Wow, what can I say! The video is doing amazing currently over 1.6k+ views and many likes and comments of people saying that they enjoyed the video. I couldn't be happier and I want to thank you guys so much for the support and kind words. It really does mean a lot and makes me very proud of my work. I will continue to strive forward to keep improving the quality of my videos with each upload. In the mean time whilst you wait for the next upload come join the Discord where we can all hang out! Here is a link: discord.com/invite/3wdk885GaQ
@@HyperFlie yeah, i was thinking the same. I mean if we got ranked 2.0 then delete the f'in hidden mmr thing, I've got 2 accounts, one is near lvl300 and one is lvl82 , I started the lvl82 in april with one of my friends so I could help him lvl up fast and learn, when I got lvl50 and tried to play ranked i got queued up against champs and diamonds as a effin lvl 50 without playing ranked on that acc, hidden mmr is a joke. Now I got 2 accounts that I can't play solo ranked on bc Im not on champ skill level but i always have them in my enemy team. I've got some R6 streamers saying that "ooh if you're playing champs probably your hidden mmr is champ, good job man, be happy about it" And i can't be happy about it bc if my hidden mmr is champ then give me my f'in charm, card background and rank, i want to see it, in the lobby and everywhere, not just on my enemies ranks
I don’t understand the need of them hiding the MMR, like what’s the point, we want to play ranked because it’s competitive and by having an MMR we see how good we are compared to others, but now it’s hidden so you don’t know what it is and you have to guess your actual skill level since in theory a copper who is playing only other coppers could make it to champ and not actually be good
@@HyperFlieoh mmr has been hidden for quite sometime I started in ember rise and sucked for the next 4 seasons. Then I got better and consistently placed plat. Eventually I would start to solo q and win a lot of games because I’d be farming golds. Then elo he’ll sets in when you lose more mmr than you gain. That got annoying so I decided to play causal only to notice that I was getting slammed by people with purple and red charms. I was matched up against the number 31 champ on ps4 at that time. When this first occurred I was low mmr plat 3. There were no cheaters during this time so I just rose to the challenge and got better eventually raising my causal mmr to somewhere around 4100 making me a causal low diamond player. When I solo qd ranked this equaled out to me being plat 2 but when I qd with my friends who were in p3 we were being matched with literal console pros. R6 always took casual mmr into account which became your true rank. And we also notice that it took lobby host into account when we’d have our gold friends host we’d be matched up with other plats and golds. From day 1 this game has been shady.
I purposly left this out because I think it is one of the most spoken about topics for the game, and I wanted to touch on the lesser voiced things, and what makes it worse is that still it is an on going issue. We all wish it would stop and it really does need to. That too is killing the game unfortunately and it has been such a long standing issue. If you go on my channel there is a video of me reacting to cheaters around 3 years ago when this used to be an R6 channel and it was an issue before and still is now. They gotta fix up.
It's sad that I've started the game two months and am already queueing consistently against cheaters. Such a fun concept of a game... Shame they do fuck all for their AC or they might even be in the kahoots with the cheat devs, as that was the case in a CoD game iirc.
I took a 3 year hiatus from Siege, and randomly played the game again for a couple weeks late last year… and I quickly realised, the game is basically unrecognisable, I wasn’t having any fun at all. I’m not going to play siege again… why does this keep happening to FPS games I enjoyed playing.
Always thought they ahould add a training mode where you pick an operator and the game would pair 1 ai bot that counters your operators gadget. This would teach new players who can counter you and how to get around countering
This is a really good idea, and this is what I mean when I say that Ubisoft has to listen to they community because there are so many good ideas just like yours and they could take inspiration.
Ubisoft: yeah so the player base is having fun just not the way we wanted them to have fun so we’ve nerfed a lot of weapons and made no positive improvements this should help balance the game
Thank you very much for this heartwarming comment ♥It relly means a lot, I do try to put in my best effort creating videos for you guys and I am happy it is paying off! If you want to keep seeing my videos be sure to get subscribed and if you fancy I have a discord server you can join in my description. Thanks again
Thank you so much,I appreciate the comment fondly❤️ I’m just trying my best so I’m happy to see it’s working! Make sure to share the video to let it grow more
I stopped playing on Year 4. Siege took bad direction whit futuristic operators and unicorn skins, i just hope some kind of classic version could be released.
