If you have not purchased the book Urban Apologetics,do NOT walk but RUN to get it!! This book is so rich with truth that is now part of my personal reference book in my home!!! I truly believe God is raising up Dr. Mason to be a much needed voice in and for our communities at large and I'm forever grateful Holy Spirit led me to this incredible and humble Biblically astute pastor/educator!!! God bless you both continually!!💙💙💙💙
It's crazy how unaccepted it is in our communities. We are told we are doing too much and too critical. No we are defending the faith from all the false teachings that are flooding at an alarming rate.
Defending a faith that we got from slave masters is weird and dangerous. Subscribing to a god that talked to your slave master before talking to you is becoming a thing of the past thankfully. It's time we stopped believing in mythology and start knowing history.
Good evening I just started a class on Apologetics and as I was reading, I said are there any African authors speaking or teaching on this topic and his name popped up! I am so thankful to hear him and it was very helpful. I ordered his book today.
This message also speaks to how important it is for "churches" to be in fellowship with one another. "Lone Ranger" Christianity doesn't have the reach to cover the capacity of human need, let alone the enormity of God and His love for people.
This separates the people who have the heart after God versus "pastors" who have a heart for themselves. God has a heart for people, which will always drive His pastors back to people.
I am absolutely blessed by what is happening through your ministry, Dr. Mason. I am a fellow grad from Dallas Seminary (1992-1996) and I am watching how you are faithfully pastoring not only your church and your direct associations, but you are also pastoring the hearts of the greater church family (all ethnicities) if we would only listen and join in on the conversation that is happening with humility and brokenness. God bless you and the work God has given you. I’m praying for my heart to be soft and for God to stretch my faith and my understanding of the needs of the African American community. I’m asking God to use me in any way I can for the sake of the Gospel for all people groups and for unity within the body of Christ.
And I just came across this Jude 3 Project, which seems like an amazing RU-vid Channel. I subscribed to it and will be watching more of your videos. 🙏🏼
Love these conversations! Although I appreciate the focus on defusing the Hebrew Israelites I wish there would be more talking points around encountering the kemetic spirituality. From a personal observation this seems to be the new age spirituality that is capturing a lot of our young adults.
@@whatshatnin4572 My personal opinion is that there can only be one belief. If Yeshua is God, how could there be other gods where there is no proof of their existence aside from hieroglyphics? The earliest translated form isn't until 3rd or 4th century AD after the gospels were already written. More proof points towards Christ if we look at all the facts.
@@OUrNit03 Much respect. I respect your opinion saying that you feel it should be one belief. But i disagree. First you talking about belief. Why are we still trying to believe? When do we graduate from trying to believe to trying to know. If you want to believe something Brotha all you must do is apply faith to what you want to believe. But if you want to know something then you must apply facts. There is no proof of any god that man speaks for. There is no evidence of Maat Bible God Odin Allah or Krishna. The gods that man introduces to you are all belief systems.. Not knowing but belief systems. Also you have to understand that many of Our People who subscribe to Kemetic Spirituality do not believe in the deities or the mythologies of Ancient Kemet. They just look at the deities a symbolic representation of the principals behind the deity. Folks who follow Maat dont believe that Maat existed. Maat just represents the principals. There is no evidence of Yeshua being god. If there was you would not be asked to believe. You would be expected to know. Your bible and preacher ALWAYS encourage you to apply faith in Jesus because they want you to believe. Your science and history teacher dont care what you believe. They always encourage you to apply facts because they want you to know. If you want true spirituality, you must cut out the middleman and then look at what you have left over.
I will advise not to ask ANYONE who does not believe they are Israelites about Israelites. It's a mute discussion. Eric Mason do not believe nor understand. Just contradicted himself about precept upon precept. The point is its law!! Not just to the Northern Kingdom but to all of Israel (southern kingdom). It never changes we have to keep it. God does not change, and there is not division between God and Christ John 5:30 [30]I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.
@@johntobey1558 Aside from Dr.Eric Mason's Urban Apologetics you should check out New I.D Apologetics. It's a full youtube channel with videos and witnessing encounters that also addresses these issues around the black community.👍
ru-vid.complaylists This playlist is helpful regardless of what racial background your trying to reach. Also the works of Hugh Ross from Reasons to Believe
Lisa... it sounds like you almost brought to tears when referencing Christians who lack structure and knowledge in using the and administering the Bible. If that's the case: Seek the Holy Spirit on what HE want you to you to do in order to help. Don't be afraid to ask GOD, thinking that HE may take one thing away, that you may do another. We have submissions, and co-misssions and various assignments. You are a Blessing my Sister!
