As an east coast rider, size 11.5 boot, and can only afford one board while trying to progress all types of riding, I couldnt be happier with last years Standard! After 51 days of riding, I think these guys got it spot on! I love buttering my standard, it floats well, feels so cool set back and twin, great off jumps, solid at high speeds and powering thru chunder. Love this board!! Loved the review :) send some of that powder our way would ya?
Bought one last year. Great for all around mountain riding for speed, control, pow and stable on kickers. No real chatter over 50 mph. Rails well on the carves. Great ollie pop with the camber. Not great for rails and presses but I do some on it anyway. I love the mid with for my size 11s on the 162. Best borad I have purchased in many years. Great if your home hill has some steep and vertical. Super stoked on this board.
Have you actually GPS’d or used a radar gun to check your speed? I have and was shocked that what I thought was about 60mph was closer to 45mph. I had to straight line down a freshly groomed super long and steep run, early in the morning when the snow was at its fastest to just break 50mph.
Thanks for the review. I got confirmation from YES. customer service, that for 2024 the carbon is gone in the glass. Did you notice it when comparing the 2024 to the 2023 model?
I ride in Australia. I'm 5"7 155 pounds. Size 7.5/8 US boot. Need advice on sizing for the regular Standard would a 151 be best for hitting the groomers, carving, hitting side hits and some jumps. Also looking at the union stratas or Burton Cartel X for bindings. With the unions and their mini discs I won't be able to use Yes setbacks. Any other binding recommendations to go with the regular Yes standard?
So for bindings go Force. I think that would be best. So not only do they work with set back inserts but you can slide them to adjust your stance width. They also do better with side hits/jumps than the Atlas because of the softer foam. What make/model/size/year board do you ride now and how does it fit you?
Hey! I might add this board to my quiver. Would it be worth it if I have a shadowban or is it a lateral move? Want something that’ll be better for carving while still being forgiving, versatile all mountain. Love the vids and thank you for always answering!
It's pretty lateral overall. You will get more grip, more camber and a softer overall flex. It might be wider depending on the Shadowban you have now for your specs. Thanks and if you want to get into it more hit me here to give me the info I need to help you much better. shop.thegoodride.com/merchandise/gear-advice/
Thank you for the detailed review! In terms of fun, stability and speed, would you say the Lib tech BRD is a better board for that? I'm an intermediate rider living in the PNW. 5'7 155lbs size 9 boot. Currently torn between the 156 BRD and 153 Standard Uninc
Thanks! So those are two very different boards so very hard to compare. One is an all mountain directional twin with a lot of camber and the other a pretty tapered, set back directional back seat freeride board with a good amount of camber but less than the Standard Uninc. Both are fun, stabile underfoot/track well and both can go pretty fast. I think it really depends on how you would like to ride. I would go to the site and use the comparison tool there to see what works for your riding style better. thegoodride.com/snowboard-reviews/?mens=1 If you still can't decide you can hit me up here. thegoodride.com/snowboard-binding-and-boot-advice/
@@thegoodridesnow Would the Standard Uninc 153 with waist width 253mm for a boot size 9m be okay? I am 5’7 and 155lbs. I was informed by another expert online that the regular Standard in 151cm would suit me best. I ride mainly in the PNW groomers/pow. No park. Thanks again for your help.
I'm 5'10, 160, size 9.5 boot. Is the 156 a bit too wide for me? Looking for the quiver killer that won't die out in powder. I like the Uninc construction but I'm wavering between the 153, 156, or just the 156 standard construction. Mostly riding trees , side hits, and park jumps. Not a lot of jibbing these days. Thanks for any input! Currently riding an older TRS 154.5
I think the 153 Uninc would be the call for a better carver that still floats increadibly well. The 156 Standard will be better in powder but it will turn a little slower and not be as fun to turn. So it's all about what calls to you more.
So after watching nearly every review you guys have for boards, I’ve centered on the yes basic uninc or the standard uninc, and I feel they are so comparable it’s hard to pick. What would you say are the main differences between the two that could help me decide? (I’m less concerned about powder as I live in the Midwest) Thanks and keep up the great reviews!
Cool! good to know you have specs that work with both models. So go Basic Uninc 156w if you want a true twin feel on groomers and it to be a little more forgiving than the Standard. Go Standard if you want a little more directional feel in powder and more camber/spring out of the turn.
