Why Scania & Volvo Keep Battling To Be The Strongest?

Подписаться 109 тыс.

Просмотров 101 тыс.

50% 1

Why Scania & Volvo Keep Battling To Be The Strongest?
Volvo Trucks has just launched its latest marvel, the Volvo D17 engine, setting a new benchmark in the heavy-duty trucking industry. Designed specifically for the iconic FH16 truck series, this 17-liter engine boasts an unprecedented power output of up to 780 horsepower and a staggering 3800 Newton-meters of torque.
Which is just enough to outperform the Scania V8 engine with 770 hp and 3700 Nm, making Volvo the strongest truck engine manufacturer in Europe.
But why have Scania and Volvo always battled to have the strongest engine?
let's take a look back at the history behind the rivalry between Scania and Volvo
---The Video-----
00:00 start
00:52 let's go back to the 1950s
03:35 In the 1980s
06:14 When Volvo Took the Crown
Watch till the end to uncover why some still long for the simplicity of the past, and don’t forget to subscribe for more captivating trucking content. Thank you for tuning in!
🚜Go visit our other channel about tractors here 🚜 / @tractortropia
🚛Subscribe to our channel: / @trucktropia
🚜Subscribe to our Tractor channel: / @tractortropia
▬▬▬ End ▬▬▬
Hope you liked this video with Why Scania & Volvo Keep Battling To Be The Strongest?
The content of our videos is for entertainment and the information contained is for you to know what is happening on the screen and has some educational value.
We enjoy making entertaining and educational vides for you, so like and share if you also like it
Copyright Issue: If you find any of your copyrighted material in this video, please leave us a message so we can resolve the issue.
For business contact trucktropia@hotmail.com

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

25 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 317

@TruckTropia 2 месяца назад

You might also enjoy THIS: WHY Today's Trucks SUCK! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rooPeQDzRJE.html

@spoony00se 10 дней назад

Why would you show American trucks when specifically speaking of the Swedish brands??

@mnls7878 2 месяца назад

The most impressing thing for me is that both truck leaders are made from the same country!!!Huge Respect

@Ghostrider-gn8ml 2 месяца назад

Some dates are wrong. Indeed Scania introduced the new model range in 2016 but they kept the 730hp as top of the line until late 2020 when they introduced the newest V8 engine generation with its 770hp. So Scania didnt had the crown for eight years. It was just a bit more than 3 years until Volvo launched their brand new 17.3l engine.

@savagememes873 2 месяца назад

yup also scania has made a 1000hp truck to but it's some really special custom made one specificaly made for some mining industry i belive.

@dionisisdimoudis8543 2 месяца назад

@@savagememes873 also volvo has a 1050 hp engine custom made , but we are talking about a mass production trucks and engines. So if u want the strongest u choose volvo

@ciaronmackle5807 2 месяца назад

This channel gets most of their information totally wrong

@imortaliz 2 месяца назад

@@savagememes873 you can just remap a 770 and get 1000hp

@BoitumeloMabena-jj2kf 2 месяца назад

Yes until 23 September 2020

@keno77 2 месяца назад

Both Volvo and Scania are superb trucks and amazingly they are both manufactured in little Sweden 😊

@TruckTropia 2 месяца назад

Well both brands has manufacturing facilities around the world

@turboturtle8977 2 месяца назад

@@TruckTropia That is so true. In the UK the 2014 R450 Scania I drive was made in Netherlands. In Brazil Scania has manufacturing facilities, a major player in South America. Today, Scania has production facilities in Sweden, France, the Netherlands, Thailand, China, India, Argentina, Brazil, Poland, Russia and Finland. In addition, there are assembly plants in ten countries in Africa, Asia and Europe.

@TerrorBlade66 2 месяца назад

Man is the best

@Coole-ee1vg Месяц назад

@@TruckTropia Yea, but still Swedish brands.

@jonasastrand9945 Месяц назад

@@Coole-ee1vg Scania is not Swedish today.

@SanderleiSouza 2 месяца назад

Some Americans be like: "what is 'Scania'?"

