Why was Poilievre kicked from the House of Commons? | EXPLAINED 

I do

Nope. I will never vote for PP

Boom

Vote him out asap 😊

get rid of little mambo

Pierre Poilievre Supporters: Assume Everything and Know Nothing.

@@DjWellDressedMan Trudeau supporters, knuckle dragging simpletons.

Absolutely but this was also brilliantly played by Poilievre. No one should think for one minute Poilievre didn't know this would happen. It's political theatre at it's finest and he doesn't make mistakes. It's to his and the party's benefit he was kicked out. It makes the speaker look partisan (he is) and it further exposes the Liberal's hypocricy. Well done M. Poilievre!

​@@operachef1The Canadian trumper wannabees will eat this up.

@@rcprod9631 Trumper wannabees? WTF?

Nah they'll keep voting for him.

Yet they keep electing him.

Ask me

What did Trudeau call Poilievre?

Because he's Trudeau.

​@@Kaegro Extremist policy maker... It's what Pollievre repeated, being thrown out. Justin Wacko is very troubled villain working for demons.

One law for me, another law for thee

Trudeau didn't call him anything.

Last week he kicked an NDP member out for criticizing a Conservative. Where was your pearl clutching then?

@@McLovin1759 the speaker does not claim to be a member of the NDP, but he got in trouble twice already for stating he is a proud liberal, while he is supposed to be non-partisan

@@mattwallace8694 he is supposed to act non partisan in parliament but the speakers of the house all come from political parties.

@@nuxkamina he is supposed to BE non partisan in the house and out of the house once he is confirmed as speaker, that's why there were 2 scandals where he attended Liberal events and claimed he is a proud Liberal. Fergus is not Partisan in the house or out of the house.

@@mattwallace8694 I work regularly to support the BC Cons party. Based on the April 30th Question period the speaker appeared to act impartial. You can imply from JT words but Pierre's were overt, and disrespectful to the government of Canada. Pierre was given chances to correct himself. I am only judging based on the current actions I see. Soon we will have a Conservative speaker. I would expect them to take the same actions Fergus just did. I wouldn't be surprised if the life long Conservative speaker is proud to be conservative. If it makes for better optics and they never say anything about it great. If a lifelong conservative supporter/MP at one point says they are a proud conservative I personally will never consider that a 'scandal'.

Fergus is a Liberal, Showing his True Colors..

“All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be best one” I’m 100% to vote ☑️ Poilievre!!

Do you have selective memory of just ignorant to the fact that Fergus kicked out an NDP member 2 weeks ago for not apologizing to a Conservative?

​@@McLovin1759 I guess trudeau gets to call them spineless and pierre can't say wacko

@@ohsnap6506 Not really that worried about what adults call each other. NDP MP got kicked out 2 weeks ago as well. It’s like the NHL and fans complaining about the Refs. Meh. I am however quite concerned that an aspiring Prime Minister would indicate that he would invoke the Notwithstanding Clause to over-rule any Supreme Court decision he doesn’t agree with. Seriously. That’s Donald Trump stuff.

What country are you trolling from?

​@@Roof_Pizza how bout u

JT name calling 0. Pierre called him - wacko, racist, extremist 3 ad hominem attacks. JT asked him to denounce extremist groups. There's a difference bud.

No Trudeau likes a younger aundience when he name calls and spreads it around where Poilièvre doesn’t have the opportunity to defend himself. That’s Trudeau.

Maybe Trudeau should do what Pierre said he would do today… invoke the notwithstanding clause at the federal level to override the constitution or court decisions he doesn’t agree with. With that in mind, maybe Trudeau could just ignore the electoral laws… invoke the Notwithstanding clause and stay in power. I mean you are cool with a PM having that level of power right? I assume so since you support Pierre.

At least the Liberals know what truth is even if they do not like it.

I don't feel hurt by this. PP violated the house rules and, though given several chances to retract, didn't and was asked to leave. You guys are so emotional

⁠​⁠@@magsj6474clearly you don’t follow what is happening in the HC! Ejecting the leader of a party is almost unheard of. It should never have happened coming from a biased clearly liberal speaker!

Like you have any historical reference here. What a child.

Even Mulclair said it was a partisan act and the speaker needs to step down. ​@magsj6474

@@wasupfool5692 Meh!

Wanna spell that out when yer Sober?

@@paddyholly2184 he's drunk on gutter oil

Excellent point

The short wavelengths that scatter across the sky correspond to the colours blue and violet, making the real colour of the sky a bluish purple. The cone cells in our eyes that detect colour aren't very sensitive to violet, so we see the sky as blue. So in the end it's about your perspective.

@@nuxkamina Trudeau is a Wacko. That's Canada's perspective.

Agreed!

Trudeau is absolutely mentally ill

@@geoffjames6181 I don't agree

Leader of what?? 😂😂😂

He said "..he is showing what shameful spineless leadership looks like". He didn't say he was spineless. He said Pierre's leadership was. The actual words matter in democracy.

switching to PPC or Liberal Lite?

@@ThinkPolisComing4Me He said Go PP, it's pretty clear, no? Why do you ask such dumb questions?

@@doctorbuga4302 Snarky

He's called a Korrupt Koon

Must have a list. 😂😂😂😂

Too much wine. Go to bed.

@magsj6474 😂 who can afford wine with these taxes nowadays?

Do you remember the day when there were no children in the House and you could actually hear what an MP was saying.

Its shameful a speaker is needed for that at all.

In my dream Canada we would prioritize kindness and compassion.

Have you watched much parliamentary action? childish is fine, rude is not. PP was rude.

Another Alt-Canadian buys into the CON.

Canadian here, I saw different. Please don't speak for me.

PP Herman in a suit will have to fight the Quebec whacko Maurice, for Dominance. 😂

He replaced not withdrew. That was the offence. Kept replacing, 3 times then asked to leave. Belligerence is not .tolerated

He's corrupt