Now that you have the 2024 version of this board with the removed carbon does it feel different? Another reviewer mentioned it turned a little slower and felt heavier
Not much different. Just a little softer and a touch less snap but I'm still pretty stoked to have it and ride it. If anything it turns a little easier because it's softer. Regarding weight, wood cores will never weigh the same board to board. That is why I never weigh boards. He probably just got a heavier board than the 2023 he tried.
Hi more of a technical question. I just got this board but i like riding with a tiny setback. im using the same insert holes(reference stance holes) but on my back binding disc(union atlas) i slid it back horizontally a little bit to make the back binding set back 1/4 of an inch. Will this board carve differently or not as well on a groomer because im not equal on inserts? im riding it for the first time in a few days so I wanted to know incase i should just keep the stance centered for groomer carving/turning. Also would this effect how catchy it feels? Thank you and awesome reviews!!
That will work fine. I'd only go centered on sidecut if you plan to ride switch a lot but being set back 1/4" isn't going to feel weird. I've ridden it on the set back inserts on groomers when I was in a more directional mood and it performed very well.
I have the K2 Excavator. Does this have more pop than the K2 Excavator? Does it have more pop than the Capita Indoor Survival or Never Summer Cougar? I’m considering getting one of those 3 boards. Thank you James!
So I think the Standard Uninc is softer an easier to get to pop vs. the Excavator but it the Excavator pops harder when you work for it more. They are super different boards though and ride very differe.t NS Cougar and Indoor survival pop more. It's close between those two but it goes to the Cougar. Especially because it handles uneven snow better. Hit me here if you want to get into it more and get better advice shop.thegoodride.com/merchandise/gear-advice/
165lb, size 9 boots, 5'10, mostly riding in Whistler, wondering if I should get 153 or 156. Currently riding the Greats 151, sized according to the size chart, but feels too short in reality. Also have a Korua Otto 157 and it feels about the right size.
Love the channel! I'm kind of stuck between the Standard Uninc and the PYL Uninc. I'm pretty much only on groomers, don't do any park and like to cruise and carve, with the occasional small jump. Which would you recommend between the two? Thx in advance
Thanks! hard to help you decide based on the info you gave about yourself but I could say this. Go Standard Uninc if you like a non-tapered ride and want to be able to weight your turn front footed, center weighted or back footed. Go PYL Uninc if you see a lot of powder and like to carve more back footed on groomers.
Hi, i cant decide between 156 and 159 (yes standard uninc). I am afraid of the width of 159 because it seems like regular wide board..or? I am 5'11", 183 lb, US 11 boots (burton swath) ... what would be better for me - 156 or 159 ? And I wanted to try NOW Yes Collab. bindings for it - do you think it's a good choice in combination with burton Swath boots? Thank you in advance for your reply.
You could easily do both as it's not a stiff or hard board to turn for your specs. Go 156 if you like lots of control, want to butter more and like to make tighter turns. Go 159 if you want to carve harder, go faster and float easier. Not sure because I don't know what kind of boots you have. If you have a soft sole boot I would pass as they cause pressure on your metatarsal as well as strain your arch and overall fatigue you fast. If you have a stiff sole boot maybe it could work if you don't care about adjustability. If you want to get into it more hit me here to give me the info I need to help you much better. shop.thegoodride.com/merchandise/gear-advice/
Hey James! Would love a little help. I'm 6'1, 175, size 10 TM2's. Looking for something that can handle backcountry Pow (Alpental & Baker) but is nimble enough in the pow trees and has freestyle capabilities (natural features and an occasional cheese wedge). I was thinking Standard Uninc, Ravine Select, BSOD '24. Open to other options too but this is what I narrowed it down to. What should you suggest? Not sure on the sizing of the Uninc (mid bite is throwing off my sizing)? Appreciate all your reviews. Very helpful!!
Thanks! Its hard to help based on the info I have. It's just enough for me to try but far from enough to help you properly. Hit me up here if you want to do this right. shop.thegoodride.com/merchandise/gear-advice/ If you want me to guess based on the info given I would say I think the Standard Uninc 156 would be a great call as long as you have full size disc bindings. BSOD might work but didn't come to mind. Ravine Select or Ravine could work if you want something more directional/tapered. Bottom line is all three boards are very different so they all appeal to different riding styles.
