Тёмный
No video :(

3 Outdated Tech Terms we all Keep Saying 

Techquickie
Подписаться 4,3 млн
Просмотров 304 тыс.
50% 1

Check out the K65 Plus Wireless at: lmg.gg/corsair...
Learn about common tech terms we still use that have their origin in very old devices.
Leave a reply with your requests for future episodes.
► GET MERCH: lttstore.com
► GET A VPN: www.piavpn.com...
► GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT ON FLOATPLANE: lmg.gg/lttfloa...
► SPONSORS, AFFILIATES, AND PARTNERS: lmg.gg/partners
FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE
---------------------------------------------------
Twitter: / linustech
Facebook: / linustech
Instagram: / linustech
TikTok: / linustech
Twitch: / linustech

Опубликовано:

 

5 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1 тыс.   
@ANeMzero
@ANeMzero Месяц назад
The fun part with the IBM PC is that since a bunch of machines had already been referred to as "Personal Computers" before the PC was made, it was basically impossible to defend a trademark on "Personal Computer." As a result IBMs followup platform was the "Personal System 2" or PS/2, which is where those old "PS/2" keyboard and mouse ports come from. So yeah, the old joke "if PCs are so good, why isn't there a PC2?" Well there was, but they had to change a letter to make a more awkward name they could actually trademark.
@seansingh4421
@seansingh4421 Месяц назад
Bro IBM is really one of the OG when it comes to R&D. Like I have seen even Honeywell following IBM in some ways
@svBlackManta
@svBlackManta Месяц назад
I remember my ps/2. I think my mom bought it when I was about 6. Played a lot of Castles, Duke Nukem, ZZT, and Wolfenstein on that beast. Also taught myself Basic on it.
@idehenebenezer
@idehenebenezer Месяц назад
Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. Turn to him and repent from your sins today!
@tonycrabtree3416
@tonycrabtree3416 Месяц назад
What? IBM literally was paid 1 dollar by all manufacturers for each computer made for a period of time. In other words, they defended it through a legal case that was only being upheld for that time period. As part of the case, they weren’t allowed to continue with the registry of PC for them exclusively. Think car, automobile, etc…
@matj12
@matj12 Месяц назад
​@@svBlackMantaI remember my PS2. I think my dad bought it when I was around 10. Played a lot of Tony Hawk, Need for Speed, FMX and Bully on that beast. Also taught myself pirating on it.
@Landscape_
@Landscape_ Месяц назад
Because i RAM the Stick in the Socket
@jarde1989
@jarde1989 Месяц назад
These things go into a socket??
@drew2626
@drew2626 Месяц назад
@@jarde1989 I’d call it a slot but I guess calling it a socket work too
@DRedGuia
@DRedGuia Месяц назад
​@drew2626 Everything as a slot or an outlet can be considered as socket.
@TwiceVisible
@TwiceVisible Месяц назад
Giggidy
@Keaton.
@Keaton. Месяц назад
I didn't expect a dad joke... but I got a dad joke. lol
@45545videos
@45545videos Месяц назад
My favorite naming conventions: * BIOS. It's not a BIOS anymore, it's a UEFI, but everybody still calls it the BIOS * We still call storage drives "disks", despite SSDs being commonplace and many PCs having zero spinning parts OKAY ASIDE FROM FANS
@teknixstuff
@teknixstuff Месяц назад
UEFI is a Basic Input/Output System, technically. It's just not an IBM compatible BIOS. So that's technically the term we should be using: "IBM Compatible BIOS" vs "UEFI", or "BIOS" for when the distinction doesn't matter. Nobody would do that though.
@Geerice
@Geerice Месяц назад
​@@teknixstuffBIOS is a specific firmware specification that allowed the OS to interact with the hardware, it's not a generic term. UEFI is the specification that replaced it. If you want a term that refers to both, then I think firmware would be most accurate.
@teknixstuff
@teknixstuff Месяц назад
@@Geerice BIOS is an acronym for Basic Input/Output System, which certainly sounds like a generic term. And it's used like a generic term in many cases, for instance console firmware (often required for emulation) is typically referred to as the console's BIOS.
@Geerice
@Geerice Месяц назад
@@teknixstuff Sure, it sounds like a generic term, but it's not. It's a formerly proprietary technology by IBM that was later reverse-engineered into a de facto standard firmware architecture. That's what makes it fall into the category of "outdated terms"
@teknixstuff
@teknixstuff Месяц назад
@@Geerice I'm fairly certain the term BIOS was used before the IBM PC was even released.
@thescrewfly
@thescrewfly Месяц назад
Before the IBM PC, personal computers were often referred to as microcomputers. "Micro" compared with the older machines that filled up an entire room and "mini" computers the size of a washing machine.
@vbifusful
@vbifusful Месяц назад
They called micro not because of case size, but because of using Microprocessor.
@pensivepenguin3000
@pensivepenguin3000 Месяц назад
I still like to call modern desktops micro computers occasionally, just for its vintage outdated charm lol
@RaoBlackWellizedArman
@RaoBlackWellizedArman Месяц назад
@@pensivepenguin3000 Well... that's the definition I recall from my first computer course about 30 years ago!!!
@thebooksthelibrarian8530
@thebooksthelibrarian8530 25 дней назад
I don't think that's actually correct.
@IntyMichael
@IntyMichael 25 дней назад
@@vbifusful nope. There were main frames, mini computers and micro computers which were the first computers you could use at home or a small office. So to say a Personal Computer or Home Computer. Just look up a box of the C64. It says Micro Computer.
@BruinesEtienne
@BruinesEtienne Месяц назад
I like how companies still talk about "SSL certificates", while the underlying tech is using the TLS protocols (having deprecated the SSL protocols).
@KaitouKaiju
@KaitouKaiju 28 дней назад
But it is still a valid certificate for the SSL protocol Technically speaking should be called SSL/TLS certificates
@wbfaulk
@wbfaulk 19 дней назад
They are really X.509 certificates.
@DarthEradicus5908
@DarthEradicus5908 Месяц назад
I don't care why it's called RAM I just want to know how I can download more of it?
@lilguygamingandmore
@lilguygamingandmore Месяц назад
You don't
@mrdinosaurproductions9507
@mrdinosaurproductions9507 Месяц назад
Just search up download ram, you’ll find a good site, I recommend downloading 128 gigs and maybe 256 gigs if you need a lot
@_At0mz
@_At0mz Месяц назад
@@lilguygamingandmorewdym? I downloaded 128gb ram this morning.
@pixGu
@pixGu Месяц назад
@@lilguygamingandmore party crusher
@KodakYarr
@KodakYarr Месяц назад
Meanwhile I just want to know how much I have to have dedotated to my Minecraft server
@okaro6595
@okaro6595 Месяц назад
CMOS (Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor). In the 1980s it used to describe low power chips that could work with batteries and the memory could keep its contents with minimal battery power so the term is still used to refer for the clock that keeps the time on a PC. CMOS used to be slower than the NMOS used in computers. However, nowadays CMOS is the standard technology for chips so the term is somewhat strange.
@patheddles4004
@patheddles4004 25 дней назад
I first learned the term 'CMOS' for what we now refer to as BIOS (or UEFI) settings.
@Rouxenator
@Rouxenator Месяц назад
The most infuriating to me is when storage space on phones are called ROM. As in 4GB RAM/128GB ROM. That is totally not how ROM works.
@laurendoe168
@laurendoe168 Месяц назад
The 128 GB cannot be written to, it can only be read... hence the name Read Only Memory. If you CAN write to it, however, it's not ROM.
@puilp0502
@puilp0502 Месяц назад
​@@laurendoe168 Is your phone's entire 128GB storage read-only?
@Cronic318
@Cronic318 Месяц назад
@@laurendoe168 um, What? That would make iPhone even more useless wouldn't it?
@laurendoe168
@laurendoe168 Месяц назад
@@Cronic318 That's what I'm saying. I don't understand why they even mention how much ROM something has - it's basically useless.
@laurendoe168
@laurendoe168 Месяц назад
@@puilp0502 I have no idea how much ROM my phone has. If it ever stated, I ignored it. Mine has 16 GB RAM I believe.
