World's Biggest Submarines Typhoon Class 

Without the Caterpillar's propulsion*

Akula is old shit. and Russia cannt made new submarine.

Антон Зуев ukie banderapigs will cry

какие же вы убогие. а верите в то что вы великий народ. аж противно

Alexander Kazakov идиот

Антон Зуев​ страдай и скачи,самостийный и незалежный ты наш

It will die of disrepair, the Russian way.

Which is exactly why every time one went to sea the US had 2 fast attack subs waiting for it to clear the dock. These would have never fired a shot in the event of WW3.

@@uio890138 These submarines could have launched their missiles while in russia s territorial waters where no foreign submarines can enter without being spotted and destroyed if necessary. What you said is really dumb.

@@laurentparodi5261 Honestly, saying Typhoons were intended to launch the missiles while in Russian territorial waters is about as stupid as it gets. What I stated was recognized fact.

@@uio890138 the Russians also had hunter killer submarines at the time aswell which were better these were designed to be shadowed by hunter killers to stop that from happening also these subs were super quit very hard to detect.

Было построено 6 штук. Теперь осталось 3, одна используется для тестирования ракет, 2 в резерве. Другие 3 распилины на метал.

She like leviathan

nope theres still one Typhoon Class submarine named Dmitriy Donskoy its the last Typhoon Class ever constructed and still in russian arsenal

probably gonna get scrapped

im sure they gonna keep at least one, this thing is history

you know why she was this size?? in order to break ice of 2.5 meters! this underwater ice breaker! it is specially created that she could patrol in the Northern latitudes of the Arctic! there are some destroyers wtf??? this is retribution in case of war with us!!

Surprised she didn't have small waterproof planes on the front end.

Dude that is freaking awesome if true, what vessel where you aboard?

Kyle Hallam I'm not sure I can answer that. Part of my service record is sealed due to several op's we participated in.

cncmike Oh I was under the impression you where aboard a civilian vessel, my apologies.

Это давно было?

Late 80's

😂 I said the same thing

Actually this nuclear sub can't go undetected in the Atlantic Ocean as there are numerous other subs and ships patrolling the Oceans, the Russians keep these kind of subs up in the north mostly in the White Sea or in the Far East

Thomas Nikolovsky Sadly there aren't any more Typhoon class submarines in operation

Julius Fabrique You never know what the enemy hides, perhaps since it's called military secret :P

Julius Fabrique They have one still in operation. and is rumored on another Typoon youtube page that the russian navy is in the process of reactivating two more. I think once those other 2 typoons are put to sea. that will restart the cold war for sure.

lol

Tha Boss Эммм как бы это по мягче, ты очень хуёво шутишь. The joke at the kindergarten level, although there will give you a head start.

174 meters long

7777777fresh 574ft long

Less than 2 football

And what would you know my Markus, ignorance is surely bliss for you. I was in British boats for 25years and followed the Soviet bombers every where,after all we did have S.O S U S.

Mike Wood what's your opinion of the borei class to replace typhoon? if im not mistaken its the first sub to have pumpjet propulsion

Вообще тайфун плохое название... Не советское... Оригинальное название Projekt 941 Akula - Акула. Борей уступает акуле по вооружению но значительно лучше её по бортовому оборудованию и тишине хода.

Привет Данила, Да, это правильно, Тайфун был Западная название для этой подводной лодки. Я очень хорошо помню имя Акула :) Слава Богу, мы никогда не использовали тезисы ужасные оружие друг против друга. Майк

Согласен с вами. Акул было построено 6 штук и все они предназначались для нанесения ядерных ударов по территории США через северный полюс поскольку они не могли плавать в тёплых водах. Закладывалась ещё и седьмая лодка но развал союза не позволил её достроить. Хорошо что они никогда не были пущены в ход. Но они были необходимы для военного паритета с США.

LollipopUnicorny yep also Tsar bomba the biggest and strongest russian nuclear bomb ever exploded with 58 megaton compare to 15 megaton of USA Castle Bravo

идеальный

A car? Only pussies make cars.Real men make nuclea Submarines,Rockets for nukes and Space and Planes.

Better hope thewest saved your submariners when it sinks. We know you cant save them. Right you know that

Sean Quinn In total, from 1955 to 2019, 8 nuclear submarines sank: 4 Soviet, 2 Russian, 2 American. You sucked.

7777777fresh your right 4 misslies can destroy a continent :/

7777777fresh Its not a beast cause it could destroy ,its a beast in its own being. Its a marvel. I love it.

+joey shatney it was made to nuke not to fight against other ships, it was often escorted by 971 Akula

+Adecodoo The purpose of this thing has never been to fire anything at anyone, neither US or (former) Soviet never, ever WANTED a nuclear war ("mutually assured destruction" is a BAD thing). The purpose is similar to that of Putin sitting bare chested on a horse; to make Russians feel like they're the alpha males of the planet and to scare Americans. Needless to say, only this submarine actually managed to scare anyone, Putin on a horse just makes everyone in the world (not Russian) laugh their ass off.

