Тёмный

Why the Technics SL-1200 is the World's Best Selling Turntable! 

Hi-Fi Riff
Подписаться 6 тыс.
Просмотров 25 тыс.
50% 1

In this episode, Mike and David discuss the legendary Technics SL-1200 - and why its parent company Panasonic has sold so many!
There's no doubting the quality of this iconic direct drive deck. Tough enough even for DJ use, it's also a surprisingly good hi-fi design - especially in the latest SL-1200G guise.
Each episode of Hi-Fi Riff features the guys' unedited, unexpurgated views about all manner of weird and wonderful hi-fi designs.
Business executive Mike has a wealth of knowledge from his earlier hi-fi retail years, and David has written about hi-fi for thirty years. Now Editor-in-Chief of StereoNET, he's picked up a few things along the way.
So brew up a cuppa or crack open a can, and relax and enjoy some one-take hi-fi riffing - and please leave your comments below. Oh, and don’t forget to hit the Subscribe button, this one goes up to eleven!
The eighties-tastic title tune is called ‘UFO/Mike’s Jumper’, and used with the express permission of our old pal and rights holder Simon Lythe.
To read David's StereoNET review of this vinyl champion, click on:
www.stereonet.com/uk/reviews/technics-sl-1200g-turntable-review

Видеоклипы

Опубликовано:

 

25 сен 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 113   
@utube4andydent
@utube4andydent Месяц назад
Not just a turn table a legend! It’s not just a DJ thing. Built like a new ank and made to last. A work horse.
@adampoll4977
@adampoll4977 Год назад
Open up a 1200 and look at the build quality - they certainly don't make them like that anymore, definitely not for the price they were able to sell them. Cast chassis, the bulk-moulding compound, the rubber base, the rubber damped platter with integrated motor rotor unit. Pulled mine apart after buying second hand to restore the separate earth lead (a popular DJ mod was to integrate it into the phono ground) and was blown away by the engineering involved.
@michaelharris4389
@michaelharris4389 Год назад
Got my 1200s 1990 from supper hifi £250 each a lot of money for a 19 year i saved for ages love them a great tool a classic for my generation as for hifi snobs i was in a hifi shop last week what a snob he was/is I'll neve go in that shop again, love my sl-1200s a design classic sound good ànd look fantastic to me and built like a tank
@stevehollingbery9744
@stevehollingbery9744 Год назад
Good to hear honest views, I think back in the day we all got too influenced by market hype.
@admiralhipowa7158
@admiralhipowa7158 Год назад
I guess it’s all down to personal preference, I’ve had my 2 Technics 1200 MK2 turntables for 23 years & im happy with the sound they produce, the thought of cannibalising a classic design that is known worldwide is a no no to me. I’m sure you can get a more defined sound by upgrading the headshell & cartridge, perfect example of this is the people who rave about Fluance turntables, those turntables only sound decent because of the Ortofon Red or Blue. The history & reliability of the Technics 1200 is already legendary & they are the best selling turntables on the market by far, most people who have owned & sold the MK2 version wish they hadn’t, like I said it’s down to personal preference.
@DrNookie21
@DrNookie21 Год назад
One thing you don’t mention, and I guess it’s probably not that relevant to all the totally dedicated hifi aficionados is durability. I’ve had a pair of 1210 mk2’s (yes I used to dj) for 35 years and now they (well one of them) is on purely home duties through a Creek amp and some AE speakers. They have been all over the country, in the back of a land rover, doing house parties and now they sit in my office working just fine, never needing and repairs or fiddling. 1210’s do a stellar job for their intended purpose and a very reasonable job of hifi duties. They’ve been a remarkable product for decades and should never have been looked down on by anyone IMO. I even tried an LP12 back to back with my intended system and I couldn’t tell the difference. The chap in the shop couldn’t either.
@BestKiteboardingOfficial
@BestKiteboardingOfficial Год назад
It does make you wonder how easily people were lead by the hifi press in days gone by? Come to think of it, not much has changed in that respect. There's loads of good kit that never got a fair hearing in the press for whatever reason. Nice to see such an even handed evaluation of a classic.
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
Thanks, and I agree. This was especially the case before forums, etc., when the hi-fi press effectively had a monopoly on deciding what was good and what wasn't. Still, the antidote to that was always to find a good dealer and listen for yourself - so there was an escape route!
@christopherrigby2798
@christopherrigby2798 Год назад
Indeed.