@TruckTropia 2 месяца назад

😅

@thierrygamer2413 2 месяца назад

maybe because you don't know the Scania T

@DaveeeOnTop 2 месяца назад

@@thierrygamer2413still scania isn't that present in the US, so many people don't know about it

@thierrygamer2413 2 месяца назад

@@DaveeeOnTop scania is present in the us, look for the scania T or torpedo 😄

@DaveeeOnTop 2 месяца назад

@@thierrygamer2413 present but not present enough

@AutoMotive_Vision Месяц назад

Incorrect, Scania revealed the 770Hp late 2020 so they held the crown until early 2024 when Volvo brought out the D17 engines with 780Hp

@blomsterfreak Месяц назад

acuatlly the scania is still the toughest ! as scania's hp is measured on the wheels.. and the volvo is measured on the crank..

@donk4254 Месяц назад

@@blomsterfreak scania measures at the diff but otherwise correct :)

@alirezajaleh6558 2 месяца назад

Great as always ❤❤

@hoost3056 2 месяца назад

The battle must exist to improve the trucks. All Scania has to do is remap the V8 and itll be at 800 hp and still running clean. Then Volvo will go 830 hp and 4200 Nm of torque, and so on and so on.

@bendermi 2 месяца назад

They are making the engines more efficient that's why they are getting stronger . The one with the strongest transmission is the winner . Do you know if the Scania is having full power in all gears?

@hoost3056 Месяц назад

@bendermi no, unless the customer asks for that style of mapping. Even when the transmission is put in manual mode you don't get max power in the lower gears unless you ask the dealer to do it or get a remap from someone. The Volvo I drive now has a moderate hp/high torque tune from the factory ( 455hp/1850 ft-lbs ) and in manual mode or performance mode the engine doesn't go nowhere near the horsepower peak just because of the factory tune. It shifts slow and low, and gets high 7s to low 8s all the time. It can do better with more responsive tuning but the factory tune is for a new driver so they don't kill themselves. I've been driving for decades and am used to manual trucks and high powered vehicles.

@bendermi Месяц назад

@@hoost3056 I was on the road in the seventies and eighties with my dad , we was driving an F89 , at that time the Scanias was breaking down because of a weak driveshaft, he told me the “fix” was to put in a driveshaft from Volvo , he also told me the Scania only had full power from sixths gear and up .

@lanfenglxf 2 месяца назад

0:48 I can recognize the image is shot from ETS2

@kristjen86A 2 месяца назад

I can't believe I didn't spot it, well spotted! Such a fun sim to play and drive.

@metehantuzcu1037 2 месяца назад

Scania - VABİS V8 Legend.

@isaacsmith1874 26 дней назад

3:31 you need to credit Stavros969.

@RoadRunner1980 2 месяца назад

I think it's more their fanbases that keeps battling.

@TruckTropia 2 месяца назад

True 😅

@SaiCharanReddy-oz8ez 2 месяца назад

@@TruckTropia I love Volvo than Scania, because Volvo is still ruling the luxury bus market in our India, whereas Scania has discontinued their buses in India and only manufacturing trucks. But Volvo is manufacturing both trucks and buses in our India. Trucks are by Volvo and Eicher and buses are by Volvo itself

@yoandeul9297 2 месяца назад

@bendermi 2 месяца назад

The horsepower increases because of higher efficiency, but the real power is the torque and everybody knows who got that right from the start . So no need for a battle . Without the driveshaft from Volvo the other truck would still be breaking down.

@gravyfoodbest988 2 месяца назад

@@SaiCharanReddy-oz8ezScania buses here in the Philippines are rare and comfortable

@johnjoseph3908 Месяц назад

I love the FMX 500. It's one of the best-looking trucks in my opinion.

@SimplyTakuma 2 месяца назад

Well they have a good competition and many big hauling companys and heavy duty oversized goods are transportet with those trucks, so many fleets are out there.

