Why Tecnam Planes Are Too Good - The Most Underrated Brand?

Подписаться 71 тыс.

Просмотров 125 тыс.

50% 1

Tecnam began their quest by constructing paragliders and powering their planes using scrap components. Unlike other planes in the market that offer great performance with some 70-year-old-looking aesthetics, when it comes to Tecnam, whether it is for training, leisure, or business, safety, performance, and mission efficiency, nothing comes close.
#tecnam #tecnamaircraft
_______________________________________________
To contact me directly: Dashboardglobal@techie.com
_________________________________________________
Our channel is about Aviation.
We make the best educational aviation videos you've ever seen; my videos are designed to clear misunderstandings about airplanes and explain complicated aviation topics in a simple way.

Опубликовано:

11 май 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 79

@Lukkas2000ify Год назад

I am a maintenance technician at a flight school, I work a lot with Tecnam (p2008, 2006T and p2010) alongside good `ld cessna. The Tecnam has a good design and avionics but is a pain in the ass to operate and maintain, especially in a flight school environment where they fly constantly. This rapid acumulation of flight hours take its toll at the aircraft airframe and especially to the rotax 912 engine ending in a lot of troubleshooting. Plus, Tecnam`s Manuals and support are the worst I ever seen. Students and instructors have mixed fellings about this aircraft. I personally think Tecnam are good aircraft for private owners that operate max 100h per year.

@carlosvalcarcelhernandez3944 Год назад

Totally agree with u. I can add some other things too, like how operates in the air. Is totally diferent (worse) as the typical (and the best for the greatest part of experienced people) Cessna 172, but of course, more expensive). Flight instructor in LECU, aprox 2000 flight hours.

@worstofthebeast Год назад

This guy knows what he's telling

@nawafsharaf Год назад

Thanks for your feedback mate. What you think about the P2010 TDI? It’s one of the shortlisted options in my list for personal use, around 80-100 per year. How’s the parts cost and availability in general ?

@fernandocampuzanomendez9772 Год назад

Porque este avión P20006T la hélice no es triple.aspas.y el motor no lo hacen turbo.tiene cobertura de poca distancias náutica.y mejorar las vibraciones.Hay prospecto de mejoras para años siguientes 2023?...

@TecnamTwin 11 месяцев назад

A&P here. Sounds like you could use Rotax Factory Training.

@LoganInfinity Год назад

Actually Tecnam planes are absolutely HORRIBLE in quality. Mine has been sitting in Tecnam’s North American HQ in Sebring for the last two consecutive years. It has endless electrical problems that they, for two years, don’t know how to fix. Some of the most incompetent leadership I’ve ever seen. They only care about selling new planes, not fixing the ones already sold.

@geralddavis8160 Год назад

Sorry to hear about your problems, buy enough machines and we eventually get a bad one. The most obvious thing is that perhaps unfortunately you purchased a lemon; not necessarily reflective of the brand's quality in general.

@chuckbolik7060 Год назад

Thanks, really good to know.

@LoganInfinity Год назад

@@geralddavis8160 It's not an isolated incident. I've talked with service centers who used to repair Tecnams. They got so fed up with them constantly having endless electrical problems that some service centers have dropped repairing Tecnams entirely.

@geralddavis8160 Год назад

@@LoganInfinity fair enough.

@lucky-gh5ox Год назад

lol thanks for the sincerity

@Kiejey Год назад

in the event of 1 engine failure on p2006t you get like 10 fpm climb on sea level, it really provides "the sense of security" as mentioned...

@tortozza Год назад

Students at European flight schools grow to hate Tecnams and their constant maintainance issues. They're good for private use but they're flimsy and break constantly when subjected to the demands of flying for 8+ hours a day at a flight school. The nosegear on the P2002 is delicate, the nosegear on the P2006 is dangerously weak. They're simply unsuitible aircraft and yet Tecnam specifically aims them at flight schools, even releasing a glass cockpit version of the P2002 recently despite its flight characteristics being particularly unsuited to IFR flying.

@erikig Год назад

Great description of the brand’s offerings, thank you. Only, I wish there was a comparison/summary slide included with a table of all the models with the engine, avionics, range, speed, climb rate, max payload etc…

@Kulis747 Год назад

Comments are gold and seem to describe a different aircraft line.