@TheDjcarlos67
@TheDjcarlos67 Год назад
Spot on. I've had a few SL1200's since the 80s/90s and they compared really well to my Linn LP12 and for DJ'ing they are head and shoulders above all others
@skularatna8136
@skularatna8136 6 месяцев назад
This is so true. Thanks fully now with how easily information is disseminated people can get a fair and thorough analysis. The truth is Technics spent a lot of money via matsushita corp research Division and spent a lot of money on building a robust turntable in a relatively small form factor and still make it affordable is remarkable. There are TTS coating around £10k which are so heavy duty trying to achieve the same level of stability, robustness etc that this deck achieves.
@rufdymond
@rufdymond Год назад
The really crazy thing is that the original SL-1200/1200 MK 2 was never designed as a DJ deck….I love my MK 2, had it from new and 35 years later it’s still going strong. Looking to change it for a 1210G sometime this year. My trusted 1210 MK2 will be going to a friend.
@gotham61
@gotham61 Год назад
That’s true of the original Mk1, but after early Hip Hop DJs in the 1970s started to adopt it, for the Mk2 Technics added a lot of featured specifically to cater to the DJ market.
@NickP333
@NickP333 Год назад
So glad you guys did this vid. Fantastic stuff. My 2 main decks are a Yamaha PX-2 linear tracking direct drive and an SL1200 M3D. I’ve put Isonoe feet, a Herbies mat, delrin thrust plate, Cardas tonearm wires and captive cables, plus a bunch of other upgrades and mods through KAB to my 1200, and it’s just plain a super solid great sounding table. Thanks for bringing the mighty 1200 more to the forefront. It’s not just a DJ deck, nor was it ever intended to be, but DJs quickly figured out how amazing they are. 👍🔊😊🎶
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
Absolutely. DJs use turntables more intensively than anyone else, so their opinions shouldn't be dismissed lightly. It's a great deck, built to a standard that beats pretty much everything else except the other high end Japanese direct drives of the 1970s. But as you say, it was never built to be a DJ deck, it was adopted by them due to its robustness, performance and longevity. In the car trade, if you want to know the strongest saloon, ask a cabbie. Same goes for vinyl!
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
@@defcreator187 Wrong. It was, following Technics' normal protocol, an SL-120 with a tonearm fitted. It may have been advertised as a DJ deck in some markets, but it was not designed as such. It features the same chassis, drive systems and tonearm of all mid-price Technics hi-fi decks of that time.
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
@@defcreator187 The SL-120 had a very different tonearm, you say? Well, I suppose you're right in one way - because it didn't have a tonearm. It was literally an SL-1200 mk1 without an arm. All Technics decks with 1000 series nomenclature had tonearms fitted, whereas 100 series ones didn't. The 10 series were of course standalone motor units. Hope this helps.🙂
@attrktmarketing4582
@attrktmarketing4582 Год назад
I have a Technics SL-1200 MK5, I haven’t changed the arm and have added an ATVM95SH cartridge and it plays really well. I was originally after the GR, but ended up buying the SL-1200 MK5 second hand for £250 in near mint condition. It’s my second turntable system and my no-faff option for when I want to play a mix of 45s and 33s - which means it gets a lot more use when compared to my vintage Linn based system. Very happy and I think it sounds great in my room. 😎
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
Nice. Anything from the Mk2 onwards, including of course the Mk5, is an excellent deck. The new motor on the SL-1200G series is better still, but then again it was never the weak point on the older generation - quite the reverse. I spoke to the SL-1200G series designer, Tetsuya Itani, several times about it. I think it was more of a case of redesigning the motor just because they could, rather than because they had to! You "no-faff" point is brilliant, that's one of the many attractions of this line of decks. Switch on and go, and it works perfectly time after time.
@attrktmarketing4582
@attrktmarketing4582 Год назад
Thank you@@MrVinylista, yes the 1200G is something very special. It looks like it has been milled from a single slab of metal. The platter looks like they have put a lot of thought into it with the two metal types. And it really needs that extra torque to get it moving so quickly. Terrific engineering. Will Mike be getting one? 🤔
@ashleycox432
@ashleycox432 Год назад
that's a bargain, they go for double that easily now.
@attrktmarketing4582
@attrktmarketing4582 Год назад
@@ashleycox432 I know 😀
@peterstudley1804
@peterstudley1804 Год назад
Great deck and a very good cart , if my memory serves me well its the brown colour shibata , I use audio-technica carts and nagaoka carts on my sl 1200g 😊.
@damianzaninovich4900
@damianzaninovich4900 Год назад
I’m glad their is justice finally for the Technics. I bought a current 1500c because I liked its looks. No strobe or fader. I bought the Isonoe feet as well and a charcoal achromat. I have to say it looks gorgeous in silver and sounds excellent. One thing I like is cleaning the record on 45rpm.
