Why do Latter-day Saints believe Jesus Christ is Jehovah? Ep. 146 

As someone who was recently contacted by LDS and is genuinely curious in some pretty dense and unfortunately sometimes boring stuff .. I can not understate how awesome your usage of memes and references is. Whoever does the editing should get a raise man. Great video!

MANY people view the Trinity as “the central doctrine of the Christian religion.” According to this teaching, the Father, Son, and holy spirit are three persons in one God. Cardinal John O’Connor stated about the Trinity: “We know that it is a very profound mystery, which we don’t begin to understand.” Why is the Trinity so difficult to understand? The Illustrated Bible Dictionary gives one reason. Speaking of the Trinity, this publication admits: “It is not a biblical doctrine in the sense that any formulation of it can be found in the Bible.” Because the Trinity is “not a biblical doctrine,” Trinitarians have been desperately looking for Bible texts​-even twisting them-​to find support for their teaching. A Text That Teaches the Trinity? One example of a Bible verse that is often misused is John 1:1. In the King James Version, that verse reads: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God [Greek, ton the·onʹ], and the Word was God [the·osʹ].” This verse contains two forms of the Greek noun the·osʹ (god). The first is preceded by ton (the), a form of the Greek definite article, and in this case the word the·onʹ refers to Almighty God. In the second instance, however, the·osʹ has no definite article. Was the article mistakenly left out? Why is the Trinity doctrine so difficult to understand? The Gospel of John was written in Koine, or common Greek, which has specific rules regarding the use of the definite article. Bible scholar A. T. Robertson recognizes that if both subject and predicate have articles, “both are definite, treated as identical, one and the same, and interchangeable.” Robertson considers as an example Matthew 13:38, which reads: “The field [Greek, ho a·grosʹ] is the world [Greek, ho koʹsmos].” The grammar enables us to understand that the world is also the field. What, though, if the subject has a definite article but the predicate does not, as in John 1:1? Citing that verse as an example, scholar James Allen Hewett emphasizes: “In such a construction the subject and predicate are not the same, equal, identical, or anything of the sort.” To illustrate, Hewett uses 1 John 1:5, which says: “God is light.” In Greek, “God” is ho the·osʹ and therefore has a definite article. But phos for “light” is not preceded by any article. Hewett points out: “One can always . . . say of God He is characterized by light; one cannot always say of light that it is God.” Similar examples are found at John 4:24, “God is a Spirit,” and at 1 John 4:16, “God is love.” In both of these verses, the subjects have definite articles but the predicates, “Spirit” and “love,” do not. So the subjects and predicates are not interchangeable. These verses cannot mean that “Spirit is God” or “love is God.” Identity of “the Word”? Many Greek scholars and Bible translators acknowledge that John 1:1 highlights, not the identity, but a quality of “the Word.” Says Bible translator William Barclay: “Because [the apostle John] has no definite article in front of theos it becomes a description . . . John is not here identifying the Word with God. To put it very simply, he does not say that Jesus was God.” Scholar Jason David BeDuhn likewise says: “In Greek, if you leave off the article from theos in a sentence like the one in John 1:1c, then your readers will assume you mean ‘a god.’ . . . Its absence makes theos quite different than the definite ho theos, as different as ‘a god’ is from ‘God’ in English.” BeDuhn adds: “In John 1:1, the Word is not the one-and-only God, but is a god, or divine being.” Or to put it in the words of Joseph Henry Thayer, a scholar who worked on the American Standard Version: “The Logos [or, Word] was divine, not the divine Being himself.” Jesus made a clear distinction between him and his Father Does the identity of God have to be “a very profound mystery”? It did not seem so to Jesus. In his prayer to his Father, Jesus made a clear distinction between him and his Father when he said: “This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge of you, the only true God, and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ.” (John 17:3) If we believe Jesus and understand the plain teaching of the Bible, we will respect him as the divine Son of God that he is. We will also worship Jehovah as “the only true God.”

Love the build up to Jesus’s “I Am” Hilarious 😂😂

Just as I am about to NOT have a good day, David reminds me to have a good day at the end of every episode:) You're a Saint, David. The Latter-day kind.

In Psalm 110, to whom is Jehovah speaking? Who is sitting at his right hand? Thanks.

That mic drop scene with Christ claiming the "I Am" title actually got me to laugh, great editing guys!

