Dear noble friend, with my respect to everyone present here, everyone is commenting on this problem regarding the Riemann Hypothesis, what impact would it have on stating that this theory from past times has completely lost its strength...!!, if some Numbers are not primes and Twin Primes do not exist? two; 19; 41; 59; 61; 79; 101; 139; 179; 181; 199; 239; 241; 281; 359; 401; 419; 421; 439; 461; 479; 499; 521; 541; 599; 601; 619; 641; 659; 661; 701; 719; 739; 761; 821; 839; 859; 881; 919; 941; 1019; 1021; 1039; 1061; 1181; 1201; 1259; 1279; 1301; 1319; 1321; 1361; 1381; 1399; 1439; 1459; 1481; 1499; 1559; 1579; 1601; 1619; 1621; 1699; 1721; 1741; 1759; 1801; 1861; 1879; 1901; 1979; the exact and non-exact roots is equal to the enigmatic number of pi that I standardized with a fraction of whole numbers (3.15), it was not approximated, it was not simplified, it was not rounded, it was simply standardized to be Rational and Irreversible, and the Trivial zeros don't exist.... Dear noble friends subscribed to my Channel, with my respect to everyone present here, as I reported previously, that some numbers are not primes, I sanctioned a Law that will always have to be respected; within the factor what is a prime number? Let’s see how this Law follows in my concept: "To be a prime number it will only have to be divided by the prime number, from the smallest to the largest, and from the largest to the smallest, only then can it be an exact and finite prime number" this Law is applied when the Prime number factorization".... contrary to what everyone has been reporting in times past, using a theory that is already obsolete in current times, Mr Sidney Silva.