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
Cool, and as you say, it's the world's best record cleaning platform. I love how torquey the motor is!
@JumbleTasteSpinning
@JumbleTasteSpinning Год назад
78 is "cleaning mode" on my 1210GR 🤣 Love the crazy torque! Cleaning in no time!
@damianzaninovich4900
@damianzaninovich4900 Год назад
Right, I figured that out as well eventually.
@jimsregaturntableshifijukebox
That was very informative and interesting. Thanks guys. Jim 🙂🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
You're welcome, squire!
@drunkbikewrenchen6400
@drunkbikewrenchen6400 Год назад
High price has never necessarily equated to high quality, I grew up on a beach northeast of Boston and there was no fee to park at and enjoy that particular beach, it was usually mostly empty. Less than a mile down the road on the same bay was a nearly identical beach excepting that beach cost $10.00. The $10.00 beach was almost always overcrowded and not nearly as enjoyable in my opinion. I equate the 1200 mk 2 turntable to the free to visit beach I grew up on. You can most certainly go spend a bunch more money on a slew of other turntables but the performance improvements are dubious at best. There are a number of reasons why Richard Long and other professional high end sound engineers here in America used 1200 mk 2s in major legendary NYC nightclubs with amazing sound systems like studio 54, Paradise garage, and many others, because they are great sounding and durable workhorses, a lot of bang for the buck. There are plenty of 1200s that were made in the 70s that are still going strong today and they sound great. I for one always preferred the free beach.
@ianbolton9882
@ianbolton9882 Год назад
Great video guys - keep em coming! 👍
@jeffl915
@jeffl915 11 месяцев назад
I have always loved Technics SL-1200 tables. I currently have the M3D version with an Ortofon Bronze cart, and it sounds fabulous. Anytime I have friends over, and I play vinyl, they are always blown away by the sound. I have no intentions of purchasing a different arm, as I really do not think I could hear the difference. I run it through a Yamaha A-S 1200, and have a pair of MartinLogans. The only thing I would consider adding would be a quality Phono Pre-Amp.
@nickevans3190
@nickevans3190 Год назад
Really appreciate your review of this turntable, as a regular reader of What Hi-Fi they really rate the Technics turntables, the much cheaper SL-1500C at £899 the top of the range SL-1000 is What Hf-Fi's Reference Deck which shows you how much Technics have come sice the 80's
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
The new range is great, but the SL-1200G is the star of the show as far as value is concerned. I reviewed the SL-1000 for Hi-Fi News a few years back and was hugely impressed by it. Thinking about a second mortgage as I write this!
@trevorbartram5473
@trevorbartram5473 Год назад
Competition is good. It's good to see Technics is giving Linn (& Rega) a run for their money!
@johnshaw359
@johnshaw359 Год назад
I remember 1200s being sold everywhere for £229 back in the early mid 90s, when CD was in its full pomp. The UK HIFI press gave all DD turntables in general bad press and quartz locked speed was heresy, the UK makers of turntables preferring the old belt drive 50Hz AC synchronous motors.
@QoraxAudio
@QoraxAudio Год назад
I own an SL-1200G for about 5 years now. It's a great deck. Even the stock tonearm is good - way better than the tonearm on the original 1200s. Better bearings, magnesium tonearm tube... it just comes with a cheap headshell and cables. If you get a good pair of phono cables, a nice magnesium headshell and good headhshell wires, you've got yourself a great performer. Adding a tonearm damper takes it up even another level! Btw, the reason the motor on these newer 1200G has even more torque is because of the heavy brass platter.
@peterstudley1804
@peterstudley1804 Год назад
Maybe I'm easily pleased , but the closest thing to heaven is finding really good records like my Yes steven wilson box set and listening to it on my technics sl 1200g. I've had many decks in my 53 years but to date nothing comes close , the best 3k I've spent , I don't buy expensive carts I use primarily audio-technica and nagaoka, they seem good all rounders.
@tonyhodgkinson4586
@tonyhodgkinson4586 Год назад
I have a GR and love it, swapped out my LP12 for it. I put a SME 309 on mine, took it to the next level. Even the stock arm was pretty good apart from it doesn’t go low in enough for some cartridges. Also added a Soundeck platter mat. It would be great if Technics sold the deck without arm.
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
Sounds good, and as you say if Technics bothered to see an SL-120G then people would be queueing up. Probably just as well that they don't though, as it allows a number of small turntable manufacturers to earn a living! Actually, you can take the arm off an SL-1200G in under half an hour - it's not that fiddly - and fit an Origin Live arm plate in its place. My friend Rafael Todes has an SME Series V on his SL-1200G and it sounds spectacular. Didn't take him too long to fit.
