Why Women Keep Each Other Fat, Single and Depressed 

Exactly why there's the dadbod but not the mombod.

@@cur244 dadbod is a meme. no one seriously finds it attractive.

@@zbridgjpxupzm It's funny that mombod isn't also a meme. No one seriously finds it attractive. The typical mom pouch.

Silly you using your brain considerately 😅 these women have brains that haven't matured past the teenage state (handle them like children)

Your post is spot on , mate !

That's how it usually is.. I don't have many female friends because of it...I noticed that when my life is bad and a mess I have the most friends.. but when I'm doing good they are nowhere to be found..

Your comment summed up what i was saying even better.@@20maxilo

grown kids @@20maxilo

It’s because they are more likely too compassionate, and are depressed when they can’t save everyone.

​@mztokyo7630 yeah, they should stop it with the God complex. Who are they to play savior for everyone else, they can't fix everyone else's problems and it's not their business too because we all, including and especially themselves, have problems to be fixed. They (liberals) need to actually focus on their own problems, and then they wouldn't have to as a result, take pills to solve them.

It's a downward spiral from mental delusion... bad decision after bad decision... multiple acts of promiscuity... Voting for a mentally handicapped pres. etc, etc.

From an evolutionary psychology standpoint (which the evidence is overwhelming) a woman usually looks for signs of commitment and that a man has the means to provide for her. The sexes have different sexual systems, stemming from thousands of generations of evolutionary influence, and these differences play out in meaningful ways. genes. The act of sex comes with a greater cost to women, due to the possibility of becoming pregnant and having to take on related responsibilities-giving birth, breastfeeding, raising the child, and ensuring his or her survival. By comparison, for men, sex requires an investment of several minutes. (About five or six minutes on average, according to recent studies.) As a result, the female sexual system evolved to account for this discrepancy, because women who made good mating choices were the ones who succeeded at passing on their genes. This is why women, on average, are more selective about their sexual partners, preferring those who possess status and resources that will benefit them and their future offspring. Back in the day, if these resources were of poor quality or inconsistent, this would threaten a woman’s survival and the survival of her children. Being less choosy about sexual partners could also result in raising a child without the help of the father, who could otherwise provide material resources in addition to emotional support and physical protection. In response, men have evolved to be highly competitive in order to be attractive to the choosiest (and, therefore, highest value) sexual partners. Individuals who are well adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce than those who are less well adapted. The mate preferences of one sex will determine the characteristics that are passed on in the other sex. For example, our female ancestors preferred male partners who could offer physical protection to them and their young, which is why greater height is generally seen as an attractive trait in men. Eggs are more costly to produce produce than sperm; consequently, women release one egg a month while men produce several hundred million sperm a day. Women are very selective about who gets to fertilize that egg, and men need to be competitive in order to get access to this precious resource. Studies have shown that for women who are successful, they place an even greater emphasis on their partner’s generosity and financial success. This explains why some men will purchase expensive toys, like flashy watches and cars, as a way of signaling status to potential partners. A woman usually looks for signs of commitment and that a man has the means to provide for her. and practical needs to also be met. As a result, when women cheat, it is usually due to a lack of emotional intimacy in their current relationship or because their sights have shifted to someone who is more successful than their current partner. It’s about more than lust or the physical act. When men cheat, however, it’s for sexual novelty-the desire to have sex with someone new. An organism exists to propagate its genetic material, and this is the sole “meaning” of its existence biologically. Masculinity has been unfairly pathologized. Successful mating consists of attaining a partner with good genes so that one’s offspring will survive and be successful at passing on their lineage. Men’s behavior is, to some extent, the result of female sexual preferences. If women didn’t want to mate with masculine men, these traits would have been removed from the gene pool long ago. It’s a case