So grateful for your job and reviews! , I'm 5 ft 10, 165 lbs, 9.5 US, advanced rider. I want this board as a more aggressive alternative to my Yes greats. main focus with std uninc will be on all mountain. 153 or 156? thanks
Hey! Appreciate all the content. Yes claims this as full camber from contact point to contact. Is the rocker you are referring to due to their “catch free” camber?? Thank you!
Thanks! When I talked to the shaper he said you can say this "Modern Camber" has early rise or a longer transition into the nose/tai from the camber. Whatever it is, you can see at 4:14 that it isn't full/traditional camber from the old days
This is very wide under foot in a 162. Check the in depth review on the site. There is an indention between the inserts and the waist called Mid-Bite so the waist width looks narrower than it is. A 162 will fit most 13's (especially reduced footprint 13's) much better than you think because it's much wider where you mount your bindings. I would call this 162 a true wide that can turn more like a mid/wide. It's fine with your weight as well. If you like a longer board you could go with the Standard 165. It will be longer/wider than the Standard Uninc 162 but it will have a lot less camber though.
Thanks! Mercury is more forgiving but it does turn slower. Make sure it works for your specs or hit me up here with all your info so I can give real advice. 2:48- Flex/Butterability/Pop/Dampness
Its pretty technical but it depends. Strong intermediate...yes. if you are comfortable with full cqmber Yes. If not maybe just go with the standard or hit me up here if you want detailed advice. shop.thegoodride.com/merchandise/gear-advice/
How does the float compare when in the setback inserts to the Yes Hybrid in reference stance? I ask because I’m taking these two boards to Japan and I’m trying to figure out in advance what depth I should use what board in what configuration etc. Such a short trip I don’t want to be faffing about tweaking my board when I can plan ahead.
Hybrid is in another world so use that when its super deep and set it as far back as you can with the limited insert pack you have. It will be great to have the Standard Uninc there too as its very good for a directional twin when set all the way back. It could be fun for more shallow days or groomer time. Or if you are riding steeper terrain and want to get big air this will be better for that. I think that's a great 2 board quiver.
@@thegoodridesnowThanks for the quick reply James. I'm in a US10 Vans (so pretty bulky), plus a little taller and heavy than your good self, but was on the fence about whether to go for the 153. Looks like I'll go 156, or the 156W in the Basic Uninc.
I am interested in buyiny the Standard Uninc. However I am uncertain about the size. Regarding the size table a 156 or 159 could both fit. My height is 180cm, my weight 75 kilograms and my bootsize is 10,5 (44 eu). I spent most times in the resort grooming. Small and big carve turns. What size would you recconmend and why? Thanks al lot?
156 would be the best fit for your specs and how said you like to ride. If you want more float and more speed at the expense of control/easier turning in tight spots you could go 159.
It's hard to recommend Flux XF because they have no shock absorption. I would keep it between the Cartel X and the Atlas. Atlas has way better adjustability and more response. Cartel has a softer more shock absorbent foot bed. It comes down to which of those two appeal to you.
I'm down to the standard uninc, basic uninc (hate the graphic though lol), and the burton freethinker. I'm 5'10.5", 180 lbs., size 10 boots. I'm also riding mostly Vermont. Is the basic uninc quicker edge-to-edge? Does the standard uninc have good switch-riding/is it lighter? Which do you think would be best for east coast riding? How does the basic uninc stack up to the free thinker (if you've ridden it)? Thank you for all your help
Yeah both will work really well for you. Yeah like I say in the review, the Standard Uninc is a true twin on sidecut so it rides switch really well. Both ride east coast really well and have exceptional grip. Rode the Free Thinker. I like the Basic Uninc better overall but it doesn't have as much pop because it isn't full camber. The Standard Uninc will give you similar pop. You might really like the 156 Standard Uninc.
I'm in between the Standard Uninc and the Burton Custom. What do you think is better? Less catchy? I'm a low intermediate looking for a camber! 6' 172lbs 10us boots, Thanks!
I think the Custom is exceptional for turning and getting air but it is more unforgiving than the Standard Uninc. The Uninc has much better grip and much better float in pow if you use the set back inserts with a full size disc binding. I would get the 156 Standard Uninc as it's a better one board quiver.