@deleted-something
@deleted-something Месяц назад
I may randomly access this memory
@DietaryCandle
@DietaryCandle Месяц назад
I may sequentially access this memory
@NissNel
@NissNel Месяц назад
Triggered Access Memories ooof
@stepheneickhoff4953
@stepheneickhoff4953 Месяц назад
The role of RAM is still memory, not storage as the SSD is. Memory and storage are still two separate systems. RAM is still a useful term.
@brianvogt8125
@brianvogt8125 24 дня назад
True, but I wonder how much longer. The role of a SATA SSD has been usurped by M.2 cards. What is the next step in miniaturisation? DDR8 that's large enough to be the entire virtual storage paging file (i.e. literally real storage).
@SophiaDalke
@SophiaDalke 20 дней назад
Part of what makes RAM useful separate from NAND storage even as m.2 capabilities increase is that the multiple channels are further divided across CPU cores. This parallelized paradigm allows for more efficient usage than shoving everything through one bottleneck on an m.2 interface. Not to mention NAND storage suffers more from high usage than RAM does, offloading the most frequent operations to separate physical memory prolongs the life of SSD storage. For these reasons I don't foresee a combination of these functions for a long time yet.
@VulpisFoxfire
@VulpisFoxfire 20 дней назад
@@brianvogt8125 ...You mean the venerable RamDisk (for you kids, that was a section or memory partitioned off to act as a virtual storage drive, though it needed to be copied from actual storage at boot, and written back before shutdown)?
@brianvogt8125
@brianvogt8125 20 дней назад
@@VulpisFoxfire No, I speculated about any device that performs the function of the current DDR5, but is so cheap that it's large enough to make virtual storage & paging redundant. All addresses literally real, just like in 1964. Nothing to do with the boot & shutdown processes, so can be volatile.
@VulpisFoxfire
@VulpisFoxfire 20 дней назад
@@brianvogt8125 ...Problem being, RAM *is* volatile. Unless battery backed up (like was used on some old game cartridges), you're going to lose the contents on every power-down.
@fanta6789
@fanta6789 Месяц назад
DYK, Natural gas is "natural" because before we figured out how to transport natural gas long distances, it used to be "manufactured" in a factory from coal.
@nocturn9x
@nocturn9x Месяц назад
huh, TIL!
@SimoneBellomonte
@SimoneBellomonte Месяц назад
Everything is natural, cuz the universe is deterministic, hence whatever we do is already written, including every single atom of oxygen being breathed, carbon emitted, etc.. 🗿
@SimoneBellomonte
@SimoneBellomonte Месяц назад
@@nocturn9x Pfp (Profile Picture) and / or Banner Sauce (Source [Artist])? 🗿
@mjbaricua7403
@mjbaricua7403 Месяц назад
Quantum mechanics abhors a deterministic universe ​@@SimoneBellomonte
@crusaderACR
@crusaderACR Месяц назад
​@@SimoneBellomonte there's no evidence that the universe is deterministic, and Quantum mechanics actually suggests (if not proves) the opposite
@unvergebeneid
@unvergebeneid Месяц назад
When writing, SSDs or flash memory in general is only _kinda_ random access. You have to re-write the entire block, which makes random operations slow. Contrast this with Intel's now-dead Optane technology, which did not suffer from this restriction.
@ricequackers
@ricequackers Месяц назад
I guess the point is that it's abstracted away by the drive's flash translation layer, from the system perspective you specify an exact address and you get the data back. Even RAM doesn't have uniform latency for accesses, it's much faster to read from a memory location from an adjacent column if the row is already open, which is why CPU caches fetch a whole bunch of bytes in one go.
@unvergebeneid
@unvergebeneid Месяц назад
@@ricequackers fair point about the RAM. But then I guess it's a matter of scale. If my tape driver also abstracts away all the rewinding and seeking on the tape, does it also count as random access?
@salsamancer
@salsamancer 26 дней назад
You can make flash memory with single byte access but it's comparatively slow and is usually reserved to store binaries for microcontrollers
@alexhobbs5704
@alexhobbs5704 Месяц назад
I'll call my computer wtf I want, Apple can't stop me.
@user-iy5ww2hj4p
@user-iy5ww2hj4p Месяц назад
I built a waddodinkle on a budget of 1k
@alexhobbs5704
@alexhobbs5704 Месяц назад
@@user-iy5ww2hj4p Waddodinkle Pro Max baybeeee
@kg4wwn
@kg4wwn Месяц назад
"wtf I want, Apple can't stop me" is a really weird host name. Will Windows even allow it? I know Linux won't.
@asadfarraj
@asadfarraj Месяц назад
A Mac is a PC, unlike what Apple may have us believe.
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 17 дней назад
​@@asadfarrajNo, it's not. It's a home computer, not a personnel computer.
@TheUtuber999
@TheUtuber999 29 дней назад
1:11 Old, mechanical spinning hard drives were also technically random access since the drive heads could move directly to the specified platter/track/sector. Yes, it's a lot slower than SSD... but it's not sequential like a tape drive.
@MonkeyJedi99
@MonkeyJedi99 28 дней назад
My first home computer has a cassette player for SAM memory. Good old Commodore 64!
@TheUtuber999
@TheUtuber999 28 дней назад
@@MonkeyJedi99 Right on! My first computer was also the C64 back in '85. Then bought the C128 the following year. I still have a newer 64-C model, but sadly it's in the box these days - the Vice emulator is a pretty decent alternative that fits the bill when I have the urge to crunch eight bits. 😊
@brianvogt8125
@brianvogt8125 24 дня назад
The heads in rotating disk units do not move "directly" as in "instantly." They take time to move sequentially across the tracks. Having arrived at the required track, they engage in rotational position sensing (a sequential process of reading sectors). It's all measured in milliseconds. I agree that nothing is as time consuming as a tape.
@jimrafert7372
@jimrafert7372 21 день назад
@@brianvogt8125 And even though hard drives are random access, they are significantly faster to access sequentially, because for each sequential stream, you only had an initial seek to the proper cylinder, an initial rotational delay, and a short track-to-track seek and rotational delay when you fill the cylinder.
@brianvogt8125
@brianvogt8125 21 день назад
@@jimrafert7372 That's true for the first few hundreds or thousands of files written on a disk device, and for short files. After that, fragmentation becomes a problem, and the smooth operation you described stumbles because the next fragment can be on any cylinder. In any case, for the past 30+ years, it's all fronted by high speed cache memory partly filled by a sequential read ahead process (hoping that the app is processing data sequentially).
@Illumas
@Illumas Месяц назад
I remember as a kid my dad shopping for a computer and making sure that it was "IBM Compatible" now I feel old.
@idehenebenezer
@idehenebenezer Месяц назад
Colossians 3. 1. If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God. 2. Set your affection on the things which are above and not on things which are on the earth. 3. For ye are dead and your life is hid with Christ in God. 4. When Christ, which is our life shall appear, so shall ye also appear with him in Glory. ******** Jesus is calling you today. Come to him, repent from your sins, bear his cross and live the victorious life ********
@DryPaperHammerBro
@DryPaperHammerBro Месяц назад
HAIL SATAN
@terdik36
@terdik36 Месяц назад
@@DryPaperHammerBro okay dude no need to go *that* far
@kg4wwn
@kg4wwn Месяц назад
@@terdik36 There may be no need, but it was decently funny. Personally I'd have gone with a flying spaghetti monster parody, or possibly discordianism, but "Hail Satan" does have a flair to it that is hard to match.
@Mutrax4706
@Mutrax4706 Месяц назад
@@idehenebenezer not ideal way to spread religion. i prefer non religion
@TuTAH_1
@TuTAH_1 Месяц назад
Fun fact: In Russian and English the meaning of "RAM" abbreviation is completely different. In russian it's "operational memoriing device" ([operativnoe zapominajushee ustrojstvo], [OZU]), it also have term "memory with arbitrary access", but it's barely used and doesn't even have acronym.
@ceiling_cat
@ceiling_cat Месяц назад
fast memorizing devuce even
@Roeclean
@Roeclean Месяц назад
@@ceiling_cat lol, interesting word usage you got there
@aheendwhz1
@aheendwhz1 Месяц назад
In German it's also different, we say "Arbeitsspeicher" which means "working memory". IMHO a term that describes its function far better.
