Some people have asked me whether bayonets make good fighting knives. Obviously this is a large question to address, but in this video I try to give an overview of the answer in regard specifically to WW1 bayonets.
I read "All Quit on the Western Front". The favorite German tool from trench fighting in the book was to use their short handled shovels as battle axes. Seemed to work pretty well. The people hit didn't seem to complain much.
The Americans took it one step further and honed their entrenchment tools to a razor sharp edge. It was a much more useful tool in trench combat compared to a Springfield with an M17/18 bayonet affixed.
I have an entrenching tool or two (I camp with them) & I can see it, I've used one to cut roots, clear brush, & hammer in pegs before now, I'd hate to get hit with one.
@@NM-wd7kx same the one i use the most is swiss made from 1940 and from what i can tell its basically the same design as the german ww1 e tools. Just finished putting an edge on it and honestly i can see why it was used like a battle axe its weighty, strong, easyish to maneuver especially with two hands, and a pretty hard chopper. Not saying its the best option but if i had to fight someone with a knife or smth id probably consider this before a knife or club
Speaking of wanting a long rifle for bayonet use: In WW2, the Japanese rifle, the Type 38 Arisaka, when combined with its bayonet, is longer than the average Japanese soldier was. The average Japanese soldier was approximately 5 foot 2, a type 38 with its bayonet attached is 5 foot 5.
Xybetrion I’ve seen illustrations from bayonet drill instruction manuals of how to use the hook to snare the blade of an enemy attacking with a sword or rifle with bayonet, so he’s not *entirely* wrong. I doubt it could actually *break* an enemy’s bayonet, but it could, in theory, be used to disarm an opponent. If I’m remembering correctly, the technique was something like, “thrust forward to meet the enemy’s bayonet with your own, while attempting to catch his blade with your bayonet hook. Then, quickly reverse your rifle, dragging the enemy towards you and directing his rifle to the side. Follow up by striking him with the butt of your rifle, knocking him to the ground to be finished off.” Regardless of how useful such a technique would actually be, I can imagine that having that hook as part of the hand guard would come in handy; if for no other reason than giving a soldier more leverage when pulling their bayonet out of a body when using it as a fighting knife.
@@D990990990 it happening at least a couple of times actually sounds plausible to me. We've all seen examples of how crude Japanese manufacturing got at the end of the war and the steel that had to be used wasnt always the best. All it takes is a bayonet being made of shoddy steel or a heat treat that didnt take to make it a possibility. No way it was common though
devlieg72 American service rifles don’t have bayonets with hooks on them. The main battle rifles that the U.S. brought into the war with Japan where the 1903 Springield and M1 Garand. Both used the m1905 bayonet which didn’t have a hook.
Modern-ish russian/soviet bayonets for use with AK platform are even called "штык-нож" which translates literally as a bayonet-knife, it's basically a normal knife that can be put on a rifle
Would you make a movie about John Malcolm Thorpe Fleming Churchill, nicknamed, "Mad Jack" because he fought through WWII with a Sword, Bow and Bagpipes. World War Two! When I first heard that I assumed that they meant World War One, but no he went through the second world war using these seemingly outdated weapons with the motto, “In my opinion…any officer who goes into action without his sword is improperly dressed.”
Now I can't stop imagining an officer giving the command to fix bayonets to a whole company of soldiers who converted them to knives by cutting the pommel and the ring-part off.
It wasn't a problem. Experienced trench fighters had a bayonet for the rifle and one for fighting they took off a corpse, then modified. Later on, i.e., WW2 you saw soldiers with a fighting knife and sub machine gun. One for shooting, one for fun.
There's a reason for the length to be 12-17cm on average, and not a whole metre long. It's because that's just the best size for it. Overpenetration is a very real (and painful) thing, and a shorter size guarantees durable performance and ease of handling. Yes, Rapiers were insane weapons, but the "make it longer!" slippery slope didn't take long to get people in the arse and wishing for a shorter length. Smallswords were not a "devolution", it's about context.
Re-posting my comment from the other video: Shovels and spades certainly weren't percussion weapons, but got sharpened all around. Particularly the Germans used them to great effect.
That's certainly true. In particular the British 1908 pattern Mk1 entrenching tool stands out, because the handle had a metal end cap. So you didn't even have to change much to get a very effective mace.
The cutting off of the barrel ring was often done by armourers when decomisioning a bayonet - especially if it was going back to a soldier as a general use knife .
