Why King James Bible Only? Bible Questions with Michael Pearl - Episode 027 

I'm using the KJV to make my own version. I've named it, but I don't want anyone getting into it, so the name will be kept secret until I release it. My new version, after it is complete, will have every verse that is corrupted in new versions highlighted. In addition, it will have the bible codes.

@@clickmeforcovidtruth8168 have you done it? please share

The lord doesn't warn you through people's words, but through their actions. "A bad tree cannot produce good fruit" Idk where this scripture is, but I remember reading it about 3 months ago. God has shown me corrupt people through their actions.

Pentecostal much?

@@chriscravens8318 Man if you saw BHI you would see what the true "miracle of reinterpretation" looks like

Some pull verses out of context from the KJV to try and justify the false teaching of KJV onlyism.

It’s all the devil doing this. Trying to pull people away from the kjv because it’s Gods true word. He can’t destroy it, so he tampers with it . Man’s opinion doesn’t matter. Man is going back to the dirt. All of this manuscript stuff doesn’t matter. Devil has everyone focused on the wrong thing. Causing confusion. And people acting like they are such scholars. Not that serious. Whatever worked 30, 300 years ago is still working. God didn’t leave his people without a bible that he said he would preserve for over 400 years. That’s foolish. What God says is what matters. Why no one is going to God behooves me. The devil has people so caught up in “understanding” Gods word. He’s blinded their minds and people don’t realize this is spiritual, and the word is our sword against the enemy. They don’t know it’s not all about understanding- which that’s what the Holy Ghost is for anyway, that they forget it’s about the power behind Gods word. The kjv clearly says angels hearken unto the voice of Gods word. So when we speak his word angels move on our behalf , and demons hate the true word. They are tripped up by it, because it thwarts their plans. Even when a demon is being cast out of someone, I notice they tend to use thee, and thus. Why is that? Why don’t they quote the niv or the others? Because even they know the true word. Niv, and all that other crap doesn’t even register with demons. If i say get THEE behind me Satan. They understand the kjv better than we ever will on this side of heaven. Therefore- I don’t need anything except the Bible that the devil is attacking. The one you can hardly find now. The one that’s hidden in my heart, even before I got saved. The one that worked when I quoted when I got saved. The one that ran demons out of the Alzheimer’s nursing home when I read it 23 years ago. The one people lost their lives over to get it printed. The one without the witchcraft symbol like nkjv. The one that gave me peace when I quoted it at night when I could hear what sounded like demons knocking on my window. The one that nobody had a problem with 100 years ago, or even 50 years ago- and worked for our grand and great grandparents, the one that I remember easily even with a bad memory- that’s the one I’ll stick with till I die!

That's a legendary quote there

Amen, it all comes down to being saved .. a person can be saved by any bible that shows salvation through Christ.

Amen I was saved using an NLT but I became wrestless. I found issues with the NLT and started to investigate all different copies. Amassed a small library but I reviled the king james. I don't know why by only recently I've been brought to gentleman like this who proclaim the King James is the pure word. I had a spiritual attack when I finally decided to truly look into the matter. It was like a massive fit of depression a d angst, but by the grace of God I pulled through and now I'm convicted. One can be saved even without scripture, but the forces are at work manipulating "bibles" today that claim only to be flawed works of man. Who confuse and attack his authority with footnotes offering alternate explanation or the teachings of men in study bibles intermingled with God's word. You don't need the kjv to be saved, but you really aught to be reading it after you are.

I’d take a closet in Heaven but I get what you mean 😂

Is that the worst? The NIV calls Joseph Jesus's father! Do I even need to say how WRONG that is!?

​@clickmeforcovidtruth8168 I'm not trying to be smart, but is Mary really the mother ie did Jesus come from Mary's ovum and carry her DNA or did Mary just carry Jesus? I've never really thought about until I saw your reply, which I already knew. As Jesus was born of a virgin mother or was Mary like a surrogate?

