@@praneetramteke9799 Louis the XVI was the last king of France. He was executed during the revolution. One reason for which he and his wife were hated was that they attended parties with the rich nobles, while the lower class couldn’t even feed themselves
@@praneetramteke9799 during 18th century, France was ruled by the good for nothing kings who always attended lavish parties, and because of these parties, many kings wasted the money of France. And because of this, the population killed the French kings. And during this time, this was called French revolution.
Bruh half of Pakistan doesn't even use Social media, Its probably Indians because the guy said "sucks" its obvious they want their rival country to get insulted.
@@joebloggs3551 see I know belong to one of the sides, but from the bottom of your heart without being biased, tell me, who promotes or practices Hate speech more? Right or Left? In UK obviously
@Cel Tic yeaa bro😂😂 and I somewhat agree 😂😂 I Agree Only becoz of the Old Time Britishers haa! So anyone reading the comment don't feel bad, I hate the old British guys who mercilessly killed our people once, but anyways it's pretty okay now, btw, the one whom I'm replying, Mr. Cel Tic lemme do this guess game, are you Irish by any chance?! Please REPLY!
@@joebloggs3551, yes I am American and I know how hard it is which is why a large amount of conservatives need to (peacefully) protest after they’re done with school and there need to be conservative businesses who won’t fire their employees for being conservative.
As someone from Pakistan, I can confirm that the video title is true. The only places in Pakistan that are actually habitable are the province of Punjab, some parts of Sindh and some parts of KPK. The rest is either too hot, too cold or too dry. P.S Search about geography of Balochistan
@@debmitra4384 Precisely. The point ws that Pakistan is NOT part of India. Burmal/Myanmar, Indian Union, Pakistan, Bangladesh were before 1947 part of British Raj.
He hasn't visited British India before, and when tasked with, he was in a hurry and made a lot of errors, it took him 3-4 months to draw the borders, we all know the border sucks hence the largest migration in human history happened, som 4 million(not sure about the number, it may be the numbers of people killed during the violence) people migrated.
@@prasanth2601 and thats why Pakistan had parts scattered everywhere and Bangladesh too. India inside of Bangladesh, Bangladesh inside of india and india inside of Bangladesh.
"there's macro difficult situations like Pakistan's Geography and then there's micro difficult situations like you being trapped inside of your house all day because of a Global Pandemic" That was smooth 🤣
@@endiangangu3167 , man you are totally wrong, company that governed both india and pakistan during british raj is known as british east india company, why its known as east india company because it rules over a land called india, before 1947 both pakistan and todays india together known as british india, even India is not a english or hindi word its actually orginated from an arabic word indu, hind, hindus, even india is mentioned in some prophecy in islam do you know that, (ghazwa e hind) pakistan, bangladesh, Afghanistan, nepal ,Bhutan, india ,srilanka these countries are combinedly known as indian sub continent man, Grow up man and just accept the fact, iam not even from india i am from srilanka, there is a dna test to find out your ancestry known as map my gene , if you are a pakistani or Bangladeshi if you take one of that test results will be indian, because you'r ancestors are from india,
Britishers Were Against the Partition, the the Leader Of Muslim League Mohammad Ali Jinnah Was Dying for a Separate Country For Muslims.... We Blame the Britishers, but that's Our Misconception, it's Not the Britishers Fault, It's Jinnah's Fault....
It is widely thought here that at the time of independence the british divided the country in such a way deliberately that it would make pakistan extremely weak and ultimately would want to rejoin india! That is why most of the border situations don't make much sense
There is an error in the initial india/pakistan map: Pakistan originally included modern-day bangladesh, which was later split off into it's own country.
The guy who made the video didn't mention that Pakistan was Muhammed Jinnah's idea. The British just listened to him and agreed that Muslim Indians would not be given fair treatment in a Hindu majority nation, and deserved to have their own country. The only stupid part about it was Jinnah's attempts to destroy Bangladeshi culture, which was then East Pakistan.
@@VitaminProtein4256 sure he can. By giving kashmir to us and giving the plane lands to us so that our land would be alot more safer. Or he can also change geography by making khalistan. We will have better relations with khalistan. Safe geography....
At 1:28 the borders shown were different at the time of independence. Bangladesh was a part of Pakistan back then, which gained independence in 1971. (The modern day Pakistan was known as the West Pakistan, and Bangladesh was known as the East Pakistan)
fun fact: the british didn’t draw the messy borders unintentionally, that’s how they want it to be, so those affected countries can never be unified and rebel against the british empire
The disadvantages mentioned with the indo pak border are almost identical for both sides though. Watch the Pakistan segment of why India's geography sucks video.
The Indian subcontinent(Pakistan , india , Bangladesh) used to be one of the most prosperous regions in the world under the Mughals before the brits came and fucked it all up.