Very popular with Australians. Used on horseback at Beersheba in 1917. After both wars SMLE bayonets were the Australian civilian choice of general purpose hunting knife for generations. Still are and are still often found in garage sales and your grandfather's shed. Loads of them still in service and still available for sale. The Carl Gustav M96 bayonet appeared in Oz in large numbers and is also still used as a bush knife. I have three of them, two still in original grease and in perfect unused condition. If there is a national knife of Australia, it would be either of these bayonets.
brad mcpherson I have an m/96 Swedish mauser bayonet or two too, but then again, I'm Swedish so it's not as odd ;) Have you seen the Swedish bayonet for the m/45 smg? That one is a looooong one XS
I haven't seen it. I don't know why the M96 and bayonets appeared in Oz in such numbers. I had about 5 M96 rifles, including a couple of rare ones and quite a few bayonets. They were standard fare for pig hunters and maybe still are. Australians have always had a thing for bayonets. I think the last bayonet charge was in Vietnam. Could be wrong. Mount Tumbledown involved bayonets but it wasn't a classic bayonet charge.
brad mcpherson I have an M96 , but no bayonette for it . I've seen a couple around here in South Carolina at pawn and gun shops . I might buy one now . The couple of German M98 type bayonettes I've owned made for poor bush knives in my opinion, they don't take a good cutting edge . Swedes make excellent ordnance steel , so if their bayonettes are made of the same quality steel as their rifles I must have one . I've never owned a British bayonette.
Matt now you have to make a video about "fighting with entrenching tools" i.e. shovels. The sharpened hand shovel, as you mentioned, was the weapon of choice for many WWI soldiers. I know of at least one member of the 82nd Airborne soldier during the first Gulf War, who told me his whole platoon sharpened their shovels. Sharpened shovels are also mentioned in "All Quiet on the Western Front". Back to bayonets, I have read that U.S. soldiers in WWI started to shorten their bayonets as soon as they got into serious trench warfare.
Is that a real expression in the UK? I was wondering about that.. Never heard it here in Canada, same city as Skalligram and thinking of joining the Hema school.
I love WWI bayonets, especially the German S98/05 and German and British sword bayonets. I was hoping for an episode about them. I'd love for you to look at fighting knives from WWI like the French Couteau Poignard Mle. 1916 and various German fighting knives.
Scolargladitoria love your videos man! Since you talk about bayonets during WW1, can you also talk about spade weapons during WW1, I'm interested in those.
Interestingly, the original P1903 bayonet for the SMLE was a fair bit shorter, with a 12" blade. Like a lot of other complaints about the SMLE, the 19th century holdovers led to the P1907 having the 17" blade, to help fend off cavalry in melee, which didn't exactly turn out to be a big consideration in WW1.
I remember a scene in "All Quiet on the Western Front" where the more experienced soldiers recommended ignoring the bayonet and using a spade if it comes to hand to hand combat. You mentioned that briefly in this video, but I would like you to do one expanding on the use of a spade as a weapon in trench warfare.
I took my basic training for the uUS Army In 1972 . Included with our training was several days of training in bayonet fighting. Our training sergeant claimed he preferred using his entrenching tool (shovel) to a bayonet. This was at the near end of Viet Nam. Somebody still thought we needed to know then.
Good stuff👍 During WW2 the us started cutting down the long M1905 bayonet blade for the M1 Garand to 10 inches to match the new shorter M1 bayonet. The M1 was used the last couple years of WW2 through the Korean war. You can tell which ones were manufactured with the 10-in blade and which ones were cut down by looking at where the fuller starts. The cut down version has the fuller all the way up to the tip.
Entrenching tool (shovel) was and still is an exceptional close in fighting weapon commonly found and used by soldiers the world over. It has many uses as a utility tool and is exceptionally well weighted as a clubbing and slashing weapon.
In example, during WWI some elite italian army corp (Yes, we had and still have, some may disagree) called "Arditi" (The Daring Ones or Daredevils, as they used swim across rivers, crawl on minefields and under barbed wires to jump in trenches with just a revolver, a hand grenade and a bayonet/knife) used kind a sardinian style reszolda with narrower point to pierce higher and thicker austrian uniform collar.