@FaridAbbasbayli
@FaridAbbasbayli 29 дней назад
@@bywonline It's true, that "оперативная память" is way more common and describes the device perfectly. But I've seen ОЗУ in more technical fields and nerd circles. I think it's the original term from the ancient times.
@TuTAH_1
@TuTAH_1 29 дней назад
@@bywonline I didn't say "оперативное запоминающее устройство" is said often. But "ОЗУ" is the most (only) used abbriveature in Russian and "оперативное запоминающее устройство" is a decryption of it. Also, I often see it's in programs (the most popular ones - in PC properties of Windows 7 and XP), becouse "ОЗУ" is much shorter than even "память" (the shortest way you can say it without using abbreviatures). And also, it's not rare when I hear "ОЗУ" (althrough "оперативка"/"память" is more often). You probably never spoke with 30+ people if never heard someone say "ОЗУ"... And speak rarely people of any age in general.. (i'm joking, you definitely heard it but don't notice it just because you understand this word and also because you don't walk with the note writing down every word you heard) But, again, my comment was about abbreviature, not about the most used word for describing memory stick.
@LPhooligan
@LPhooligan Месяц назад
Learned what RAM wad from Daft Punk album
@scottcole1881
@scottcole1881 Месяц назад
Probably a typo, but I've spent like 10 minutes imagining what a "RAM wad" might be.........
@scottcole1881
@scottcole1881 Месяц назад
For example, does one RAM the wad or does one Wad the RAM??
@comicalacurate
@comicalacurate Месяц назад
@@scottcole1881 You talk too much.. It’s a simple mistake bro
@scottcole1881
@scottcole1881 Месяц назад
@@comicalacurate I know, but it was funny 🤣🤣
@comicalacurate
@comicalacurate Месяц назад
@@scottcole1881 cmon bro its not THAT funny😭
@franceslarina5508
@franceslarina5508 26 дней назад
Competitors did not reverse engineer the original PC's BIOS. IBM released the IBM 5150 Technical Reference manual in August, 1981. It included the fully commented source code listing for the BIOS.
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 17 дней назад
They still had to reverse engineer how anything actually worked. The reference only specifies how to use it. For legal reasons they had to use "virgins" who had never worked at IBM so they couldn't be sued for stealing company secrets.
@pufflonn
@pufflonn Месяц назад
The "I'm a freak in the sheets" line was hilarious 🤣
@HarpaxA
@HarpaxA 25 дней назад
BIOS...everyone still calling it BIOS instead of UEFI.
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 17 дней назад
Because UEFI is a type of BIOS. One where Trojan horses are a feature, not a bug.
@gasracing5000
@gasracing5000 Месяц назад
nerd pickup line "we should excel sometime, spread some sheets"? 😂
@idehenebenezer
@idehenebenezer Месяц назад
Where are you going after you die? What happens next? Have you ever thought about that? Repent today and give your life to Jesus Christ to obtain eternal salvation. Tomorrow may be too late my brethen😢. Hebrews 9:27 says "And as it is appointed unto man once to die, but after that the judgement
@gasracing5000
@gasracing5000 Месяц назад
@idehenebenezer Did you want me to actually answer these questions for you? Or is this rhetorical rhetoric? Propagandhi 3:8 - Jesus saves, Gretsky scores!!!
@niv8880
@niv8880 Месяц назад
Oh no. That's good but you just reminded me, way back last century I got a nerd friend out on a blind date with one of the work's secretaries. The next day she came in and asked me what I was thinking.... apparently the conversation between the two has descended to "what's your favourite word processor, Word or WordPerfect".
@SimoneBellomonte
@SimoneBellomonte Месяц назад
@@idehenebenezerTo your mom Self-explanatory. Yes
@SimoneBellomonte
@SimoneBellomonte Месяц назад
@@idehenebenezerAlso, for the last 1, no. 🗿
@CW91
@CW91 29 дней назад
Also in Win 95/98 there was the "It's now safe to turn off your computer." screen displayed even though you had Shut Down the computer. Being a young kid, I was like "Are you sure cuz you are still displaying some text"
@Umski
@Umski 28 дней назад
Pretty sure that was only on the older AT systems that had a hard on/off button rather than ATX that could do a soft turn off - hence not seeing that screen 🤔
@TallinuTV
@TallinuTV 14 дней назад
Yep. Technically on those old boards it was just shutting down Windows itself, since it couldn’t actually control the power supply!
@mrnoonan81
@mrnoonan81 Месяц назад
They also called x86 computers "IBM Compatible".
@NerdENerd
@NerdENerd 15 дней назад
IBM Compatible was more about the BIOS being able to boot MS DOS. There were plenty of X86 systems that couldn't run DOS.
@Blink_____
@Blink_____ 27 дней назад
Calling RAM an antiquated term is like saying a modern car isn't a car because it isn't a Model T
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 17 дней назад
Wikipedia says that the first car was the one Carl Benz built, ignoring the earlier Flocke Elektrowagen, probably because it was electrical, like 40% of the cars in the Americas when Ford built his Model T. But those weren't _real_ cars. Electric autos weren't cars until Elon Musk bought Tesla, right?
@julianbrelsford
@julianbrelsford 15 дней назад
Mr Cugnot seems to have been the first one to produce a "steam car" although you could call his contraption a tractor. It was supposed to tow several tons of artillery at roughly a walking pace. His was built in the 1700s so he beat the flocke electrowagen by well over a century... but nobody ever intended his "car-like object" to operate with the primary purpose ofoving humans about.
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 14 дней назад
@@julianbrelsford That's not a carriage at all, is it.
@Creepus_Explodus
@Creepus_Explodus Месяц назад
Could you make a video about how neither Intel nor AMD have made a true x86 CPU since 1995 and 1996 respectively? With the introduction of the Pentium Pro and AMD K5, they both switched to RISC cores, with x86 serving more as an intermediary for compatibility. The x86 instructions are broken into smaller operations to be executed by the RISC cores. I think it would be a very interesting topic, especially with the current popularity of ARM and RISC-V in new devices.
@nocturn9x
@nocturn9x Месяц назад
What? The fact that modern x86 CPUs now perform internal translations to a simple-ish RISC-like dialect before breaking it into micro-ops doesn't make those CPUs "not x86" lmao
@Creepus_Explodus
@Creepus_Explodus Месяц назад
@@nocturn9x Those micro-ops are the RISC instructions. As far as I am aware, neither manufacturer has ever disclosed what they are, only that they exist and are used. The point is that people look at x86, see that it's an old CISC instruction set, and think that AMD and Intel are completely screwed because "RISC is taking over computing". RISC has taken over desktop computing back in the 90s, people just don't know it because there wasn't much point in marketing it that way.
@user-um9sl1kj6u
@user-um9sl1kj6u Месяц назад
@@Creepus_Explodus they are X 86:-/ X86 is the baseline. Everything else is because they tacked on stuff after that- that’s what that micro code is= Additional functionality on top of the baseline.
@DanielQRT
@DanielQRT Месяц назад
even the original 8086 had microcodes, what is so surprising?
@LeafBoye
@LeafBoye Месяц назад
​@@nocturn9xwhy did you respond?? Bros gonna send you so much
@Chastity_Belt
@Chastity_Belt Месяц назад
Although the development of computers in the Soviet Union followed the path of copying western technology, they transferred that technology to their own theoretical base. Therefore, in russian, most computer terms differ from english ones. So, RAM in russian is called 'operational memory', and that is what it is still called today. In everyday life 'operational memory' often shortens to just 'operational', because essentially everyone knows what it means, but occasionally it creates little confusions when it comes to VRAM. So to avoid this, VRAM can be called 'video memory' or just 'memory' when in put into context, but never called 'operational'. Interestingly, in russian PC is also called PC (but it sounds differently, like PK) and have very same meaning - personal computer.
@TurboLoveTrain
@TurboLoveTrain Месяц назад
I wish their Trinary computer had beat out the X86.
@PioterCygan
@PioterCygan Месяц назад
Here in Poland you can find also a ,,Pamięć Operacyjna" which is just operational memory translated said alternatery with RAM
@RetroGameSpacko
@RetroGameSpacko Месяц назад
I was there 3000 years ago, when you had to manually assign IRQ and DMA values to your hardware
@TurboLoveTrain
@TurboLoveTrain Месяц назад
I remember the Conventional Memory, The Upper Memory Area, the High Memory Area the Expanded AND Extended memory. ...I was there when the FPU moved on to the CPU...