@sollydeaguiar2221 2 месяца назад

Here in South Africa...85 % of lowbeds carrying the HEAVIEST OF THE HEAVIEST LOADS ARE VOLVO'S... MAYBE 10%%SCANIA'S... THE OTHER WANNABE'S A PALTRY 5% OF THE REST COMBINED!!!

@adamhlali8106 Месяц назад

Swede here: Why did Saab and Volvo battle over safety? Simple: Cause why the fuck not? Some healty competition never hurts. One makes something better and the other one has to step its game up and so one. Eventually both will be better in general than the rest. Volvo and Saab cars were among the safest in the world at their glory time. And Scania and Volvo are among the best trucks in its own league above the rest. Also, as a worker at research on Scania, hearing the news of the 780 Volvo... It made most of us laugh... Like come on 10hp? I guess 800 is there for us... Unlike their D17, our DC16 is proven, and capable of 1200... Just needs a stronger gearbox and aftertreatment system. And also cooling.

@markusylitalo8376 28 дней назад

Years ago I laughed at Volvos ad about their newest engina at the time. "We have gained the tourque of the V8". They referred to Scanias top engine at the time. I thought, do they really think that Scania stopped developing their V8?! I don't think I6 will ever gain the tourque of V8 as long they both developed simultanius. And if it true that one here said that Volvo messurres from flywheel and Scania from wheels, the comparing is unfair.

@adamhlali8106 28 дней назад

@@markusylitalo8376 I think both measure the engine. You cant measure torque on the wheels, just horsepower. The torque at the propshaft is around 26000+ nm. And you can reach the torque of a V8 in an I6, however, something that isnt talked about is power delivery. A V8 has a much more balanced power output, while a I6 have "deadspots" where the engine isnt pumping out the top power even if its in the right RPM range. And yes, it is noticable if you drive one. I notice the different engines after a few meters.

@kingyuonobryant1416 2 месяца назад

I thank there both nice trucks

@yourgtadaily Месяц назад

Speaking of Volvo and Scania, I am interested in one question - since in Australia they use both European and american models of trucks, and both cabovers and long nosed, and we all know that both Scania and Volvo have long nosed models like the Volvo VNL and Scania T series, why aren't these two models of the brands popular in Australia? May be you can do a video on that topic.

@audoinxr6372 24 дня назад

T cabs don't exist from factory anymore. We still see the older series 3 ones from time to time. Volvo dropped the VN series back in late 90s and no one can say why. Although the new VNLs being 100% American manufactured means that it would be a large task to get RHD and Aus legal. Something they don't want to bother with in such a small market.

@andysvehiclehistorychannel 2 месяца назад

Scania R Series 2005 Volvo FH4 2013 Scania Next Generation 2016

@smurface549 2 месяца назад

I'm inclined to believe that they don't battle each other for having the most powerful engine for the sake of having the most powerful engine. Instead, they both operate in the same market and neither can affort to fall significantly behind. Also in parts of Scandinavia and Finland trucks can be significantly more heavy than elsewhere (exception is of course Australia), and it's often somewhat mountaineous terrain. So even with 780HP it might not be an absurd abundance of power and the need for more is easily justifiable. It then boils down to who's having the more lucky hand with their latest development, and when the next release of a newer version happens.

@optify9971 25 дней назад

there is so many misinformation in this video. The Scania 4 series had 530 horsepower back in 1995 not 470 you can even see it on the grill smh, the Scania R series had 620 horsepower in 2005 not 580, the 730 horsepower was indeed released in 2010 but in 2016 when the next generation scania trucks came (R and S series) it still had the 730 horsepower. the 770 came in 2020

@petarelez595 2 месяца назад

3:20 stolen clip from Stavros969 video about Volvo F10. Clip shows Rory Linch himself

@BURZT_YT 2 месяца назад

Yea, he's a little shitty on not giving credit on the clips

@tobyytlai 2 месяца назад

@@BURZT_YT That's called stealing. This channel is a thief

@BURZT_YT 2 месяца назад

@@tobyytlai fr,

@landryabraham642 Месяц назад

They both great machines made by great people's highest quality of engineering

@williamjohnrigneyjr1839 2 месяца назад

Ten horsepower difference is not a battle. That is just marketing BS.

