Why Nobody Can Stop North Korea 

Very interesting. It reminds me of NATO troops in Eastern Europe.

@@orangecat504nazi nato troops yeah. Gotta cleanse the Serbians from Bosnia and kosovo somehow

@@orangecat504 I would say that our groups in eastern Europe are a deterrent. It's about proving that we are willing to back up our NATO allies. It also forces ourselves to act if Putin does something. If our troups die in Latvia we're gonna have to do something, and Putin knows that. That will in theory stop Putin from trying anything. Which will lead to no conflict whatsoever. It's like stationing a police officer to stop speeding, or a home alarm to prevent burglars.

This is the same thing I was told by our brass and that it's supposed to slow the north down so that the us fleet and air lifts can arrive

I think that completely takes away from how important your job was, along with the active duty SK forces, although it would be very bloody it would be imperative that the active duty personnel close to the border fight tooth and nail, because the south Koreans have mandatory conscription they have a massive base of trained men but would need time to raise reserve units or volunteer units like the Ukrainian TDF, organize them, arm them, and give them training on new weapons, tactics and systems, and US forces outside Korea would need time to get in country especially if they are coming from the mainland US, obviously troops from bases like Japan and Guam could be there in days to weeks but considering how massive the Norths army is there will need to be large quantities of men and equipment brought in from North America, the bulk of it by ship, I would not want to be a soldier on or near the DMZ durring the initial hours or days of a conflict, that being said depending on their actions and depending on how feircly they resist it could save the lives of countless civilians if they are given time to flee, and the less ground given the fewer US and South Korean soldiers would need to die later in the conflict taking that ground back, also the less ground taken the less damage would be done to the south Korean infrastructure and economy and could be the difference between a long road to economic recovery and millions of refugees or a short term recession that wouldn't hamper south Korean long term economic ambitions

Every last Native American will testify to the fact that no one can ever trust an American "peace" treaty.

Ukraine learned that the hard way unfortunately

Honestly I don't understand why people and leaders of a country would ever give up nukes in any scenario There are the most foolproof backup plan and a deterrent and no matter if you are surrounded by friends or enemies, it makes them think twice before doing something stupid

We didn't have the ability of Building a nuke system in libya anyway, so giving up was the smart choice for a stupid decision. But i believe that north Korea wouldn't dare to have it's own nuke without the permission of world's super powers. India and Pakistan+ korea and south Korea+ russia and europe, all of this makes me think that someone wants to keep "the current status" for an actual nuclear war.

@@tylerkoch5255 those nukes in Ukraine were non-operational Soviet era trash. The Budapest agreement was about securing broken and decaying nuclear hazards, not disarmament. They could not have used those nukes even if they wanted to.

Also SK is a important chip maker, which only like 2 countries in the world are.

Koreans are basically Americans

Not for long

Nk would almost certainly see that as an act of aggression

@@Aaron-sx7zfWhat is alternative? Wait for day they attack? Obama gave “strategic patience” which is a fancy way of saying they did nothing. Same thing with Iran--and allowing them get to gets of cash in the night. It may have been their money-but they put into ☢️ weapons and Hamas. Thanks Obama.

Lol

That sounds terrifying. I'm still confused how can they claim they have the technology to ruin a specific county when they're having that many technical difficulties.

@@SofijaSofijaSofija Probably because they don't focus on "fixing technical difficulties", but rather "causing as much destruction as possible" (and by that end not caring how the latter might be achieved).

Similar to certain past US presidents - I wasn’t afraid he’d start a world war on purpose, I was afraid he’d stumble into it.

America could have rid the earth of these nuclear terrorist in the 50’s if it weren’t for the Chinese getting involved. That would have never been a problem or worry for you. Oh well. Welcome to the 21st century where there are more than one nuclear terrorist state in the world.

@Radio K.A.O.S. You think they're going to announce the real one as not being a test?

Too many "our enemy is crazy" explanations all around. Strategy is often reserved for "our side" 😮‍💨

One of the very very few western channels that is impartial. There are far too many western propganda channels on the anti-China bandwagon.