Extremely clear and fun as always! Thank you so much for all the work you put in to bring us these videos!

Thanks for adding some nuance at the end. Around 4:00 you mention that some early church leaders used Jehovah to refer to God the Father. These include Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, John Taylor, and Wilford Woodruff as I recall. Making Jehovah into Jesus took some time as you noted. One thing that should be addressed perhaps in the future is that basically all biblical scholars use the terms Jehovah and Elohim to differentiate between two of the early sources for the books of the Torah. J and E sources are generally easy to differentiate. In stories like the flood and the creation, the story is told twice, once from an E perspective and once from a J perspective. So although having Jehovah (Christ) as the God of the old testament works from an LDS perspective, holding this view wouldn't get your through a beginning course in bible literature at a respected university.

2:44. That's NOT a proper translation. What jesus was trying the Jewish people was ...BEFORE ABRAHAM EXISTED......I ALREADY EXISTED. jehova name is God's name . No I AM...name . When he told Moises tell my people I AM...is sending you . I meant....ME . ( the God who keep his promises) sent you . THE JEWISH BIBLE SAYS I am who will be sent you . Which means.... I am the GOD who will be there for you . The GOD who will protect you and the God who always keep his promises SENT YOU . That is the meaning for that verse. Jesus verse has nothing to do with Exodus . The Jewish people had Abraham as their FATHER when it comes to religious leader , jesus told them....oh yeah, ? So you listening to him but don't wanna listening to me who has a higher Rank ? Before Abraham existed, I already existed in heaven. Cause I came from heaven ! That was the meaning of Jesus conversation with them. These I am...stuff came into existed around the year 325 of this era ,by the time the orthodox church and catholic church established the trinity teachings . You need to get deeper in this Jesus, jehova, trinity stuff my friend

So we are to have no other god before Jesus? If he is the one who gave the commands. It makes sense in the context of the triune God but not when they are separate beings. Genuinely curious.

Great info, thanks! PLEASE invite Rod Meldrum and Wayne May on to your program for a Book of Mormon geography video. I think you'll quickly find that their evidence for where the Book of Mormon lands is overwhelming and that most members of the church agree with them, but would be great to hear them in this Saints Unscripted format.

Excellent video. But I have a question; If Jesus is Jehovah in the old testament, in the old covenant the Abrahamic God then how would you explain this passage in the new testament, in the act of the apostles chapter 3 verse 13 and chapter 5 verse 30? I would appreciate it very much if you would answer me with Biblical bases. Thank you so much!

So when I'll read the Old Testament and see "Lord" I will think of Christ, then when I see what exactly...? I should think about God the father

Is God a Trinity? The Bible’s answer Many Christian denominations teach that God is a Trinity. However, note what the Encyclopædia Britannica states: “Neither the word Trinity nor the explicit doctrine appears in the New Testament . . . The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies.” In fact, the God of the Bible is never described as being part of a Trinity. Note these Bible passages: “Jehovah our God is one Jehovah.”-Deuteronomy 6:4. “You, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth.”-Psalm 83:18. “This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge of you, the only true God, and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ.”-John 17:3. “God is only one.”-Galatians 3:20. Why do most Christian denominations say that God is a Trinity?

HALLELUJAH (Hal·le·luʹjah). A transliteration of the Hebrew expression ha·lelu-Yahʹ, appearing first at Psalm 104:35. In the New World Translation it is nearly always translated “praise Jah, you people.” The expression occurs 24 times in the Hebrew Scriptures and, with the exception of Psalm 135:3 (“praise Jah,” NW), introduces and/​or concludes the Psalms in which it is found. (See Ps 112:1; 115:18; 146:1, 10; 147:1, 20; 148:1, 14; 149:1, 9; 150:1, 6.) This expression stands alongside “Amen” at the close of Book Four of Psalms (Ps 106:48), and a Greek form of it appears four times at Revelation 19:1-6, where the reference is to the joy experienced over the destruction of Babylon the Great and that associated with Jehovah’s beginning to rule as King

Reasons to know and use God’s name God must feel that his personal name, Jehovah, is important, because he included it thousands of times in the Bible.​-Malachi 1:​11. God’s Son, Jesus, repeatedly stressed the importance of God’s name. For instance, he prayed to Jehovah: “Let your name be sanctified.”​-Matthew 6:9; John 17:6. Those who come to know and use God’s name take the first steps in building a friendship with Jehovah. (Psalm 9:​10; Malachi 3:​16) Such a relationship enables them to benefit from God’s promise: “Because he has affection for me, I will rescue him. I will protect him because he knows my name.”​-Psalm 91:14. The Bible acknowledges: “There are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth, just as there are many ‘gods’ and many ‘lords.’” (1 Corinthians 8:​5, 6) Yet it clearly identifies the one true God by his name, Jehovah.​-Psalm 83:18.