@TruckTropia 2 месяца назад

😂

@AXXeYY 2 месяца назад

the reason why Scania & Volvo is so good is this battle that has been going on for 100 years know!

@ontheroadagain4773 Месяц назад

At first sight it seems that Volvo's D17 engine is just a drilled up D16 - the same stroke but a bigger cylinder bore - but I believe there is more than that...

@d.natrop4495 Месяц назад

Short answer: marketing

@pachokardana6192 Месяц назад

Simpler is better so inline is the better engine of the two . Less moving parts better balance , smoother, less fuel , less repair costs, longer life span , more torque at low rpm, wider powerband.....they are a lot to count

@yahyayarim5774 2 месяца назад

Rica etsem altyazılardaki otomatik çeviri seçenekleri arasına ‘Türkçe’ dil seçeneğini de ekleyebilir misiniz? Sizi anlamak ve takip etmek istiyorum! Saygılar ve başarılar.

@udififkfkfck 2 месяца назад

Both these engines are not some of the most powerful in the world and not only in Europe! These beasts are the 2 most powerful on the planet without any other matching equivalent!,

@hihaveaniceday9386 Месяц назад

Nope, there is the most powerful for on highway use but not the most powerful engines in the world at all

@luisvalentim99 Месяц назад

wrong Chinese shaman 8000 is the most powerful one with 800 hp

@originalguy4535 2 месяца назад

We want to know who is more reliable and durable. Scania or Volvo?

@TruckTropia 2 месяца назад

Depends on mode and engine

@originalguy4535 2 месяца назад

@@TruckTropia pls make video on this

@Lil_Atrax 2 месяца назад

@@originalguy4535 Depends of the usage, enviroment and gross weight of the truck, but from my experience in gravel trucking in Finland (76 ton total weight) 2013 Scania R620 around 550k km to engine rebuild and 2014 Volvo FH16 650 around 500k km to engine rebuild. So it depends alot from usage and terrain.

@sollydeaguiar2221 2 месяца назад

THEY'RE BOTH EXCELLENT... DEPENDS WHICH CLOWN IS BEHIND THE WHEEL!!! MY LATE BROTHER DROVE AN FH12-420 WITH SUPER HEAVY LOADS AND AT 400,000 KM HAD USED BARELY 2MM OF THE ORIGINAL 28MM BRAKE PADS OVERALL ON THE TRUCK TRACTOR!!! RIP DINO "BEANS" DE AGUIAR!!!

@thomtrucker1925 2 месяца назад

Depending aspects. Volvo has stronger chassis and faster gearbox for many years. Scania v8 is more complicated engine, more bearings, injectors, pipes etc. For building sites are better different marks as military use them. Both are very good trucks and top strongest models cost top prices. Otherwise Chinese truck has 800hp and cost just over half price

@user-pp3pm1rw8u Месяц назад

You guys are so lucky in America Volvo has a 425 hp D 13 engine with 2.14 rear ends that spit out a whopping 1650 foot pounds of torque

@gercobosch2870 26 дней назад

It has a few reasons, a V8 in US trucks makes less sense since you have a nose and therefore length of the engine is less of an issue. Also weight, in Finland they a road legal truck and trailer may weigh up to 100 metric tons and that with mountains. Whilst the US is relatively flat Europe has 3 mountain ranges, with the Alps the pyrenese and technically the ural mountains in Russia but that is a bit of the split between Europe and Asia. And even then those extreme engines are a rare sight with only fanbases driving those. But most are still between that 400 to 550 HP mark.

@RandomerFellow Месяц назад

I think it's because we Swedes have always liked to compete, not least in technology. The Swedish “lagom” does not exist here.

@tomassjoberg6371 Месяц назад

Its like rap, East coast vs west coast. Södertälje vs Gothenburg

@honkiebikedude 2 месяца назад

Dates and engine sizes are not remotely accurate . The engine size is in the trucks name . An F10 = a 10 litre engine . A Scania 143 is a 14 litre V8 3 series . An FH12 is a 12 litre and nothing else , if it has the 16 litre engine it is an FH16 .