Yep. A lot Americans probably think China's happy with NK getting nuclear weapon but it definitely isn't. The chance of an NK missile getting through all the US missile defense and hit LA or NYC accurately is just slim, but Beijing and many big cities in China are within 1000km from NK.

it's kind of self explanatory. dictators stick together

China created this situation with North Korea. Then and the Russian / Soviets.

At least in prison you get fed.

They ARE unhinged

​@@noidsuperexcept if NK declared open war by launching nukes they'd swiftly get rained down upon. Nuclear war is a zero sum game, but the ones initiating it stand to lose even more than the ones getting hit by the initial nuke. It's why even 1 and a half years after Putin's invasion of Ukraine, with all those threats of using nuclear arms, it hasn't happened once. Putin knows if he launches nukes he will well and truly be on his own. Xi cannot defend the use of nukes while trying to maintain the sovereignty stance. It would immediately escalate the invasion and get NATO involved. If NK started launching nukes they'd get a swift response from the West, SK, and Japan

​@@noidsuperunhinged, yes. Willing to throw it all away, clearly not.

⁠​⁠​⁠@@josh___somethingif kim knows he will lose his land he will 100% fire everything in his arsenal onto the world killing 10+ million people nobody wants that which is exactly why nobody interferes with NK they sit on the longer lever

Yeah, I agree they are unhinged@@noidsuper. Both things need to be true, I would think. Like josh said, it doesn't seem like they willing to give up what they have just yet.

because this guy is straight up a western propagandist

Yes! And every time I find an inaccuracy (which is disappointingly often), it makes it seem much less acceptable if there’s no source- like he’s just made something up!

@@boarbot7829 source : trust me bro and Google

@@samkelo27 😂

Exactly

I guess this topic is a 5 word phrase.

He is just that good.

Discount Wendover's back at it again lol

What do you mean?

Yeah who needs context or details!

That's not a stalemate, it's called Zugzwang.

@@MAC0071234 Zugzwang is an inbetween move totally unrelated

@@MAC0071234 Zugzwang is when you HAVE to make a move that either will make you lose or worsen your position, stalemate is when you simply cannot move. In Zugzwang there’s a winning side, in an stalemate there is not, the position remains the same just like here

It's a stalemate between those entitled to having nuclear weapons "to protect peace" For the rest of the world it's more imperialism

you're confusing it with a zwischenzug

Thats what they want ...they dont go war with south korea or USA ...they make blackmailing forever to tight the guarantee of kim or his successors forever ..hope you understand

you severely underestimate how loyal/brainwashed these people are.

@@sheiladikshit5110 Doesn't really matter. North Korea's military is much less equipped and trained than South Korea, and the SOuth would have full US backing. The only thing preventing South Korea from winning at this point is that the north can hold their major cities hostage, first with conventional bombs, and now the Nukes.

You are not wrong but you see the thing is that you dont need good soldiers when you have literal rockets doign all the work for you. Its basicially the same thing when a guy shows up with a gun to a fist fight. Of course NK will never win a war against anyone really, but it doesnt have to as long as it can kill a lot of people b4 getting killed itself. That is enough for all the democrats to not risk doing anything about NK really.... can't blame them tho I myself woudn't want millions of South Koreans die for this.

You sure about that? The NK army has top priority for the country's food supply, whatever it may be.

Why?

Missiles were not fired at Japan. Rockets will mostly fly eastward from the rotation of the earth. Japan is east of NK. Who cares what a US puppet regime think about the development of strategic space defense and space science?

@@toocoolforu Ah yes it sounds so much better to assume they have no idea what they are doing and cant aim a rocket with GPS available for free to anyone. It being an accident makes it even more scary/funny.

Lol nice lie lots of accounts of majority of people in Japan shrug and don’t care. The missile was never aimed at them in the first place

Also this happens often so it’s not a sudden escalation

@@NeostormXLMAX At this point probably. The first time? No people were watching the news and stopping in the street to see what was going on.

