Тёмный

XI Fears Flying Domestically, Unprecedented U.S. Air Strike Plan Revealed 

China Observer
Подписаться 478 тыс.
Просмотров 55 тыс.
50% 1

They would likely carry out a series of carefully planned actions to maximize strike effectiveness while minimizing their own losses. This complex operation would involve tactics across multiple levels, including escort, strike, and air defense suppression. Let’s consider the specific battle plan proposed by Chinese netizens for the U.S. military.
#chinaobserver
All rights reserved.
⭐For business cooperation, please contact us: business@chinaobserver.co

Опубликовано:

 

27 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 419   
@wheezysqueezebox7651
@wheezysqueezebox7651 3 месяца назад
The officers in the PLA, bought their positions, the officers in the US military, earned them.
@anotheryoutubechannel4809
@anotheryoutubechannel4809 3 месяца назад
Not sure if that is always so true these days unfortunately. Some dude in a dress might show up.
@lookoutforchris
@lookoutforchris 3 месяца назад
The PLA bought their rank, but in the US military it’s full of Didn’t Earn It, DEI. I’m not sure which is worse.
@gamingfreako7480
@gamingfreako7480 3 месяца назад
@@anotheryoutubechannel4809Literal brain rot comment
@anotheryoutubechannel4809
@anotheryoutubechannel4809 3 месяца назад
@@lookoutforchris and the DEI crowd have their holy than though cause that rarely is the same as the country's or of 80% of the rest of the population. Lord knows what they would do when you had to count of them to survive. Wouldn't trust them for a second.
@GundamChief
@GundamChief 3 месяца назад
Only at the lower ranks. The higher ones...that's where politics, nepotism, and favors come into play, unfortunately. I prefer Patton types who are warriors, but we usually end up with the opposite like our current ones.
@k9killer221
@k9killer221 3 месяца назад
The Chinese overwhelmingly rely on copies of Russian weapons, from the most basic to the most complex. And we all know how effective the originals are right?
@knightwolf3511
@knightwolf3511 3 месяца назад
kinda they where selling equipment to China like planes, although i think past 10 years China has started to produce there own but still requires Russian equipment
@jugeerivera4916
@jugeerivera4916 3 месяца назад
Look up how modern and effective their air carriers are.. LoL They can't even engage in a long skirmish because they run on diesel still.. LoL China is all talk and show
@patriot388
@patriot388 3 месяца назад
Well if China has Russian air defence it would be easy! 😂😂😂
@Hmonks
@Hmonks 3 месяца назад
S300 and S400 they can’t even defend against drones
@orlock20
@orlock20 3 месяца назад
They probably could if the operators were sober and awake.
@mtrest4
@mtrest4 3 месяца назад
Not meant to defend against small drones. Mostly against fighter aircraft and cruise missiles. Same with Patriot missiles.
@knightwolf3511
@knightwolf3511 3 месяца назад
@@mtrest4 difference between something a size of a microwave going to be little harder to defend since current tanks and equipment are not really designed for that, next generation will be. it's basically using ww2 weapons in modern combat well newer current Abram tanks are pretty old now i think 20 years at lest
@glennjanot8128
@glennjanot8128 3 месяца назад
S300 and S400 are not designed to defend against drones, not to mention that it's extremely expensive to use a million dollar missile to destroy a $10,000 drone. Something like the German Gepard tank is a lot more efficient in doing that.
@game_life_1
@game_life_1 3 месяца назад
​@@glennjanot8128 Yeah I agree, also auto turret that have any sort of machine gun is more effective at shutting down drones. If you want a more cost effective you can also go accelerate the development of energy weapons/lazer, they don't spend much because they only use energy unlike missiles and guns you practically have infinite ammo as long as you have electricity.
@mikestewart4752
@mikestewart4752 3 месяца назад
Here’s the real plan. Some young airman sitting in a beige sea-can in the US hits a button on a joystick and Xi go POOF. “What’s for breakfast?” says the airman.