The Afroasiatic (also known as Afrasan or Afrasian) are a language family of about 300 languages that are spoken predominantly in the geographic subregions of Western Asia, North Africa, the Horn of Africa, and parts of the Sahara/Sahel. With the exception of its Semitic branch, all branches of the Afroasiatic family are exclusively native to the African continent. The Afroasiatic languages and Afroasiatic peoples originated from the Proto-Afroasiatic speakers somewhere in the Southeastern Sahara or the adjacent Horn of Africa (~13kya). An African origin has broad scholarly support, and is favored by most linguists on the basis of the linguistic data. Modern distribution of Afroasiatic languages: Suggested expansion from the proto-Afroasiatic homeland: The African languages of Afroasiatic are not more closely related to each other than they are to Semitic, as one would expect if only Semitic had remained in an Asian AA homeland while all other branches had spread from there. Likewise, all Semitic languages are fairly similar to each other, whereas the African branches of Afroasiatic are very diverse; this suggests the rapid spread of Semitic out of Africa. It is assumed that the proto-Afroasiatic language to have been spoken by pre-Neolithic indigenous African hunter-gatherers, as there is no evidence of words in Proto-Afroasiatic related to agriculture or animal husbandry. This aligns well with the archaeologic and genetic evidence. Northern Africa was largely populated by a hunter-gatherer population related to the West/East African lineage, likely sharing a common “proto-Saharan ancestor”. Since around >15kya, West-Eurasian migrants arrived to Northern Africa, getting absorbed by these autochthonus Africans. Based on the archaeogenetic evidence, Proto-Afroasiatic speakers likely resembled modern day peoples from the Horn of Africa, such as Somalis or Ethiopians. Here a simple schematic of the diverging patterns of proto-Saharan population (the West/East African lineage and linguistic patterns): There is a distinct West-Eurasian ancestral component among Afroasiatic-speaking groups in the Horn of Africa (and to a lesser extent in North Africa and West Asia), most prevalent among the Somali. This ancestral component - dubbed “Ethio-Somali” - would have diverged from other Eurasian/non-African ancestries around 23,000 years ago and migrated back to Africa prior to developing agriculture, merging with the local indigenous lineages of the Horn of Africa. This West-Eurasian component may have been a substantial ancestral component of the Proto-Afroasiatic-speaking population. A subsequent mtDNA analysis by Gandini et al. (2016) has produced additional evidence in support of a pre-agricultural back-migration from West-Eurasia into the Horn of Africa with an estimated date of arrival into the Horn of Africa in the early Holocene, possibly as a result of obsidian exchange networks across the Red Sea. Christopher Ehret, O. Y. Keita, and Paul Newman (2004) also argue that archaeology does not indicate a spread of migrating farmers into Africa, but rather a gradual incorporation of (West-) Eurasian animal husbandry into indigenous African foraging cultures. Ehret 2004 gives this proposal for the homeland of Proto-Afroasiatic (Afrasan): Speakers of Afroasiatic (Proto-Afroasiatic) were based in the Southeastern Sahara or the Red Sea hills, because that region includes the majority of the diversity of the Afroasiatic language family and has very diverse groups in close geographic proximity, sometimes considered a telltale sign for a linguistic geographic origin. Based on genetic data, the homeland of Proto-Afroasiatic could include the whole North African region, because Northern Africa was characterized by an Iberomaurusian-like gene pool, which formed from varying degrees of indigenous African (West/East African or basal West/East African) ancestry and Paleolithic/Holocene West-Eurasian migrant ancestry: These Ancient North African people were most similar to modern populations in the Horn of Africa: Horners, Somalis and Ethiopians are the closest modern population to Ancient Proto-Afroasiatic peoples! Based on the genetic results, it seems that Proto-Afriasiatic peoples had around 60-80% indigenous West/East African ancestry and 20-40% West-Eurasian migrant ancestry. Their culture and language was indigenous African, as they simply absorbed and assimilated the Paleolithic West-Eurasian migrants! Early Afroasiatic people, an indigenous Northern African population: - Its also clear that Ancient North Africans, prior to the West-Eurasian geneflow, were equally related to West and East Africans, inline with a shared ancestry with the West/East African lineage. Genetic