@tonyhodgkinson4586
@tonyhodgkinson4586 Год назад
@@MrVinylista yes took me about half hour to remove and replace with SME 309
@paulomontero12
@paulomontero12 Год назад
Why would you do that guy? Put back the original arm Panasonic engineers know more then a smoh’s like us
@tonyhodgkinson4586
@tonyhodgkinson4586 Год назад
@@paulomontero12 beacause the stock arm is built to a price, the mounting is plastic and the SME trounces it and makes a good turntable a great turntable, that’s why.
@matthewtaylor7355
@matthewtaylor7355 11 месяцев назад
@@tonyhodgkinson4586 Sounds like more Jap plastic crap nonsense
@stevehollingbery9744
@stevehollingbery9744 Год назад
There were lots of turntables throughout the 70 and 80’s that got short shrift by press etc, Marantz, Denton, and Pink Triangle all come to mind.
@TexTom1981
@TexTom1981 Год назад
I searched for Denton turntables. You sure of that name?
@stevehollingbery9744
@stevehollingbery9744 Год назад
Sorry should read Denton, my finger not calibrated!
@stevehollingbery9744
@stevehollingbery9744 Год назад
Nope DENON.
@martinconnolly3776
@martinconnolly3776 6 дней назад
Actually, even the original MK2 gets up to speed in just one quarter of a turn. I DJ with them and even clean the records whilst they are playing. The speed stability is fantastic.
@titntin5178
@titntin5178 Год назад
Hi Guys and thanks for another interesting conversation. Fortunately, I never have had hi-fi snobbery and spent many a few hours in the original Richer Sounds shop @ London Bridge 40 years ago. Across the way from them, next to the river, was a more high end outlet and my second home 'the Sound Organisation' - fantastic guys who would call me in for a listening session whenever they landed an esoteric new Japanese cartridge to evaluate. I bought my first Roksan Xerxes from those guys , though I never managed to upgrade the RB300 I had on it. I love that this little Technics unit has been performant for so many years whilst being ignored by the mainstream press. Without trying to generalise, I do take the views of outlets such as 'What Hi-Fi' with a large dollop of skepticism as I've proved to my satisfaction that they can trash review items that are actually extremely good, though its nice to see that they have reversed their former bias when it comes to the technics turntables. I've also discovered very recently, that even a very inexpensive turntable can produce magical results well above expected. With no desire to go through the loft, rescue my old Roksan xerexes and send it off to make it good, a recent decision to finally sell off all my old LP's has seen me buy a cheap USB turntable to digitise some things you just cannot get any more. I bought a Sony unit which outputs a digital DSD stream for about £300 and stuck a Japenese £150 cart on it. Whilst I certainly wouldn't want to use it via analogue outs (its not good) - the DSD streams it produces from its internal circuitry has blown my socks off. DSD's of cleaned up albums have been immaculate and unbelievably high end sound - I've even done a few old albums where I do have a Quobuz high res alternative and I'm shocked to report I often prefer the DSD's I've recorded. Mind Blown - not an expected result at all. Thanks for another great vid!
@gotham61
@gotham61 Год назад
I used to take that same route, going to see Roger and Hamish at Sound Organisation (where I bought my first LP12), then popping into Richer Sounds to see what was happening on the other side of the industry.
@dougie834
@dougie834 Год назад
Bomb proof build quality iconic turntable..
@gaetancharbonneau3902
@gaetancharbonneau3902 Год назад
They got the speed right... not bad already compared to so many high end turntables...
@EddyTeetree
@EddyTeetree 7 месяцев назад
Thanks guys. My first “proper” tt was a Mk2 in 1979 with a Marantz made in Jp receiver and JBL 4333’s a literal back breaking rig haha!
@grahamstrahle4010
@grahamstrahle4010 Год назад
I think it was also disbelief at the time about the technology, that direct drive could ever possibly rival a properly set up suspension system. Great discussion chaps.
@simonatkin6501
@simonatkin6501 Год назад
Classic riff ❤❤❤❤
@dean6816
@dean6816 Год назад
I have a 1210 mk2 with a Rega rb330 👌
@skularatna8136
@skularatna8136 6 месяцев назад
This particular turntable was born out of the SP (special) research division of Matsushita corp. Who built the components for Technics which was Panasonic’s hifi division. The level of engineering put into this TT was a cut above anything else and was targeted for home Hi-Fi . The robustness of this build quality, meaning it could be knocked around and still not suffer any performance degradation is what attracted DJs. It is a fantastic sounding turntable and I’ve heard TT costing £10k which don’t sound nearly as good as this and take up an entire rack.