It would be nice to see a more grounded version like Siege Classic or something along those lines, maybe a new Tim Clancy game which is what R6 was supposed to be from the start, realistic and tactical which I think would be amazing!
The problem with the recruit “rework” is that they wanted to put in as little effort as possible. In the ideal world, recruit remaster gives access to a handful of primary and secondary weapons (too much might confuse new players), maybe a minor gadget (defense could have a small healing station, offense could have a small global heal like Finka), and allow 5 recruits per team. It makes them not very competitively viable, but increases the fun factor of the recruit. Instead, they wanted to try and make having two gadget’s competitively viable, creating the monster that is striker, and the ok sentry. The funny part is that this IS the reason we can’t run more than one recruit, and it isn’t even balanced properly (attacking recruit can bring 3 flashes and 2 frag nades, which will obliterate a Jager setup). It’s ridiculous.
Yeah it’s just stupid the way they did it and the way you described it as it should have been are the ways I too think it should have been in the video, thanks for the comment!
Thank you so much for the kind comment! I strive to keep the quality up an try to make it better with each video that comes out, I am planning on around one per week but might do more if I get the chance, thanks again for the comment I appreciate it a lot ❤️
you should've included jynxis recent clip of him saying people like the fun factors of siege and how it can be that stupid that it's fun. Like nightmaps you did talk about and recruit rush. Siege is leaning more to pro league but to get into pro league it's not just your skill. You actually have to l know people to get into the scene. nother the less really good video mate look forward to seeing more
Great video man really good work. I agree with the all problems u listed. The r6 developers love to nerf nerf and nerf. Instead of just getting all operators on a good level and they need to realise that many operators would be preferred and thats okay as long as it's not broken. But they just love to nerf because they think it's what we want. how bout buffing the operators they never get picked? Changing how they work and make them more viable in matches. idk what they do in that office but they seem to just do everything that we asked for but the complete opposite
100% agree with you, the game is a balancing mess, they could they buff operators instead of only nerf but they seem to Not want that at all! I appreciate the positive comment a lot ❤️ if you are interested i have a Discord server too in the description and get subscribed to Not Miss any more videos
Well said. But you forgot the hacker problem that every season the number of hackers skyrocket (while they claim they banned 60% more hacks this season). I appreciate Ubi's move to take steps for VAC ban on Steam, but they needs to push it faster and stronger. Not to mention, reversion of Ranked 2.0 is essential. Fixing streamer mode (where you can simply block a player on uplay and reveal their real identity is just breaks the reason to have streamer mode in the first place) and stop innovating new bugs no one can imagine of upon a new season release (e.g the visual bug when you play the game on vulkan). Listening to the community helped them gain players after Operation Health. They should know this way better than any one of us and now they should act circulating that. ITS OK if we get few content, but fix what you have already broken and don't fix what's not broken (back to ranked 2.0 again, and it goes beyond) Again, these are my 2 cents, but it's coming from a person who is a tournament organizer, player and a shoutcaster. I have amazing memories in this game and I don't want it to end so quickly.
Thanks for the valuable comment, your points are very good, I actually purposely left out the cheater problem to highlight the problems which people pay less attention to due to how bad the cheater problem is. I also agree that even if as now we get less content as long as they fix the game or bring value in other ways it would be great. I too do not want to see the game die off since I have my some of my best memories playing it and I would love to see Ubisoft start listening to the community and if they do so hey the game could last even up to 20 years if they wanted.
I still don’t get why ranked 2.0 exists. It’s essentially just a “prestige”system and can’t sort out the correct elo I should play against. Why as a gold 3 player being matched up with diamond players
Yeah it doesn’t really make sense why they hide your real MMR and then it also enables champs to play with coppers who are genuinely coppers and they can easily boost
Im not saying it was not for esports, I’m saying that they strayed away from the tactical aspect which is why the game was originally made and they are mostly listening only to the pro league players when it comes to changes
@@DRNounours77 it was not. They even had to remake the whole lighting and graphics of the game to turn it in to a esport game. At the time ubisoft saw the money games like cs, lol and dota where making with pro play and tried to copy it, But at the end of the day you cant force a game into becoming a esport
Yes this is it, it has evolved into an esports game but it was never a vision. Look at the all the Tom Clancy games before that and it would make more sense, siege was supposed to take the Tom Clancy style of games and make it online so it’s vs. Other people rather than just AI
Used to be very rewarding once now it’s much worse, I guess they can say that bravo packs will have better items however you have to pay for more than one of them through the battle pass
@HyperFlie which is why I stopped playing Siege after Deep Feeeze. Cause I'm putting Siege in a Deep Freeze until the Deadly Omens of the New Blood realize what they did and go into damage control.