But was never treated as such , Bengali people were not given much attention and seats in Pakistan , while pastuns and others native people of western Pakistan were given much more even though Bengali contributed so much
@@zuboy4272 Which is ironic considering that Bengali Muslims were the biggest supporters of the Muslim League and advocated strongly for an independent pakistan
@@priyamtolani1480we Bengalis liberated Pakistan. Then in few years Pakistan started to attack our culture, language and started looting our resources. Even though a large number of Bengalis supported muslim league in 1947. By 1971, 95% Bengali became Bengali nationalist. And Pakistan started the genocide in 25 march and millions of bengalis jumped into the war in 26 March.
The main obsession of Pakistan with Jammu and Kashmir is because of the majority Muslim population of the Kashmir valley, while it totally forgets the hindu and buddhist populations residing in Jammu and Ladakh. It is a part of the larger dream of the islamist of gazwa e hind meaning re-caputuring sub continent which will now forever remain a pipe dream for them.
CaptDeaDpooL nope considering ever increasing usage of cars,planes,gas trans, and more. It’s not gonna be long when one day people will say winter ❄️ was a season mainly because of global warming
Fax. This channel bases the geography only, not accounting how the geography is utilized. Also, what's he basing this on? Relative to what is considered good geography?
@@roshniayaan4791 probably. Take a look at the USA's geography for example. I imagine that's one of the countries he uses to compare. As the USA is seprated from all major powers by ocean, has two major mountain ranges to defend its heartland, and both countries it borders are allies
@@bilalbaig8586 Exactly. I know it's a meme and all, but it's easy to understand why it's also true. Making less of an ironic meme and more of just a factual statement.
@@bilalbaig8586 Exactly this. One of the main reasons why the Ancient Greek city states were rarely unified is because its mountainous terrain separated groups and the thousands of islands in the Aegean Sea. Not so easy to govern huh?
1:18 They DECIDED to let it all go As a Indian I can surely tell they were forced to grant india freedom Many People WORKED HARD to make india independent so please dont state that british just decided to let it all go
I’d like to tell that, Kashmir is an integral part of India. The Whole Kashmir. (check out the Instrument of Annexation signed between India and Kashmir). A part of it was illegally occupied by Pakistan in 1948, a year after independence of both the countries. They advanced their army, in the form of Tribals, and were close to occupy Srinagar, the capital city of Kashmir. It was then the instrument of annexation was signed and Indian Armed Forces took the charge. As the army began to thrash tha Pak’s Army back, UN interfered and asked to control and maintain ceasefire and that (new)border that is not accepted by India, came to be known as Line of Control. (Not an international border as said). It’s 2022 now, and this issue is stands unresolved between both the countries. There is a lot more about proxy wars and Bleed India with Thousand cuts theory (google), cross border terrorism, radicalisation.. much more. But we’ll take back POK(Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) someday! It belongs to us Indians. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
If you have read history carefully It was your contry who went to UN you say that indian army thrashed pak army and at the same time you say pak occupied it Why dn't you go for a refrandom let the kashmirie people decide to which country they belong You can do it on both sides Azad kashmir and your occupied one
@@mehboobgeegee7063 1. You’re right. It was We who went to the UN as we hoped that the UN would listen to the truth and do justice and in order to maintain the status quo, would tell the Pak Army to retreat. But unfortunately, UN failed miserably at it. 2. But failure of the UN turned out to be a blessing for Pakistan, as it was due to the UN only that we could not then take our part back. Otherwise what happened in 1965, 1971, 1999 could have happened a long ago in 1948 only. We could have enjoyed the tea at Lahaur much much earlier. 3. After being responsible for decades of Islamic radicalisation in Kashmir Valley(only), you’re now indicating to a plebiscite in Kashmir. I wouldn’t shake my head in disbelief for real. We had Kashmir in 1948 and that’s when it became an undivided part of the Indian Union. 4. Look at your Home now. Baluchistan is gonna be a reality soon. Generations have spent their life in distress. You can’t feed people with hatred all through their lives. Common people want peace and prosperity, not religious fanaticism. And if you can’t part ways with Baluchistan, we can do it for you ( Remember East Pakistan ---> Bangladesh in 1971) 5. A USD costs 205 Pakistani Rs as of July1, 2022. You have become China’s Territory. Evergreen FATF Member, Home to more than 90% Terrorists in the world including Osama Bin Laden, Government is a puppet in the hands of Army and ISI, No foreign Policy what so ever, Recently proclaimed Rape Emergency in Punjab, You’re on the verge of Economic Collapse but still can’t get over Kashmir. 6. My heart goes out to the common people of Pakistan that are spending their life in misery. I wish them peace, prosperity, happiness, money, education, upliftment… but not Kashmir. 7. I will not reply to you now. and if you have a lil self respect, you too won’t. PS: Vacate POK before we snatch it back!