@Akira625
@Akira625 Месяц назад
Good ol’ MS-DOS. I remember the frustration of trying to find a free IRQ for my Sound Blaster and other cards I installed.
@danjitheman
@danjitheman Месяц назад
​@TurboLoveTrain I still have nightmares about exp/ext and trying to set it up and work.
@TurboLoveTrain
@TurboLoveTrain Месяц назад
@@danjitheman What is really interesting is that memory addressing never really changed--the handlers were moved to the main chip dye and everyone kind of forgot about extended/expanded memory... but it's still the same as it was in the 80/90s. Hell were still using the antiquated SDRAM and the associated antiquated buses and addressing methods.. that, again, came out in the 90s.
@kenbrown2808
@kenbrown2808 Месяц назад
you kids are cute. I remember when you had to take the computer to a shop if you wanted to max your ram out to a whopping 128K.
@rasowa2958
@rasowa2958 17 дней назад
I like how we still often use a pictogram of a floppy disk for a "Save" button. We ditched floppy disks about 15 years ago, so there is a generation of computer users who never saw a floppy disk.
@ego-lay_atman-bay
@ego-lay_atman-bay Месяц назад
I actually hate how many people refer to windows as PC (Personal Computer), but mac as mac. For example, I have seen people say something like "here's how to switch from pc to mac". The annoyance I have, is that a mac _is_ a Personal Computer, not specifically windows. I prefer to refer to PC as just a desktop (or laptop) computer that a physical mouse and keyboard, and is meant to be _personal_ to the user, which does not restrict what operating system you use, whether it's windows, mac, or linux, it;s still a PC. Oh, and cell phones and tablets are different, because they're mobile devices that are made to be used with just a touchscreen, and are usually not used for stuff that a PC is used for (by the way, a laptop that can fold into a tablet is still a PC).
@laurendoe168
@laurendoe168 Месяц назад
I agree with you, but 30 years ago got used to the term "PC" to mean an IBM clone. I "fought" that battle in the 80s; my Atari was also a personal computer; I was offended by the dominance of the use of the term "PC" to mean a specific genre of personal computer.
@KaitouKaiju
@KaitouKaiju 28 дней назад
Well now you know why that is the case. For the longest time apple themselves never called their machines PCs and neither did anyone else making non IBM computers. Like try convincing someone in the 80s that their commodore 64 is a PC
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 17 дней назад
Not every home computer is a PC.
@svr5423
@svr5423 16 дней назад
@@KaitouKaiju C64 is a home computer and therefore a type of PC. Not an IBM compatible one though.
@laurendoe168
@laurendoe168 16 дней назад
@@davidwuhrer6704 While not every home computer can run IBM software, every home computer IS a personal computer - even Macs.
@Kiyuja
@Kiyuja Месяц назад
I guess a PC is a PC, regardless of chip architecture, just like with the term laptop. Maybe I am wrong here but when I use the term PC I generally refer to the concept of a DIY machine for the home, not a specific architecture, brand or OS
@StolenJoker84
@StolenJoker84 Месяц назад
Same here. “PC”, IMO, means exactly that. A “Personal Computer”. Brand, OS, form factor, or any of that other stuff is pretty irrelevant to what is your “personal computer”.
@abbe9641
@abbe9641 Месяц назад
Modern phones could also be considered PC's as they are personal computing devices.
@EliseoBLK
@EliseoBLK Месяц назад
same here, at least in chile, it means computer, or any of the synonyms we use for it, like Tarro (bucket), compu, torre (desktops) or whatever we use to call them around here.
@user-lz2mu9uq4e
@user-lz2mu9uq4e Месяц назад
@@abbe9641 you've just reinvented PDA and PPC 😄
@Systox25
@Systox25 Месяц назад
Even apple call their Mac's PC…
@SmoggyLambGG
@SmoggyLambGG Месяц назад
"I'm a PC" "And I'm a Mac" "And I'm a Linux user"
@scialomy
@scialomy Месяц назад
"I use Arch by the way"
@wesleygreenhow8843
@wesleygreenhow8843 Месяц назад
@@scialomy " I use Dex btw"
@teknixstuff
@teknixstuff Месяц назад
And technically they were all PCs (Unless you had a really old mac or a raspberry pi or a linux phone, in which case they weren't x86 which might disqualify them depending on your definition of PC)
@idehenebenezer
@idehenebenezer Месяц назад
Jesus is returning soon🔥 Repent and turn away from your sins to obtain salvation 🤗🤗
@pensivepenguin3000
@pensivepenguin3000 Месяц назад
Linux guy would be sporting a neck beard and fedora
@awebuser5914
@awebuser5914 Месяц назад
Mechanical HDDs were always "random access", that's kind of the entire point of the moving head!
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 17 дней назад
No, that's "direct access".
@awebuser5914
@awebuser5914 16 дней назад
@@davidwuhrer6704 _"No, that's 'direct access'."_ What a moronic, stupidly obtuse, and basically incorrect, reply! The categorically understood difference between "random" and and "linear" is the _requirement_ to have unneeded data pass the read/write heads to position the media to the point of the correct data, ie: *TAPE* . HDD's are completely "random" in the ability to position the head at exactly where the requires data is, skipping the vast majority of other data that may exist on the platter. There is essentially *no* practical difference between a hard drive, core and later static "random access" memory. An address (track/sector or binary, difference is meaningless) is selected and a bit (or byte, depending an address width) is read. You could argue that SRAM was *MORE* "sequential" than an HDD since related data was always assumed to be in the next sequential address (ie: a string, etc) here a HDD has no such to limitation, as it were, related data _could_ be one byte at a time, scattered across the platter (fragmentation, basically). Core was unique since it used a destructive read and needed to be re-written. DRAM requires refresh cycles to stay persistent.
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 16 дней назад
@@awebuser5914 No, hard disks are not random access. You position the read at the track you need, but you still have to read the track until you get to the block you want. So a hard disk is not entirely linear like a tape, nor entirely random access like core memory. The technical term for it is direct access.
@awebuser5914
@awebuser5914 15 дней назад
@@davidwuhrer6704 That is a modern-day, bullshit, "re-definition", that has absolutely *no* meaning in the context of when the term was _created_ . The term was created to distinguish from ubiquitous magnetic *tapes* , nothing more. The _concept_ of RAM reaches back to 1948, being the first tube-based electronic storage of a program, versus hard-wiring or other mechanical means. Soon after, in 1951, magnetic tape was introduced as a way to store programs and data in a high-density and inexpensive manner, albeit linear and fairly slow. Thus the term "random access memory" was coined to distinguish between the two. Hard disk drives didn't appear until five years later and IBM (not so) ironically called it the "IBM 305 RAMAC (Random Access Method of Accounting and Control) system". Hmmm, I seem to see the term "random" in there...
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 15 дней назад
@@awebuser5914 The Zuse Z3 used telephone relays rather than vacuum tubes for storage. Tubes were first used in Bletchley Park, and they also used relays at first. Nobody called any part of a computer "memory" back then, although the Z3 could already store parts of programmes read from paper tape. John von Neumann was the first to use the term "memory" for the data store. Random access memory was used to distinguish from stack memory. Paper tape was not regarded as memory yet. Calling magnetic tape a linear memory is a retroactive redefinition, but accurate. In pure theory, all memory is one-dimensional like the magnetic tape of the Turing machine. In practice, a number of different storage technologies were used, some of which could be addressed directly, like magnetic core memory, and others which could not, like bubble memory. Hard discs are magnetic. Like with bubble memory, you can select a track, and then spool until you reach the address you want. Not random access. Not a stack. Not linear either. The term "direct access" was used. I don't care what buzzwords IBM used in their marketing material.
@Rylos277
@Rylos277 Месяц назад
Why didn't they just call it Direct Access Memory? Random isn't really accurate as it isn't random information getting fetched. It's specific to the information requested by the cpu. Is it because RAM would be called DAM?