Ngl this is a hot take but I have been playing R6 since the ending of 2017, but honestly rank 2.0 I like more because I can play with friends and rank up, joining groups post is annoying bc you have to win the first game or else there’s a 75% chance someone going to leave, on top of that, it makes boosting easier 😂😂😂
I understand your point, but boosting is another issue because what happens is people in lower ranks could end up in a lobby where there is a champ diamond etc. and then the other team is all copper/bronze and they have no chance.
Siege always ends up recovering its self some way or another but then the cycle repeats itself every time 🤣 who knows what will happen next hopefully the next season will be better
To be honest if we kept getting one new map and two new operators every season the game lifespan would have officially ended in (Year 10 - Season 4), and seeing how because of the Siege is expected to go for another 10 years that means the game will be along for longer. The problem is, is that Ubisoft doesn't want to forget about all the original maps that could be made into competitive maps, which is completely understandable. Because why I make more maps instead of reworking the ones in game to actually be playable in a competitive environment... It's the same premise with new guns, Ubisoft already has over 100 unique guns in game, which means licensing more just wouldn't make sense because it's too much to keep track of. The only thing that is really killing the game for certain people is the balancing...
I agree with you, the game doesn’t ‘need’ all new maps and operators but what it does need is better thought out balancing, they could have stopped reworking maps like house since it anyway was supposed to remain a casual map so why make it more competitive? Ubisoft has some interesting ideas when it comes to this but if we got at least one really good map each year that would be great
Ubisoft's balancing team for R6 is absolutely atrocious. I mean like who's a great idea was it to give Wamai the ACOG on the MP5K, the same thing with Melusi getting the ACOG on the MP5 coupled with an already annoying gadget. Instead maybe buff operators like T-Bird that have been nuked into the ground to give operators like Doc and Rook some competition... What I'm genuinely trying to get across here is there's more nerf than buffs currently, which makes the game feel completely stale. And to make matters worse, so many operators that have been nerf that were good for their guns are absolutely long gone, meaning that people are just picking operators solely for their gun now...
@dakotaterry5451 this is very true, the ability almost feels like a second thought when choosing who to play at least it seems that way, for example I don’t think I have played gridlock much since she was released and Ubisoft does not give us a reason to, the ability is okay but nothing needed the weapons are mid and she is a 1 speed so why should someone play her over capitao for example when he has a fire bow that forces a player to not walk into it and you cannot get rid of it until the fire diffuses. The we have Clash who I’m not sure why she has not been reworked to give her a completely different ability because her role has no right to be in siege in my opinion
@@HyperFlie To be completely honest I used to main Clash at the higher ranks in Diamond to Champion lobbies, and the reason why I do this is because I have a highly coordinated team to back it. If a Clash is on an uncoordinated team she is more than likely an easy kill, but it's the exact opposite if you have a team that's coordinated that can work around the Clash. Clash is not a very easy operator to play, and her original design that people don't seem to understand is that she was meant to counter attacking shields... One of the best ways to kill a Clash is to dismantle the site and leave her with the least amount of cover to operate, a smart Clash player like myself will not push into an area that has multiple angles to get shot from, that's why a lot of people don't play her is because they seem to forgotten how to...
This is good and yes, if you have a team and you have strategies to do this then yes it it good to player, however in lower rank lobbies the guy picking clash that gets killed in the first 45 seconds is why clash needs to be learnt how to play first
The new update on lighting really makes me wish we had maps with night or even afternoon times, like favela looked good on the day time but FAVELA AT NIGHT LOOKS BEAUTIFUL. Its completely understandable that the game has to be adapted to a more competitive setting but having a change of atmosphere on a map does so much for the game, and specially that we dont even get new maps that often. But at this point ubisoft is probably not going ever touch night maps again, but a man can dream.