Would this be too similar to an older LibTech (directional twin) Goldmember C2 BTX? I'm looking for something just a touch more playful but still has good grip in the occasional icy/hard packed snow like the Magnatraction provides.
They would have similar all mountain versatility and edge hold but a very different feel on snow due to the camber profiles. The Uninc will have more of a less catchy traditional camber feel vs the loose auto spinny but more forgiving feel of the Goldmember. The Uninc also has a little more set back on board than the old Gold Member but it needs full sized discs to utilize that set back. You will get a faster base too along with a more deeper/turny sidecut with the Uninc that likes to carve harder. The Gold Member is much more forgiving through.
Do you recommend to wax and sharpen a YES board from the factory? Picked one of these up for the season and wondering if I need to get it tuned before heading out to the hill
Definitely wax any board you get. I would leave the edges unless you are very particular about how you like them sharpened. Most will be fine with what comes out of the factory. You could de-tune a little before the tip/tail if you plan to butter a lot but that would be about it.
Tough call. What make/model/size/year board do you ride now and how does it work for you? Or hit me here to give me the info I need to help you much better. shop.thegoodride.com/merchandise/gear-advice/
You might like the 156 a little better if you want more stability and a better board in pow or for turning. The 153 might work if you value control over everything.
Hey guys I love the reviews and have been watching for a while now! I was wondering if you would recommend the YES Standard or the YES Greats? I love carving down some big mountains and bombing hills but I also like hitting the park and side hits and just playing around on my board on the way down. Just wondering what you would recommend. Also I'm on the east coast if that matters. Thank you!!
I own both, thanks to the good ride. My humble opinion: Get the std uninc for what you are describing. I live in sweden with ice conditions... Greats will not bomb and be as damp as std uninc. Size correctly depending on your style. I mean size down for a more freestyle ride.
Thanks for your take ANETOKILLE and the good words Jason Bunk. I think if you are planning to see pow out west or with a good storm out east the Standard or Standard Uninc are going to be better. Especially if you have a full sized disc binding to use the set back inserts for easy directional float. Standard Uninc if you are ok with a board that is a little more locked in/technical and Standard if you want something more forgiving but less fun to carve. If you have a board already that's good in pow or just want a twin that can ride switch easier then go with the YES Greats. I don't know your specs though or anything else about you so hard to say though if these will be a fit. If you want real advice truly tailored to you hit me up here. shop.thegoodride.com/merchandise/gear-advice/
@@thegoodridesnow Thanks for the reply! I wish I could ride both these guys and figure it out myself hahaha. Gonna be a tough choice for me. Appreciate the help!
Depends. If you like to carve really hard and want to make sure you avoid toe/heel drag or ride steep terrain go 159. If you want something better for your weight and height go 156.
Hey guys, love the in depth reviews. I'll be buying a new board this season and this is high on my list. I am exactly Davey's size (only diff size 14 boots), and curious how the feel compares to traditional big guy boards, like the Magnum or the Skunk Ape? Also, I ride a wider stance than 21.5 and wondering if you shortened your normal stance because it's a wider, more stable platform? Thanks!
Thanks!. So the 162 Standard Uninc will be too narrow for 14's. You might want to go to with the 167 Standard instead. Skunk Ape could work too. If you want more detailed advice hit me up here as I need to know a lot more detail about you to help properly. shop.thegoodride.com/merchandise/gear-advice/
@@thegoodridesnow Thanks for the reply! The pro model actually has a wider platform so the uninc 162 is slightly wider than the standard 167. With my boot size I know a lot of board specs haha. I've accepted that unless I go custom I'm getting a bit of toe hang. You seem to like this sizing for your height and weight, which is good for me to know!
This isn't Davey. This is James but Davey did like the 162. I don't think he would though if he was size 14. Actually it looks like both 162's are wider on reference. I would probably rule out both then unless you are ok with toe/heel drag.
@@thegoodridesnow Thanks James, that's helpful. And yeah I kinda have to be ok with drag unless I find a board that's over 310mm at the inserts, which basically doesn't exist.
Hi I’m 5’10 240 lbs size 10 boot I wanted a stiffer flex and wide bc of my heavier weight. I have a power lifter build so I think I can handle the width well on the standard. I want to go 156W or 158 but weight specs say i should go 162. 158 was up to 210 bs and I’m intermediate what do you think I should do? I guess I could always cut weight to 210. Should I go 156W, 158, or 162? Uninc is new to me I don’t know the difference but I’m going to CO this month and I live on the east coast. Weight is my concern I don’t know why I have to go with a bigger board?