distance between modern populations: Inline with the diverging patterns, West African originated (Niger-Congo and Bantu) and East African originated (Nilo-Saharans), as well as Ancient North African originated (Afroasiatic) populations cluster closely together in the “proper African cluster”, differentiated from Southern hunter-gatherers (Khoesan) and Eurasian groups. - Furthermore, the specific correspondence between the distribution of haplogroup E1b1b and Afroasiatic languages point to a link between indigenous Northern/Eastern African and the roots of Afroasiatic languages. Ehret, Keita, and Newman argue that the distribution of haplotype E-M35, is strongly connected to speakers of Afroasiatic languages, a argument confirmed in a review of Andrew Lancaster (2009). This also corresponds with their deeper links to West/East African Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan peoples, and a shared proto-Saharan root. There is clear genetic and archeologic evidence for African/Iberomaurusian geneflow and material culture migration into the Levant, likely associated with the spread of proto-Semitic, giving rise to the Natufian culture. The analyzed Natufian samples had around ~21% Iberomaurusian (Taforalt-like) and ~7% Omotic (Aari-like) admixture, highlighting African geneflow into the Levant. This is also associated with the spread of paternal haplogroup E1b1b, which peaks among Horners and Northwest Africans. Most Natufians had E1b1b, showing a positive bottleneck favoring E1b1b rather than J2 which is Middle Eastern. A subset of the Proto-Afroasiatic population would have migrated to the Levant during the late Paleolithic, merging with local West-Eurasians and resulting in the formation of Semitic peoples, which replaced pre-Semitic groups, such as Sumerians. Conclusion: Afroasiatic languages originated from the proto-Afroasiatic source population somewhere in Northeast Africa, presumably the Southeastern Sahara or adjacent Horn of Africa. These proto-Afroasiatic peoples belonged to a cline of indigenous Africans (Ancient North African lineages related to the West/East African lineages, sharing a common proto-Saharan ancestor), which absorbed varying degrees of West-Eurasian migrant ancestry, forming a Iberomaurusian like gene pool. The proto-Afroasiatic peoples display affinity with modern populations of the Horn of Africa, such as Somalis and Ethiopians. The spread of Afroasiatic languages is linked to the spread of Iberomaurusian like ancestry and paternal haplogroup E1b1b. The Afroasiatic languages and people have their ultimate roots in Africa, among a (Ancient North African) sister lineage of the West/East African (Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan) peoples. Afroasiatic peoples are best represented by modern Ethiopians and Somalis, consequently, the early Ancient Egyptians resembled populations from the Horn of Africans, but also the Nilotic peoples, which joined the dominant local Afroasiatic-speakers, and contributed to the formation of the Ancient Egyptian civilization: These two populations are the root of the Ancient Egypt civilization. Later on, Levantine Natufian and other Middle Eastern (CHG: Caucasus hunter-gatherer or Neolithic Iranian) geneflow was absorbed by the initial Ancient Egyptians (3-7kya), which resulted in higher heterogeneity and more affinity to Middle Easterners than originally. Modern Egyptians additionally received geneflow from Middle Easterners and lastly the Arab expansion, resulting in the modern makeup of Northern Africa and Egypt. Ancient Egypt is African, and its indigenous African roots can not be denied by anyone. The culture, religion, mythology and worldview is indigenous African and has many African parallels. Thank you for reading, please share, upvote and comment!✌🏿
Based on history the best apologetics to get Black People in the church were Christian slave masters. Anything less than that aint gone work nearly as good.
Why is Tim telling you gods way.. If its gods way shouldnt got be telling you his way.. How we know it aint Tim's way being that you not reading what god said but reading what Tim said that god said.
@@correyteague8272 it's not god telling any one anything. You cant leave out the author. This is what Paul is writing. This is what Paul is telling us. How do we read the words of Paul and play make believe like they are the words of a god
This “white mans religion” is still popular and there are memes, RU-vid clips, and online content that are still pushing this narrative. There’s also a strange insurgence of allegiance to ancient Egyptian gods and customs when Egypt was populated by Ham... who just so happened to be a son of Noah... 🧐🧐 🧐. I can’t wait to get this book.