@djsubculture2786
@djsubculture2786 4 месяца назад
"The robustness of this build quality, meaning it could be knocked around and still not suffer any performance degradation is what attracted DJs." That and the fact that it was light years better than the previous club standard turntable, Thorens TD-125s.
@esquilo______
@esquilo______ Год назад
Love your videos, I was really considering to buy lp12 magik just because I already have a technics sld2 (which I know it’s not comparable to any of this ones), from my father, but now I really must listen to one sl1200g I believe that i can save some euros if I go with the technics. My system is very basic I got Luxman integrated amp with kef r7 speakers. Would love to know your thoughts on witch of these turntables would work better on my system. Thank you so much and keep up with the nice videos. Regards from Portugal.
@jimashby43
@jimashby43 11 месяцев назад
The cheapest one I've seen was almost 1800 and I bought it. It's a fine record player surpassing the Theron's TD 160 I had as far as fun sounding.
@BokBarber
@BokBarber Год назад
I'd be very curious to hear a direct side-by-side comparison of two Tec 12s in the exact same configuration, except that one has a tonearm upgrade, and see what the differences really are. I've heard allot of conflicting information about this; that the arm is of low quality and basically any Rega bolt-in is an upgrade, and conversely that the original arm is a Swiss watch that beats out anything in its price range. For now I'm keeping the original arm as-is. I agree with the general sentiment that the Technics SL-1200 MKx series flew under the hifi radar for way too long, and even at today's inflated prices is a decent value. The prejudice around this deck helped me score a used one for very cheap about 10 years ago, so I can't be too mad about it, but it's laughable to think about the bargain you got on these machines for what they were. The best bargain in hifi, all because of the "implications" of using a DJ table.
@stephenharding428
@stephenharding428 Год назад
Great review again, thanks! My SL-1200 journey started 45 years ago when my Dad bought one (Mk1) After we all left home it wasn’t played for over 20 years, and now I have it and it sounds fine. I have made some upgrades, added a AT mc cartridge, the Origin felt cartridge dampener, and the Funk Firm APM Achromat. I would like to change the arm but I’m not sure you can with this model? I’ll keep going with upgrades but it is difficult to find someone who can help with this model haha. Thanks again
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
Sounds like you've really improved it. The SL-1200 mk1 was available without an arm as the SL-120, if I remember correctly. You should be able to remove the arm.
@RogerBergqvist
@RogerBergqvist 24 дня назад
Back in 1988 i heard Toto 7 (The Seventh One) on a Technics SL turntable. It´s was normal. And a NAD amp.....
@davidcarr2216
@davidcarr2216 Год назад
Nice one guys. You can bet that Technics used a bit of science and engineering in their designs, as opposed to , well let's tweak this a bit and see what it does. I don't think Technics would go in for suck it and see audiophile engineering. Even the arch subjectivist , Stevey G. has gone from his SME TT to one of these and loves the interchangeable headshells for swapping cartridges.
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
I hate to say it, but by the time Technics made the MK2, they had more engineers at their disposal than the entire British hi-fi industry put together - plus vast economies of scale. I'm not doing UK Hi-Fi PLC down, but we do need to remember that Matsushita Corporation don't mess around.
@TexTom1981
@TexTom1981 Год назад
Sounds like sitting through a lunch room discussion at Stereophile.
@stephen579
@stephen579 Год назад
I have a custom built Rega that was constructed from every upgrade part I could find and also a Kenwood Kd990 and a Garrard 401, so for me listening to a Tecnics turntable I can find areas that I feel it is lacking, but I am still working on it.
@ProjectOverseer
@ProjectOverseer 11 месяцев назад
You guys are great, and I agree 100% I've been on this ride myself since 1977 and remember the HiFi snobbery well in regards to turntables, and most things considered cheap by Audiophiles - with a few exceptions. If you followed the guru's of the time, money separated the wheat from the chaff. Probably a lot of cool kit was missed because of this attitude.
@michaelvincent8306
@michaelvincent8306 5 месяцев назад
I have a technics sl 1200 mk2 and a linn lp12 and I prefer the technics simply because technics plays lps even poorly recorded ones and makes them sound great and if the recording is poor it sounds rubbish on the linn the linn is more musical but that's it I'm enjoying the music far more on the technics it not modified in any way it was my friend's till he passed away and his brother sold it to me because they needed the money for his funeral i have to say you were right pete your deck is better than mine
@josefserf1926
@josefserf1926 Год назад
The audio press are serial liars pandering to advertising revenues. So it's good to see an admission of this prejudice, even if it's several decades later. Any casual side by side listen will demonstrate that even a basic Technics punches most of the highly reviewed sonically lackluster audiophile decks into the middle of next week. Ask any professional archivist/ broadcaster which one they prefer.