@honkiebikedude 2 месяца назад

The FH16 was released in the early to mid Nineties , it replaced the F16 .

@ontheroadagain4773 Месяц назад

@@honkiebikedude Need to piece out that info about Volvo a bit: The letters are all about the versions of the cab: F = Frambyggd (Cabover) N = Nos (Long hood) - not made anymore. H = High cab M = Medium cab L = Low cab Both the 7, 10 and the 12 litre trucks were available in all the versions H, M and L.. The smaller 4 and 6 litre didn't have a H cab and the 16 litre didn't have a L cab - if I got it right.

@fhurtig72 Месяц назад

There really is no competition. Scania is vastly more popular among drivers and owner operators.

@daniel16.4 Месяц назад

Now is Scania's turn. And i say they are the one who will achieve 800 hp first.

@jonathasfigaro4992 2 месяца назад

Because men are competitive and we we always want the best , fastest and strongest things.

@gabriellaanonim6142 29 дней назад

Hi Everyone! I think both of the Truck Manufacturers are making great and reliable products. One group for Volvo One group for Scania. Thomas

@sollydeaguiar2221 2 месяца назад

@Karen McClaren... not French OR Chinese! South 🇿🇦 African of Portuguese actually!!!

@Itmehokiledu 2 месяца назад

Will it fit in a miata?

@IgrejaBrasilBem-aventurado8193 2 месяца назад

Volvo Fh 16-780cv aero motor 06c em L diesel

@user-eu8bb1py4p 2 месяца назад

Volvo❤❤❤❤❤❤

@robgoff3549 27 дней назад

Volvo measure HP at the flywheel, while Scania measure HP at the diff.. Scania motor still stronger than Volvo

@ontheroadagain4773 7 дней назад

If that was true, I think Scania already would have informed something about that instead of staying quiet and admit that Volvo is stronger? I'm sure that the same standards are set for how to measure engine power and torque on every truck.

@beyondnow1600 2 месяца назад

I like them both but volvo has always looked better to me. I also think other truck brands have copied the Volvo look.

@lanfenglxf 2 месяца назад

Scania doesn't

@beyondnow1600 Месяц назад

@lanfenglxf No your right Scania has its own unique look.

@irvinstruckinggroupse 2 месяца назад

Outnumbering a Scania V8! Volvo, the new king of the road!

@NisseHolmb 22 дня назад

It's not a matter of strength. It's POWER. Interesting review, but many fact mistakes and confusions.

@jeffbartholomew3259 22 дня назад

I Always go for scania ❤

@kizitodettakatantha6236 Месяц назад

You don't know how the horse power is measured in these two different manufacturers I see Volvo measures the power in flywheel while Scania measures from the wheels, which means that all losses are already subtracted yet, volvo include losses If you include losses, you'll end up with 700hp

@audoinxr6372 24 дня назад

No they dont

@liuyifei1989 2 месяца назад

Meanwhile the most poweful engines we can get in North America is still the DD16 or ISX15 for literally the last 14 years.

@TruckTropia 2 месяца назад

😂 true

@user-wm9pj2xj7z 2 месяца назад

North American market is different a lot more highway travel where your not constantly stop and go so the higher horsepower number don’t really matter at those speeds, given though if you look aftermarket several cats and Cummins will be pushed past 700hp

@stark3855 2 месяца назад

@@user-wm9pj2xj7zyes with stratospheric fuel consumption and ridiculous torques. I have a friend to whom I sold my T800 with an ISX 600, he made some modifications raising it to 700hp, it has the same torque as I currently have in my Scania V8 620, but it consumes almost twice as much fuel as me and climbs slower

@V.Tolvanen Месяц назад

saab scania on top🙌

@karendarrenmclaren 2 месяца назад

I'm still don't know. But... There can be only one 😝😉

@sollydeaguiar2221 2 месяца назад

VOLVO IS THE BOSS... PERIOD!!!