What is the origin of the myth? “The impression could arise that the Trinitarian dogma is in the last analysis a late 4th-century invention. In a sense, this is true . . . The formulation ‘one God in three Persons’ was not solidly established, certainly not fully assimilated into Christian life and its profession of faith, prior to the end of the 4th century.”​-New Catholic Encyclopedia (1967), Volume 14, page 299. “The Council of Nicaea met on May 20, 325 [C.E.]. Constantine himself presided, actively guiding the discussions, and personally proposed . . . the crucial formula expressing the relation of Christ to God in the creed issued by the council, ‘of one substance with the Father.’ . . . Overawed by the emperor, the bishops, with two exceptions only, signed the creed, many of them much against their inclination.”​-Encyclopædia Britannica (1970), Volume 6, page 386. What does the Bible say? “Stephen, filled with the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at God’s right hand. ‘Look! I can see heaven thrown open,’ he said, ‘and the Son of man standing at the right hand of God.’”​-Acts 7:55, 56, The New Jerusalem Bible. What did this vision reveal? Filled with God’s active force, Stephen saw Jesus “standing at God’s right hand.” Clearly, then, Jesus did not become God again after his resurrection to heaven but, rather, a distinct spiritual being. There is no mention of a third person next to God in this account. Despite attempts to find passages of Scripture to support the Trinity dogma, Dominican priest Marie-Émile Boismard wrote in his book À l’aube du christianisme​-La naissance des dogmes (At the Dawn of Christianity-​The Birth of Dogmas): “The statement that there are three persons in the one God . . . cannot be read anywhere in the New Testament.” The dogma that Constantine championed was intended to put an end to dissensions within the fourth-century Church. However, it actually raised another issue: Was Mary, the woman who bore Jesus, “the Mother of God”? Compare these Bible verses: Matthew 26:39; John 14:28; 1 Corinthians 15:27, 28; Colossians 1:15, 16 FACT: The Trinitarian dogma is a late fourth-century invention

Remember this being very confusing as an investigator

1 Corinthians 10:4 is my favourite bit of evidence.

JAH A poetic shortened form of Jehovah, the name of the Most High God. (Ex 15:1, 2) This abbreviated form is represented by the first half of the Hebrew Tetragrammaton יהוה (YHWH), that is, the letters yohdh (י) and heʼ (ה), the tenth and fifth letters of the Hebrew alphabet respectively. Jah occurs 50 times in the Hebrew Scriptures, 26 times alone, and 24 times in the expression “Hallelujah,” which is, literally, a command to a number of people to “praise Jah.” However, the presence of “Jah” in the original is completely ignored by certain popular versions. (Dy, Mo, RS) The King James Version and An American Translation have it only once, as “Jah” and “Yah” respectively. (Ps 68:4) In the English Revised Version it appears twice in the body of the text (Ps 68:4; 89:8), and in the American Standard Version the full form, Jehovah, is substituted throughout, but these latter two translations in practically every occurrence of the contracted form call it to our attention in footnotes. The New World Translation preserves for the reader all 50 occurrences of Jah, or Yah; and Rotherham’s Emphasised Bible, 49 of them. In the Christian Greek Scriptures “Jah” appears four times in the expression Hallelujah. (Re 19:1, 3, 4, 6) Most Bibles simply carry this Greek expression over into English untranslated, but G. W. Wade renders it, “Praise ye Jehovah,” and the New World Translation reads, “Praise Jah, you people!” In point of time “Jah” could not have been a primitive form of the divine name used earlier than the Tetragrammaton itself. The latter full form, Jehovah, occurs 165 times in the Masoretic text in the book of Genesis, but it was not until the account of events after the Exodus from Egypt that the shorter form first appeared.​-Ex 15:2. The single syllable Jah is usually linked with the more moving emotions of praise and song, prayer and entreaty, and is generally found where the subject theme dwells upon a rejoicing over victory and deliverance, or where there is an acknowledgment of God’s mighty hand and power. Examples of this special usage are abundant. The phrase, “Praise Jah, you people!” (Hallelujah) appears as a doxology, that is, an expression of praise to God, in the Psalms, the first being at Psalm 104:35. In other psalms it may be at the beginning only (Ps 111, 112), occasionally within a psalm (135:3), sometimes at the end only (Ps 104, 105, 115-117), but often at both the beginning and the end (Ps 106, 113, 135, 146-150). In the book of Revelation heavenly personages repeatedly punctuate their praise of Jehovah with this expression.​-Re 19:1-6. The remaining instances where “Jah” appears also reflect exaltation in songs and petitions to Jehovah. There is the song of deliverance by Moses. (Ex 15:2) In those recorded by Isaiah a double emphasis is gained by combining both names, “Jah Jehovah.” (Isa 12:2; 26:4) Hezekiah, in his poetic exultation after being miraculously healed when close to death, expressed heightened feelings by repetition of Jah. (Isa 38:9, 11) The contrast is drawn between the dead, who cannot praise Jah, and those determined to live a life of praise to him. (Ps 115:17, 18; 118:17-19) Still other psalms display a prayerful appreciation for deliverance, protection, and correction.​-Ps 94:12; 118:5, 14.

