Good design, poor production. They provided a small batch of these choppers for Soviet Army, but as they were in there, they were AOG more than airborne...constant failures, lack of parts etc. Aircrews preferred to fly Mi-4, as she was more reliable.
Ну про товарища в беде конечно напиздели, но вертушка заслуживает внимания, жаль что в СССР не дали им возможности существовать долго, как всегда, не решать проблему, а просто её бросить...
no, it’s just that the scheme is similar - pisetsky had such helicopters with two propellers, as well as early experiments in France and Russia in 1910-1912 and the Germans (I don’t remember, but it seems the Horten brothers) did something very similar in the late 30s
Nope Piasecki was first to build tandem rotor helicopter. And CH-47 folowd by CH-46 (PV-102), H-21 (PV-22), H-25 (PV-18), H-16 (PV-15) and HRP-1 (PV-3) - 1945. In Yakovlev design bureau was team responsible for helicopters - they build prototypes of coaxial, tail-rotor and tandem helicopters and then they go to Kamov and work on primary coaxial helicopters (except Ka-22 which was gyrodyne).
Сумашедшая вибрация от двух двигателей а процессе эксплуатации разрушала фюзеляж. Появлялись трещины. Также было тяжело его эксплуатировать, даже общаться с диспетчером было трудно из-за вибрации
@@LollipopUnicorny Not only that. I heard from people that the military operators were just afraid to let these copters go airborne due to constant failures, both mechanical and structural. Strong vibrations, fuel/oil leaks, engine overheating, fuselage frame cracking etc etc. In total, they experienced the same bucket of problems US operators had while flying their Pyasetsky choppers back in 50's. Countries different, problems the same.
@@MattGlucharr nonsense on the Yak-24 there was not a single fatal accident just the usual circuit is cheaper and easier to mass-produce the ussr developed many multi-engine / twin-engine helicopters at various levels, but most did not go into series
@@dropanukeonusaagain6606 The truth is that airfield commanders were just afraid to get Yak-24 airborne, due to constant failures...I appreciate that - they already operated Mi-4 which was much more reliable, so what to get them airborne for? So, Yak-24 mostly stayed on the ground and were eventually written off.
Yak-24 was the last one. Before that they had designed test co-axis helicopter, named "Sh" - it states for "Shootka" (Gag); and then Yak-100 helicopter, similar to Mil Mi-1 and Sikorski S-51. However, Yak-24 was the only Yakovlev's copter which went into limited production.
De hecho Sikorsky fué un ingeniero nacido y formado en la URSS, luego emigró a USA y se convirtió en el más icónico de los fabricantes de helicopteros de EU :)
Vamu Darcho Jandreoski Pegasus Galaktica 7 - VELKO Gruppi go Naselivte niz Grado Kiev gi vidov pivo piaja nadvor im rekle Darcho Jandreoski da go Chekiram ova Naselba Uliza nekoj Darcho Jandreoski ce pominel ovde
@@ertis.2262, не совсем. Пара вертолётов CH-21 была закуплена СССР для изучения. Да, в чём-то эти машины схожи. Но Як-24 - это отнюдь не копия CH-21. Каждая из этих машин впервые поднялась в воздух в 1952 году. На момент своего появления, Як-24 был самым грузоподъёмным вертолётом в мире - он мог нести до 5000 кг груза на внешней подвеске. А CH-21 - всего 1814 кг. Но прогресс не стоит на месте. Через несколько лет, появились такие машины, как CH-47 "Чинук" и Ми-6, способных поднять в воздух до 12 тонн груза.