@randomuser3555
@randomuser3555 3 месяца назад
@@thisbarb Well the Nukes WOULD be made in China...sooo
@mikestewart4752
@mikestewart4752 3 месяца назад
@@thisbarbI doubt it… that would also lead to a nuclear retaliation. And the US has China surrounded with subs lolol
@RT-qd8yl
@RT-qd8yl 3 месяца назад
@@thisbarb We don't know that for sure. I feel like there's probably *a lot* of officials in the CCP who would be perfectly happy with Xi gone.
@breveth
@breveth 3 месяца назад
​@@thisbarbwho said anything about nukes? I don't think anyone would be dumb enough to escalate things by going nuclear. No one wins with the amount of nukes operational.
@ItsJoKeZ
@ItsJoKeZ 3 месяца назад
you know not every long range missile is a nuke right​@@thisbarb
@newhailman
@newhailman 3 месяца назад
Those weren't pandas, they were just dogs painted as pandas
@joshsmith2368
@joshsmith2368 3 месяца назад
LOL! Come see the baby Chow Panda's!
@ksl-988
@ksl-988 3 месяца назад
I remember hearing that Russia's military was the second greatest in the world and the Moscow battleship was king of the Black Sea. Ukrainian drones and HIMARS have thankfully put those claims to rest.
@venturefanatic9262
@venturefanatic9262 3 месяца назад
XI should fear traveling on his Government's own Aircraft. Wouldn't want to end up like Iran's recently deceased Leader.
@paulfuchs6920
@paulfuchs6920 3 месяца назад
Too scared to fly on the C919.
@patrickt49
@patrickt49 3 месяца назад
Also, add the Chinese's lackadaisical approach to maintenance which only fuels Xi's anxiety 🤣
@orlock20
@orlock20 3 месяца назад
The real problem is something will fall from the plane and it won't be a part of the plane.
@worldwanderer91
@worldwanderer91 3 месяца назад
That was a CIA/Mossad op
@Shinobubu
@Shinobubu 3 месяца назад
@@worldwanderer91 You give the CIA and Mossad way too much credit. If they could easily do this what can the rest of the world do against a country with an easy KILL button? Heck what can YOU do? If these people can afford protection yet still die what can you the lowly keyboard warrior do against such overwhelming covert operational superiority?
@randybentley2633
@randybentley2633 3 месяца назад
Rapid Dragon would also be a factor in the onslaught that would come should Xi become frisky.
@senorhassanbinsoberg1561
@senorhassanbinsoberg1561 3 месяца назад
The U.S military is always ready to rock !
@trompell0
@trompell0 3 месяца назад
You are well trained cattle.
@andrewcrowder4958
@andrewcrowder4958 3 месяца назад
The F-35A has an availability of about 52%, if that's what you mean by "always ready."
@SerotoninReuptake
@SerotoninReuptake 3 месяца назад
Wow! I didn't know an AI woman talking ordinances, tactics, and destruction would be such a turn on 😅
@midimusicforever
@midimusicforever 3 месяца назад
Xi has reason to be worried.
@youcantata
@youcantata 3 месяца назад
All the major cities near to the East China Sea coast area are within 1,000 km range from US airbase in South Korea or Jeju Is. or Okinawa Is. of Japan. Maybe 80% of Chinese population live in these area. Even without any US aircraft carrier, US air force can hit these cities and air base/naval ports just in 1 hours.
@danielch6662
@danielch6662 3 месяца назад
And what do the South Koreans and Japanese think about that? They have no say about whether they get bombed in return?
@Alpacabowl98
@Alpacabowl98 3 месяца назад
@@danielch6662 Stop that, they aren't victims. They had their say. They accepted all risk long ago. It's what happens when you form an alliance.
@controllerplayer1720
@controllerplayer1720 3 месяца назад
xi jinping is equivalent to eunuch who took the seat of power in china and claiming to be the emperor.. just look on the history of china what those eunuchs bring into their empire..
@recondax
@recondax 3 месяца назад
One factor not looked at is F-15s and F-16s. With the new F-15EX, they would mixed in with F/A-18 and launch long range missiles that could be passed up to the F-35 and F-22 for final target designation.
