I filed a Writ of Prohibition after my motion to recuse was denied. The "defendant" the judge, cited that I could not file a Writ of Prohibition to "challenge" the denial of the motion to recuse. How true is this?
He can cite case law but ultimately it is for the appellate courts to review legal determinations not him. Of course prohibition/mandamus are usually denied without opinion so its tricky. On appeal you could get a legal opinion of course.