@Ian Merritt Brother there is nothing good about the Egyptian religion. I studied that information and nothing but one thing resonated in my Spirit. How Washington DC was set up like parts of Egypt.
here is the problem I have with Christianity. People shouldn't have to believe outlandish fairytale stories to get right with God. Our African ancestors used mythologies based around humanist principals along with 5,000 years of observing the physical universe to explain the characteristics of God which they later compiled in the worlds first universities and libraries in both Egypt and West Africa. God wasn't an entity to believe in God was studied through the rotation of the planets, constellations in the stars, numbers, psychology, magnetism energy, even down to the cells in body was a reflection of the creator in their world view. The Roman Catholic Church prescribed doctrines because they wanted to control how people think. Im not one to attack the black church or black preachers. I just think the black church needs a new theology based in our ancestral lineage that promotes inner knowing and rational thinking. Not these fairytale beliefs. The doctrines given to us such as original sin and biblical literalism is based in subjugation and white supremacy which has not improved our condition in the U.S or globally.
God created man in His image (Genesis 1:26-27; Genesis 9:6). Adam & Eve lose the breath of life aka Spirit of God (Genesis 3). Adam begot Seth after his image (Genesis 5:3).
@@pierreferguson5257 Yes indeed.. I know how the story goes.. But thats mythology. The consensus on adam is that he is a mythological character and there is nothing historic about man living 900 years.. Anytime you see talking animals and 900 year old men, you are dealing with mythology.. Not history.
Amen Brother Adam CHRIST Type All Thanks and Glory to GOD GOD of Glory Sun of Righteousness LORD of Glory Son of GOD LAMB of GOD KING of Glory LORD of Hosts Ancient of Days The VINE The ROCK The BRANCH Faithful and True GOD of ISRAEL The MOST HIGH JEHOVAH The LIVING GOD JESUS CHRIST
To be honest I don’t see why we wouldn’t as Christian not lump Israelites all together because when they speak against us as Christian ..they teaching throw all of it away. As if their isn’t true believers of Jesus and then imposters. I don’t hear any cult out there saying well don’t lump all Christian together 🤷🏾♂️
Because they do not all follow the same traditions or have the same thoughts. Generalizing groups oftentimes causes problems because you're not even addressing the people you're speaking to or their beliefs but who you think they are and what you think they believe. It will cause you to lose credibility. I'll never forget trying to tell some Jehohavh's Witnesses "I believe such and such..." and the lady responded "we do to" and she rebuked me for assuming I knew what they believed without talking to them. I never forgot that moment and till this day I've never forgotten she was correct.
Its mythology. Before we argue the book we need to verify the historicity of the book.. I still kaint find the talking snake anywhere in history.. Kaint find Noah or Adam anywhere in history.. The consensus on Moses is that he is a mythological character. So where does the mythology stop and the history begin in the bible?
@@whatshatnin4572 lol what's good bro. Lol there is no talking snake, apples, etc lol. Hosea 12:10 [10]I have also spoken by the prophets, and I have multiplied visions, and used similitudes, by the ministry of the prophets. Finding forefathers in the bible as you mentioned (characters) Jeremiah 8:1-2 [1]At that time, saith the LORD, they shall bring out the bones of the kings of Judah, and the bones of his princes, and the bones of the priests, and the bones of the prophets, and the bones of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, out of their graves: [2]And they shall spread them before the sun, and the moon, and all the host of heaven, whom they have loved, and whom they have served, and after whom they have walked, and whom they have sought, and whom they have worshipped: they shall not be gathered, nor be buried; they shall be for dung upon the face of the earth. Easy question? Do you know where your great, great, grandparents are buried? Most of us don't. But we claim we came from them....just a thought.
@@whatshatnin4572 Also I say follow your bloodline. Most of us are taught the Bible in a mythical book, it's not. That's why we (Israelites) try our best to show our identity. The most important thing because our history culture had to be at the forefront. So the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, Sub- Suharan trade are starter points if you are interested. You will find names have been changed. Follow the rabbit hole and you will see these names in the bible. These are your ancestors. That's a start
@@orchestratedadmin All books that have talking animals are mythological books. History books have dates.... Not talking snakes Its mythology Bro. I started to realize this when I could not find Noah in history.. When I read the book of Deuteronomy in the oldest completed old testament its says nothing about yokes on necks and ships. All of those verses were added later. Perhaps you can tell me who added the slave verses into Deut and when.