@JeanAriesM
@JeanAriesM 3 месяца назад
😂😂😂😂..you made my day about Xi fears of flying his own country.
@charleswomack2166
@charleswomack2166 3 месяца назад
You pretty much nailed this one.
@jhowlett1264
@jhowlett1264 3 месяца назад
before attacking taiwan, Winne the pooh will announce that he has Gundams and Voltrons in his military force. that should scare off the Americans.
@danielch6662
@danielch6662 3 месяца назад
Before invading Taiwan, China will destroy all of Taiwan's factories with missiles. Trump is a very bottom line kind of guy. He would wonder what does it benefit the US to save Taiwan. Getting into a war with China is going to seriously hurt the US economy. Can you imagine what happens to the stock market?
@TheGhostGuitars
@TheGhostGuitars 3 месяца назад
LOL, that's funny! The only problem is that Winnie is not a Chinese bear, he's a Canadian black bear, so he's far more likely to be an American Ally. 😉 Two, Gundam is Japanese and Voltron is American based on the Japanese "Beast King Go-Lion," and they'd both stand on the US's side too. 😁
@stephenallen4374
@stephenallen4374 3 месяца назад
The new b1b bomber is being designed and developed as a first strike weapon against America's enemies they'll never see it coming😂
@TheGhostGuitars
@TheGhostGuitars 3 месяца назад
New? The B1B was introduced 1985 and the last was made in 1988 with #100. Many of them are still flying. Granted it's still part of the US triple strategic bomber threat. The B1B is the fastest and has the largest payload. The B2 has stealth capabilities and a very decently large payload capacity. The B52 has huge payload capacity and ridiculously huge fuel capacity for long range and/or long loiter time. Methinks yer talking about the B21 Raider, that's now in flight tests.
@robinbinder8658
@robinbinder8658 3 месяца назад
all of these scenarios are irrelevant. this war would instantly turn the whole world into a radioactive wasteland
@timtim2668
@timtim2668 3 месяца назад
4:13 i think that this Lady should of been a Military and War Strategists. Instead or in addition to making a RU-vid Channel 😂😂
@edjo3430
@edjo3430 3 месяца назад
MALD-J is a nightmare for any air defense system. That includes fighter aircraft. Saturating that systems radars while jamming them thus allowing cruise missiles to approach unseen.
@yojomojo
@yojomojo 3 месяца назад
ps, our stealth planes those Chinese pilots saw, its because they wanted to be seen. Its much different when you are the target, if you see them during war, your already gone.
@Sierra-208
@Sierra-208 3 месяца назад
The B-21? With anti-grav tech? What?
@kensmith8152
@kensmith8152 3 месяца назад
B52s where are you?!😂
@ItsJoKeZ
@ItsJoKeZ 3 месяца назад
haha b21 raider would be there since yesterday
@PoohSeaFresh
@PoohSeaFresh 3 месяца назад
Winnie the pooh is scared af😂😂😂
@Antiquated-Ether
@Antiquated-Ether 3 месяца назад
No one going to tell you the plan.
@erogakisu
@erogakisu 3 месяца назад
True but with how Trump loose mouth this aint all lie then ?
@sandsandwich9217
@sandsandwich9217 3 месяца назад
​@@erogakisuTrump's erratic, but he's smart enough to say how but not say when.
@daviddrake5991
@daviddrake5991 3 месяца назад
@@sandsandwich9217 Why is Trump still in the US then? Trump is a windbag and a liar.
@Barry-sx4gj
@Barry-sx4gj 3 месяца назад
If a person or Country thinks the other person or Country is there enemy / adversary, even when the other person dose not want to be one must be ready for problems. Xi and the Chinese people’s need to rethink what they are saying, what they are not saying, what they are doing and what they are not doing. It is always wise to give 50% Respect & Trust whether a person gains or looses from that point is up to them. We all should do Better.
@TheBryceWade
@TheBryceWade 3 месяца назад
WW3 gets worse by the day
@RealJeep
@RealJeep 3 месяца назад
Thanks to Sniffy Biden.