It’s all the devil doing this. Trying to pull people away from the kjv because it’s Gods true word. He can’t destroy it, so he tampers with it . Man’s opinion doesn’t matter. Man is going back to the dirt. All of this manuscript stuff doesn’t matter. Devil has everyone focused on the wrong thing. Causing confusion. And people acting like they are such scholars. Not that serious. Whatever worked 30, 300 years ago is still working. God didn’t leave his people without a bible that he said he would preserve for over 400 years. That’s foolish. What God says is what matters. Why no one is going to God behooves me. The devil has people so caught up in “understanding” Gods word. He’s blinded their minds and people don’t realize this is spiritual, and the word is our sword against the enemy. They don’t know it’s not all about understanding- which that’s what the Holy Ghost is for anyway, that they forget it’s about the power behind Gods word. The kjv clearly says angels hearken unto the voice of Gods word. So when we speak his word angels move on our behalf , and demons hate the true word. They are tripped up by it, because it thwarts their plans. Even when a demon is being cast out of someone, I notice they tend to use thee, and thus. Why is that? Why don’t they quote the niv or the others? Because even they know the true word. Niv, and all that other crap doesn’t even register with demons. If i say get THEE behind me Satan. They understand the kjv better than we ever will on this side of heaven. Therefore- I don’t need anything except the Bible that the devil is attacking. The one you can hardly find now. The one that’s hidden in my heart, even before I got saved. The one that worked when I quoted when I got saved. The one that ran demons out of the Alzheimer’s nursing home when I read it 23 years ago. The one people lost their lives over to get it printed. The one without the witchcraft symbol like nkjv. The one that gave me peace when I quoted it at night when I could hear what sounded like demons knocking on my window. The one that nobody had a problem with 100 years ago, or even 50 years ago- and worked for our grand and great grandparents, the one that I remember easily even with a bad memory- that’s the one I’ll stick with till I die!

I also think the KJV is superior. It puts things in a way that is much more poetic then the NIV. Straight away it grips you. “ 1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.”

@@noodlyappendage6729 Amen. More importantly, KJV avoids the fraudulent saying Sinaiticus. So does nkjv, which is nice to check occasionally when confused by wording. The others are *based* on sinaiticus

GOD* (not "god") 🙏👍

Church Bible publishers prints some really nice Pure Cambridge Editions.

Learn greek

Foundational explanation, he didn't compare the translations. It's an OK explanation.

I agree. I can barely understand it

@@Allyourbase1990 try UKJV, and U = UPDATED.

Why did Jesus Christ send us the Holy Spirit? Do you engage Him while reading the Bible? Why don't you canvass for the translation of Shakespeare's books into modern English? That would water down his ideas right? But you are okay if the Bible, God's word is watered down to make it more "understandable"! It does not make sense to me at all!

@@Allyourbase1990 That's because you read it like a novel. The Bible is a spiritual book and it has just one Author- the Holy Spirit. If you ask Him to give you understanding, He will do just that. Jesus Christ sent Him to us for a reason.

Hello, We think you might find this helpful. www.bing.com/videos/search?q=the+door+king+james+bible&&view=detail&mid=1A247E233B118442D2291A247E233B118442D229&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=%2Fvideos%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dthe%2Bdoor%2Bking%2Bjames%2Bbible%26FORM%3DHDRSC3

No Greater Joy Ministries thank you now I have another question. If I have a KJV bible that was published by Thomas Nelson is that ok or should I be reading out of the Cambridge publisher?

Wrong. They compared and diligently revised the previous English translations. But out of the around 50 translators, many of them spoke 7, 8, even 9 languages in one and spoke them all fluently. They actually translated directly out of the Hebrew Bible and for the New Testament Greek text they mainly used the Stephanus Greek text (both 1550 and 1551 editions) and probably even more importantly was Beza’s 1598 Greek-Latin (corrected translation)-Latin vulgate (corrupted text used by the catholic church). Please do your research.

@@stevenl1706 The Textus Receptus used for the KJV NT has pieces of the Latin Vulgate in it.

So what Bible is perfect then? Which translation would you say is perfect? There must be one since God promised to preserve his word. If you say there is no perfect bible then you would be saying God did not keep his word, essentially you make Him out to be a liar

Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are not 4th century manuscripts. Codex B appears first in the 14th century. Codex Sinaiticus in the 1800s. We have no idea what their provenance is or their chain of custody. They have *not* been chemically tested because if they were you'd probably have a similar situation to Codex 2427 and they don't want that.

Hello, We think you might find this helpful. nogreaterjoy.org/shop/why-the-king-james-bible-is-the-perfect-word-of-god-book