The idea of Pakistan is of Jinnah not the Britishers... The Britishers fled from India due to Indian freedom fighters not because they let us go just because they were bored with India. BHARAT MATA KI JAI🔥
@@mehboobgeegee7063 and if you are talking about freedom then MAHATMA GANDHI/BHARAT SINGH and more freedom fighters fight for the nation. Jinnah just talk about Seperation of muslims from our country India.... Not to free the country
@@yashdewan3633 Freedom fighters 😆😆 You guys got independence thanks to nasi Germany and Imperial Japan who weaken Britsh in WW2 and Didn't had the power to assert its control on Britsh India. Ever wondered why 95% nations got independence after 1945 Man what kind of history are they writing in India
@@hewas_chewasky I agree with your half statement................ Yeah due to WW2 we got an advantage but It is not true THAT WE JUST WON OUR PRECIOUS LAND BECAUSE OF NASI GERMANY + JAPAN .....
@@abhishekbhardwaj5272They were forced because due to Indian freedom movement, workers' stopped working, which was the only reason they stayed in India (because by then they looted most of India) , so they had to leave.
Yeah. Britain has looted the Indian subcontinent and other colonies to become the "superpower" it is today. 3.4 trillion dollars just from India. It wouldn't be where it is today without its colonies.
He should modify his vocabulary ; Indian army does not “ Control “ the union territory; Its a part of India just like every other border state on Indias 15106.7km of border.
Its like seeing glass half empty or half full, the issues of borders and ethnicity are our advantage rather disadvantsge. We have a whole variety of places, from sea shore, to deserts to highest mountains, rivers and vast fertile lands.
Bro, he forgot Bangladesh which was when partitioned became East Part of Pakistan, but India and Bangladeshi freedom fighters took it away from Pakistan in 1971. 🇮🇳♥️🇧🇩
@@philosoftfurkitusjunkyard2462 Then a stronger would take more control. Monarchies would rise, who wouldnt be under control of british at all in the future. Actual capitalism would be just a theory. Most monarchs ideology would be religious based.
Europe was a powder keg without external powers arbitrarily drawing borders. And India *had* to be divided in order to prevent escalation of existing divisions.
actually all of land of india and afghnaistan is pakistan cuz both indus and gandhara started in pakistan plus the pakistani are local punjabis sindhis balocj pashtun more then in any country and its their land so if you name your country a new name t doesnt mean its taken its our land actually afgahnistan and india is taken from us
Have any body noticed when the mountain thing came between ind and pak he said these are very advantageos But when this was beyween pak and afg he said difficult to control He is just showing what he wants to
@@thewaiguoren1609 I dunno, they seem to make lots of sense to me. His main point is that Pakistan's geography either works against it, or does not benefit it. Some points he made in the vid are: -That the British's way of arbitrarily dividing the countries placed Pakistan in a position where it would be in direct opposition with India, he then proceeds to describe the conflicts that arose from this problem. -He then states that should conflict ever escalate, Pakistan's non-existent geographical defenses would work against it, the Indian army could punch through the easily traversable terrain quickly, and many of Pakistan's population centers are near the border to India, which means a victory will be much easier for them. -He goes on to say that since Pakistan has so few major ports, and the biggest one being reliant on the oil from the strait of Homurz to keep the money rolling, so it would be easy to blockade Pakistan. He makes a lot more points throughout the video, and all of them make a lot of sense to me. All of this is pretty easy to digest.
@@LightyDust Are you sure he owns the channel by himself? I don't feel like he can do all this animation, editing, script writing, proofreading and fact verification all by himself. Just look at Kurzgesagt, they have a team of about 30-40 people (I believe?) I mean I'm pretty sure there are at least 2 other people working with him.
Regarding Islamabad, I don't think the direct threat is there as all the terrain is mountainous and hence one can't have a large scale movement of infantry or vehicles through it. If India ever were to attack it, it would have to do it from Punjab where the terrain is plain.
@@mabubakarminhas71minhas59 Feeling hopeless is not a trait of a Pakistani, quaid taught us to be brave and work out everything, you think a country like afghan can break down Pakistan? you think india who could'nt capture Pakistan in 70 years could do it now? Pakistan is a nuclear country now. No country would dare to attack Pakistan
@@mabubakarminhas71minhas59 China Ur ally ? U think china will go to war with india for Pakistan? China fear a Indo US alliance and china pak alliance will only make A India US alliance Easier
@0 it's complicated we jammuties are with India so dogra pahadi and gujjar vs kashmiri that to south my baramula frnds used to talk about neither India nor pak veacuse they haven't forgetting 47 invasion so u r in minority never hona hapoen
@@ilikelampshades6 lol Pakistan was the demand of Muslims at this area whitout demand nobody could divide any country - i am asking to u what heppens with muslims In India? Do u have any idea- today in India many Muslims accepted that's creation Pakstan was Right decision and our elders were wrong to choose India - Indian politics is still stuck in Hindu Muslims in India Muslims are not free- and founding fathers rightly says they are two different nations mostly with conflicted ideas they can't live together - whatever Pakistan's founding fathers said today proved truth -
I want to add that Pakistan's capital used to be Karachi, which is like 1500 kilometers South. All the way on the ocean coast. They moved it next to Kashmir long long after the conflict began.