Well, well aren't they boasting about how they are going to crush the evil imperialists anymore? They used to at least.

tell kim jong un to free his people then

@@Iqaluitio Mr dragonsword would never do that

Dennis Rodman?

Do you play basketball too?

See whatifalthist for such a video

@@wetbadger2 please use the space bar

Wrong. NK nearly wipe out the superior SK army first. NK PUSH sk all the way to Busan. Then the US military enter and push the NK back to thw Chinese border. That's when china enter and push the US, UN, SK forces passed the 38th. The truce was called and the 38th parallel was agreed as the border.

Correct. What a mistake in hindsight

You forget abou USsr?

We shouldve gone in from the China side

​@@AmarFox6eh small detail 😂

E‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

You can’t answer a “why” question with yes or no

@@AB-yr2eo but you could answer it easily with a MUCH shorter vid

@@gawkthimm6030 Yup, but then you would have to remove a crap ton of context.

Too long for the question at hand.

Saddam only surrendered in ODS after the USA showed they can blow up his bunkers. Im sure whatever NK has, the USA can defeat it.

So we go back to siege warfare? Starve them out? Genuinely curious how you could tackle those with minimal losses

@@killrsloth9187 divert a river and drown them in the bunker.

I mean all they can really do is sit there with their ww2 equipment.

@@killrsloth9187 it’s not a great strategy lol, if you’ve already taken control of the ground and air, 10000 men in a bunker are way easier to kill than 10000 men on a battlefield.

As long as the south doesn’t start massacring a hundred thousand of its own people again, the north won’t intervene again

I really love Korea, and hope the people in the North can rise up against their government and eventually rejoin the South. I'm sure this is easier said then done, but I think that will be the only way this cold war ends.

what are south korean people like

You're birthrate is so low it won't matter in a few hundred years anyway

Try to unite your northen fellows

Virgin north korea- test fires a missile in sea of Japan Chad India - test fires missile right into Pakistan

@@Squish_that_cat india isn't chad for launching an nuke into a country, any country wouldnt be a chad for that

@@veinssupreme you didn't read about the 'accidental' launch of brahmos supersonic cruise missile into Pakistan

@@Squish_that_cat no?

@@veinssupreme try searching about it

I am British, at a school I went to near D.C. we had a tornado drill, we don't have tornado drills in Europe.

@@bristoled93 very interesting! We don’t have to deal with Earthquakes or Hurricanes in the Midwest, but I live in a region that is known by many as “Tornado alley”. One of our nearby cities (Joplin, Missouri) got absolutely demolished by a Tornado about a decade ago (2011?). I even met some folks who were inside of a Walmart when the tornado directly hit the building. They survived but tornados are no joke. With that said, most Missourians who see a tornado are more likely to grab a chair and a beer than to hide from them. There’s only so much you can do, so most people around here don’t get too worried by tornado weather.

haha SKorea is much more safer than safest place non-govt place in US. He faces harsh realities like some drill which he'll never face, while your classmates could get shot in during a school siren

We had to do bomb drills on the US when I was in elementary school in the 90’s. We’d ride under our desks. This was because the US was still afraid Russia would nuke us.

@@isabellam1936 Liar, I was in school in the 90's nvr did that shit

I think you might be able to find the source in his Nebula channel. But I could be wrong.

Agree

Not gonna lie, this was one of the worst episodes so far. Too many assumptions, too over the top in those assumptions, no sources, etc. it felt like click bait title but in video form.

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson that’s it. Showing 0 sources invites you to sooner or later become more speculative and stop sticking to actual valid sources

@@angriffslusticherWildoger Exactly. Without sources there isn't much holding them back into using a lot of speculation. There is a massive difference in a video from say Caspian Report and others like him vs RLL. RLL have always been a little overly dramatic but it's become more speculative and more overly dramatic. They often state the speculative part as if it's a fact too.