What I find crazy is that instead of Jesus being the new introduction to the Godhead it was actually more Jesus introducing Heavenly Father to the Godhead.

Is god the father not talked about in the old testament then?

Wouldn't this be an admission that the restoration got that wrong when it comes to the incorrect utilization of the generic "elohim"? Why wouldn't Joseph Smith know this through revelation as a prophet? If the claim is he can translate ancient books, or even 'fix' the bible, wouldn't this little detail be important? I would sincerely like a good answer to this if anybody can.

This video is very timely especially with come follow me Old Testament for this year.

Do an episode on the Heavenly Counsel

Myth 5: Mary Is the Mother of God What is the origin of the myth? “Veneration of the mother of God received its impetus when . . . the pagan masses streamed into the church. . . . Their piety and religious consciousness [that of pagans converted to Christianity] had been formed for millennia through the cult of the ‘great mother’ goddess and the ‘divine virgin.’”​-The New Encyclopædia Britannica (1988), Volume 16, pages 326 and 327. What does the Bible say? “You are to conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you must name him Jesus. He will be great and will be called Son of the Most High. . . . And so the child will be holy and will be called Son of God.”​-Italics ours; Luke 1:31-35, The New Jerusalem Bible. That passage of Scripture clearly states that Mary was the mother of the “Son of God,” not of God himself. Could she have carried within her the One whom ‘the heavens themselves cannot contain’? (1 Kings 8:27) She never made such a claim. It is the teaching about the Trinity that has sown confusion over the identity of Mary. By proclaiming her Theotokos (a Greek word meaning “God-bearer”), or “Mother of God,” the Council of Ephesus, in 431 C.E., set the stage for Mary worship. The city of Ephesus where this church council was held had for centuries been at the heart of idol worship celebrating the fertility goddess Artemis. So it was that many aspects of the worship of the image of Artemis that “fell from heaven,” such as processions, were integrated into Mary worship. (Acts 19:35) Another practice that crept into Christian teaching was the use of images of Mary and others in worship. Compare these Bible verses: Matthew 13:53-56; Mark 3:31-35; Luke 11:27, 28 FACT: Mary was the mother of the Son of God, not of God himself. The Trinity myth gave birth to the worship of Mary as the Mother of God

John 1 doesn't identify Jesus as creator but rather all things were created "through" *The word*, which is a poetic way of saying created with god's word, plan, purpose in mind.