@Lucyhehe_
@Lucyhehe_ 3 месяца назад
@@RealJeep you got divided and conquered
@RealJeep
@RealJeep 3 месяца назад
@@Lucyhehe_ Come November the country will be returned to the sane people.
@GyawaliPrajwal-uk1zh
@GyawaliPrajwal-uk1zh 3 месяца назад
I find your profile amazing 😂@@RealJeep
@SoSolly-tt8ni
@SoSolly-tt8ni 3 месяца назад
Xi xi his pants when he see this.
@harmen2456
@harmen2456 3 месяца назад
If they think a US incursion would consist of a few dozen planes that's hilarious. Look at Desert Storm, it was *gorgeous* in terms of military aviation, against Irak they few well over 2.000 sorties per day, for a good two months. That was Irak, now ask yourself if they'd put less effort into China.
@johnjessie3083
@johnjessie3083 3 месяца назад
God Bless American 🇺🇸 ❤🇺🇸🫡🫡
@DawnLi-iw8qb
@DawnLi-iw8qb 3 месяца назад
How dumb. Why would the US mistreat pandas? No one would do that.
@Blue.star1
@Blue.star1 3 месяца назад
Chi Xi using pandas in mil
@timtim2668
@timtim2668 3 месяца назад
0:16 No that doesn't mean that Trumps had this preconceived idea about bombing Beijing or Moscow. Its more about the way he approaches problems. Trump is a no nonsense type of person thats it. Hes not a person whos drafting war ideas. Its evident in the way he behaves and approaches problems. He specializes in one thing, Making money and making money grow. And hes thinking how to stop, or navigate around those people or organizations in the way, or causing a loss of 💰 or opportunities for making more Money.
@timtim2668
@timtim2668 3 месяца назад
And the US Military is always considering possible or potential battles and battle plans for success. That's why the US Military is the Strongest by far in the world
@boonnathan9827
@boonnathan9827 3 месяца назад
China has no idea.
@israelgregoriojr.7425
@israelgregoriojr.7425 3 месяца назад
THANKS FOR THIS VIDEO, VERY GOOD PERSPECTIVE AND INSIGHT; I LIKE IT.
@bastiancooper-queen1849
@bastiancooper-queen1849 3 месяца назад
It's CRASY, even to speak about, very dangerous.....
@karldavidson2071
@karldavidson2071 3 месяца назад
thank goodness he wont travel domestically, so when he does get targeted no Chinese population members , would get hurt.
@ayystayyfann4972
@ayystayyfann4972 3 месяца назад
You can never denied or ignored Trump words.
@JeffBilkins
@JeffBilkins 3 месяца назад
The military videos on this channel are not very good. Why is the first bit so specific about every weapon load-out and everything while being pure speculation on some generic mission profile? All those nerdy details mean nothing. This is just spicy filler.
@talkingbutt3150
@talkingbutt3150 3 месяца назад
Its probably propaganda to deter the Xi-See-Pee from trying to take over Taiwan.
@johnqpublic4012
@johnqpublic4012 3 месяца назад
That's what these channels do. None of the text-to-speech, auto-generated channels offer any serious analysis. Canned commentary, generic video clips, poorly sourced info. Such channels are for entertainment only.
@viewfromvt4698
@viewfromvt4698 3 месяца назад
Are you both little pinks?
@johnqpublic4012
@johnqpublic4012 3 месяца назад
@@viewfromvt4698 Homeschooled, VT boy?
@knightwolf3511
@knightwolf3511 3 месяца назад
@@johnqpublic4012 it's speculation because of classified info and such and what if idea like Radar detection vs lock on so Radar can see lets say 90 miles but to get a lock on it then has to be 40 miies away for example
@Kingcobra6699
@Kingcobra6699 3 месяца назад
He is just calling their bluff. Probably he is not that stupid after all?!
@kendougherty4445
@kendougherty4445 3 месяца назад
You're Intel is incorrect an F-22 signature is the size of a marble you give China too much credit
@danielch6662
@danielch6662 3 месяца назад
The question you need to ask is whether their radar can flag bees flying at 600 mph. It could pretend to be a bee, but bees flying that fast are somewhat uncommon.