It threw me off for a sec when he said India in the south too. Makes sense and helps show his point. I like it.

There’s not a single country on earth that puts south at the top of their maps, so while it’s an interesting thought experiment to consider, upside down maps are totally pointless in practice.

@@Spengleman2 it's been used historically both in Australia and South America There are variations that have the Americas on the East as well and Asia in the center

@@arthurheine5631 In southamerica we don't put the World upside down, not in Argentina at least.

@@anti-spiral159 it's a historical thing, most common in Uruguay I'm from Brazil and I've seen a few as well

Imperialism is real.

I google about it then 2 sources -Unveiled in October 2020, the missile is believed to have a range of 15,000km or more, and could potentially carry three or four warheads, rather than only one.(from bbc) -North Korea, which has launched at least 88 ballistic and other missiles this year, fired an ICBM that could travel 9,300 miles or longer, putting the U.S. mainland within its range, according to Japan's defense minister (from abcnews)

Source (trust me bro)

Source (my homie said)

Source (I heard)

It’s Wikipedia bruv

@Oversimplified!

MacArthur had no means or authority to nuke korea

But McArthur wanted Truman to nuke China…

Dude so uncool

Should've nuked em

They can't. That was hyperbolic. Beijing would prefer the Kim dynasty and status quo to be maintained but won't just take their shit lying down

North Koreans would unironically be better off if their country was invaded and annexed by South Korea with US's help. Sadly, the best opportunity (during the 1990s when China was weak, USSR dead, and NK in the middle of a famine) was wasted.

American arguments be like :

They have tested nukes you dimwit. We know they have them. Probably why the regime still exists.

Saudi Arabia makes 9/11, Saddam gets the blame because daddy issues. History.

It’s almost like you want to invade countries BEFORE they get nukes…

Yeah He's the one picking the soup

wait a minute..

Um, what??

@@barakato It’s his fault for always picking chicken noodle

Doesn't look all that bad 🙃

E‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

i love shit like that, we’re so used to the world map simply turning it upside down gives you a whole new perspective

@@EEEEEEEE E

The Nebula video linked is from Aug 2021. "North Korea since 2000" Wouldn't really call it a companion to this though.

@@TEDodd Thanks! That was very helpful 🥰

Ive always wondered how you would even function knowing that every military installation in the region could be wiped, and you’re in one of them.

Lol you guys were told that shit too 😂😂😅 I was also a "bump stop" in 2018.

We know how north Korea is doing by the interviews with the escaped slaves

Hungry

They’re poor that’s how they are

Not good, they are not ok

North Korea is bad, M’kay?

Same here, one of my all-time hands down favorite RU-vid channels.

What if hope and freedom provide strategic advantages?

Hope and Freedom mean cluster munitions and White Phosphorus by American terms.

@@dsdy1205 country isn't considered free if it's not friendly towards USA

​@anguschandler4482not really lol

@@al1sa920 NK defender lmao

One of the biggest points is the huge amount of casualties. If we sent something they’d retaliate. NK can’t send anything for the same reason

hope so. If like that, what will dictators Putin and Xi react then...

I totally agree. NK most likely will never attack, but it’s it’s more about just fluffing up the feathers to stop anyone from coming in or mear

And then China and Russia get involved and retaliate, and then everything becomes a glass crater.

Yep, it would rain death if that happened.

Are you able to see the latest video he said was uploaded to Nebula? Isn't on my one

Yeah!

like you can do anything lmao

@@sIlver66916 I made that mistake once. All I can say is i never will again

damn callum chill mah nigga

No, Callum. Rest more now, warrior. Your fight is coming, and it will be enough for a thousand lifetimes.

Yeah , those bases would have been overran, if not destroyed before hand. That is what the ppl who are stationed there need to realize and understand, they are the sacrificial lambs if things go south.