0:53 I am LOSING it Great vid by the way

The Divine Name​-Its Use and Its Meaning , IN YOUR copy of the Bible, how is Psalm 83:18 translated? The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures renders this verse: “May people know that you, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth.” A number of other Bible translations give similar renderings. However, many translations leave out the name Jehovah, replacing it with such titles as “Lord” or “Eternal.” What belongs in this verse? A title or the name Jehovah? The Tetragrammaton-the way the divine name is written in Hebrew God’s name in Hebrew letters This verse speaks about a name. In the original Hebrew in which much of the Bible was written, a unique personal name appears here. It is spelled יהוה (YHWH) in Hebrew letters. In English, the common rendering of that name is “Jehovah.” Does that name occur in only one Bible verse? No. It appears in the original text of the Hebrew Scriptures nearly 7,000 times! How important is God’s name? Consider the model prayer that Jesus Christ gave. It begins this way: “Our Father in the heavens, let your name be sanctified.” (Matthew 6:9) Later, Jesus prayed to God: “Father, glorify your name.” In response, God spoke from heaven, saying: “I have glorified it and will glorify it again.” (John 12:28) Clearly, God’s name is of the utmost importance. Why, then, have some translators left this name out of their translations of the Bible and replaced it with titles? There seem to be two main reasons. First, many claim that the name should not be used because the original way to pronounce it is unknown today. Ancient Hebrew was written without vowels. Therefore, no one today can say for sure exactly how people of Bible times pronounced YHWH. However, should this prevent us from using God’s name? In Bible times, the name Jesus may have been pronounced Yeshua or possibly Yehoshua​-no one can say for certain. Yet, people the world over today use different forms of the name Jesus, pronouncing it in the way that is common in their language. They do not hesitate to use the name just because they do not know its first-century pronunciation. Similarly, if you were to travel to a foreign land, you might well find that your own name sounds quite different in another tongue. Hence, uncertainty about the ancient pronunciation of God’s name is no reason for not using it. A second reason often given for omitting God’s name from the Bible involves a long-standing tradition of the Jews. Many of them hold that God’s name should never be pronounced. This belief is evidently based on a misapplication of a Bible law that states: “You must not take up the name of Jehovah your God in a worthless way, for Jehovah will not leave unpunished the one who takes up His name in a worthless way.”​-Exodus 20:7. This law forbids the misuse of God’s name. But does it forbid the respectful use of his name? Not at all. The writers of the Hebrew Bible (the “Old Testament”) were all faithful men who lived by the Law that God gave to the ancient Israelites. Yet, they made frequent use of God’s name. For instance, they included it in many psalms that were sung out loud by crowds of worshippers. Jehovah God even instructed his worshippers to call on his name, and faithful ones obeyed. (Joel 2:32; Acts 2:21) Hence, Christians today do not hesitate to use God’s name respectfully, as Jesus surely did.​-John 17:26. In replacing God’s name with titles, Bible translators make a serious mistake. They make God seem remote and impersonal, whereas the Bible urges humans to cultivate “close friendship with Jehovah.” (Psalm 25:14) Think of a close friend of yours. How close would you really be if you never learned your friend’s name? Similarly, when people are kept in ignorance about God’s name, Jehovah, how can they become truly close to God? Furthermore, when people do not use God’s name, they also lack knowledge of its wonderful meaning. What does the divine name mean? God himself explained the meaning of his name to his faithful servant Moses. When Moses asked about God’s name, Jehovah replied: “I Will Become What I Choose to Become.” (Exodus 3:14) Rotherham’s translation renders those words: “I Will Become whatsoever I please.” So Jehovah can become whatever is needed in order to fulfill his purposes, and he can cause to happen whatever is required with regard to his creation and the accomplishment of his purpose. Suppose that you could become whatever you wanted to become. What would you do for your friends? If one of them became seriously ill, you could become a skilled doctor and perform a cure. If another suffered a financial loss, you could become a wealthy benefactor and come to his rescue. The truth is, though, that you are limited in what you can become. All of us are. As you study the Bible, you will be amazed to see how Jehovah becomes whatever is needed in order to fulfill his promises. And it pleases him to use his power in behalf of those who love him. (2 Chronicles 16:9) These beautiful facets of Jehovah’s personality are lost to those who do not know his name. Clearly, the name Jehovah belongs in the Bible. Knowing its meaning and using it freely in our worship are powerful aids in drawing closer to our heavenly Father, Jehovah. *

Psalm 110:1 shows that Jesus is not Jehovah. According to the KJV it says: “The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.” Who is speaking to whom? The Hebrew text for this verse includes the divine name YHWH (unfortunately, most Bibles substitute LORD in all caps for the divine name). In English this verse would read “Jehovah said to my Lord.” In Acts 2:34-36, Peter quotes Psalm 110:1 and explains that God is speaking to Jesus Christ. Jesus' words in John 8:58 have been misinterpreted to mean that Jesus is claiming a title belonging to Jehovah of the Old Testament. They say it is an allusion to Exodus 3:14 where God says, “I am that I am,” according to the King James version. However, the Greek expression “ego eimi” (“I am”) is a common expression that was used by several others in the Bible besides Jesus. In John 9:9, the man who Jesus cured of blindness says “ego eimi” (“I am he”), affirming that he was the one cured by Jesus. That man was not claiming a title belonging to God. In John 8:58, Jesus is simply saying that he existed before Abraham: “Before Abraham was born, I am.” Other translations translate it to more proper English: “Before Abraham was born, I have been” or “I existed before Abraham was born.”