The model of 1903 is the most awesome. I just restored one (a Wilkinson) along with cobbling together an appropriate closely fitted scabbard. The scabbard was a "bear". I had to make 3 attempts with 3 different kinds of leather including an original surplus blank which failed. Once I got the leather to fit the locket and chape, I worked the blade in and out a hundred odd times before the bayonet would slide in and out easily. I recreated the bayonet frog too in better form than the painted replicas from India. The locket is a teardrop stud, but from a pattern of 1907 set, so longer and not perfectly true to the 1903 bayonet. It was the best I could do. I searched for years for someone with an original 1903 locket kicking around in their junk drawer, without success. The locket and chape staples were a huge hassle to get in and then scratched the blade. I used glue instead which will suffice until I can anchor the staples into the leather at diagonal angles that avoid the beautiful, double-eded, diamond cross-section blade.
Interesting video! One thing I think maybe you overlooked was the weight savings. The foot soldier had to hump those long bayonets/short swords everywhere. Subscribed!
Looking forward to your take about ww1 trench knifes / trench weapons. WW2 weapons might also be quiete interesting e.g. SOE knifes&daggers and how useful they really were. Keep up the good work.
Matt, I'm surprised as a Military Saber guy you don't mention Hutton's section in Cold Steel on "The Short Sword-Bayonet or Dagger" (partly based on Marozzo's Bolognese Dagger techniques). I know he's before WW1 but great treatise on exactly this weapon. We're using it now as an intro & supplement to Marozzo's Dagger techniques. Do you know if Hutton's dagger techniques were taught more widely in the British military of the time and what do you think of the techniques he presents?
Great video Matt, have you thought about linking up with the great war RU-vid series? I think you could make some good collaborative episodes. Keep up the good work
Some time ago I saw a ww1 german bayonet in a flea market, it had no ring, it was shortened and the handle had a name carved. Obviously it was cheaper than a normal one, but in my opinion a piece like that is more interesting.
Hey scholagladiatoria on the subject of bayonets i was reading an interesting story about bayonets used by the Japanese army in WW1 and WW2. Japanese Arisaka bayonets are famously very large and almost looked like mini katanas. Apparently that was done for a reason. See the Japanese army, like most armies at the time consisted of mostly draftees who were of peasant stock. In Japanese culture, a sword is a very high status symbol however only people of samurai heritage were often allowed to carry swords. So to boost morale, the Japanese military made their bayonets more sword shaped rather than dagger shaped so that the soldiers could have more or less a surrogate sword. Hope you found this interesting and keep up making good videos.
556deltawolf That's absolutely not true. The samurai class was abolished in the Meiji Revolution and nobody could carry a sword for civil use. In word war 2 or in the Russo-Japanese war the katana was an officer sword just like european armies would do. And because of the suppling problems they faced due to their imperialist and island nation nature they had to rely in an army of few but higly skilled soldiers. This unskilled draftee scenario only happened during the end of the war when loss of their elite troops and manpower overall together with desperation forced them to use the mainland soldiers (who were unskilled recruits just out of highschool).
Leandro Ribeiro Calling the Japanese army "elite" at the start of the war is a massive exaggeration. They were trained reasonably well but no more than any western nation. Elite compared to Chinese troops or Russian conscripts perhaps, but against Australians and British - who they fought initially - and Americans - later on - they were very average soldiers.
In what way does the Type 30 bayonet (introduced in the 30th year of Emperor Meiji's reign or 1897) look like a mini katana? The general shape of the blade and grip are essentially the same as smle bayonets. Hell, they even have quillions, what are you talking about? The Type 30 is pretty generic as far as early 20th/late 19th century bayonets go, the design has little to nothing to do with what you are talking about. In addition, this sword business is probably a bit overhyped. Basically every country with a sizable military sent officers to embed themselves with the armies participating in the Russo Japanese War. An American officer observing the fanatic care that Japanese soldiers dedicated to their rifles commented on it to the company captain, who responded that "In former times, the Japanese warrior looked upon his sword as part of his spirit, and that now they tried to impress the soldier with the same idea about his RIFLE". The quote is from "Reports of Military Observers attached to The Armies in Manchuria during he Russo-Japanese War. Part V" Pg 101.
As a matter of fact, the weapon, for which the italian trench knife class I taught at FightCamp was intended, is a shortened Vetterli-Vitali bayonet, issued as fighting knife, to the Arditi.
I remember reading that the Australian Light Horse were ordered to "draw bayonets and charge" (basically using them as a sword substitute) at Beersheba, against the Turkish gun positions.
Always a Great review. What is Your opinion on the D-Guard Bowie Knife that was used in the Civil War & The various Bolo Knives used in WWI ? Can You Please review them ?