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
I think you overstate your case Josef, I don't think the audio press is malevolent. But some times they have blind spots and historically the SL-1200 was certainly one of them. I agree with your general drift, though. I would say that the deck is seriously hampered by the stock arm, which does it no favours. That would have put many of us 'golden eared' hi-fi hacks off.
@richardsinger01
@richardsinger01 Год назад
You put forth a common internet claim regarding hifi reviewers in the print media. You'll see plenty of RU-vid videos where an a reviewer puts forward his opinions on a piece of equipment and the comments are full of responses claiming this video is the only honest review of product x , evidently because it reinforces their own preferences. That doesn't make a contrary review in the hifi press wrong or a lie, just a different take. RU-vid reviewers are also in the game for the money and are no less susceptable to the sort of bias you attribute to the printed press. After all they won't get too many review items from the distributors if they rubbish them - so they don't tend to. Your own appraisal of the sl1200 isnt exactly objective either I might add.
@tomwebb7091
@tomwebb7091 6 месяцев назад
Ive never got on with the Technics DD sound signature.... rigid, hard, metronomic, grey, grainy upper middy. For me it just sounds too tight and rigid and it wont loosen up n boogie unless im drunk enough in a club somewhere. For some music this signature works to its advantage (electro/dance/fast, impulsive music) but for my diet of prog rock, soul, jazz, funk and so on it really does impart a rigid digital-esque signature. I wish it wasnt the case as its clearly well built to last (or is it when you see how many platters of the new models arent flat?), are super low maintenance and are very practicle/useable. The reason they sell so many is because 95% of buyers dont spend alot of time going and comparing turntables somewhere and these buyers thus have to rely on what they can read up, where they will find the outstanding measurements of a maintenance free and instantly recognisable (named and looking) device, with countless fans to boot and take comfort in what is realistically still a blind purchase. This is why so many others have copied the 1200 look and DD operation. Its a safe sales bet.
@attrktmarketing4582
@attrktmarketing4582 Год назад
Are there any written hifi reviews of the SL1200G people would recommend?
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
You can read my StereoNET review here: www.stereonet.com/uk/reviews/technics-sl-1200g-turntable-review
@trevorbartram5473
@trevorbartram5473 Год назад
You guys are killing me with this Hi-Fi nostalgia. Around 1980 Hampshire Audio of Chandlers Ford demoed (to a large audience) the LP12 vs a high end DD turntable (maybe Denon?) at a hotel ballroom in Southampton. Same arm & cartridge, the demo showed the LP12 to vastly superior at detail retrieval & PRAT. As a recent student, I couldn't afford the LP12 so I compared it with others at Hampshire Audio & went with a Dual, that I still have. Maybe the LP12 would have been a good investment but by 1985 I transitioned to CD, so maybe not. Why CD, do you remember how bad vinyl was in the late 70s, early 80s? Constantly having to return LPs because of flaws. It was time consuming & exhausting! Rant over.
@Hi-FiRiff
@Hi-FiRiff Год назад
Speaking of nostalgia, I remember visiting Hampshire Audio and going out for a few beers with the guys there, that must have been around 1990, they were all really nice people. I wonder what they are all doing now. Love that you still have the Dual (CS505 perhaps?) Mike
@zjzozn
@zjzozn Год назад
DJ Dave 😇
@Trojan0304
@Trojan0304 Год назад
Use a 1600Mk2 to help me with hand issues 😢
@Kwippy
@Kwippy Год назад
With their low end turntables like this one, Technics knows that their turntables don't always spin at the correct speed and so they come with strobe lights and fine speed or pitch adjustment to allow manual checking and correcting. The bonus is with this deck you can change the pitch of the music to your taste and are not forced to listen to music the way the artists intend you to. Make Beyonce sound like Barry White, and Bieber sound like a chipmunk.
@koozmusic
@koozmusic Год назад
Regarding them not always spinning at the correct speed, that's not true. As was discussed in the video, they are quartz-locked and will always spin at the correct speed, regardless of conditions. The strobe is mainly there for peace of mind, and the speed adjustment can be used for DJ purposes, or perhaps like you said, just to listen to music in a different way than was intended.
@richardsinger01
@richardsinger01 Год назад
​@@koozmusic the slider speed control is for tempo matching records.
@koozmusic
@koozmusic Год назад
@@richardsinger01 That would be the "DJ purposes" I mentioned, yeah ;)
@michaelcraig2949
@michaelcraig2949 Год назад
you said the deck is more important than the arm which is more important than the cartridge, I was led to believe that order was reversed? can anyone clarify this?