Did Jesus and disciples ever say Jehovah or Jehovah god? Governing body for Jehovah witness is not in the Bible

If Jesus Christ is not Jehovah, then He was a blasphemer as the priests said about Him. Who is the Lord of the Sabbath? Who shares glory with God? Yahweh said that He is the Lord of Sabbath, Jesus said that the Son of Man is Lord of Sabbath, Yahweh said that his glory He share with no one, Jesus said to God the Father to give Him back the glory that He had with Him since before the creation.

Jehovah and the Father, are one. There is no other God, no, they know not one. And no other God we are to worship but them.

Jesus is not claiming to be Yahweh in John 8 with I am. It simply means "I am the one" i.e. the Messiah. See the same usage in John 4.

Why everyone now-a-days all want to put Jesus above God? I know all thru Jesus but who send Jesus as he himself says he ''was'' send . His prayers to who they went to isf he is God? Remember that somebody else wanted to be as God and is still trying and now he is passing the doctrine around the world putting Jesus above God, you who know that is too. Like the doctrine of a flat earth and the Trinity etc. Also remember, Jesus was tempted by Satan, you can not tempt God.

My favorite scripture declaring that Jesus is Jehova is 1 Corinthians 10:1-4

I am going to go through your resources in the description, but I have to wonder why we muddied the waters with the Elohim title. It really makes it hard to explain citations like Psalm 110 away. I mean, why WOULDN'T the OT writers use Elohim to refer to God the Father. Why was there no differentiating them? We know from the BofM that the OT folks clearly knew the difference between God the Father and Jesus when the scriptures were new and shiny.

Nope nope nope. What about Psalm 110:1? “The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.” ‭‭Psalm‬ ‭110‬:‭1‬ ‭KJV‬ In this verse we see two different Hebrew words, both are translated The “Lord.” The first “The LORD” here is the Hebrew word, Jehovah. But we know for certain that Jehovah here is not referring to Jesus but God the Father. We know this because in Matthew 22:41-46, Jesus refers to this Psalm and tells the Pharisees that he is the Lord of David. The second Hebrew word for The “Lord” is a different word that refers to the Messiah, or Jesus. Basically this is how the verse reads: “Jehovah said to Jesus, Sit thou at my right hand until I make thine enemies thy footstool.” So “Jehovah” refers to God the Father AND Jesus Christ in the Bible. The only way to explain this is a Trinitarian view.

Exodus 7:1 interpret this please

No, they arent the same!!!! LIFE

Joseph Smith claimed: "We believe the Bible [the King James version] is the word of God; as far as it is accurately translated!" Elohim is a title=God (with a plural suffix) YHWH =Yahweh or Jehovah is a name. "I AM" is a poor translation of the Hebrew. Thousands of times in the Old Testament the first person singular pronoun is used of God/Elohim: I, He, Him. "I am the LORD (YHWH) your God (Elohim) ... ." Furthermore, the consonants that make up the Tetragrammaton in Paleo Hebrew could have been used as vowels-as does the letter 'y' in the English alphabet: try, why, sky, my, etc.

What about issa

'Lost in translation!' The Tetragrammaton is the name of Elohim = which is the Hebrew word for God. Your grasp of "I am" is totally misleading! And your use of Jesus use of 'I am', ego eimi, is contrived, eisigesis.

Isaiah 45:11 Romans 5:11 KJV Holy Bible

Jesus is the son of Jehovah. Psalm 83:18: “May people know that you, whose name is JEHOVAH, You alone are the most high over all the earth.” Since Jehovah is the most high over the earth then I don’t see how he could also have his own father. Most high means most high. No more no less. It cannot be Jesus.

What movies are the clips from. Thank you for answering my question.