I carried two types of knives one was the infamous K-bar but the other was an old WW2 Garand bayonet the 1942 with a 9 inch blade. It was hard to sharpen but could be, a good stabber and it's main strength was it was solid, it made a good chopper. I used it to open coconuts when everyone else's knives failed. The answer is, yes, though not perfect, not balanced for the job beating an enemy about the head and shoulders with a hunk of flat edged steel would kill and wound them even unsharpened. Beats nothing.
Matt, make a video about WW1 clubs and other exotic weapons like flails. I never understood why the soldiers went to the trouble of making such elaborate weapons. I always saw percussive weapons as anti-armor weapons but although WW1 soldiers had heavy clothing in some situations I don't see why somebody would need a flail. I'd probably stick to a small knife like the FS or the Mark I american knife or just a bowie knife.
Tezcax Probably goes back to the instinctual tendency of most people to abandon finer techniques when under stress, reverting to simpler methods. Matt's done some videos about anecdotes on trained fighters versus untrained, where he goes into some detail about this phenomenon and its benefits and drawbacks.
People made armor for trench raids. I have seen pictures of scale and maile suits from this period. I think Matt does not allow links in his comments, but you could google it up just as quickly as I could. Apart from that, it's not easy to go through thick clothing, just as Matt said. Test it yourself. Pork legs are delicious, even after being stabbed and "tenderized". ;-) Just remember that people used to wear several layers of fairly thick wool clothing. That's a bit tougher than what we wear nowadays, simply because their outdoor activity did not amount to a short walk to and from a car.
I think the helmet part makes a lot of sense and I didn't think about it. Clothing is a fair point if you're talking about cutting but the kind of clothing I see on WW1 pictures doesn't lead me to believe that it would be resistant to stabs at least not from a knife of a similar size to the clubs I've seen used. I'd personally go for a knife or other pointy object(I've seen these hand forged spikes used in the trenches) and get a revolver or pistol like the 1911 ASAP, considering I didn't have access to SMGs or shotguns.
+Tezcax - Stabbing through clothing isn't as easy as it may seem. Cloth wraps itself around the tip. If the tip is very narrow it will slip through and pull the fibers apart. If the tip is very sharp, preferably double-edged, it will cut the fibers. Bayonet tips are neither of those. Just think about it - it's fairly common to identify the attacker who killed someone with a knife by the cuts on his hand. They often hurt themselves, because they lose grip and their hand slips on the edge. If stabbing didn't require effort, that would never happen. It does. I've seen a lot of it during butchery.
Blades get stuck in clothing and meat,......a club will always allow for a faster follow up swing. Also, as Caramel pointed out, hits to the head with a mace are more likely to immediately take you out of the fight than a stab wound which could take many, many seconds to bleed out.
The Bowe style bayonet (in the U.S.) did not happen till 1989 with the M9 bayonet. WWII U.S. bayonets are 10 inch blade pointed with a false edge back. WWI U.S. bayonets are the design just 18 inche blade. All bayonets for the U.S. after the Korean war are of the same design as M1 carbine bayonet About 7 inch blade pointed with false edge on the back. Handles and barrel ring very for rifle(M1, M2, M14, M16, and M16a1) . The M16a2 got the M9.
The soldiers probably started out using the standard bayonet length and then cut them down because of experience and necessity once they found out they were just too long to be used efficiently for combat
That explaination is understandable and consistant to the material I have read or seen in the last years to that topic, but it was the first time, somebody with fighting-/fencing experience put some knowledge behind it for further understanding. *thumbs up* But there is a question in my head, that may could get figured out a bit. I do some fencing mainly with the Anderthalbhänder after the Book of Joachim Meyer and also had some exercises with the long knive (Langes Messer) and after that looked on my few bajonetts and asked myself, if you could use a long bajonett in the way of a long knive. The shape is similar and you could do most technics with it. (I did some choreography fighting training once with it agains a onehand sword and it did the job) Thanks to the pandemic situation, we had no chance to test it further yet. The grip is a bit smaller in comparison to a long knife but ok. If you apply long knife technics on bajonett fight, wouldn't that work? (Except very close combat, where you fight with enhanced fists.)
When I was a kid the local skinheads used to carry bayonets. I don't know if they were good fighting knives or not but they used to scare the shit out of me!
Matt, have you ever talked about stopping power in weapons? Especially blunt weapons. Marc MacYoung notes that a hammer has much more stopping power than a knife and that seems to hold a lot of relevance in trenchfighting.