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
Hi Michael - when building a hi-fi system, the 'source first' concept is that speakers can only sound as good as the amp driving them, and amps can only sound as good as the source driving them. When you apply this to turntables, it means the cartridge can only be as good as the arm, and the arm only as good as the turntable itself. This is neatly summed up by the 'garbage in, garbage out' concept that came from the computer industry. Linn cleverly 'borrowed it' in the 1970s and used it to explain the above philosophy. So basically, you need to buy the best possible deck, before you get a serious tonearm and then cartridge. Putting an expensive cartridge on a poor turntable won't sound as good as a poor cartridge on an expensive turntable, if you get my drift? This is complete true in my opinion - and Mike's - and is an important rule for system building. The better your source, the better your system. Hope this helps?
@michaelcraig2949
@michaelcraig2949 Год назад
@@MrVinylista great help thanks! May have solved my next turntable dilemma. I was torn between Project Debut Pro but upgrading the cartridge or the new Thorens TD1500. I think Thorens it is in that case
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
@@michaelcraig2949 Yep, get the best turntable you can afford and upgrade the cartridge when funds permit, later.
@fanclub670
@fanclub670 Год назад
​@@MrVinylista That's correct !! i agree.
@heartofcinema3454
@heartofcinema3454 2 месяца назад
Bass wouldn't come just from the table. It would also be affected by the arm and most importantly the cartridge.
@craig1442
@craig1442 11 месяцев назад
10 for the full package or just the deck??
@josephfuller7008
@josephfuller7008 Год назад
They’re not talking about a Technics turntable. They’re talking about a Technics turntable with a Rega arm, after market mat, and aftermarket feet. If the table was great there would be no need to change so much. I own a technics sl1210gr, vpi classic II, and a Rega p3. Sound wise the technics is a good turntable, the Rega and vpi are great turntables. The arm on the technics is it’s weak point and does not allow for the the kind of sound quality the vpi and Rega afford.
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
We're talking about the SL-1200G in its present form, and more generally the SL-1200 mk2 - in both stock and modded form. The point is that the basic 'bones' of the turntable - the plinth, bearing and motor - are absolutely superb, but the rest less so.
@mitchparker7652
@mitchparker7652 4 месяца назад
And it’s quiet.
@ashleycox432
@ashleycox432 Год назад
hifi snobs are wrong about most things. incidentally the arm on the original Technics 1200MK2 is better than a lot of audiophile arms, most judge it unfairly. The only issue with the original arm is the sleeve of the internal wire, which corrodes the internal copper strands turning them black. Swapped with a decent thin gauge wire (none of this audiophile rubbish) and wired externally too with some decent low-capacitance cable, it is a great arm. The wiring issues were fixed in the later M5G model. The arm on the new SL-1200s is better than most, certainly nothing that needs replacing. Comparing anything with even moderately competent engineering to a Linn is laughable, let alone a Technics. Even Technics cheap consumer models (and Pioneer, Hitachi, Sony etc) will trample a Linn to dust
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
Good points Ashley, but I would say that the stock Mk2 arm is certainly worth upgrading. That said, it it's rewired and a better headshell fitted - such as an ADC LMG-1 - it's not bad. The new SL-1200G arm is significantly better, but again can be improved on. That's the beauty of hi-fi, you can take things as far as you want to go.
@ashleycox432
@ashleycox432 Год назад
@@MrVinylista The performance you'll get out of a Technics arm very much depends on alignment. Use a Baerwald (Lofgren A) alignment, for example, and to an extent a standard Stevenson, and by necessity you'll have to alter the offset angle of the cartridge. These arms have their offset calculated into the shape, so in doing so you negatively affect the arm's lateral balance, tracking ability and resonance of the whole structure of the arm. I believe this is why most people feel the arm can be outperformed, even on the new models. That cheap plastic gauge that comes in the box is in fact the best way to get the optimal performance from the arm. That, or set the stylus 52 mm from the rubber washer at the rear of the headshell connector, and set the cartridge straight in the headshell. There are other reasons the Technics arm is superior to others - how many hi-fi manufacturers quote a bearing friction specification for example. Technics arms are 5MG for the new arms and 7MG for the old, something no arm that I'm aware of from SME or any other can match. Stability, and zero play with movement as friction-free as possible in an arm's bearing are critical, and Technics have had this down to an art for the best part of 4 decades while most (bar Rega perhaps) are still catching up.
@gotham61
@gotham61 Год назад
Yes, the stock arm has some definite limitations in terms of rigidity and stiffness, but once you realize that you can change cartridges in just a few seconds, that becomes a pretty compelling argument in favor of the Technics arm.