Quoting Peter Ruckman: Here is the evidence for retaining 1 John 5:7-8. In line with God promising to preserve His words (Ps. 12), we have this material which Jimbo slyly “swept under the rug.” a. John Gill says that Fulgentius cited the AV reading in A.D. 510. Do you think he got it from an Irish manuscript written in A.D. 1519? b. Jerome cites the verse from Eustochium A.D. 450, and then puts it into the Vulgate where it is preserved (Ps. 12) for 900 years. c. But Athanasius quotes 1 John 5:7-8 before Jerome was born (A.D. 350). “Irish 1519 manuscript” is it, kiddies? You silly smart-aleck little Twinkies! d. But why stop here? In A.D. 415, at the Council of Carthage, we find the “fathers” cite (in Latin) the text of 1 John 5:7-8 (PATER,VERBUM ET SPIRITUS SANCTUS”). e. But why stop here? “The wealth of information” and “embarrassment of riches” (two Alexandrian hackneyed cliches meaning “no evidence we can quote”), which Jimmy didn’t want you to find, says that Tertullian quoted the King James Version of 1 John, chapter 5 in A.D. 200 (Gill, An Exposition of the New Testament, Vol.2, pp. 907-908). f. That isn’t all. If I had debated Flimsy-Jimmy , I would have pulled Which Bible? on him (by David Otis Fuller) and put pages 211 and 212 before the video camera. You see, the King James translators had four Waldensian Bibles on their writing tables in 1611. These Waldensian Bibles had 1 John 5:7-8 in them. The trouble with Biblical illiterates like Andy Sandlin, Doug Kutilek, James White, F. F. Bruce, Bobby Ross, and John Ankerberg is not just that they have not “done their homework.” No one gave them any homework to do. Their teachers were bankrupt. Watch God Almighty preserving His words, in spite of the negative, critical, destructive work of “godly” Conservative and Evangelical “scholars”: A.D. 170: Old Syriac and Old Latin. A.D. 180: Tatian and Old Syriac. A.D. 200: Tertullian and Old Latin. A.D. 250: Cyprian and Old Latin. A.D. 350: Priscillian and Athanasius. A.D. 415: Council of Carthage. A.D. 450: Jerome’s Vulgate. A.D. 510: Fulgentius. A.D. 750: Wianburgensis. A.D. 1150: Miniscule manuscript 88. A.D. 1200-1500: Four Waldensen Bibles. A.D. 1519: Greek Manuscript 61. A.D. 1520-1611: Erasmus TR. A.D. 1611: King James Authorized Version of the Holy Bible. God had to work a miracle to get the truth of 1 John 5:7-8 preserved; He preserved it. You have it; but not in an RV, RSV, NRSV, CEV, ASV, NASV, or NIV.

One need only read the preface of the 1611 from the translators ; and they faced the same accusations then as anyone not idolizing the KJV

Hello, you may find this literature helpful in answering your question. nogreaterjoy.org/shop/which-version-is-the-bible

Thank you for your question. We apologize for the delay in getting back to you. Mike has dealt with some of the questions regarding the King James Bible on The Door channel. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-qAilfG-IFQg.html

Shhh don't ask that question or how other countries that have the Bible in their language that wasn't translated from KJV got the real scripture. Actually though, there's several excellent videos by James White that really call out KJV onlyists.

There translations of the Textus Receptus in other languages.

Why are you a disciple of a mere man? Are you called to feed on man or the Holy Spirit? I'm shocked that you can even say this in public.

One of the owners of the NASB said "There are so many corrupted verses in both the new and the old testament, I did not realize it when we made it. I funded it, I sat with the translators, I oversaw the translation, but all these things I'm seeing, I can no longer say it's a good translation. I believe I'm in trouble with God."

All modern versions are recommended by the Roman Catholic church! They only HATE the AV 1611! Why?

Where does confusion come from? If you have any problem with the Scripture in King James version, just ask the Holy Spirit for understanding. The Bible is not an ordinary book. Why have you not canvassed for the translation of Shakespeare's books into 'contemporary English? The reason people like you give for new Bible translations is rooted in the mind of satan. He is the only one smiling to the bank over the issue. The more translations we have, the more Scripture is watered down to make it more "understandable".

One of the owners said he believes he's in trouble with God for helping to make such a corrupted version. If he knew it was going to be corrupt, he wouldn't have participated nor funded it.

Thanks for your comment! Mike recommends using a Strong's Exhaustive concordance for Bible study. He also recommends the Swordsearcher Bible software, available here: nogreaterjoy.org/shop/swordsearcher-bible-study-software Be sure to subscribe to The DOOR's RU-vid channel ru-vid.com/show-UC5wl-5XZhI3ZQPf5KyW0aBw! Mike teaches a weekly Bible study on Facebook Live each week (facebook.com/thedooroflobelville) and they are posted to RU-vid shortly thereafter: youtube.com/ Here are some additional videos and resources that Mike has produced regarding this: vimeo.com/75504944 nogreaterjoy.org/articles/what-is-the-best-method-of-studying-the-bible/ nogreaterjoy.org/video/how-to-study-your-bible-part-1-session-with-nathan-pearl-from-the-big-texas-shindig/

Hi, I use a Greek interlinear Bible with multiple translations readily available and an Oxford Greek Dictionary readily available! If you feel the need to get to the "true" text, the KJV is no more accurate than other translations. If you're going to put in the effort to "decipher" the text, the only option that makes sense is to look at the original, untranslated, text.

@@NoGreaterJoyMinistries The scriptures are not the Word of God. They are some of the words about the Word. Jesus is the Word, God is the Word, but a book is not the word. John 1 is explicit about this. "And the Word became flesh " the Word did not become a book.