@justicefool3942
@justicefool3942 Месяц назад
Direct Access Memory is already a thing. It's how Hard Drives operate since you can go directly to where the data is stored, but you still have to read it sequentially and wait for the hard drive platters to spin over where the data is. Random Access Memory means the information can be stored anywhere on the device and can be retrieved in any order. It is, in effect, random in how the data will be retrieved.
@nocturn9x
@nocturn9x Месяц назад
What's "random" is the access pattern. You can't predict it so it's effectively random. Hence you need byte addressable memory, unlike other memory technologies like NAND flash that only support block level operations by their very nature, and while you can definitely do "random reads" from an SSD or HDD, those are still not quite the same as RAM accesses. Since RAM is optimized for being accessed at any point in any order, that's where the random is coming from
@stanleysmooth
@stanleysmooth Месяц назад
Because saying "DAM" would be too vulgar
@codeman99-dev
@codeman99-dev Месяц назад
A disk can be "direct" access too. Random means *both* any location and any order.
@fanta6789
@fanta6789 Месяц назад
@@justicefool3942 thanks
@dallasgrful
@dallasgrful Месяц назад
Today is CrowdStrike day!
@test-rj2vl
@test-rj2vl Месяц назад
We should declare it international holiday. Imagine wishing happy CrowdStrike day to your colleagues and staying home that day.
@12thMandalorian
@12thMandalorian Месяц назад
We would love a video on the origin of CrowdStrike
@kr19569
@kr19569 Месяц назад
A man of culture
@seansingh4421
@seansingh4421 Месяц назад
They’re a…….weird company…. Like tech wise
@ColtonWeeks17
@ColtonWeeks17 23 дня назад
Honorable mention: "debugging" originally referred to the process of going in and removing actual bugs/insects from the computer (back when computers were the size of rooms)
@fridaycaliforniaa236
@fridaycaliforniaa236 Месяц назад
In some countries, you can't put a trademark on words that are too basic or too close from natural language. It would have been difficult for IBM to keep the term « personal computer » for itself, while the thing was actually nothing else than... a personal computer. Would be the same if some random car company tried to get an IP on a car called « small car ».
@panda4247
@panda4247 Месяц назад
fun fact, you can't get a copyright on numbers either, that's why Intel went from 286, 386, 486 to Pentium... like 586 "Penta-" being a prefix for 5
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 17 дней назад
IBM built the Personal Computer, as opposed to everyone else's home computers. ("A mini for your home!") They were a late entry to the market. The reason why they allowed others to clone them was because there was an anti-trust (monopoly abuse) case running against them at the time. Same reason they let Microsoft keep DOS. (The surprising thing was that they bought it from MS at all instead of using their own CP/M.) It was built from off-the-shelf components, designed to be as cheap as possible, causing all kinds of headaches for users having to configure the interrupts themselves. It sold so well because, well, nobody had ever been fired for buying IBM. Even though the thing was trash. But being thrown together from existing components, it was also modular, so it offered tinkering opportunities and upgrade paths that didn't require throwing the whole thing out, like Apple's products did and still do. The anti-trust suit against IBM was dropped by presidential decree a year later.
@britcom1
@britcom1 27 дней назад
I had a low tech friend years ago who asked me what he should get on a new computer. So I told him the specs he should ask for including how many Meg's of RAM he should need. He later forgot the number and asked me again how many Mega-Rams he needed. I couldn't stop laughing. Baaaa!
@Szejski
@Szejski 24 дня назад
0:08 Does "To the pit with him" mean the same as "drag and drop"?
@Konic_and_Snuckles
@Konic_and_Snuckles 29 дней назад
I think the technical term for a non-IBM "personal computer" in 1981 was "microcomputer," contrasting with "minicomputers" that were the size of refrigerators, and regular old computers a.k.a. mainframes, that were the size of entire rooms or office suites. If IBM hadn't enjoyed such a meteoric rise in business space, and later, the consumer space, we might still be calling them "microcomputers" to this day. Instead, we got "PC".
@pensivepenguin3000
@pensivepenguin3000 Месяц назад
Imagine how chaotic your computing experience would be if the processor did indeed just access memory randomly 😂
@Gramini
@Gramini 29 дней назад
That reminds me of Bogosort. But that memory behavior, you don't even need to randomize the set, you just have to check it again.
@johnlumsden9102
@johnlumsden9102 28 дней назад
"I'm a freak in the sheets" -thing I'm going to say at work next time someone compliments my Excel skills.
@comicalacurate
@comicalacurate Месяц назад
Daft Punk Album RAM!?
@MichaelPulsII
@MichaelPulsII 21 день назад
"RAM" is still useful because if you say "memory" to a user that doesn't know much about computers, they'll think you're talking about hard drive storage. They may not know what RAM is exactly that they know it's not storage for your files etc.
@Thurgosh_OG
@Thurgosh_OG Месяц назад
As an older UK PC builder, we used the term RAM (Random Access Memory) to differentiate from ROM (Read only Memory). ROM was where the bios and its precursors were stored and could not be accessed or adjusted by the end users in those earlier days. While there are still some uses of SAM today (magnetic tape being one) much faster memory types have since come into play.
@aheendwhz1
@aheendwhz1 Месяц назад
Technically, ROM vs. RAM doesn't make so much sense. A memory can be both ROM and RAM, and it could be neither of those.
@RolandHutchinson
@RolandHutchinson Месяц назад
Consistency is not to be looked for. ROM is random-access, but it is not RAM.
@kyleolson8977
@kyleolson8977 Месяц назад
The Personal Computer naming is wrong. The term Personal Computer predates the IBM PC's release in August of 1981 and it took a long time for the term to only mean what we would call the "IBM", or "IBM PC". *** A quick check of old Compute! Magazines shows personal computer was common in 1979, although "Microcomputer" was still more popular, and it shows that "Personal Computer" was used for other systems for years later. I can quickly find references to "your Apple or Atari Personal Computer". We wouldn't use the term "DOS" to describe the machines. "It's an IBM" (even if it had no IBM parts) vs " It's an Apple II" vs "It's a Macintosh" (the full name was common for a long time) vs "It's a Commodore 64" ("C64" was only used when there was no space). What we now call PCs, box specs would call something like "IBM", "IBM PC and Compatibles" or just "IBM PC-Compatibles", with occasional references to PC models. In the late mid-late 1980's into the 1990's the "Tandy" (Tandy 1000) also appeared on the spec box. For example, the original 1991 Civilization box specs say: "IBM PC/XT/AT/Tandy and most Compatibles" The goal would be to emphasize compatibility with the PC "IBM PC and 100% compatibles". Realistically, the best home computers and the most powerful PCs were not IBM, and all those models were dated. For that reason, when referring to the IBM it actually made sense to not use the term IBM PC, since the original PC, the IBM 5150, would not run PC games, and you needed to refer to CPUs If you look at the specs on 1992's Ultima VII: The Black Gate, you see IBM 100% Compatible: 386, 386SX, 486 PC System. In theory, this should make clear that the "IBM PC" will not run this. As a side note, since this is Ultima VII, there's a good chance your 386, 386SX, and 486 will not run it until you have performed a sacrifice to the memory manager to fit all of your drivers and the game under 1MB. You usually needed a boot disk for U7. Mine had an ultra tiny mouse driver. It isn't until the old 8-bit machines go away that PC starts to mean just the IBM PC Compatibles. *** No sane person used Wintel in the 1990's. It was a way to embarrass yourself. Just because it was done didn't mean it was a thing. Please top trying to make Wintel happen.
@MerccreM15
@MerccreM15 Месяц назад
I was fully expecting debug to be on this list too. Surprised it wasn't since that completely changed exact meaning but kept the same overall meaning since it became a term
@KaitouKaiju
@KaitouKaiju 28 дней назад
Yeah it used to mean removing actual bugs from mechanical computer components
@brianvogt8125
@brianvogt8125 24 дня назад
In 1983, I had a colleague (we were MVS System Programmers on IBM mainframe computer) who still referred to main memory as "core" because in the 1960s, main memory consisted of magnetic rings with wires cris-crossing through them.
@ssl3546
@ssl3546 Месяц назад
What color do you want that database? I think mauve has the most RAM.