Cyril Radcliff, was never even been east of Paris before he was made incharge of the committee responsible for drawing the border. Even he was so embarrassed about the outcome that he refused to collect his salary of 3000 pound.
KAKAKAKAKAKAK this is wonderful! PRANK! It is terrible! I looked in the mirror and saw something UNPRETTY: my face. KAKAKAKAKAKA! But I am happy agayn because I have TWO HOT GIRLFRIENDS and I use them to get views on my videos! KAKAKAKAK!!! Good day, dear merci
Dude, you've completely left out any mention of Bangladesh which was East Pakistan until 1971. Pakistan started out with horrible borders and thousands of Kms of Indian territory separating it from its eastern half. Think the Polish corridor before WW2, except so large that the eastern part inevitably seceded.
Having East Pakistan was a huge strategic advantage for us. If adequate military assets would have been placed there we could have waged a two front war against India. It also had the advantage of not being land-locked and had ocean access independent of West Pakistan. Unfortunately, our defence assets and even industry were highly concentrated towards the West while the East was neglected.
@@mobeenansari2076 Not just that, if you look at India's largest internal weaknesses, they were all literally concentrated around East Pakistan: Naxalite corridor, which in turn is connected to Siliguri chokepoint in West Bengal, next to rebellious and sparsely populated NorthEast (which is next to China), with East Pakistan having a larger population in a land that back then was hard to traverse with heavy equipment (and would be a nightmare to invade during monsoon season especially). All of this while West Pakistan tag teams from their side. I have no idea why Pakistan passed this golden chance up, especially when you have military leaders. Lmaooo. Assuming if you were going to go ahead and arm only one side (bad idea nonetheless), East would have made way more sense. CaspianReport briefly mentioned in one of his vids that Bangladesh's side is actually more dangerous to India than Pakistan's...
Lmfao and when you look at Indians history it is ironically Pakistan, the provinces neighbouring the Indus is technically the real India not the republic of India we see today who live in the planes of the Ganga.
Well india was named pakistan did not exist. In fact if the mughals had never invaded parts of India, there would be no Taj Mahal but most importantly no pakistan or bangladesh! 😂😂😂😂😂
@pulkit khanduri You just proved my point. The country India has a false claim to the title. Please start calling it Bharat again. Please let go of the Colonial terms :)
The partition of India is a ridiculously complicated issue, but initially Britain wanted to keep India united. What changed circumstances was demands for a separate Muslim state and elections in 1945 and 1946 that saw the Muslim League win in what is now Pakistan and Bangladesh. The Partition lines were drawn by a 5 person commission, with two members each from the Congress Party and the Muslim League and chaired by Cyril Radcliffe. The whole situation was a rushed mess and a reminder that borders should be drawn by and in consultation with those who live in the effected communities, not by powerful politicians.
@The Engineer Guy I'm Pakistani Pashtun and literally, no one here has the desire to reunite with Afghanistan. In 1947, when Pakistan was created there was a poll in KPK (Pashtun majority region) and no one wanted to join Afghanistan, in fact, the prime minister of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai was an ISI agent and worked for Pakistan when he resided in Quetta basically India is using Afghanistan against Pakistan so the afghans esp the Pashtuns side with India all the time. The other ethnic groups do not want this to happen since pashtuns are always dominating Afghanistan and adding kpk will further worsen the situation. We have a soft heart for the pashtuns of Afghanistan and we know the govt of Afghanistan has to be pro-Pakistani. This is one of the reason why pakistan has supported the Taliban in the past, unfortunately. Also, majority afghans don't like Indians mainly because they're racist and think of them as low beings lol they have beef because historically speaking afghans have ruled India many times. As far as Iran is considered we never had beef with them basically pakistan is neither Sunni or shia sometimes we have Sunni govt and many times Shia we're not that hateful with each other due to this the shia govt of Iran does not bother our government.
I would like to add some facts to it 1. Pakistan although in such a vulnerable position is always the first country to engage in a war with India. 2. Taliban is actually Pakistan own creation. 3. There is so much instability in the Balochistan. Baloch people want independence and break away from Pakistan. 4. Pakistan never since it's independence had a stable government. 5. There are high chances that in future Pakistan will break up in four regions. This is said by none other than Pakistan ex prime minister.