@Kenneth_James
@Kenneth_James 3 месяца назад
Aim 120d for ground targets? Good research
@jbc8673
@jbc8673 2 месяца назад
china really doesn't know the capability of the usa military. they are that misinformed. it only takes ONE nuke to completely destroy beijing. ONE. the usa has 240+ nukes on each of their ohio subs. EACH nuke can have a payload of up to 475 kilotons. and get this, the usa has 14 of these ohio subs.
@TheHumanMass
@TheHumanMass 3 месяца назад
wrong and you wont see it comeing
@playwelldowell8739
@playwelldowell8739 3 месяца назад
lol.. plans are not long plans if they are announced.
@kryts27
@kryts27 3 месяца назад
The B-21 does not have VTOL capabilites nor outstanding aerobatic manoeuvre capabilites, but is an improved version of the B-2 Sprit (which is already an aging stealth bomber). The stealth capabilites of these bombers are not designed for air-to-air combat (unlike the F-35), although it may carry sidewinder missiles if intercepted. It's main stealth missions are supress or destroy air defence installations, communication node centres like headquarters, nuclear missile or nuclear, chemical or biological weapons manufacturing facililites, submarine naval bases or special locations where top leaders dwell like Zhongnanhai. Note that in a war, Xi Jinping himself may not be a top priority target. He has more capable underlings, but they still top leaders and would be more valuable for taking out to the Anericans.
@israelgregoriojr.7425
@israelgregoriojr.7425 3 месяца назад
Thanks!
@paulbuck90
@paulbuck90 3 месяца назад
But what happened to the 20000 drones?
@RattlerSSBN
@RattlerSSBN 3 месяца назад
Not even close......🤣
@saavedra909
@saavedra909 3 месяца назад
Would the US deploy the F22 Raptor in case of a military escalation?
@theorize999
@theorize999 3 месяца назад
lol right… like we haven’t watched them build everything we know exactly where it all is
@peterl545
@peterl545 3 месяца назад
B-21 Raider. Nobody can see it coming.
@JOzzie-u8z
@JOzzie-u8z 3 месяца назад
At least hes got the balls to say it
@mm-yt8sf
@mm-yt8sf 3 месяца назад
wouldn't the safest non-nuclear bombing be by putting explosive on icbms? or is optics of missile attack from a certain distance unacceptable...but from a closer distance it's fine (like cruise missiles)
@thomasferrari6465
@thomasferrari6465 3 месяца назад
And all the civilians on both sides are at risk, just because. Of money and Power
@Mike-mp8co
@Mike-mp8co 3 месяца назад
Good they didn't do it under trump did they 😂😂😂 because they know he would
@billotto602
@billotto602 3 месяца назад
What's a F-34A ? Sheesh 😡
@LegendaryCollektor
@LegendaryCollektor 3 месяца назад
Uh....anti gravity technology??????? Huh???
@janhyl_bundok8276
@janhyl_bundok8276 3 месяца назад
Let's see which is better .. Fake or original..
@seraph3761
@seraph3761 3 месяца назад
I would check on those pandas to insure they’re not dogs
@Krazycat321
@Krazycat321 3 месяца назад
Sooo… what are we waiting for??
@de-bodgery
@de-bodgery 3 месяца назад
WHERE are these F35A jets flying from? Taiwan? They don't have very many! So the vast majority of F35's would be US carrier based...aka F35C. F35A are ground launched from pristine runways. F35C are carrier launched with much heavier landing gear to handle carrier launches and landings. They also have larger wings than the F35A and can carry larger pay loads.
@ungas024
@ungas024 3 месяца назад
Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines, including 2 fleets of aircraft carrier.
@de-bodgery
@de-bodgery 3 месяца назад
@@ungas024 I think you missed the point. F35A is land based ONLY. F35C is designed for carrier landings and take-off. I was pretty clear about this in my first comment. South Japan to Taiwan is about 500 miles. Any F35A's that Japan has would be running pretty low on fuel by the time they got there and need refueling to do much good over Taiwan and then NEED refueling to get back to Japan! Taiwan has been rejected to buy F35 of any kind so they have none and won't have any. Same for Philippines. So literally 100% of all F35A's that might possibly fly over Taiwan would be from Japan. 100% of F35C would fly from US aircraft carriers.