I would have thought that mentioning the Australian Light Horse charge on Bersheeba (please pardon my spelling of the town) where the Light Horsemen did a successful "cavalry charge" but used their bayonets as swords and took the town would rate as an interesting addition to this video.
In Argentina, during the 19th century, the gauchos (local cowboys, more or less) would take long bayonets as the one you are showing and turn them into fighting knives. They were called "facones caroneros" and were used as short swords, in fact, a fencing style was developed arround these weapons, inspired by the rapier and cloak style. It was facon and poncho.
(Commented before I finished watching this video.) Most bayonets from what I heard do not always have a sharpened enough blade edge like a typical knife. They are made dull on purpose. They are usually made for thrusting/stabbing. Also, there are a LOT of bayonets that do not have a "knife shape" format. Some are literally just a just a piece of metal shaped like a rod, with the tip ending in a point. This was quite popular by a lot of places I think nearing the end of 19th and beginning of 20th century. There were some using the blade/knife format that did sharpened them sharp. However I think the actual answer is," Some you could use them as a combat knife, but not all of them." I think it was also not unlikely for a person to realize his blade bayonet might not suited the role as a combat knife, but had enough he could get by until obtaining a actual fighting knife. Also some bayonets might have been well suited for it. I think modern bayonets are this way. However, all bayonets in general? I think the shortest answer is, "It depends on the type of bayonet."
Could you someday do a video on the different swords used in trench raids? I know you mentioned cutlasses but I've also come across images of a folding leaf-bladed short sword used by Welsh troops (I believe), and of course the Dutch klewang and I've heard even the American m1860 cutlass was around.
Hey Matt, do you know about Sabaton (the band)? Their songs (mostly) are about history and are what actually got me interested in history. What do you think of them?
spykez spykez seeing as no one else has answered, I have a Spanish long bayonet that is just a few inches shorter and it weighs 1 pound 2 ounces without the scabbard, so i would guess it's somewhere in the 1 1/2 pound range.
I have a World War 2 Mauser K98 bayonet cut down as a boot knife. Its got around a 6-7 inch blade. Probably a good carving and multi purpose knife also.
It's indeed Lebel as in "le bel", not "leebel". The later versions of the lebel bayonets come standard without a quillon, but I think it was mainly done to save material.
The Ka Bar is a fine knife. This mattered a lot to me 30 years ago, but they were cheap enough to afford. And tough enough to actually use in the field.
I remember having around in my grandma's house an folding bayonet, looking at some images it could have been an Italian Carcano mod 1938. I always wandered what was the reason for that design, any insight? BTW, I have no idea where it is now.
Hey Matt! Can you make a video about double-bladed swords in fantasy and science fiction someday? For example there is Darth Maul's double-bladed lightsaber, which doesn't really have any historical counterpart I know of. I've found only one exception, the haladie, but it's a dagger, not a sword. I think the reason behind the lack of such weapons in history is that they're probably impractical to use. But why are they? I would like to hear your opinion about this, I hope you will find this an interesting topic to discuss. Keep up the good work!
Overpenetration basically means "more penetatration than you need". Imagine sticking that long bayonet all the way though someone, down to the hilt. After you've stuck in half the blade, it will start sticking out on the other side. There will be a hole all the way through, and the remaining half won't really do any extra damage. However, it will take a little bit more time to get it out, and those precious moments may be the difference between getting untangled and managing to defend yourself from his friend, or getting your head smashed in by a club. Also, if your victim moves or falls over, there's a significantly greater chance that your weapon will be wrenched out of your hand, disarming you. Which you won't want, obviously, if his mates are around and about to attack you.
You are 100% correct if you look on ebay there are tons of shortened altered bayonets I carred a m-1 gurand bayonet that I ground a bowie knife tip on it and removed the latch.I carried it along with a kabar in the gulf war. It was very sturdy and I liked it a bit more because it was longer at 9-1/2'' also the ka-bar got stolen!
Canadian Ross bayonets were actually arsenal converted to fighting knives after the rifles were withdrawn from service. The blades were reprofiled, ring removed , and latch removed and filled. The one I have is actually quite good as a combat weapon. I believe the work was done by Wilkinson Sword for the Canadian government.
James Morgan Ayers, an ex SF guy from the US says that knives were an important part of his special forces training, late 60s and wrote his book called the Tactical Knife about his and others experiences. He says 7 to 10 is most useful if you can carry it.
There is actually a good amount of documentation from the 18th, and early 19th centuries, suggesting that socket bayonets were indeed used independently from the musket, as a hand weapon.