@@whatshatnin4572 kool, let's start with Noah's. If this is not real there would not be any other stories from other nations like this would it? Like the flood correct?
It took some time but they showed their true intention of this entire Jude 3 crap...to come against the Israelites. The fear and ignorance is real among these so-called Apologetics.
@@therlowfoy9738THAT'S THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK DO ANY CHRISTIANS TRY TO HAVE A DIALOGUE WITH US BUT ALWAYS SAY WE ARE A CULT WHEN IN THE FAKE CHURCH YOUR HOLY DAYS ARE BASED OFF LIES DECEPTIONS FABLES MYTHICAL BEINGS PAGAN RITUALS INDOCTRINATING KIDS WITH LIES
@@therlowfoy9738The Afroasiatic (also known as Afrasan or Afrasian) are a language family of about 300 languages that are spoken predominantly in the geographic subregions of Western Asia, North Africa, the Horn of Africa, and parts of the Sahara/Sahel. With the exception of its Semitic branch, all branches of the Afroasiatic family are exclusively native to the African continent. The Afroasiatic languages and Afroasiatic peoples originated from the Proto-Afroasiatic speakers somewhere in the Southeastern Sahara or the adjacent Horn of Africa (~13kya). An African origin has broad scholarly support, and is favored by most linguists on the basis of the linguistic data. Modern distribution of Afroasiatic languages:  Suggested expansion from the proto-Afroasiatic homeland:  The African languages of Afroasiatic are not more closely related to each other than they are to Semitic, as one would expect if only Semitic had remained in an Asian AA homeland while all other branches had spread from there. Likewise, all Semitic languages are fairly similar to each other, whereas the African branches of Afroasiatic are very diverse; this suggests the rapid spread of Semitic out of Africa. It is assumed that the proto-Afroasiatic language to have been spoken by pre-Neolithic indigenous African hunter-gatherers, as there is no evidence of words in Proto-Afroasiatic related to agriculture or animal husbandry. This aligns well with the archaeologic and genetic evidence. Northern Africa was largely populated by a hunter-gatherer population related to the West/East African lineage, likely sharing a common “proto-Saharan ancestor”. Since around >15kya, West-Eurasian migrants arrived to Northern Africa, getting absorbed by these autochthonus Africans. Based on the archaeogenetic evidence, Proto-Afroasiatic speakers likely resembled modern day peoples from the Horn of Africa, such as Somalis or Ethiopians.  Here a simple schematic of the diverging patterns of proto-Saharan population (the West/East African lineage and linguistic patterns):   There is a distinct West-Eurasian ancestral component among Afroasiatic-speaking groups in the Horn of Africa (and to a lesser extent in North Africa and West Asia), most prevalent among the Somali. This ancestral component - dubbed “Ethio-Somali” - would have diverged from other Eurasian/non-African ancestries around 23,000 years ago and migrated back to Africa prior to developing agriculture, merging with the local indigenous lineages of the Horn of Africa. This West-Eurasian component may have been a substantial ancestral component of the Proto-Afroasiatic-speaking population. A subsequent mtDNA analysis by Gandini et al. (2016) has produced additional evidence in support of a pre-agricultural back-migration from West-Eurasia into the Horn of Africa with an estimated date of arrival into the Horn of Africa in the early Holocene, possibly as a result of obsidian exchange networks across the Red Sea. Christopher Ehret, O. Y. Keita, and Paul Newman (2004) also argue that archaeology does not indicate a spread of migrating farmers into Africa, but rather a gradual incorporation of (West-) Eurasian animal husbandry into indigenous African foraging cultures. Ehret 2004 gives this proposal for the homeland of Proto-Afroasiatic (Afrasan):  Speakers of Afroasiatic (Proto-Afroasiatic) were based in the Southeastern Sahara or the Red Sea hills, because that region includes the majority of the diversity of the Afroasiatic language family and has very diverse groups in close geographic proximity, sometimes considered a telltale sign for a linguistic geographic origin. Based on genetic data, the homeland of Proto-Afroasiatic could include the whole North African region, because Northern Africa was characterized by an Iberomaurusian-like gene pool, which formed from varying degrees of indigenous African (West/East African or basal West/East African) ancestry and Paleolithic/Holocene West-Eurasian migrant ancestry:  These Ancient North African people were most similar to modern populations in the Horn of Africa:  Horners, Somalis and Ethiopians are the closest modern population to Ancient Proto-Afroasiatic peoples! Based on the genetic results, it seems that Proto-Afriasiatic peoples had around 60-80% indigenous West/East African ancestry and 20-40% West-Eurasian migrant ancestry. Their culture and language was indigenous African, as they simply absorbed and assimilated the Paleolithic West-Eurasian migrants!  