@@martinandrew3189 clown

@@martinandrew3189 clown

@@Xilladan093 clown

Spoiler alert: The jews have been censoring your news since 1915, 2 years after their banking cartel started printing the USD.

yet people are complaining about the length and detailed explanation; you can't win on here

yeah man

I feel good that there are still people who can watcv a vid like this and not dehumanize and demonize people od NC

They can hop on one of them rockets to get out! 😬

For the most part they don't know what they're missing out on and think most if not all countries are as bad so most probably don't want to leave

I don't. Ha

No Comments?Let me Fix That.

Can’t wait for tomorrow’s

nice

That’s actually a lot more interesting that this rim jobbing Kim jong nk video

What!!!...???

BUT NORTH KOREA IS ACTUALLY GOOD

​@@NigerianCrusaderOK fam.

Re-making history is a bad thing

You should do some fact checking he's been wrong or misconstrued about things multiple times

@@Gunsmoke2220 In another video of his, relevant to Russia and the ongoing war in Ukraine, I wrote in the comments below that he 's kinda obsessed with how evil Russia is, without referring to America's key role for hundreds of wars globally..

Or canada. For almost 10 years(half a birth cycle) their immigration rate has been 3x their birth rate. I'm guessing in 10 years canada is gone

​@@dean9261 gone to whom

@@boerandemo7766 Mexican Influence always results in a drug infested region . Canada is done for.

@@boerandemo7766 shortest answer is it's a transfer of power from federal to provincial and municipal governments to the UN-regional-microstates and municipal. A supranational layer of governance is being added, and provincial government is being divided into regional and microstates But to answer as to whom, all governments work for banking corporations. These corporations all have slices of the pie worldwide and the middle of the pie is unknown to me.

@@boerandemo7766 *the big kick in the crotch about how canada is being divided is that when the npcs rise up they will blame immigrants instead of themselves and our government.

Fear. Many will read what you have left here and they will fear it. I do not. It is possible to be aware of nuclear weapons and not be living in fear of it. I have been doing it my whole life. You have too. Everyone born after 1949 has. Every human born after 1949 on this Earth has lived their entire lives under the relentless threat of nuclear annihilation. It is as natural to you as breathing is at this point. It is a part of what defines you as '221 b'; and without the relentless threat of nuclear annihilation you would be someone else entirely. And if your parents were born after 1949(like mine were) they would have been the same way, which means without the relentless threat of nuclear annihilation you may not even exist. Yeah, you may owe your very existence to the relentless threat of nuclear annihilation. How can you be afraid of this? How can anyone be afraid of it? Do you even have a right to be afraid of it?! Me? When I hear threats of nuclear annihilation I lean one of two ways. I dismiss it entirely, or I treat the threat with indignance. I either don't care or I dare you to do it. Because really, at this point, if I did fear the relentless threat of nuclear annihilation, I would be paralyzed with fear, huddled in a corner somewhere, unable to move, unable to function. And lastly, what does one expect another to do? These are matters that are unfortunately way beyond your control. I mean, if you had the time to worry about a RU-vid video, you don't have any control over anything. So fear? Why even bother with it.

@@user-lv7ph7hs7l I would argue that nuclear weapons are no longer useful as a deterrent. I could site the number of people who think stopping Russia is too dangerous and risky, as the argument. In their case, the mere mention of nuclear weapons was enough to get them to back down. What does that even mean? That means Russia is ALREADY using their nukes in an offensive manner. In fact, Russia has leveraged their nuclear weapons to good effect, they have been able to use them without actually detonating them. Effectively allowing Russia to use their nukes, free of charge. Nuclear deterrent no longer works. And really, I am wondering now if it EVER worked to begin with.

Dancu

you still not realized that none of them actually made in korea but rather exported from one european country ?

It doesn't matter if their stuff works or not if they use it, that's the end, keep them pegged in and leave them!?!

consider the current relationship between China and NK, I would said Kim don't really care about China. Putin is now Kim's BFF.

What economic growth? 2022 Chinese economy is the worst (other than the start of Covid) since the last year of Mao Zedong, 1976.

@@graceliu8839 1 year is like nothing in long-term period for any country

Until they would consider / want a war to test their power again... possibly in the future whenever they will "over take" USA.