Well, my comment wasn't really a reply to you. I just wanted an excuse to mock the Russian alpha male behavior in general and Putin in particular. From a bystanders view point, Putins behavior has "cave man" written all over it and russians are not only blind to it, they seem to love it ... well, there i go again.

sure is!

What is the name of the music?

come and play

Yea

No it's only you by ashanti (instrumental)

And still loving it !

Size DO matter. They try to make them as small as possible with as much firepower as possible to avoid being detected. So with that in mind, the russians failed. These subs are easily detected as they are to big. That means larger areas to detect and larger and more noisy machines. These subs are really not much o brag about with that considered.

Because it doesn't. These things stick out like a sore thumb so Russia keeps them close to home

it doesn't need, it lunched rockets with distant more than 10000 km and it hid itself under north pole ice

It was dooms day weapon..its spend most off time under polar cap in north pol ..if US would attack russia with NUKES then it would go out and lunch nuclear attack on US

Oleg Da How do you lunch a rocket and if you do ,what do you have for dinner

chris doyle I mean launch

Not really it was designed to break ice and launch missiles hence the size and reinforced tower. It did it's job well might I add. No other class of SSBN can operate under the northern or southern ice packs without risks. The job of a SSBN is to hide some where in the world and await order t launch having more place to hide and launch is a good thing.

Дмитрий Реалист The Americans didn't destroy the Typhoon class submarines after Cold War ended. Typhoon class submarines are insanely expensive (duh) and Russia was in deep financial crisis during the 90's.. They couldn't modernize their fleet nor pay any salary to the sailors, or even repair/modernize their subs. U.S and other Western nations took the cost to dismantle those subs, without U.S and West E backing, those gigantic subs would still be out there, rusting and eventually leaking dangerous radiation.. It was the Russian government who agreed. Also, Typhoon Class submarine have played out their role. There are Submarines which have exactly the same capability as the Typhoon yet they are smaller and cheaper... Nevertheless, magnificent machines! How many were built? I think 6. 6 Submarines of this class, WOOW that's EXPENSIVE! and to MAINTAIN them? Holy fuck. Not to mention modernize them. Friggin' unbelievable expensive.

Ben Dover

Who cares ?

Ben Dover But there is 2 or 3 in service now right?. They put them in a bag for a lots of years ,but now at least 2 are back. Maby im wrong.

+Piet de V. They watched too much "Hunt for the Red October")))

You do know Swedish subs are daily around russian waters aswell, they never find them either. So shut your damn mouth. Atleast we knew there was a sub.

supafuckinmingster yes Wait shit

No.... not at all...(facepalm)

oh yes

There were at least 4 side by side near the beginning of the video

Only you - ashanti

Ka Bong You are not right. Typhoon-class submarines - 20 missiles SS-N-20 Sturgeon, 10 warheads each. 200 warheads (medium power yield ) at a distance of 8300 km. This submarine was the most powerful weapons in the world.

You are so full of shit with your numbers.88 and 161?Stop pulling shit out of your asshole.

Gotland Class...and they are pretty deadly...but...no match for our American Subs. Im sorry. :)

Gotland class is very good for littoral waters. but would not be as effective as a nuke attack sub in the deep waters of the atlantic. You are right, Hms gotland did sink those ships in navel exercises. That was why the U.S.N. hired out the Gotland for training . So who has the the best Diesel submarine. is it Sweden, Germany or Japan.... I think it is the type 212

ERIK SAGER and I think it's Varshavianka sub if we talk about this class.

Mark Hower I don't trust anyone who writes a word and read it differently ;)

You better watch your back Mark.

the ohio class, what a beautiful american submarine. Im american but this submarine, the typhoon is the best in design. Its just so different. By the way there are no longer typhoons, they are taking them apart, so ohio class wont have to sink anything.

they still have them just like we stockpile everything. Irregardless, Ohio class sub is the most dangerous weapon in the world.

I'm not too sure the typhoon class can be said to be a 'better' design. I think they did use titanium for the hull, and even implemented a liquid bismuth reactor rather then a high pressure water cooled reactor. But both of these had practical flaws. Like welding titanium is difficult and it cracks more easily under high pressure, and the bismuth reactor was subject to overheating and malfunctioning

The United States and Russian subs are completely stealth while the British subs can be detected as soon as they leave port. I think theirs is at the Vangaurd Class.

Open Beta I know that for a fact because the vanguard class sub is outdated compared to the US and Russian subs. The Brits haven't updated their subs in quite a while because they updated their carriers to the Queen Elizabeth class and their type 45 destroyers. How ever the the Vanguard class was serviced in 1993 so I don't know why the brits didn't make it stealth. The typhoon class AKA Akula was serviced in 1981 and the Ohio class in 1981 but they both have stealth capabilities.

Only you - ashanti

Only you - ashanti