@venkuzephyr Год назад

The Tecnam P92 was my first plane I ever flew. I loved the stick

@sdedson144 Год назад

I bought a new 2022 P2010 MkII with IO390 engine this last February and have over 120 hours on it in less than 6 months. I love it and have no issues or complaints. N144SE

@glennstubbs8232 Год назад

I have a few hundred hours in various Tecnam types, and I loved them all. Sometimes getting parts shipped across the pond would get aggravating, but no more than for anything else.

@neillist5517 Год назад

Everything mechanical built in Italy is questionable.

@blaster-zy7xx Год назад

I have flown all of the single engine planes listed here. They fly great, but are not quite as robust as a normal certified aircraft, but they are working against the LSA weight restriction. Also, 172 is now well over a quarter million dollars, so…..

@jphoyost Год назад

Dwayne, certainly always bringing great options to all of people line me looking options for having a plane and family trips. One question, I live in Colombia, and there is a group called colombian air patrol which basically takes humanitarian missions to apart places in the country where you can only get by plane. Do you think the tecnam P2006 will be an option?

@Dwaynesaviation Год назад

The P2006T is a great plane, not adequately powered but it'll got the job done... A critical aspect to consider is its service network in your country

@alexdarcydestsimon3767 Год назад

Don't get a Tecnam, it is lightweight... So is its structure. You might land a Cessna in a field with no consequences. Not a Tecnam.

@StevenJohnson-jv1iw Год назад

just to add a horror story. going out with an instructor to do stalls. He shows me the spot where a school aircraft had crashed after loosing a wing..... When you enter an insipient spin, they try to flip on their back... and they are unable to handle any negative G!

@ivansantos8036 Год назад

You missed the Tecnam P2002 JR; Two seater single, 912 Rotax, variable pitch prop and retractable gear !!

@jphoyost Год назад

¡Gracias!

@satreaaji Год назад

It's depend on Marketing team, if they had good skill, they can even selling junk product for gold

@fifi23o5 Год назад

When speaking of Italian style we shouldn't forget Piaggio Avanti and Aviamilano (Sequoia) F.8L Falco.

@factfilenews Год назад

I didn't know Tecnam was so good. Great video.

@belkacemF Год назад

they aren't

@Alexgeo4975 Год назад

I have about 10hrs in a P2002. It was a flimsy plane but flew fairly well. I’ve heard that the P2012 is a maintenance nightmare though. Seems to have trouble with its gear system.

@jamesburns2232 Год назад

Since it is Italian, you don't say it's a flimsy plane, you say it's a Fragile (Fra Gee' Lay) plane! 😂😉🤠

@mythoughts9305 Год назад

Lovely aircrafts. Good luck if you need to refuel the high wing ones. You'll need a ladder to dip the tanks or refuel because you can't climb up using the strut. Unless you are about 10ft tall.

@esau82 Год назад

That's the same for almost any high wing

@melvinmayfield470 Год назад

BRAVO! :)

@jonasbaine3538 Год назад

The twin looks good.

@mattsartori2624 Год назад

Really amazing airplanes and gorgeous ☺️ grazie!!!

@superwinkta4682 Год назад

..theres an airshow video where a tecnam twin's wings pop right off during a high g pullup. U can here the crowd yelling "oh no" bc they know the pilot is effed.

@markdoan1472 Год назад

Are you sure that wasn't a Panavia and not a Tecnam .. remember it is slander if you get it wrong so take care on your claims

@bangaloremusic Год назад

Ferried the P2010 - it was ok, lots of plastic and a bit flimsy feeling in the Wx

@license2listen 8 месяцев назад

12:47 "a great option for turboprop aircraft" and 5 seconds later at 12:52 "Lycoming piston engines". They ain't the same thing.

@hadleymanmusic Год назад

Question. How long does it last till it starts breaking?

@russellbedell8198 Год назад

Less than 100 hours for the 2006 lol

@Soycanalcolombia4927 Год назад

Por que hacer dificil volar , no es mas facil colocar menos instrumentos para q en caso de perdida de piloto cualquiera pueda resolver problemas

@RJ-sr5dv Год назад

Watched a similar Italian designed twin called a Partnavia come apart at airshow in Texas. Any design that is similar in structure strength is suspect. Sure the pilot was probably at fault, with the exception of a well built aerobatic airplane like a Pitts or an EXTRA, you can pull the wings off of just about any airplane. But to watch what I thought was a relatively low G maneuver have the wings separate from the fuselage just outside the engine nacelle's is totally UNSAT. I wouldn't get in one of those designs.

