why we keep Bleach around

Kind of like today

As if romans and Byzantine greeks belonged to North Africa, middle east, gaul, breton?

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

Did you even made the effort to watch the video ?

It literally means God in Arabic.

There's no credible evidence to show or support a God in existence anywhere in reality.

True. So many religions and different beliefs​@@fresh-eggs

@@fresh-eggs you should say scientific evidence

@@jazimjamal7634 Nope. Because I am not making a case for science.

Lol wat

@Faris-bk6xu There exists no evidence of Islam in the 7th century. The Standard Islamic Narrative is a later fiction.

@@Faris-bk6xu There exists no evidence of Islam in the 7th century. The Standard Islamic Narrative is a later fiction.

​@fantasia55 Lol 😂😂😂😂

It wasn’t a “Moroccan” revolt since Morocco didn’t exist back then. And the Berbers failed to take the Umayyad provincial capital of Kairouan.

Moroccan? Lol. Morocco didn’t even exist. Stop embarrassing yourself Bousbirian.

@-Blast But the fatimed berbers take kairawan and the all of Tunisia

​@@-BlastIt was Moroccan since vast majority of the rebelliers were from Morocco and by the way Morocco existed as the kingdom of Mauretania

​​@@blutherhood3893Kingdom of Mauretania isn't related to the Moroccan identity which started with the Idrisids. Mauretanian tribes were also in nowdays Algeria and Numdian tribes were also present in nowdays Morocco. You Moroccan nationalists and Algerian nationalists shoudn't touch our Berber history. Alot of Houara Berbers and Ifranid Berbers in the Trara, Aures mountains formed around half of all Berber rebels

Cito power in syria

No learn history,poor immigrant

@@xirvt ?????

@@rambikshprasad4648 ?

Probably because Cordoba the most prominent city in Al-Andalus was in Spain and not Portugal and it held more Importance.

Tolerant COMPARED to their contemporary. Take, say, 19th century Russian Empire with Kosher Tax, and (occasionally) conscriptions, plus pogroms.

The umayyad caliphate even forced jizya on Muslims native berbers

Maybe they are tolerant for other faiths with same race but we are pretty sure that they weren't tolerant with the non-Arab Muslims

@@samiman5606 please post your sources on that claim.

They didn't really care about your religious they just wanted a reason to tax you...some became Muslims but they still taxed them

They were nonetheless a very influential empire, you gotta acknoweledge that

​@@valeriodelaurentiis5614acknowledgia

@@valeriodelaurentiis5614 altho i think the abbasid which started the islamic golden age were even more influential

They spread Islam ,most of the theological , scientific and intellectual things were in Abbasid era not to mention their heritage to other Islamic states such as Seljuks, Mamluks and Ottomans@@MazyarGheidi

​@@valeriodelaurentiis5614 Abbasid took knoweldge from umayyad and their gov system and etc they learnt many things from umayyad

Persians were minority in khorasan?😂😂😂even today the population is majority persian speaking

@@darthpigeon At that time they were a minority The majority of the Khorasanis spoke the Sogdian, Bactrian, and Khwarezmian languages Dari Persian spread after Islam under the rule of the East Iranian/Turkic dynasties

@Faisal-pb5gu depends on what part of khorasan you're speaking if we speaking the western part of khorasan(which was the most populated part) persian had become the major language replacing parthian by the late years of sassanids

Yes, they'll continue to rule the Iberian peninsula for about 4 centuries

5:28 Again, WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? How can he oppose the prophet's beliefs? He would be immediately charged with blasphemy and the companions of the prophet will absolutely not tolerate such acts (death sentence most likely). Where are you getting this information from? And for you to portray it as "a matter of fact". If you are citing your ridiculous information from Shia sources, then that explains the exagerrated resentment they have for Muawiyah may Allah be pleased with him. This is nonsensical and unprofessional...🤢

6:05 this is getting ridiculous. He is totally getting his information from Shia sources only. Not only that, he is totally misinterpreting the shia sources, making ridiculous conclusions shias didn't even claim...

I am Syrian, may God have mercy on our ancestors Hisham bin Abdul Malik, Abdul Rahman Al-Dakhel, Muslima bin Abdul Malik, and many grandparents 💔🇸🇾

Actually Ummayads were opposed by all medinites, meccans, Kufis and berbers

Yes there is

yea. Really proves the point of being a religion of peace

What's this supposed to even mean

@@Ramyy5123 hahahaha. Without lies Islam dies! The main religion of the Umayyad Caliphate was Islam. The Umayyad Caliphate, which ruled from 661 to 750 CE, was the second of the four major caliphates established after the death of the Prophet Muhammad. The Umayyad rulers were Muslim and governed according to Islamic principles and laws.

@@Ramyy5123 Expansion of the Islamic Empire: The Umayyads significantly expanded the Islamic empire, spreading Islam across a vast territory that included parts of Asia, Africa, and Europe. Administration and Governance: They implemented an administrative system influenced by both Islamic principles and the existing Byzantine and Sassanian models. Arabic was made the official language of administration. Religious Practices: The Umayyad Caliphate supported the construction of mosques and Islamic centers of learning. Major cities such as Damascus, the capital, became important centers of Islamic culture and education.

Umayyad = 80% uninhabitable desert Rome = 20% uninhabitable desert

It's Morocco that caused the collapse of the Umayyad empire, Moroccan Berbers killed the Ummayad elite forces that the Abassids wouldn't be able to overcome and also caused other rebellions.

Thank God that I am Arab and also from Hijaz🇸🇦🔥

Was abbasid sunni or shia ?

@@deepworld7 sunni

Sunni

@@Poiyti سني