Russia is one of them as well, their population is decreasing since the end of URSS I heard they already have some programs to incentivize new immigrants

lab born babies, like in the new brave world

@@tenzingyatso5096 problem even with that is a lot of young people don’t want children even if they could skip pregnancy and childbirth, their too distracted with holidays, shopping, socialising and less responsibility.. you wouldn’t have enough people wanting to parent

@@mattyhartley9079 Or becoming a soldier to protect a psycho ruler who would hang you for enjoying an American song by Elvis 😅

Robots and AI maybe? I dunno. Slavery? Oh.... Both! Both is good! (this is supposed to be verry dark irony! pls dont get me publicly executed like im in *some countries* !)

It's not so much about nukes. We will throw endless resources and people for two decades into a war and still lose. Then move on and learn nothing. Our government isn't us though. We have little to no say in anything....just like North Korea, but we have food.

If North Korea fires a nuke at us, I sure hope we do. It’s horrible for the NK people… but we would have to put an immediate end to it before we would suffer more loses. What should we do? Try to invade them while they keep nuking our cities? Say you better not do it again? No… complete destruction of their regime. Which would probably obliterate the majority of their country. But it would have to be done immediately without second though

Well normally I’d say just because there’s a precedent doesn’t mean there’s conviction however given the context of how it happened the first time, you’re probably right.

No USA government would accept a nuclear attack on their troops or soil without retaliation in kind.

I definitely agree.

they don't necessarily 'censor' it, the terms and conditions on how modern conflicts and contraversial topics are treated is a bit of a grey area and can lead to easy demonitisation, then the algorithm kicks in and either doesn't promote the video or age restricts it - not saying this is 100% the reasoning but its how far i understand it to be.

It's not censored. At least 80% of RU-vids viewers are under the age of 18 and promoting violent, sexual or otherwise inappropriate material to children would chase away advertisers and start forcing parents to ban their children from RU-vid altogether grossly lowering revenues which you might not care about but would cause your favorite creators to not be able to do this for a living because RU-vid wouldn't be able to pay them. Is not allowing children to purchase pornography or watch ultra violent movies censorship? No, it's just common sense. I love this creator and they have nearly 7 million subscribers so it's safe to say the RU-vid algorithm has actually been incredibly kind to them. Not to mention how many channels out there pump out straight up propaganda and push agenda driven narratives painting history and current affairs in a light favorable to their political affiliation and obviously monitoring that content is very difficult. RU-vid is so large and ubiquitous now it's not unreasonable to expect it to follow the same guidelines as other mainstream broadcasters.

When it's fake

Ukraine has to redevelop its nuclear weapons.

​@@bilboriches7216lol. Gave it away. Would have been #3 nuke power.

@@borisyurinov4822 thats whst you get when you give it away. No sane country would give it up now.

@@coloradoing9172 Yep. You never trust russians, they will always betray you.

his voice does give off that 'dodgy' vibe with this much stress- I agree

He's been doing that for ages and many people commented on how grating that can be, but he didn't change his over the top delivery.

6.57M subscribers, so I guess it works for him. This is how he orders takeout.

It is REALLY grating.. I HAVE more than ONCE stopped viewing his VIDEOS because of THIS

It happens most with the words having a "H" in them. A form of vocal technique to control mild stuttering perhaps? It eludes me why would anyone choose to speak like that unless to overcome slight phonetic issues.

You should probably read about the Actual Korean war instead of masterbatory jingoism. We Lost. Then Macarther reinvaded and fought nk to a draw. That fantasy bullshit is cancerous

Coyle also wrote a novel about a U.S. invasion of Mexico and published it years before the WOT got us into Iraq. I think it was a pretty fair assessment of what we’d encounter if the events actually occurred. No more 19th Century gunboat diplomacy.