@karendarrenmclaren 2 месяца назад

@@sollydeaguiar2221 French? Or Chinese one? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@indboy8040 2 месяца назад

One more fascinating thing is that they both compete even in bus industry❤

@icindric 2 месяца назад

How many times can you say robust in a video?

@VilleWilen 2 месяца назад

Was there really any battling untill late 00´s?

@dreadzjackson5349 2 месяца назад

For real

@deezelfairy 2 месяца назад

There was a lot of battling in the 1960/70's that's when the horsepower race really started in Europe. It's also what began the end of the British truck industry - our typical attitude of "we're the best, take us or leave us" and the market left them. Thing is, Britain was the best for a long time, but we sat on our hands whilst the competition over took us. In the mid 60's, your best offerings from a British truck manufacturer was a 180hp Gardner, a Leyland 680 (180-200hp) or some offered a 220 Cummins usually detuned to 205hp. When trucks like the Volvo F88 dropped with 270hp in 1965 then the first Scania V8's in 1969 with 350hp it's no wonder our hauliers switched. Numbers aren't that impressive today but going from 180hp to 270hp is a 50% increase in power - staggering at the time. Imagine one of the US truck manufacturers announcing tomorrow that they were releasing a 900hp otr truck - that's how significant that's how significant those power gains were in the 60/70's TV

@spv1093 Месяц назад

@@deezelfairy During the 1950s I visited Scotland as a sailor. At one point we unloaded pulp to four-axle trucks such as AEC and Leyland. It was cold weather and the drivers sat in short cabins and wiped the windows with rags. It did not seem to find effective heat in the cabins. But there were in the Volvos and Scania Vabis that were later sold in the UK. As for Volvo, mostly F86 was sold in the UK. According to what was heard, it was the best profit to sell F86 instead of F88.

@deezelfairy Месяц назад

@@spv1093 That was the thing, British hauliers were tight with their money which is why the F86 was more popular then the F88. It's also why you'd see our drivers wiping their windows with rags as back then a heater was an 'optional extra' on British trucks of that period. You had a real good boss if you got any options that were for driver comfort. With the Swedish manufacturers things like heaters were standard fitment. Sleeper cabs weren't a big thing in British trucks either - drivers were generally expected to sleep on top of cover over the engine hump in the cab 😂

@victoriamonique7223 2 месяца назад

Volvo übertragen übertrifft mit der Innenausstattung in Scania von außen sind beide gleich geil❤❤❤

@noobtuber9625 2 месяца назад

Are they stronger than those classic KWs Petes?

@TruckTropia 2 месяца назад

Yes 💪

@4_SJR 2 месяца назад

Very easy...

@GoBot05 Месяц назад

Scania👍

@zosimoromero3475 Месяц назад

Mercedez, MAN, volvo,scania,DAF,iveco

@Drive-X-Gaming Месяц назад

I love scania, Volvo is very impressive too but I still like a scania 😂

@riyaskamarudeen7560 Месяц назад

❤️🔥💪volvo💪🔥❤️ ❤️❤️❤️Drivers safety first that's volvo concept ❤️❤️❤️

@petrihakkinen2336 27 дней назад

Finnish Sisu have 900hp

@fortune300 2 месяца назад

That torque curve from the Volvo 780hp engine looks like a bad joke...

@ajidamarjati Месяц назад

I've been telling everyone this exact thing! I think Volvo not really serious to challenge the 770 Scania. Scania 770 have better and wider torque curve.

@fortune300 Месяц назад

@@ajidamarjati A hill climb test with 40t would be interresting. I bet the Scania would be the winner.

@SOMTRUCK480 2 месяца назад

all European trucks the best two's are Scania and Volvo to others next is Mercedes-benz actros 3340

@henthust9784 16 дней назад

Where are the German trucks? Any of them above 700hp? The last time I knew, MAN managed 680hp with their last V8 engine, before pursuing a straight six. It was temporarily the most powerful, as Volvo and Scania were still loitering around 600hp.

@bendermi 2 месяца назад

End the battle and show us the torque curve let the facts speak. There has always been one king of the road and the winnee has the widest torque curve .