of feminists the lady doth protest too much. “Toxic masculinity” is the result of women’s sexual preferences over thousands of generations. A study found that women prefer men who exhibit benevolent sexismsexism over those who do not, despite also finding these behaviors undermining and patronizing. Benevolent sexism consists of chivalrous behavior, such as opening doors and paying for dates, and positive attitudes about women that reinforce the belief that women are less competent, relegating them to traditional gender roles. (This is in contrast to hostile sexism, which involves overtly misogynistic views.) Regardless of whether women endorsed high or low levels of feminist beliefs, they interpreted signs of benevolent sexism as signals that a man is willing to invest in them through an ability to provide, protect, and commit to them. The positives associated with this behavior outweighed the negatives. From a brief survey of my straight male friends, the more progressive and feminist a woman proclaims she is, the more she prefers dominant, masculine men. As for men’s sexual preferences, they are a solution to an interesting evolutionary quandary. Because men are unable to tell, simply by looking at a woman, whether she is of high fertility and high reproductive value, they’ve evolved to prefer partners possessing observable qualities indicative of both. Women have also evolved to attract men in beauty standards like breat, waist to hip ratio, houglass figure, youthful appearance, beautiful-possessing symmetry, smooth, clear skin, and shiny hair- full lips and high cheekbones are a sign of facial femininity, linked with higher levels of estrogen and fertility. etc. Youth and attractiveness are physical cues that a woman is healthy and will have greater reproductive success. Men have evolved to prefer partners possessing observable qualities indicative of both high fertility (able to produce healthy offspring) and high reproductive value (able to have many children) This explains, in part, why the beauty industry is today a $500 billion industry and also why the growing popularity of lip injections and women overdrawing their lips on social media. Contour and highlighting exaggerate facial contrast to make one’s features appear more feminine, and foundation and concealer hide under-eye circles and discoloration to give the appearance of an even complexion. This is not due to the patriarchy or capitalism trying to sell women things they don’t need. These are tendencies that are, to some extent, hardwired in us. In one study, the nucleus accumbens, a brain region associated with feelings of pleasure, was shown to activate when men looked at attractive female faces. Research has also shown on-average sex differences in brain activation during sexual arousal. When men and women are brought into the laboratory and are shown pornography during an fMRI scan, visual areas of the brain are more activated in men, and regions associated with inhibition and emotional processing are more activated in women. Another common indicator of attractiveness is waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), because it offers clues to a woman’s reproductive history and reproductive potential. Cross-cultural research has shown that, no matter where you are in the world, a low WHR (evident when a woman possesses a small waist and larger breasts and hips) is found to be attractive. The most attractive WHR, according to studies, is about 0.70.5 WHR tends to be lower in women who have fewer children, and also, women who are not currently pregnant, offering a visual estimate to an interested suitor regarding the likelihood that a woman would conceive and bear healthy children if he were to have sex with her. It is very unlikely that men have been socialized on a global scale to find an hourglass-shaped figure attractive. In modern-day beauty trends, this may explain the appeal of having a big “booty,” as popularized by celebrities and social media, and the subsequent rise in Brazilian butt lift cosmetic procedures, in which fat is taken from other parts of the body to create a more voluptuous bottom. I also think it’s a bit unfair that women get more flak from society for their partner preferences than men. Women who date wealthy men are commonly derided as gold diggers, while men who prefer to date young, attractive women will get an eye roll at most. Overall, for both men and women, a partner’s looks matter because having a child with someone who is attractive means your children will inherit those good looks and be in a position to attract better mates in the future, thereby ensuring that your lineage continues, although the emphasis is certainly more on womens looks. This does not apply to homosexuals because their brains are wired a differently from heterosexual people of the same sex due to pre natal hormonal exposure in the utero..Gay mens brains are feminized and lesbians masculinized.