@ProductBasement
@ProductBasement Месяц назад
One of the few acronyms I remember from college is: PCMCIA (People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms)
@FracturedPixels
@FracturedPixels Месяц назад
PEBCAK
@kellyherald1390
@kellyherald1390 Месяц назад
@@FracturedPixels I still use the acronym PICNIC - Problem In Chair Not In Computer
@Geeksmithing
@Geeksmithing Месяц назад
But that is not even an acronym though.... How exactly do you pronounce PCMCIA?
@Gametherapist
@Gametherapist Месяц назад
TIme to blow someone's mind with CD-ROM standing for Compact Disc - Read Only Memory. And DVD-RW being "Digital Video Disc - ReWritable"
@noonenoesbutme
@noonenoesbutme Месяц назад
Nice try bud 👍
@doujinflip
@doujinflip Месяц назад
Don't forget DVD+RW
@KryptonianAI
@KryptonianAI Месяц назад
Also don’t forget DVD-RAM. 🫢
@AaronOfMpls
@AaronOfMpls Месяц назад
Or Digital Versatile Disk, rather. (Movie-formatted DVDs were DVD-Video.)
@AaronOfMpls
@AaronOfMpls Месяц назад
@@doujinflip Yup, because Sony's gonna Sony 🙂
@samarahmad2008
@samarahmad2008 24 дня назад
RAM is random due to byte addressable capability while HDDs are sector addressable. In HDD, to read a byte first need to read sector and then in sequentially read byte which make it non random. Some SSD can do byte addressable but lot slower as they are not designed for that. In this context RAM is still relevant to randomly access memory location. 😊
@beakt
@beakt 29 дней назад
I disagree with your interpretation of RAM and your thesis that the term is outdated. It's random access memory from the processor's point of view. That is, the processor directly addresses and can manipulate RAM, even individual bytes, by direction of the program code it's executing. An SSD storage device might have grids for randomly accessing cells by its built-in controller, but the processor can't see the cells; it must request data in 4 KB blocks (or larger) through mass storage protocols, which is then transferred into RAM.
@ArneChristianRosenfeldt
@ArneChristianRosenfeldt 21 день назад
DRAM can only be read in a whole word line and then needs to be written back. SDRAM transmits a sequence of bytes from these. The CPU is indeed free to specify the starting address.
@beakt
@beakt 20 дней назад
@@ArneChristianRosenfeldt Irrelevant distinction, but thanks for playing.
@airknight8307
@airknight8307 20 дней назад
@@beakt lol he really thought he was on to something with that
@herbie_the_hillbillie_goat
@herbie_the_hillbillie_goat 19 дней назад
RAM is volatile memory used for temporarily storing data that the CPU needs quick access to while performing tasks. When the power is turned off, all data in RAM is lost. RAM is much faster than SSDs and is designed to handle the high-speed demands of active processing and running applications. An SSD is non-volatile storage, meaning it retains data even when the power is off. SSDs are faster than HDDs but are still much slower than RAM. They provide quick access to stored data but are not optimized for the rapid read/write operations required by the CPU during active tasks. Despite both being forms of random access memory, RAM and SSDs serve different roles in a computer system. RAM is still the appropriate term for the type of memory that provides the CPU with fast, temporary data storage. The speed, volatility, and purpose of RAM distinguish it from SSDs. The term "RAM" accurately describes its role in computing, and conflating it with SSDs would blur these important distinctions.
@ArneChristianRosenfeldt
@ArneChristianRosenfeldt 19 дней назад
@@herbie_the_hillbillie_goat you sound like a business accountant who briefly read into the topic. Can we make this topic more fascinating please? More about physics? What about MRAM? Core memory? DRAM and EEPROM both store charge on a capacitor. Some people claim that charge is distributed over a bulk material? I learned in school that charge site on the surface of a conductor. Later I learned that even an insulator has a conduction band, but doping does not work well. But if you shot electrons into the conduction band by sheer force (voltage >5Volt) , they are free to move.
@nonamesleft136
@nonamesleft136 Месяц назад
I refer to all endpoint machines as PCs, compared to servers, NAS or other more specialized tech. Yes, that includes Mac and Linux, so long as it's designed for an individual to use it as a daily driver.
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 17 дней назад
Is my Amiga a PC? What about my Raspberry?
@nonamesleft136
@nonamesleft136 16 дней назад
@@davidwuhrer6704 is it designed for use as a daily driver by an individual? Is it designed to carry out a specific function on its own?
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 16 дней назад
@@nonamesleft136 It is a universal machine, not limited to one specific function. I use one of my Raspberries as a desktop computer. I use another as a web server. And there are still things that only Amiga makes possible.
@xenomcze
@xenomcze Месяц назад
Another outdated term may be BIOS - today, every new computer doesn't have a BIOS, but an UEFI, however branding inside UEFI settings' screens still often refers to itself as "BIOS", because the term is just so commonly understood (whereas UEFI isn't).
@teknixstuff
@teknixstuff Месяц назад
UEFI is a Basic Input/Output System, technically. It's just not an IBM compatible BIOS. So that's technically the term we should be using: "IBM Compatible BIOS" vs "UEFI", or "BIOS" for when the distinction doesn't matter. Nobody would do that though.
@turtlefrog369
@turtlefrog369 Месяц назад
UEFI is still a BIOS. probably even more so than the IBM BIOS.
@ricequackers
@ricequackers Месяц назад
I think it's just because BIOS rolls off the tongue more easily. The correct generic term would be firmware.
@Fred2-123
@Fred2-123 Месяц назад
And BIOS can be pronounced as a word, but UEFI can't. That's why it will always be called "bios".
@KaitouKaiju
@KaitouKaiju 28 дней назад
​@@ricequackersEven firmware isn't really a good term because there are a lot of firmwares that aren't at all a bios. Any piece of software stored permanently on a chip is a firmware, for example the OS of a 3DS is firmware
@Noone-of-your-Business
@Noone-of-your-Business 29 дней назад
Yep. And _floppy discs_ stopped being *floppy* after the 5.25" format was succeeded by 3.5" discs in _rigid_ casings. But that didn't stop us from calling them "floppies". Heck, we even called the disc *_drives_* "floppies".
@dlevi67
@dlevi67 27 дней назад
To be fair, the magnetic medium inside a 3.5" hard plastic casing is still floppy.
@patheddles4004
@patheddles4004 25 дней назад
Dlevi's right, 5.25" floppies and 3.5" floppies both store data on internal magnetic disks that really are floppy. 3.5" floppies just have a rigid case. And Hard Disk Drives really do store data on rigid metal disks - I've opened them up too.
@timseguine2
@timseguine2 Месяц назад
I remember when video games and software used to say "IBM PC or compatible" in the system requirements.
@nydamx
@nydamx 22 дня назад
"Ram is outdated term." "Ram is correct and accurate term still today. I just don't like the term." Never seen someone prove themself wrong so fast in their own video.
@rodrigotudancafernandez17
@rodrigotudancafernandez17 Месяц назад
Why do they call it RAM when you RAM in the cold data of out hot read the data?
@scorcher64
@scorcher64 21 день назад
We just continue to use these terms simply because people would know what we're referring to. Like how we continue to say "Q-tips" when the actual name is "cotton swabs". Just up and saying something different the next day will start to confuse people. Though, we STILL have people today still calling storage space "memory". Conversation goes like...: "Dang.. I'm low on memory..." "Then delete some stuff!" "I said MEMORY, as in RAM! Not storage space! I have plenty of free storage space!" "Oh...then.. what's the difference..?"
@pensivepenguin3000
@pensivepenguin3000 Месяц назад
As a kid in the 80s I always thought “floppy disks” were those larger flexible discs and “hard disks” were the smaller discs with the hard plastic cases. I can’t be alone in having thought that lol
@sureshmukhi2316
@sureshmukhi2316 Месяц назад
Many people thought that. I had to explain to them that a "hard disk" was inside the computer and those 1.44 mb 3.5 inch disks were also called "floppy disks" or "diskettes".
@allanrichardson1468
@allanrichardson1468 Месяц назад
The actual disk inside a 3 1/2 inch floppy is just as floppy as the disk inside a 5 3/4 or 8 inch floppy. It just has more protection.
@alanlafond9705
@alanlafond9705 26 дней назад
As a kid in the 80s, we didn't even have the 3.5" floppy disks. Everything we used was on the 5.25" disks instead. It wasn't until late 80s that I even saw a 3.5" floppy, and by that point I was already familiar with hard drives since we had some computers with them, so it was only natural for us to go on to call the 3.5" disks floppies as well.