Loved the video

So Jesus killed all the first born of Egypt? (Exodus) And Jesus ordered Joshua to slaughter every man, woman, and child in Jericho? (Joshua 6)

I was just reading Moses 3:18, and God the Father says, “And I, the Lord God, said unto mine Only Begotten …” The Father calls himself “The Lord God”. In Hebrew, this would be “Yehovah Elohiym”. Yehovah is not an exclusive title for just Yeshua.

"Jevovah begins with an I" 0:48

Jesus himself said, concerning a woman accused of sexual immorality, "I do not judge".

Read -Acts 7:30 That was an ángel faking up God's voice ... Also Read.. -Acts 7:53 What does It say...( Bingo) Two Angels playing God. Remember Satan Is a Copycat , as God and Jesus are one so are those two entities.

It's such an intriguing topic! It is so interesting and mysterious like the DaVinci Code by Dan Brown. This video turned out so gripping! It's awesome!

ELOHIM IS THE TRINITY

😃

I AM WHO I AM =AHAYAH ASHER AHAYAH. Ahayah is God and Adoni Yesha is his the Son.

God’s identity is only confusing for Mormons because they have inherited confusion from Trinitarian Christianity. The gospel authors are not nearly as confused about this subject as mainstream Christianity.

Great post.

"Ye must be born again," said Jesus. Nicodemus replied: "Must a man climb inside his Mother's womb?" IS THIS ACTION PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE? How then did the One that created (bara) the Universe get inside the womb of a woman?

Revelation 3 KJV Holy Bible We must chsnge Jesus dont like Rap....We have witess Acts 2:14-21 because of tri tones and other devil worship traditions involved....

Well done

Jesus is a angel created by Jehovah

Yahweh broke his own law before Israel 's eyes. Read Leviticus 26:8-18 ( shall not murder). Yahweh Is the old serpent!! -Deut.13:6 ( Yahweh taught them to fight against each other...Read verse 8, 9 ,10... Yahweh was the angel of darkness. Read John..and compare the Beauty of Jesus to Yahweh with His so called people. While Jesus multiplied bread, wine and fish ...Look what Yahweh did in -Numbers 21-6 Now Read Mathew 7: 9-11 Do you still believe Yahweh Is the father of Christ and God of creation!? Wake up ...!! Jesus Is the way the truth and the life . Jesus Father has no name.. Jesus Is Him the Father.. He came to save not to condemn or to kill as Yahweh did and many still in deny. Read...take Jesus word seriously...!!

Jehovah ❤ good 😊

No

As a LDS, I’m not on board with this. God and Jesus are two separate personage’s. Jesus wasn’t praying to himself in the New Testament

AMEN

Yahwe Is the serpent and usurped the Father of all creation's name. Jesus never mentioned any name...Only refered to Him as "My Father who Is in heaven." If Jesus is image of the Father how Is that Yahweh always commited homicide to his own people in the desert...!? Since the garden of Eden he began to lie pronouncing him as creator when he only "formed" ( never created) Man. The God of creation and Father of Jesus created Man and woman throughout the entire world and with consent to reproduce and replenish the earth...Read carefully.. Create and to form are two different concepts. The God of the garden Is the same that fooled Moses and up to this day still fooling the entire world believing Him as Jesus Father. That's the God of Israel I agree. But Jesus came to reveal His lies and no one believed Him but only His disciples and that revelation was the reason they were put to death.

HE WHO IS IN US = HE+ US =HEUS ->> VAV +AYIN (IN)=W I AM =Y HIDDEN BERESHIT TRILITERATION HEBREW LATIN ALPHA- BET OMEGA=ALPHABET THE J+HESUS= JESUS=YASHUA IN AYIN VAV TAV ALEF AS HASEM

Jehovah is god but lds believe jesus and god are two separate beings and at the same time believe jesus is Jehovah so he isn't god but is....

It’s 2022 y’all still believing these lies Christ is White? Christ is Black also the Father….😂😂😂😂✌️✌️

Lds believe what they believe because Joseph Smith was brought up on the K j Bible and joe smith got all his inspiration from this and other books to write the book of mormon ! Also the writings of the jews who spoke about their God ideas, kings of jews. As the K j bible speaks of LORDS and lords people of the jews were obsessed with ideas inherited from eygptians about the concept of Royality. This lead to a class system. The USA had no history of royality like Europe and the middle east so Joseph Smith invented one via the book of mormon!

Nice