The denial of evolution is one of the most damaging myths I’ve encountered, because it throws everything we know about human sexual behavior out the window. It actually hurts women to behave like men, and vice versa, when it comes to courtship and sex. This is the case regardless of one’s political affiliation. Drawing upon biological or evolutionary explanations for behavior and abiding by traditional gender roles might actually help us when it comes to romantic relationships. The modern-day feminist movement maintains that a well-functioning society should do away with gendered norms. In theory, this would be a good thing; a person should be free to live as they please without being held to expectations based on an immutable characteristic like sex. But then this line of thinking goes too far-if the sexes are truly equal, it reasons, there should be no differences between men and women, including in the realms of dating and sex. Any deviation from this symmetry, or any adherence to gender-typical roles, is seen as chauvinistic or “toxic” of men and belittling of women. The admirable goal of gender equality has metastasized into meaning that men and women are the same, and therefore, any sex differences differences are socially imposed and can be unlearned, or altogether don’t exist. As a result, it’s become fashionable to call into question biology and evolutionary psychology, which is a shame because they offer a truly enlightening perspective into the way we think. Both have become verboten in recent years, tarnished with allegations of sexism, irrelevance, and being in opposition to women’s rights. In actuality, nothing could be further from the truth. One of the greatest myths perpetuated about female sexuality is that women enjoy casual sex as much as men. Young women are encouraged to pursue hooking up because that is what empowered women are supposed to. Those who abstain are seen as unfortunate casualties of a culture rampant with slut shaming and repressive gender norms. Considering everything we know about evolutionary psychology, this doesn’t make much sense. Despite feminism’s incessant prodding that women indulge in no-strings-attached sex, men consistently report greater enjoyment of it, while women experience more negative reactions. After having casual sex, women are more likely to self-report depression, regret, and feeling “used.” Men, conversely, self-report feeling like they had used their female partners. Is there any truth to the idea that social standards influence this behavior? When we look at sociosexuality (which refers to a person’s enjoyment of sex without commitment), in more egalitarian societies, like Norway and Denmark, women enjoyed casual sex more, but so did men, leading to larger sex differences This is not to say that women should cease having casual sex. Women should be free to have as many libidinous encounters with as many different partners as they’d like, if that’s what they choose to do. I’m a strong believer that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander; if promiscuity is socially acceptable for men, then it should be socially acceptable for women, too, and conversely, if it is frowned upon for one sex, it should be frowned upon for both sexes. There definitely still exists a double standard regarding women’s sexuality-for example, that men are free to roam sexually while women must remain chaste to preserve their inherent value as future wives and human beings, more broadly-and even though these attitudes are rooted in evolutionary psychology, that isn’t an excuse to hold women to a different standard than men. A person cannot make good decisions without having all of the information available to them. Currently, only one message is being aimed at women in the mainstream, and unless a young woman has parents, educators, or health professionals in her life-who have not embraced this particular ideology around casual sex-whom she feels she can turn to to talk about these very intimate and in some cases, potentially embarrassing, topics, the only place she will be able to access information will be on the Internet and through exposure to messages in the media. There are, of course, many women who do enjoy casual sex, and many men who don’t, and so long as everything is consensual, it’s no one’s place to judge. My concern is that only one perspective is being promoted as acceptable for young women, once again dictating to women that they should behave like men in order to be well adjusted, yet paradoxically, young men are being made to feel shameful if they behave like men. If a woman is more interested in having committed relationships, that should be completely fine, too. She should not be made to feel as though she is uptight, unenlightened, or a sexual prude. The narrative that sexism and socialization are the most powerful influences on women’s sexual behavior-or lack thereof-leads women astray in several ways. First of all, male sexuality is concordant. This means when a man is turned on psychologically, he’s also turned on physically, down below. Female sexuality, on the other hand, is much more context-dependent, and is lower in sexual concordance. Women may be psychologically turned on, but not physically, and vice versa. It can take a bit of extra time for a woman to get warmed up. From an evolutionary perspective, this ties into women’s greater selectivity when choosing their mates. For instance, a woman’s brain processes sexual cues differently, depending on where she is in her ovulatory cycle. A recent study using functional MRI demonstrated that women possess increased efficiency in inhibitory brain function when they are potentially fertile. This is adaptive because it allows a woman to be more cautious when evaluating a potential partner at times when it is more likely that she will become pregnant. It’s not appropriate or helpful to use male sexuality as the standard, because women’s bodies don’t operate this way. Women who believe female and male sexuality are no different will feel pressured to perform similarly to their male partners in the bedroom. When they don’t or can’t, they will internalize this, thinking there is something wrong with them. It may be the twenty-first century, but a man should still be required to make the first move. Initiating contact contact or romantic interest is a small act demonstrating he is willing to invest in her. As a woman, you do not want your boyfriend to treat you like one of the guys, even if that sounds commendable in the name of gender equality, because doing so requires him to put in much less effort. You want to know that if and when the day comes that you’re heavily pregnant and immobile on the couch, he will bring you what you need to ease your discomfort, instead of muttering that you should get it yourself. Even if you have no plans to have children, you want to ensure that your partner will prioritize you. We have not yet severed our modern-day sexual behavior from its history. It’s a system that has served us quite well, considering that we exist today. Acknowledging as much doesn’t mean women will get the short end of the stick, nor does it require perpetuating the cliché that women should be sexually submissive and men should be sexual aggressors. If anything, this knowledge can be used to the advantage of both sexes. Women have been told to take charge in their romantic lives as a sign of independence, confidence, and female strength. While I don’t think women should be sitting around, waiting for a guy to send a text, there is something to be said for letting him come to you. You want to give signals that you are interested, but not too interested-sexually appealing, but not too forward. Finding the right words to start a conversation can be hard, especially if it’s with a stranger. Requiring men to, at minimum, initiate interest will help to weed out those who are just going to waste your time. It also means that he values you. A man who isn’t required to invest will almost by default be interested. Beyond that, I’d advise women to not play hard to get. If you are interested in someone and they ask you out, say yes. As for men, don’t apologize for being masculine. Pull your weight in a relationship and be gentlemen. Some women may find holding doors open and gestures of the like unnecessary, but they shouldn’t be offended. Truly successful relationships require a healthy and accurate understanding of not only one another, but human behavior; otherwise you will end up with a partner who is only telling you what you want to hear.

Lmao fuck sparta Long live Persia

I'm glad you're now seeing this, good on you for reflecting and being here with an open mind. I see it all the time now, women giving fake compliments to each other, it's sad

So many women are consuming massive amounts of weed these days I've noticed. I drive Lyft and often take women to and pick them up from weed dispensaries here in LA

@@hussle2654 IMO weed separates a person from god. A woman who smokes weed is unmotherly/ungodly.

Me too!!!

Agreed. There are some chicks that can pull off short hair pretty well.

Julianne Nicholson for one

@@johnkeith2450 Natalie Portman

​@@johnkeith2450 I beg to differ. She looks far better with neck length hair.

@@sailor1921 I can see it both ways, but for her, no longer than that