@allanrichardson1468
@allanrichardson1468 26 дней назад
@@alanlafond9705 And indeed they were floppy, on the inside!
@alanlafond9705
@alanlafond9705 26 дней назад
@@allanrichardson1468 Oh, indeed! I've taken a few of them apart, back in the day! Pretty easy to separate the casing if you're careful. If not, a 3.5" disk doesn't run you too much to buy a replacement. 😁
@miketrissel5494
@miketrissel5494 28 дней назад
I was fed up with acronyms, especially "PC's". as far back as a job interview in Aug of 1983. As an electrician/electronics tech, the owner/interviewer asked me if I was familiar with PC's. and I had to ask which type of PC's he meant, and he did not know what it stood for. I said, to me it could be, 'Printed Circuits", "Programmable controllers", or "personal computers". He still didn't know which, so I let him off the hook, and said ...I can do all 3. 🤭
@hhidd
@hhidd Месяц назад
3:53 lets just be happy that acronym didn't take off...
@jnharton
@jnharton 27 дней назад
The thing about an SSD (Solid State Disk) is that you have 'random BLOCK access' whereas RAM gives you 'random BYTE/WORD access'. So they work a little bit differently in practice.
@leapbtw
@leapbtw Месяц назад
it’s named after a Daft Punk album
@zephsmith3499
@zephsmith3499 27 дней назад
RAM still works because it's a generic description of functionality, not a specific technology. Long ago, I predicted that we would use "core memory" long after the origins were lost, retronymically considering it to be the (random access) memory closest to the CPU, ie: at the core of the computer. Of course, the actual origin referred to very tiny ferromagnetic donut shaped "cores", which had been used for some while, but were being replaced with other technology (which today we would generically call RAM) at the time of my prediction. My prediction turned out wrong, although the term "core dump" lasted for some while (as a dump of memory contents).
@svr5423
@svr5423 16 дней назад
memory closest du the CPU would be the L1 SRAM cache. Although it's transparent :).
@SpidermanandJeny
@SpidermanandJeny Месяц назад
PC is iust a generic term. It doesn't matter about the specifics very much. Apple makes P. C.'s. They just don't like to call them that.
@this.is.a.username
@this.is.a.username 29 дней назад
he literally just explained that it wasn't and how it wasn't.
@KaitouKaiju
@KaitouKaiju 28 дней назад
The point the video is making is that that was not always the case. The apple ii for example was not a PC even though it is a home microcomputer
@angrymokyuu9475
@angrymokyuu9475 26 дней назад
​@@KaitouKaiju Apple didn't start drawing a distinction between Macs and "PCs" until much later. At the time of the Apple ][, there were plenty of other PCs that were all incompatible with each other. There's a reason the phrase "IBM PC compatible" survived until Windows 9x came along(rendering it unnecessary).
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 17 дней назад
​​​​@@angrymokyuu9475The reason for that phrase is that an IBM PC compatible machine is not an actual IBM, and while it will run MS-DOS, it is not hardware compatible, as opposed to an IBM PC clone (which is a PC for all intents and purposes, but not an actual IBM either). An Apple, Atari, Sinclair, Commodore, Acorn, or TRS won't even run MS-DOS. They were home computers, but not PCs.
@Geeksmithing
@Geeksmithing Месяц назад
All great info, except for you mistakenly referring to terms are acronyms when they aren't. RAM and BIOS are indeed acronyms. Acronyms are strictly pronounceable words. CPU, PSU and AMD are not acronyms, they are initialisms. You have to say the letters individually. I mean, if we are a bunch of geeks getting pedantic about the names of things at least get it right! 🤪Thanks for attending my TED talk.
@JohnneyleeRollins
@JohnneyleeRollins Месяц назад
because thats how you install it
@debemdeboas
@debemdeboas Месяц назад
underrated comment
@andejacobs6633
@andejacobs6633 13 дней назад
SSD's are not that random. Reads are still done a page at a time, writes are usually 3 pages for TLC, and erase is done a block at a time. This is why random benchmarks are slower than sequential.
@BrianG61UK
@BrianG61UK Месяц назад
Q: Why is it called RAM? A: To keep ewe happy?
@TheBattleRabbit860
@TheBattleRabbit860 Месяц назад
I had no idea about most of this. While we're pointing out odd things a lot of us get wrong without realizing it: at around 2:37 "What we all need is more acronyms." and while I agree, we have too many, none of the "acronyms" swirling around were, in fact, acronyms outside of "R.A.M." or 'ram'. An acronym is an abbreviation that is pronounced as a word. PSU, GPU, CPU, HDD, SSD, are all abbreviations. R.A.M., N.A.S., R.A.I.D. are acronyms. Now we both learned something :3
@patheddles4004
@patheddles4004 25 дней назад
The proper term for those other abbreviations is 'initialisms', but that distinction is mostly dead. For most purposes now, 'acronym' already covers both acronyms and initialisms.
@TheBattleRabbit860
@TheBattleRabbit860 25 дней назад
@@patheddles4004 I haven't heard anyone use initialism in ages. Good to see it's lost but not forgotten! And even though acronym has effective taken the place of both, in my head I will always be correcting people lol.
@svenwahnsinn734
@svenwahnsinn734 Месяц назад
Because of Daft Punk.
@Bob-rb9zw
@Bob-rb9zw Месяц назад
0:58. No. It's still storage, not memory. Car radio technology has changed in the last 20 years but it's still a radio, not a wheel. 1:45. Yes, the name was because it was physical chips but the name remains because what it refers to still serves the same function, even though the technology has changed.
@conorstewart2214
@conorstewart2214 Месяц назад
Storage is memory, the only difference is persistence. The term RAM could apply to both. There is nothing to say that your computer's memory has to be RAM anyway, you could use sequential memory in place of RAM and it would still be possible to have a functional system, it just wouldn't perform as well. The actual memory or storage type and technology used doesn't actually matter, the only thing that changes is performance and how you access it. You could have a system with only SSDs and no traditional RAM and it could work absolutely fine. As for chipsets the name remains but it isn't accurate anymore so why shouldn't it be changed?
@Aeturnalis
@Aeturnalis Месяц назад
3:17 skip ad
@NegativeROG
@NegativeROG Месяц назад
Ads? What are those?
@xMdb
@xMdb Месяц назад
Use Sponso Block instead
@Mark.Taylor.
@Mark.Taylor. 29 дней назад
Getting low on video ideas? So basically the 'old' terms are still valid. WinTel was never popular (source: I was there) and the ARM Laptops are Personal Computers so yes they are PCs.
@bite-sizedshorts9635
@bite-sizedshorts9635 Месяц назад
If we keep using the terms, they are, by definition, not outdated. The "random" in random access memory meant that you really could access any random spot in memory directly, not that the accesses would really be random. This is just being silly. As far as "chipset," he says that modern computers have only one chip, the CPU. That is incorrect. I just looked at a motherboard on Amazon and counted over 20 integrated circuits or chips. It sure looks like a set of chips to me. "PC" was short for personal computer before IBM built one. I had a PC that was by Timex-Sinclair, and several by RadioShack Color Computer. Then in 1989, I bought an "IBM PC compatible," meaning a computer that would run the same software as the computers IBM was making. Mine was a Tandy 3000NL from Radio Shack. I have never in my life owned a computer from IBM. I built my current computer from scratch, so it has no brand name at all. Listening to this "child" talk about things that happened before he was born is amusing. I started my computer journey over 50 years ago by accessing the mainframe at the Research Triangle via acoustic modem from UNC at Chapel Hill as part of my astronomy homework.
@dave23024
@dave23024 20 дней назад
Exactly. I just refer to my car as a "fast thing with wheels," but there are other fast things with wheels, like skateboards. Thus, my car is actually a skateboard.
@Hako_exe
@Hako_exe Месяц назад
And how does this help me with cloudstrike… lol
@CaptainJZH
@CaptainJZH Месяц назад
Gotta download more RAM bro
@hatyyy
@hatyyy Месяц назад
just boot into safe mode and update the system.