@TheGhostGuitars
@TheGhostGuitars 3 месяца назад
Ok, as an American, I can follow with this video, until around the 10 minute mark where it started devolving into fantasy. Anti-gravity and VTOL in a subsonic stealth bomber? I WISH we had such capabilities, but no, you're getting silly. Anti-gravity sounds pretty, but we don't even understand the fundamentals of gravity itself, so nobody's not even close to being able to field any gravity controlling technology. While VTOL technology DOES exist and has been pioneered from the 70s and 80s, thus it is a mature technology. However, it's fundamental requirements for operation are in conflict with the fundamental requirements for stealth bombers. That's why ye never have seen any VTOL versions of ANY dedicated bombers. They're too big and massive for any existing engines to be able to produce enough thrust to power a bomber vertically. The F35B is VTOL capable but it is NOT a bomber. It's a much lighter fighter jet plane that CAN carry bombs, a fine but major distinction. When it's fully loaded with ordinance, I doubt that it could take off vertically. Perhaps it might be able to but that'd require so much power that it'd use so much fuel during vertical launch that it's flight range will be drastically reduced. Ye can't beat physics here. It makes more sense to take off normally and let aerodynamics work for you to lift the plane. Or better yet, use a carrier catapult to launch the fighter quickly to aerodynamic flight speed with even less jet fuel consumed. Nuclear powered catapults, yeeeah baybee!
@k-9741
@k-9741 3 месяца назад
way over complicated for how an actual strike would be planed and executed.
@bananian
@bananian 3 месяца назад
He's going to go full Stalin if his paranoia get any worst.
@theorize999
@theorize999 3 месяца назад
haha anti-gravity yah lets go with that psychological warfare is fair.
@tonytravels2494
@tonytravels2494 2 месяца назад
Cool story bro!
@sekoilu316
@sekoilu316 3 месяца назад
Why 20...???
@kaushiksarkar7837
@kaushiksarkar7837 3 месяца назад
Trump respect Putin and Putin did the same for Trump , Putin hated democracy but more the democrat Biden
@offgridcabinbelgium
@offgridcabinbelgium 3 месяца назад
The thumbnail suggested a strategic plan revelation. A fantasy operation followed. Not good enough from a channel that has earned a lot of credibility in reporting on real stuff in past. I don't think there was any benefit in this item.
@louiedy6659
@louiedy6659 3 месяца назад
I smell too much fear... Xi xi xi, you better watch out... Youd better not cry.. 😂😅😊😂😅😊
@aegrisomnia
@aegrisomnia 3 месяца назад
... advanced air defence systems like the s-300... 🤣 ... the B-21 incorporates revolutionary anti-gravity flight technologies... (are you sure you're not high China Observer?)
@ItsJoKeZ
@ItsJoKeZ 3 месяца назад
you can just say AIM like the word aim. Just like you say HARM instead of saying H-A-R-Ms
@S.T.A.N.L.E.Y.
@S.T.A.N.L.E.Y. 3 месяца назад
F34 A?.. 🤔
@navyseal1689
@navyseal1689 3 месяца назад
Bro, you are assuming everything will goes with US favour
@wr3add
@wr3add 3 месяца назад
😂who writes this😂
@spinncook7402
@spinncook7402 3 месяца назад
They don't need planes
@mawhayden
@mawhayden 3 месяца назад
I don't see that this type of attack would be feasible, it would be better on a coastal city, getting to the Capital would be tooo messy and too many things could go wrong. This plan is madness anyway....
@kennethvenezia4400
@kennethvenezia4400 3 месяца назад
This is all nonsense. My flying cat would take out every aircraft on both sides. Nobody, but my cat would survive. He's one bad ass kitty😾
@mah7961
@mah7961 3 месяца назад
Oh yeah Mighty Mouse would squash your cat. Any day of the week.
@mah7961
@mah7961 3 месяца назад
Mighty Mouse 🐭 begs to differ.