@martinpoulsen6564 2 месяца назад

You need to study your specs a lot more thoroughly before posting these videos. The Volvo F-series was released in 1977 with a 10 liter F10 and a 12liter F12. Top of the line at release was 320hp. 1979 saw the Globetrotter cab emerge and be a huge success for the F12. The F-series got a big brother in 1988 with the 16liter 465hp F16, and then rightly evolved into the FH series in 1993. Scania ran 11 and 14liter engines from their 110 straight 6 and 140 V8 up through the years, coming out with a smaller 8liter with the 2 series, the 82, upgraded to 9 liters with the 93. Along with the 4 series came also a 16liter V8 as the new king of the road, and as they say, the rest is history. The 2 brands have always battled. Not only on horsepower. On everything. Safety, fuel mileage, design, ease of use, smoothest transmission, heaviest hauler, highest payload, driver comfort... For a great many years they have been the benchmark trucks, although way outsold by Mercedes and also compeeting with great trucks made by dutch PACCAR owned Daf.

@cvetanx 2 месяца назад

Volvo for life! ❤

@sollydeaguiar2221 2 месяца назад

Scania is brilliant.... but my blood is Volvo BLUE!!! HAVE AN R620 HIGHLINE AND A VOLVO FH16-610 GLOBETROTTER.... VOLVO WINS HANDS DOWN!!!

@KosovaliShqiptar34 Месяц назад

And why volvo not scania brother?

@sollydeaguiar2221 24 дня назад

Which do you OWN....I OWN BOTH top dogs with Top POWER!! Try pulling out of a slush quarry with 80 tonnes payload...and then pull away without any problems??? BTW the Scania is 620 hp and the Volvo only 610 hp!!!

@MCDeetlefs-jq1lb Месяц назад

I don't get it . Scania 144g 530hp 2800nm . Volvo fh16 610hp 2800nm . Scania 164l 580hp 3000 nm 🤔

@JohannZ100 2 месяца назад

In trucks horsepower from the engine is higher than at the wheels due to what transmission and axles are used

@IIGrayfoxII 2 месяца назад

This is not just in trucks but cars as well. Gearboxes, no matter how good add frictional losses into a system. Engine>Gearbox>Diff>Wheels can have a 5-10% loss in power easy.

@JohannZ100 2 месяца назад

@@IIGrayfoxII Thats correct same goes for cars too.

@davidmarshall5603 2 месяца назад

❤❤❤❤❤Volvo .

@lewisndhlovu89 Месяц назад

You forgot Daf trucks

@tonkis4812 Месяц назад

Hahahahahahahhahahah nice joke

@sibbolo9204 2 месяца назад

funny fact, if iveco wants, already have a 1000 hp marine V8 turbo diesel that just need conversion to shut them down. FPT rules.

@rude252 Месяц назад

Another fun fact, truck engines and marine engines are not the same. Marine engines are tuned for a lot more horse power and in many cases less reliable.

@sibbolo9204 Месяц назад

@@rude252 maybe the opposite, marine engine can't left you stranded in the open sea like a truck into an open road. Anyway, adapt it to euro 6 and so on, sure will have a drop, easily i bet could stay on 800 hp easily. Because it's a marine engine born from V8 of turbostar.

@ontheroadagain4773 Месяц назад

@@sibbolo9204 Scania's most powerful marine version of the 16 litre V8 has 1200hp.

@paulgodden8226 2 месяца назад

Scania take their hp rating from the axle. Volvo from the flywheel.. If Scania took their hp from the flywheel the 770 is actually 840hp. End of story

@patodonovan274 Месяц назад

Bullshit ,volvo has a bigger engine & more torque what ever scania will Do Volvo will follow both makes are good

@audoinxr6372 24 дня назад

No they dont

@user-sc2ii2no7z Месяц назад

Very nice but, some of the details are not accurate. Volvo had a 16-liter V8 at the 90’s with 520HP., (this is just one detail that is not mentioned at the clip and there are more )

@ontheroadagain4773 Месяц назад

No. The 16 litre engine Volvo introduced in 1987 was an inline 6 with 470hp at first. The only V8 Volvo has mounted in a truck was a 3.6 litre petrol engine, B36, with 120hp, made between 1956 and 1966

@hakansvensson8314 Месяц назад

There are a lot of errors in this video, would make a quite a list.