@giancarlogarlaschi4388 Год назад

I flew the P 68 Partenavia during my Fish Sporting days , Excellent aircraft. The Navy of Chile has four of them , along P3 Orions and Casa / Nurtanio turboprop ASW twins.

@RJ-sr5dv Год назад

@@giancarlogarlaschi4388 I will never forget seeing both wings separating killing the pilot. One of the things I hope a aircraft engineer will answer for me is, ' can a previously over stressed metal wing exhibit deformation..? I've seen several airplanes with wrinkles in the upper skin, most notably from the trailing edge wing root extending to the forward wing tip. I've turned down a number of ferry jobs after looking at the skin closely. As a GA contract pilot for many years before I flew freight in C-130's (some of them were bent to some extent, (ripples in the fuselage, just forward of the ramp) and before the airlines, it's unfortunate, many light airplanes trade structural integrity for weight reduction.

@pushing2throttles Год назад

The Piaggio Avanti is still the best Italian aircraft. Just saying!

@blaster-zy7xx Год назад

Just saw one yesterday at Martin State airport in Maryland.

@ericlayton6 Год назад

I have 1,000 in the P2012 and they are NOT underrated. I would stay far away from these if I were in the market.

@gsfromc Год назад

Eric, what are the issues that you experienced? Was this with Cape?

@syx8676 Год назад

The only problem with tecnam is shipping them overseas (parts as well) otherwise they rock!!!!

@chulian1819 Год назад

Is this a sponsored video by tecnam? Just to know if this is an unbias assessment of the planes

@Dwaynesaviation Год назад

Not a sponsored video

@badwolf2592 Год назад

Decent airplanes but they are all underpowered. Every single model the make, needs twice the hp power they have, at minimum.

@DiegoSanchez-ii3xz Год назад

Italian rubbish with a rotax engine, my old flight school has a lot of them I was lucky to barely fly them, they were low quality built, it has a lot of indications issues, fuel press used to drop bellow minimum as soon as you turned off the fuel pump. The only good thing is they have good avionics but as most modern airplanes, so don't be cheap, buy a real airplane instead of an ultralight aircraft.

@lionheart1429 Год назад

👍👍👍

@Freysn Год назад

The quality is really poor but you get what you pay for

@robinmyman Год назад

Lovely planes…wished they didn’t use Rotax.

@petesmith9472 Год назад

It’s not that they are a bad plane…just way overpriced. Give me an RV8 any day

@russellbedell8198 Год назад

The 2006 is a terrible airplane lol. Easy to fly and great for training. However, other than the Rotax engines, the airframe is junk. Cracked ribs, broken aileron cables, flap hinge cracks and many other issues. You will never see me own anything Tecnam.

@donaldclark8692 Год назад

Total Crap!Poor corrosion prep on inner metal.Pop rivets holding fairings on,But the big killer is the Weak main wing spar metal thickness.

@kevinbarry71 Год назад

I generally enjoy your videos but I really wish you would learn how to pronounce the word "fuselage"

@robertjames8220 Год назад

And "composite".

@jimydoolittle3129 Год назад

Not Underrated , I’ll better say Underpowered 😖🤣

@blackbirdpie217 Год назад

You have a lot of information in this video son, but how does the P2012's fuel injection "help preserve gasoline" ? Does it somehow keep the gasoline from growing old? I don't think you mean it preserves the liquid but it CONSERVES it. Now with that behind us, if you can just learn how to say the word "Fuselage" correctly you might sound more like a real airplane kind of guy. Hint: It's not Fyoosalidge. You had ONE job in this video, that's to talk- and you screwed it up!

@StevenJohnson-jv1iw Год назад

I am reluctant to be negative... but I am rated on the echo and Bravo.... worst aircraft I have flown... sorry

@Rod.Machado Год назад

Tecnam is a great aiircraft, but its not a utilitarian aircraft. Good for owners that fly less than 100hrs annual.

@flyhigh5056 Год назад

Over priced underwhelming

@savageryflyer5391 Год назад

What a video full of BS, tecnam is the worst training aircraft i've flown/given instruction with. I've flown DA20/40/42 PA28/SENECA III/IV/V C152/72/82 and by far, the tecnams are the worst. The multi engine cannot even maintain level flight with one engine if there's a bit of bad conditions ie: altitude/heat. Not to mention that they brake if you treat them a bit rough ( which is the usual at schools ). SAY NO NO TO TECNAM.