@darkercore8185
@darkercore8185 3 месяца назад
tofu dreg air defense
@panpiper
@panpiper 3 месяца назад
This 'plan' blithely ignores the fact that the listed planes don't have the range to reach Beijing. Maybe if everything launched from South Korea (I think they might have an issue with delaring war on China), they could use aerial refueling tankers, but that would involve a lot of loitering with big fat targets well within range of Chinese weapons. In short, this 'plan' is a pipe dream. A strike on Beijing is 'possible', but it would more likely be submarine launched Tomahawk cruise missiles. But China has a LOT of submarines, ASW ships and ASW aircraft that would make getting in range for those US submarines, very dangerous. Worse, launching the cruise missiles would give away their position, making get out afterwards even more dangerous. The B21 is a different story. A flight of B21s could indeed launch a cruise missile attack largely with impunity. That said, to posit their use of nuclear weapons is absolutely ridiculous. Under no circumstances would the US use nuclear weapons on China unless China used them first. Furthernore, talking about the US using anti-gravity technology in the B21 completely undermines your channel's credibility.
@ItsJoKeZ
@ItsJoKeZ 3 месяца назад
boy they would launch from the pacific and do have the range. you sound slow before even getting into details.
@polaritypictures
@polaritypictures 3 месяца назад
Ehh, the dream scenario the author says is totally wrong. The tactics they are dreaming up is highly limited.
@dontcare7086
@dontcare7086 3 месяца назад
Well the tactics are speculative one needs to remember a single American carrier strike group can take out any other countries air force. People have no idea how powerful our air force is.
@JesusSaves379
@JesusSaves379 3 месяца назад
Come on, China, do something.
@jessiedacalos6942
@jessiedacalos6942 3 месяца назад
14:08 pala ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QbyeHNQprdE.html
@kennethvenezia4400
@kennethvenezia4400 3 месяца назад
BS
@thurston905
@thurston905 3 месяца назад
Just use Musk’s rockets.
@xcloud777
@xcloud777 3 месяца назад
No way china can head-on to US. In the dawn of drone they needed to think 100x to attack taiwan.
@JohnSmith-fl6qd
@JohnSmith-fl6qd 3 месяца назад
I support president Donald Trump's comments 100%
@bernsbuenaobra3665
@bernsbuenaobra3665 3 месяца назад
But what if Putin join the game?
@nemelendez
@nemelendez 3 месяца назад
Wait, don’t we have to MakeAmericaGreatAgagian again?
@RichSDet
@RichSDet 3 месяца назад
Won’t and couldn’t happen, USA has more sense than that.
@mah7961
@mah7961 3 месяца назад
More importantly we saved those pandas 🐼. Why you think they keep faking them in China.
@snarkymoosesshack8793
@snarkymoosesshack8793 3 месяца назад
>won't and couldn't Famous last words.
@nicholasrockall7308
@nicholasrockall7308 3 месяца назад
Really..? do you actually believe that?
@jcak552
@jcak552 3 месяца назад
Wow, did you get a look at some warplanes. It would not be done this way but Bravo.. on your imagination..
@AngelOfDeath420
@AngelOfDeath420 3 месяца назад
Sounds like BS!
@NVCourier762
@NVCourier762 3 месяца назад
First
@vn3353
@vn3353 3 месяца назад
what a stupid fantasy.
@EduardQualls
@EduardQualls 3 месяца назад
*Since this videos' premise is based entirely on the "inject yourself with bleach"-level ideas of the rapist, fraudster, felon, "Captain Bone-spur" "Diaper Don," the whole thing is a waste of time.*
@dep7311
@dep7311 3 месяца назад
Time to unsubscribe. A promotion for trump again😅
@eugenebode5525
@eugenebode5525 3 месяца назад
Unsubscribing Tromp vs Biden politics just trash.
Далее
US Air Force is losing its tech edge (over China)
22:34
US launches retaliatory airstrikes in Syria
2:36
Просмотров 403 тыс.
US Air Force vs China: Preparing for Day Zero
23:01
Просмотров 146 тыс.