@Hako_exe
@Hako_exe Месяц назад
@@hatyyy the joke went over your head lol
@Randomtheprotogen
@Randomtheprotogen Месяц назад
You got cloudstruck
@hatyyy
@hatyyy Месяц назад
@@Hako_exe wheres the joke
@yellstr
@yellstr Месяц назад
So none of these terms is really outdated. Any mathematician would tell you: a set containing one item is still a set, so chipsets are still relevant, computers are still personal and RAM is still accessed randomly (as opposed to sequentially).
@theblackwithin3457
@theblackwithin3457 Месяц назад
we should indeed call apple devices PC.... pricey crap.
@xgui4-studios
@xgui4-studios Месяц назад
that sooooo trueeeee!
@owlstead
@owlstead Месяц назад
I don't think their hardware is crap at all, I think most tech people would love to have Apple HW, if it just came without Apple trying to control everything.
@theblackwithin3457
@theblackwithin3457 Месяц назад
@@owlstead as a tech person myself (who works woth other tech people) i can asure you that your assumption is incorrect. we're efficient. you can get much more powerful hardware for the same money. with much better features. (and without fisherprice OS)
@teknixstuff
@teknixstuff Месяц назад
@@owlstead Actually no. Apple's locked down firmware etc and confusing OS isn't something I'd ever want to deal with.
@owlstead
@owlstead Месяц назад
@@teknixstuff Oh, that's the reason that I don't buy them either. But I won't call their hardware crap.
@peterkaldenberg2812
@peterkaldenberg2812 18 дней назад
Ram is random access, meaning you can address a cell randomly. In contrast with serial memory which can only be read in sequence. (I2C, SWP, SPI)
@larryroyovitz7829
@larryroyovitz7829 Месяц назад
I remember looking at old game boxes and seeing that "IBM AT/XT Compatible"
@skullleader-hw9hi
@skullleader-hw9hi 22 дня назад
Personal Computer have been around since the 60. IBM just reused the term. There was even Personal computing Magazine as far back as 1977. Covering Apple, Atari, commodore, Tandy and others. The trade mark is "The IBM Personal Computer"
@aegisofhonor
@aegisofhonor 22 дня назад
RAM is still RAm in it's pure form, there is nothing "targeted", it still uses an entirely random access algorithm to find the data. It just "seems" targeted because it can randomly access the data so fast, it seems to us that it has to know exactly where it is, but no, the computer can not instantly know exactly where any complete data code is.
@feralstorm
@feralstorm 29 дней назад
I remember the days when any computer that could fit on top of a desk was designated a 'microcomputer' or 'micro', as they were smaller than 'minicomputers' which were small enough that they didn't fill an entire room.
@TheJjcczz
@TheJjcczz Месяц назад
The key is the significance of the identifier. RAM has always been RAM because the speed at which it access information is what’s most important, just as the most important identifier in SSD is that it’s Solid State rather than Hard Disk. Chip Set is a slightly different as it also became used to refer to a series of chips from a given brand such as intel’s i5, i7, and i9 or AMD’s Ryzen series. Since they are typically 3-4 processors released at the same time
@anenglishmanplusamerican7107
@anenglishmanplusamerican7107 Месяц назад
The only set of chip I know is from a chippy which I went last night. It was well cooked, and the fish was great.
@876Droid
@876Droid Месяц назад
Could you do one on the two wires that are usually laid across roads and runs to a sealed metal box. I'm assuming it tracks the speed and number of vehicles that use that given road way.
@conorstewart2214
@conorstewart2214 Месяц назад
Why would they cover that? Also a lot of the time they aren't wires but thin pipes filled with air, when a car drivers over one it compresses the air which they can then sense back at the box. They can use them to measure how much traffic there is, speeds, directions, etc.
@annoloki
@annoloki 29 дней назад
"Random" is correct, random just means that each value is unrelated to the value that came before, ie, not a pattern, not predictable... contrast this with a spinning disc, where you can move the head to a random track, but then the sectors on that track have to be read sequentially, as they spin past the head. Of course, one of the oldest terms in computing is "computer", which used to be the profession title of a person whose job was to perform calculations. A room full of computers was a roof full of people (usually women) with pens 'n paper, doing maths for stuff
@David-hm9ic
@David-hm9ic 20 дней назад
Hobby? After 20+ years in corporate IT it's hardly a hobby. I see no issue with the old terms. Most everybody understands what they mean and the key to effective communication is to be understood.
@jagger2001
@jagger2001 Месяц назад
Growing up my dad always had the latest tech. He helped me build my first few PCs which he always referred to as "IBM compatible"
@BoraHorzaGobuchul
@BoraHorzaGobuchul Месяц назад
I hate far more when people confuse non-volatile storage with ram. Here in Mordor they more and more often call any data storage "memory"...
@stephenspackman5573
@stephenspackman5573 Месяц назад
I must be old, I was unable to figure out what was outdated or even confusing about any of these.
@frankz728
@frankz728 Месяц назад
The OS locates programs and files after the data location algorythms and is still ramdom like, computers nowadays are more efficiently locating thins in memory but RAM is still a valid term.
@Llortnerof
@Llortnerof Месяц назад
The OS has nothing to do with it. It's called RAM because all data in it can be accessed in any random order without noticeably affecting performance. It is indeed still valid since nothing about that changed. It seems old is being mistaken for outdated here. Notably, no explanation for why it would no longer apply is given.
@javabeanz8549
@javabeanz8549 23 дня назад
How about thumb drives? Some of them are more like thumbnail drives these days. I know, they are more correctly referred to as flash drives.
@mfoxxy52
@mfoxxy52 26 дней назад
When programming FGPA, you have BRAM and DRAM with the BRAM requiring you to read blocks of data a bit more like sequential memory
@tongwang653
@tongwang653 Месяц назад
Its interesting that "chipset" is actually called "south bridge" in other languages, e.g. Chinese. I only came to know the term chipset later on as the original English version of south bridge.
@KaitouKaiju
@KaitouKaiju 28 дней назад
A Southbridge is one of the chips that makes up a chipset The other being the northbridge
@Ce1es
@Ce1es 22 дня назад
The first thing that comes to my mind is tech but not directly PC related (there, I said it). It's to tape something and rolling the tape when there is clearly no tape involved when recording a video, either film or flash storage. RAM: If comparing working memory to nvme drives, maybe something like volatile and persistent memory could be used to differentiate them as one loses the info when the power is cut and the other doesn't. Or we could call it cache as that describes what it does. It caches information that does not fit in the CPU cache. PC: That took a weird evolution. I still remember the term "IBM compatible PC" when IBM didn't even do that thing anymore. They meant a PC that was able to run MS-DOS and later Windows. Nowadays I still like the term PC to differentiate them from computers that are not personal such as servers or virtual machines in the cloud. Chipset is still a correct term for what is going on on the mainboard, but yes and X670E is not a chipset, it's a single chip. I sometimes wonder how a completely alien race would develop technology. How would their cars look when they didn't evolve from horse carriages? What aspect ratio would their screens have and why? How would their input devices look like, would they have a keyboard and if so by what reason would the keys be sorted? Would the num block be different depending on whether it's a phone or a calculator?
@gparyani
@gparyani 25 дней назад
Reminds me of "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" on Linux. "Core" refers to memory, and is also a reference to an ancient storage technology called magnetic core memory.
Далее
The Hidden Engineering of Landfills
17:04
Просмотров 1,2 млн
The Dumbest Connectors Ever
6:36
Просмотров 1,3 млн
Why did we Abandon 4:3? | Nostalgia Nerd
16:40
Просмотров 677 тыс.
Should You Buy an Expensive Mouse?
8:19
Просмотров 136 тыс.
I've never seen ANYTHING like this before... Temple OS
17:57
Why is HD 1080p? | Nostalgia Nerd
20:59
Просмотров 292 тыс.
How Bad is This $10,000 PC from 10 Years Ago??
22:00
Просмотров 3,8 млн
The SECRETS That Make Your Phone ACTUALLY Work
16:25
Просмотров 361 тыс.
The Slow Death of Windows
17:22
Просмотров 1,1 млн
The ORIGINAL SCAM Graphics Card!
28:18
Просмотров 226 тыс.
Why Fast PCs Stutter (Interrupts Explained)
5:28
Просмотров 135 тыс.
Do we really need NPUs now?
15:30
Просмотров 494 тыс.