😊

😊

A military sergeant told me all the usa soldiers stationed n South Korea would die if war pop off

Robotic armies are a fools errand, not only would it be extremely expensive and unrealistic , it wouldn't matter in the long run as electronic warfare and anti-drone capabilities improve and make such armies obsolete, also a 50 cal doesn't care if it hits flesh or metal It's simply unhealthy and uninspiring for a nation to outsource military duty to robots, you might as well castrate all those spiritual eunuchs at that point, such cowardly ppl don't deserve to be saved in case of invasion

You can hack or emp electronics, humans are a resource that is still reliable even then. The more common sense choice is to increase immigration, there are countries in the world that are having a population boom, encourage their integration, and education to give them tools to integrate into their society to help their economic situation and military situation.

So North Korea is the evil dystopia but replacing us all with A.I for the rich and powerful 1% isn't?

robotic army is too hard to do with our technology, and no one will choose that when it will be useless against bombs and nukes

​@@halinaqi2194Asian countries don't like the idea of immigration unfortunately

I agree with you: Procrastination is worse than just getting over it then and there

Yeah, there are a lot more factors that go into projecting future demographics then outlined in the video. Which isn’t to say the South Korea, China and Japan aren’t all facing stiff demographic challenges. They are. It’s just that there are more factors at play then simply birth rates.

Maybe the shocking facts about N.K was propaganda after all

He never said outgrown the South, just that they will be more or less similar to each other and with NK men serving for 10 yrs vs SK men serving for 18 months, NK will have a much larger and much more experienced army 30 yrs in the future

@@OptimisticNihilist15 experienced in what tho. nk never fought war outside korean war

@@QWERTY-gp8fd Also, given Russia's performance as of late, I am somewhat skeptical that North Korea's army is anything more than a paper tiger.

These are not real analyticals, just authors own very ignorant wet dreams and ideas from wikipedia and tabloids

why cant you get elsewhere?

100th like

IDK, a Minecraft server is better to live in than North Korea.

No, the quote was by made half as interesting which is run by the same person

@@frommarkham424 My mistake. Thanks for pointing it out.

AND Israel's attacks on Iraq and Syria were, internationally, very illegal. There is a difference between GIVING UP something and having it taken from you.

Iraq didn't give up nuclear weapons but it served as an example of what it can mean to be a non-nuclear country on United States' bad side. Especially when you compare that to Russia where US don't even dare directly intervene in Ukraine. For NK this is a clear sign: if you don't have nuclear weapons, you're prey. If you do have them... then even invading South might be an option since US might end up hesitant to really throw their weight behind it if NK threatens nuclear retaliation in such case.

@@Eliastion Yeah, ngl I have always been curious at the idea of how NK or other regimes would react if U.S. Just decided to go through anyway, like would they just accept mutual destruction and fire the nukes or back down as well, and maintain a conventional war.

@@Eliastion North Korea probably got like four nuclear weapon. And trust me they won’t use it. Just like usa say if you ever use it they will be erase from world map. True story

@Eliastion in his vod it made it sound like They "willingly gaved up nukes that they controlled " which in either of the cases mentioned , they didn't Controll or even owned them , in Iraq case they didn't even had it The only one case of a state willingly giving a way Nukes that they owned controlled and fully operated by themselves was Aperthied south Africa, which did so because the white minority ruling party didn't trust the black majority party with these weapons , and So... Scrapped! Baiscly RLL was kinda of misleading with the way he said it..

It’s called MAD for a reason.

Yea, there are batteries of Patriot missiles deployed in Eastern Europe and the pacific

Patriot Launching Station, look em up been around for a long time now

You don't have to actually win a war to be dangerous

They know that. They’re doing it for political power. The North Korean gdp is pathetic. They provide absolutely nothing to the world. Yet America is in constant proximity to NK on the political stage which is power in itself. We negotiate their whims and wishes because we’re too level headed to play the matador, for now.

The North would still cause catastrophic devastation to the South and Japan, possibly even irreversible

@@alexs_toy_barn oh I know. Just sayin NK would turn to glass.

@@Aaron-cb2dd yup