The trend towards shorter bayonets had more to do with minimizing the reduction in shooting accuracy, consistency, frequency, ease and effort of operation (i.e. overall performance, effectiveness, and lethality) caused by shooting with a bayonet-fixed rifle vs without. The rifle is a precision tool/weapon; balance and weight are fundamental parameters. As a general rule, the greater the degree of change, the greater the detrimental effect. A bayonet-fixed rifle is heavier, both overall, and specifically at the muzzle i.e. the far end of the barrel. Both of the above change the balance of the rifle, making it more muzzle-heavy, thus more prone to muzzle-dipping i.e. pointing down. Most soldiers shoot less accurately, consistently, and frequently with a bayonet-fixed rifle; obv. moreso the longer/heavier the bayonet. All things being equal, shorter bayonets are lighter & less bulky; lighter weapons are better weapons (w/ some caveats) and the less weight and bulk grunts have to lug around, the better.
My dad was given a Japanese bayonet from the 2nd world war from his granddad..... and he swapped it with some other kid when he was at school for some cigs. THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN MY BIRTHRIGHT!!!!!!
I definitely agree that at above 10 inches it does get a bit unwieldy and it does take longer to unsheathe which can definitely be a negative in an unexpected close quarters 1v1 duel ;)
In open ground a long blade is handy, in CQC in tight area a 7 1/2" is very good. Easy to change grip and you don't need alot of area tko draw or manoeuvre the knife.
When they went to the Enfield Rifle # 4 in WW2 the bayonet became a round spike 8" long with no handle whatsoever, just a 1" or so square block with the socket for the barrel. The Russian bayonet from both world wars is also a spike with no handle and a chisel point, they were intended to be left on the rifles at all times. One assumes the soldiers were issued or equipped themselves with knives for camp work if nothing else. What would you say is less than ideal about a Ka-Bar as a fighting knife?
Question: would you rather have a modified bayonet for a trench fight or given the option would you rather just have a Bowie knife? Also, what - besides a gun - would you want in your other hand? Two knives? Knife and club?
Recently was gifted a mint (used) S98/05 n/A and it is quite robust. Feels very substantial and would be terrifying in a fight. You could slash as well as simply stab.
Before you get hurt. I am third generation MARINE. The Ka-bar was designed to be general uses knife. That is why the MARINE CORPS had the M3 trench knife(what my Father used and liked, 1st Mar Div WWII). The truth be told the Ka-bar is really not a great combat weapon. The Ka-bar name came for a backup manufacture. Camllus was the original manufacturer and the contact holder (and the best) till they closed.
When I hold my SMLE bayonet, I find it way too narrow for my larger hands. Surprised this didn't get a mention. It feels more comfortable if I hold it with my index finger above the guard.
A true WW1 trench knife is a nasty thing to behold. I saw one at the Prague WW2 warmuseum. Of course most troops used WW1 stuff at the start of WW2. A trench knife looks like a specialized penetrator. Thing and extremely sharp, more a very sharp long spike than a knife. Of course it has a handguard but that's more to keep it from being wrestled from you. Very good against thick cloathing in extremely confined quarters where one would normally fight with fists (if one did not have a trench knife).
We are currently selling the 65-year bayonet collection of retired US Army Col. Peter Kilburn. The current auction features several rare bayonets including a Sten SMG MK1 B&JSL Spike bayonet 41- 42, a M1847 Musketoon MFGR 1856k (1 of 580), a 1875 MOd Belgian Allbraendlin, a US CSA Hall Bayonet WSF, a US Cold Armalite bayonet Marked Colt, a M9 B1 USMC BUCK+ (1 of 5,000), a M9 L-2 LAN-CAY 10 Camo Prototype, a M9 LAN-CAY USCG bayonet, a 1799-1810 UK Baker Officer Fusil Lenght bayonet, a UK Volunteer Baker bayonet, a GB Canadian 1899 Savage, a 1862 Wurtzberg Art bayo, a Early German Fire/Police Bayonet from WWI. You can see more details, pictures and bid here: bit.ly/BayonetA2
I own a Steyr Mannlicher M1895 bayonet converted into a fighting knife of sorts, the ring to attach it the muzzle has been removed cleanly. The blade, I believe, has not been shortened or otherwise modified.
Does matt have any videos about lance use in cavalry warfare in wwi? I hear about the existence of mounted lancers all the time but can't find anything about how they actually fought