Early Afroasiatic people, an indigenous Northern African population: - Its also clear that Ancient North Africans, prior to the West-Eurasian geneflow, were equally related to West and East Africans, inline with a shared ancestry with the West/East African lineage. Genetic distance between modern populations:   Inline with the diverging patterns, West African originated (Niger-Congo and Bantu) and East African originated (Nilo-Saharans), as well as Ancient North African originated (Afroasiatic) populations cluster closely together in the “proper African cluster”, differentiated from Southern hunter-gatherers (Khoesan) and Eurasian groups. - Furthermore, the specific correspondence between the distribution of haplogroup E1b1b and Afroasiatic languages point to a link between indigenous Northern/Eastern African and the roots of Afroasiatic languages. Ehret, Keita, and Newman argue that the distribution of haplotype E-M35, is strongly connected to speakers of Afroasiatic languages, a argument confirmed in a review of Andrew Lancaster (2009).   This also corresponds with their deeper links to West/East African Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan peoples, and a shared proto-Saharan root. There is clear genetic and archeologic evidence for African/Iberomaurusian geneflow and material culture migration into the Levant, likely associated with the spread of proto-Semitic, giving rise to the Natufian culture. The analyzed Natufian samples had around ~21% Iberomaurusian (Taforalt-like) and ~7% Omotic (Aari-like) admixture, highlighting African geneflow into the Levant. This is also associated with the spread of paternal haplogroup E1b1b, which peaks among Horners and Northwest Africans. Most Natufians had E1b1b, showing a positive bottleneck favoring E1b1b rather than J2 which is Middle Eastern. A subset of the Proto-Afroasiatic population would have migrated to the Levant during the late Paleolithic, merging with local West-Eurasians and resulting in the formation of Semitic peoples, which replaced pre-Semitic groups, such as Sumerians.  Conclusion: Afroasiatic languages originated from the proto-Afroasiatic source population somewhere in Northeast Africa, presumably the Southeastern Sahara or adjacent Horn of Africa. These proto-Afroasiatic peoples belonged to a cline of indigenous Africans (Ancient North African lineages related to the West/East African lineages, sharing a common proto-Saharan ancestor), which absorbed varying degrees of West-Eurasian migrant ancestry, forming a Iberomaurusian like gene pool. The proto-Afroasiatic peoples display affinity with modern populations of the Horn of Africa, such as Somalis and Ethiopians. The spread of Afroasiatic languages is linked to the spread of Iberomaurusian like ancestry and paternal haplogroup E1b1b. The Afroasiatic languages and people have their ultimate roots in Africa, among a (Ancient North African) sister lineage of the West/East African (Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan) peoples. Afroasiatic peoples are best represented by modern Ethiopians and Somalis, consequently, the early Ancient Egyptians resembled populations from the Horn of Africans, but also the Nilotic peoples, which joined the dominant local Afroasiatic-speakers, and contributed to the formation of the Ancient Egyptian civilization:   These two populations are the root of the Ancient Egypt civilization. Later on, Levantine Natufian and other Middle Eastern (CHG: Caucasus hunter-gatherer or Neolithic Iranian) geneflow was absorbed by the initial Ancient Egyptians (3-7kya), which resulted in higher heterogeneity and more affinity to Middle Easterners than originally. Modern Egyptians additionally received geneflow from Middle Easterners and lastly the Arab expansion, resulting in the modern makeup of Northern Africa and Egypt. Ancient Egypt is African, and its indigenous African roots can not be denied by anyone. The culture, religion, mythology and worldview is indigenous African and has many African parallels.