@magnusgreve6036 2 месяца назад

One relevant detail is that Volvo measures HP at the crank but Scania measures at the diff. Scania 770hp makes 800+ at the crank

@dbclass4075 2 месяца назад

But, why Scania uses the term "gross power" in their DC1658A specs, instead of "net power"?

@muhammadhanifkurnaen6689 2 месяца назад

It still to be debated until someone dynobench both of trucks on a same dyno engine

@ItzChaza 2 месяца назад

thats bullsh*t, both scania and volvo measure hp at crank, this is easily known by just googling scania dc16 and it shows you a pdf with the engine specs showing the torque curves ect and guess what, that measured 770 is at the crank

@dbclass4075 2 месяца назад

@@ItzChaza Plus that specs do not include any load. Not even a truck.

@sollydeaguiar2221 2 месяца назад

Prove that... my friend!! COMPLETELY INCORRECT!!!

@S.Yucel1962 2 месяца назад

Scania is the undisputed leader at all times and under all conditions.

@Team_Reaper. 2 месяца назад

😂

@patodonovan274 Месяц назад

That's your opinion, volvo just as good

@S.Yucel1962 Месяц назад

@@patodonovan274 I say this as someone who mostly drives a Volvo.

@piratecraft2528 2 месяца назад

Currently in India, The powerful truck is Volvo 540 fmx cab(if I I not wrong). Volvo didn't released its fh series engines. But,scania launched uts super engine this year in March and max hp is 560hp. But,scania is giving 560hp oy in tippers.

@es111youtuber6 2 месяца назад

you r wrong

@MALITLHAREMOPHETE 2 месяца назад

Volvo FH16😮

@AllanKendall-ek5ow 2 месяца назад

I.worry.future Of.mack.trucks....

@francescorestivo1320 28 дней назад

The real answer is because they both shat their pants when Iveco thrown on the marked the ungodly Turbostar V8

@kmg501 2 месяца назад

lol @ 00:44

@JohntimKamadi Месяц назад

How about China's or India's trucks

@luaanomizinga 2 месяца назад

I prefer Volvo parts are easily accessed in the Southern Africa

@joshuavanwilligen1666 Месяц назад

The 770 from scania is on the rear axel and de 780 form Volvo is at the crank so if you count the drivetrain loss by the scania has actually 850 bhp at the crank

@DarkestSheepZ Месяц назад

Sweden showing all the world how to make proper trucks 😂😂😂 Volvo is just pure power no matter what is the beast but that v8 rumble is 😍😍😍👌

@yasharjavdani4173 Месяц назад

Scania S770 just & only

@jonhroarulstad5775 2 месяца назад

High salary cost is the reason.

@dobese7086 Месяц назад

The info on this is not quite accurate.

@MichaelTucker Месяц назад

The difference is that Volvo measure horsepower at the flywheel, while Scania measures horsepower at the rear wheels.

@audoinxr6372 24 дня назад

No they dont

@ontheroadagain4773 7 дней назад

If that was the fact, I think Scania already would have informed something about that instead of staying quiet and admit that Volvo is stronger. I'm sure that some standards are set for how to measure engine power and torque on every truck.

@rayweh-bfa4966 2 месяца назад

Had a Volvo 2 million k had a v8 scania cost a fortune in repairs will send you broke in Australia conditions

@BOPENKK 2 месяца назад

Saya Indonesian pilih Volvo

@GaryLloyd-li7dx Месяц назад

Why is it still called fh16 when it a 17 litre engine it should be fh17?

@TruckTropia Месяц назад

The engine is called d17 👍

@qe2836 Месяц назад

@@TruckTropia Volvo's model number usually refers to the size of the engine so it's logical that this should be called a FH17. But maybe there's something else with the model and FH17 will come later.👍