Why JaackMaate Was Arrested! (not clickbait) 

You gotta do itt!

These stories are so good

Cmon👍👍🤫🤫

Do it

He’s done it

Yes

@@abzinhoo ur a legend

Robbie’s reply, “it was a different fat c*nt” killed me

@@benhardcastle2305 yes

Pat earrings

Hey Cass....where you been?

CASS

@@gazman6536 He’s got an album coming out this year apparently. Signed with XL

@@mspaceselectrical3652 nice. Thought he may be in prison

Two words: no comment

Why the police didn't do anything wrong. The solicitor would have told him to be honest anyway.

@@gsw8734 no solicitor is going to tell you to be 'honest', particularly if that honesty could lead to you being prosecuted 🙄

@@gsw8734 any solicitor worth his salt would tell you to go no comment in this situation and let it ride.

@@gavinphillips9367 a solicitor will only tell you 2 go no comment if it serious

Daddy robbie

And bent

@@RoganClipVaultYT your daddy nobby

Makes sense that does

how do comment on every single video and tweet ?

@@cmb741 just as easy as You are there for them

@@JamesReviews difference between viewing tweets and videos to commenting on every single one but ok

@@cmb741 but what you're saying is. It's hard to comment on all the ones you've seen him on because it's a lot right. But you're there too, the only difference is he commented and got likes. Doesn't take much time

@taco trader I study law and as far as I have been taught you can hit first and claim self-defense

@taco trader this is where you need to play off of what the prosecutor says to your advantage as well as trying to get access to any security tapes for your defence. Although, being honest most courts wouldn't even take this case

@taco trader if you have the right evidence and can play off of the law and what the prosecutor says then I'm pretty sure most barristers could cope

@taco trader take it from a police officer hitting first can be self defence preemptive strikes are used loads, yes you’ll have to prove it was self defence but if you’re honestly in fear for your or someone else’s safety it’s fine to hit first eg if you see someone arguing with your mate and from behind you see the other guy holding some sort of weapon if you hit the guy you’re doing it in self defence of your friend.

That’s true but it’s extremely hard to prove, and in this case I get the strong sense that they were both drunk and being aggressive to each other which resulted in jack hitting him after he insulted him. That’s not self defence at all. Insults and arguments are not defences against assault unless in very very specific circumstances. If someone insults you or is aggressive towards you just walk away, it’s not worth getting beaten up or being charged with assault.

the yt username says it all lol

@@bradazbradazbradaz 😂

This is good but it is actually reasonable belief and not general belief. However, that's besides the point. Be careful of what you say. I assume you are in the field of law and therefore you should understand that wherever you give free legal advice, whoever takes up the advice becomes your client immediately. You are therefore responsible for that individual and you could be sued if anything goes wrong. Which is why you see online lawyers and youtubers who are in the law field always emphasizing that "this is not legal advice".

@@waleodufote8211 oh thank you. I wasn't aware of that. I'm only at my first year of college so this is all new to me. Also, I knew it was reasonable but didn't want to use the word twice so I went with general instead 😂😂

@@HarryRose You're welcome bro. Enjoy Law, it is an amazing field.

@@waleodufote8211 thanks bro 🙏❤

yeah, pre-emptive strikes are protected, but you gotta be really careful and genuinely feel threatened.

Great shout!

@@HappyHourPodcast get this done!!!

@@HappyHourPodcast hopefully it never happens . You’re both bellends.

I only just saw this comment, but this comment should have at least 500 likes

Aye, its on perceived threat. No wonder the CPS hate coppers🤣

Yes but you also have to state that the force used was reasonable and that you believe that you was in danger.

@@gsw8734 yes, so in jack’s case it was self defence

@@callumsharpe2045 Really? Jack never said he was actually fearful nor was punching him the correct course of action, for starters he didn't have to approach the other guy.

Well you do have to prove the risk to yourself and that used reasonably force.

@@gsw8734 well ye as I said if he isn't lying I'd say one punch is reasonable force. Maybe I'm wrong 🤷‍♂️

@@reubenmanoharan3204 Again one punch could definitely be assault.

Daniel Ricardo?

would be sick to see an f1 driver on here but jack has stated a few times that he doesnt really care about f1 and that he isnt bothered about it

Yeah he hadnt heard of William's so I doubt hed be the best one to do a podcast with them.

It's out now on Spotify with highlights clips coming out on the channel this week. 🇳🇺

Why it was a voluntary interview, he could have got up and left.

Or Jack is remembering it wrong considering it was 10 years ago...

He’s got a couple boxing matches first

He’s been on lad

@@oxxyyyyy when has been on send a link

@@oxxyyyyy oh yeah but I guess my be good to get him back on again

@@SharkyHD nah there is so many good guests he could get than getting Chris again because that podcast was dry.

Irvousnessir. Even Google doesn't have a clue...

Ok Liam

oh liam. hope you get better soon

Or Jack could have remember the conversation incorrectly considering it was 10 years ago. The police are not legally allowed to lie in interview in the UK so I highly doubt that is what the officer said.

@@gsw8734 hahahhahahahhahahahahah police not allowed to lie in an interview.

@@Mr_jz_12 They definitely are not, hence why it's recorded audio and visually. You also get a copy of the interview on DVD.

@@gsw8734 You're nieve if you think they dont lie. Fuck, ive had JUDGES lie, in court.

@@Mr_jz_12 Sure you have. If that is true go to the Independent Complaints Commission...