The thing i want it's the easiest to add: give new guns to new and old operators and add customisation on the sights so you can put thinner or thicker lines on them
This. Yes I think that giving some of the older operators a bit more variety in their loadouts will be good, the sight thing is something I have wanted for literally years and even more so now, the old 1.5x was the perfect sight imo and I used it on basically everyone who had it if not the holo but now with it being a 2.5x the lines are so much larger and it feels horrible to play with
Thank you so much for the comment ❤️I appreciate it a lot! Make sure to share the video around so we can get it to grow more but again I appreciate the support it helps out a lot 😁
Appreciate the comment man I put a lot of time and effort and give it my best shot! Im trying to Grow the channel out make sure you get subscribed to continue getting my content in your feed, if you are interested a Discord server thats in the description 😁
I guess they were added back recently then because I remember he didn’t have them 🤣 or at least they did remove them from him but this just shows how by balancing they keep making and undoing changes
@@HyperFlie he never lost nades.Making and undoing changes is and will never be an issue in a live service game. Time to understand that. New operator/equipment => new meta =>new balance =>new operator/equipement.
And your point about new stuff new meta yes I agree but it’s not just that, they try to balance things in the game and it seems to go wrong almost all the time, for example nokk getting silent step removed, it was a good feature to nokk who was not played much anyway and now she ins never really played because there is not much reason to
When Ubisoft appeals to less than 3% of the Six Siege Community that is Pro League, it's like modern companies appealing to the Woke population which is like 10% ish. At least that is what it feels like
@HyperFlie That's how sport and esport works. You balance your game by watching the top players who pushed the game to the limits the others are not able to reach (right now). Imagine balancing the game with level coppers? Imagine Balancing fighting game for the newbie perspective. WTF. That's why the low/medium level player don't have the same tier-list than the pro. Because what's op for normal player, is just balanced or weak for the best players. If ubisoft listened the community , the game today is COD since year one
Not saying they should listen to coppers that would obviously not make sense, but if the majority of the player base agree with something and the pros also say they agree with that thing then clearly is a good reason for Ubi to implement it
@@HyperFlie sometimes the game designer knows better. they have a vision at least a year ahead. It's like in football. Everybody was against the change added by the VAR. Today a lot of people admit it's more fair now.
@@DRNounours77 The thing is with Ubisoft with this season, they don't and didn't know what they were doing. Everyone wants to be able to 5 man recruit with the new rework, but no fun allowed not only that people expect new content, without the content why bothering coming back if it is a rework and two nerfs
I can’t tell you how many times I witnessed someone get team killed because they didn’t run recruit with everyone. Also, aside from the “fun factor” the recruit was actually useless and didn’t contribute to the teams success in any way. With striker and sentry they actually are viable options and do absolutely help the team.
I get your point and while my experience was different that is a valid point. However, even as much as the new season may have made them better to actually use they still made a change that no one really wanted or asked for instead of changing something that people actually want to see be changed.
bro, unfortunately, I watched this cinematic movie more than I listened to you 😅, but yes, you are right, I started playing this game exactly one year ago, operation dead factor, before I bought the game, I also watched the trailer, although I watched a lot of lives, I expected to see some tactics in the game and brutal realism like from that trailer, but here after a year, everything has become just a routine, because this has now become competitive, unfortunately 🥲
Yes unfortunately the game never turned out to be what Ubisoft had planned. Now there are many games that let you play like that however such as Ready or Not or Gray Zone Warfare, whilst not exactly 5v5 I guess they are similar to the vision Ubisoft once had. Both games I intend to make videos for too so stay tuned. But yes it would be nice if we got a nice game where tactics play a crucial role.
@@HyperFlie I would make a new game in their place, the same as r6, but this time it would be like the trailer, I believe that everyone would dream about it. Ready or not is a good game, but we are rainbow! .... this sounded good in my head 😅😂
Hey @@pavlematovic2116, I went off and did some research and the closest game I could find is called Ground Breach, It seems pretty good. It is currently on sale on steam here is a link if you are interested: store.steampowered.com/app/16900/GROUND_BRANCH/