@gotham61
@gotham61 Год назад
@@ashleycox432 The white plastic gauge is essentially Stevenson alignment. The difference in offset angle between that and Baerwald on the Technics arm is less than 1 degree, which becomes a challenge to even see reliably.
@ashleycox432
@ashleycox432 Год назад
@@gotham61 The Technics alignment is close to Stevenson though it's not quite the same. The baerwald offset I believe is a change of about 0.8 degrees which is a small amount, but it also increases the overhang to around 17.2 mm which in terms of lateral balance of the arm makes the change of angle a more significant difference.
@gordonglasgow14
@gordonglasgow14 10 месяцев назад
The 1200 mk2 was not designed as a Dj turntable! it was sold as a hi fi turntable and was sold in 2 forms with a tone arm or with out. Hi Fi Snobs poo poo it but i hate belt drive turntables if the belt stretches you lose speed. People who knew about them were the ones laughing.check out the TECHNICS SP10
@matthewtaylor7355
@matthewtaylor7355 11 месяцев назад
Is the 19 000 GBP technics nearly as musical as a Rega P3 sarcasm aside??
@ENGLISHISBEST
@ENGLISHISBEST Год назад
Best selling does not mean the best turntable, It's just that some people don't really research & just go for one that a common popular model. Ie. What turntable should I buy? , friend says Well the technics us a big seller. Some people don't know what's really out there or about newer models, Admit most people if you asked what car would you like if you were better off would say a ferrari. They didn't really think of Bugatti or Mercedes. Technics is actually a common name for a better turntable they just don't know about Rega & such likes that are as good if not better. Technics fits in well in a expensive but not too expensive price bracket so you feel you got something decent but it is now getting dated too, the styling is very 70s. I emphasise common because I felt it is a standard choice for those that don't review others.
@ENGLISHISBEST
@ENGLISHISBEST Год назад
But Rega have got a varied choice of models & style is more now than 70s.
@MrVinylista
@MrVinylista Год назад
The SL-1200G is one of the best turntables that money can buy. There are better ones, but not comprehensively so. I speak as someone who has reviewed and/or owned pretty much every turntable made from around 1975 to the present. It's not a universal panacea, it's not right for everyone, but it's capable of great sound and great value for money. There are better decks, but it's a big seller for a reason. The customer is usually right. There is nothing 'dated' about its drive system, and its build quality. Lest we forget, belt drive is primitive compared to Technics-style quartz crystal servo referenced direct drive, with its latest motor. It is incredibly quiet and speed-stable. The weakness of the SL-1200G is its tonearm, but there are ways around this, if you're really serious about sound. I still love plenty of high end belt drives, but it is pure ignorance to dismiss the SL-1200G and its siblings - especially when, like you I suspect, you haven't heard one.
@Wised1000
@Wised1000 20 дней назад
In fact no, its not the best sounding turntable. Its the second "least sounding" turntable. For 5 times the price you can get an SL1000R which is even "least sounding". The whole point of the turntable is to have no sound at all. The SL1200R is as good as consumer grade gets, the SL1000R is laboratory grade. It's so good in fact, that its rumble and wow and flutter are below measument levels😅
@matthewtaylor7355
@matthewtaylor7355 11 месяцев назад
I get the impression the former Editor of Hi Fi World was a little too democratic for for the former Owner NK... The letters that appeared on the said page expressed contrarion views the DP celebrated??
@mookie2637
@mookie2637 5 месяцев назад
It's just stupid to dismiss anyone who prefers a different approach than that adopted by Technics as a "hater" or a "snob". In a reversed way, this kind of childish posturing is pretty much why these decks were overlooked in previous decades..
@robinliebrechts9122
@robinliebrechts9122 7 месяцев назад
Sturdy design but soundQ with good mm or mc cart still is a bit hmmmmm, not very spacious, not very dynamic, a bit sterile and lacking texture. And both second hand and new prices are very high in the Netherlands. You can go much better with a nice Rega.
Далее
The Technics SL-1210G Turntable Review
36:52
Просмотров 44 тыс.
The New Technics SL-1200GR2 | An Exclusive First Look!
13:45
Technics SL1200mk7 review from DJ point of view
15:20
Просмотров 4,7 тыс.
The history of the Technics SL1200 - Tried & Tested
20:46
Funkiest CD player ever?  Technics SL-DZ1200
23:14
Просмотров 512 тыс.
Why don't I use the better-sounding turntable?
16:48
Просмотров 487 тыс.
BABYMONSTER - ‘FOREVER’ M/V
3:54
Просмотров 51 млн