You mean Basic Uninc? I think the 156w would be the better call for you. the 156w feels like it can handle weight better than the 158. If you are talking Standard Uninc I'm not sure this is the best board for an intermediate and especially in a 162. It is not as forgiving as the Basic Uninc. When it comes down to weight vs. boot size it is often better to go with what best fits your boot size. If the board it too wide it is very hard to turn. If you want real advice hit me up here. shop.thegoodride.com/merchandise/gear-advice/
What would you say is too much over the recommended weight in between the 159 and 156. 159 would be better for my weight (210lbs) 156 for my boot size and height. I would be about 10-15lbs over the 156 recommended weight. Would I be sacrificing a lot of speed from downsizing to a 156 would speed be worse? Right now i ride a 158 yes typo.
What is your boot size and height? Boot size is most important when sizing a board and that is the determining factor of what board you should ride. Then weight. Then height but all three should be considered. Then you make compromises from there depending on boot size vs. weight vs. height.
156 will work well for you. That is the size I would go with if I were your specs. I would only go 159 if you like a bigger faster board but is a little harder to turn and the set back inserts might be a little wide for your stance width at 159.
I haven't ridden Bataleon's new bindings so hard to say. Looks like Rome built them because they are both owned by the same parent company. So if they have similar response to Rome and you sized the board correctly my guess is they should turn it fine.
Hey I am 176 cm 76 kg size 8 boots size what board should I choose ?? Or go for the shadowban 154 ?? I want one versatile board ride most time on piste little freestyle little on pow Please help
You would probably be best with a 153 Standard Uninc and you are in between sizes with the Shadowban. 154 shadowban will be better for buttering/playing around the mountain and 157 will be better in powder and better for turning, have more speed etc. What make, model and size board do you ride now and how do you like it? That might help me determine what you should go for size wise this time.
Hello of course great review as always Can you please guide me please by your experience i wear the same size boots as you, us 9 and my weight is 72 kilos I am a little confused should i go with the 153 or the 156 you think? I like the 56 most because i really don't like the very small boards, platforms fits me better, i am a taller guy, but the 25.8 waist of the board the riders scale weight confused me a little?
You are in between sizes. You might actually like the Basic Uninc 158 better as it better fit's your specs. If the Standard Uninc is calling to you might be best to go 153 for your boot size and weight.
Thanks for the review! Currently deciding between the Atlas or the Atlas Pro to go with this board, do you think the Atlas Pros are too much for this board?
Thanks for the reply! Ye I had a hunch they would be a bit overkill. Currently riding the Bataleon Astro Fullwrap on the Standard Uninc, but feeling like its not the best fit either. @@thegoodridesnow
I haven't ridden that so hard to say. Seems like it's in between the Rome Cleaver and DOD. You might like the full disc feel of the Atlas along with all that rubber on the bottom to stiffen up the flex of the Standard Uninc. I'd go Force or Force Classic though if you get a lot of air and like better shock absorption. They will still stiffen up the board but just not make it as damp as the Atlas.
Might be a bit late to ask this but how does this compare to the korua otto? I got the otto but am looking to get a twin park/freestyle board and this is what I found.. Any comments on these two boards?
Not at all. You know there is a lot of overlap between the two but they each have a very fun personality. The flex is softer and there is more early rise in the tail with the Standard. It also has a little more turny sidecut and feels closer to a true twin when riding centered. It still is very much all mountain so I wouldn't get this for a twin/park board. This is a direct competitor to the Otto. Instead take a look at the YES Greats, Dicey or Jackpot for a twin/asym twin park ride. That would compliment your Otto better. I would only consider the Standard Uninc if you want to ride pipe or hit big kickers.
It's not about me. It's about you. For a 1 board quiver I'd recommend the Standard Uninc 9 times out of 10. It's soo much better in powder when set back, has better girp in hard snow and rides switch better centered. If you have other boards for powder and don't see a lot of hard snow you might like the extra pop of the Custom. Hit me up here if you want me to know more about you and help you properly. shop.thegoodride.com/merchandise/gear-advice/
For an intermediate directional rider on the east coast, would you recommend a hybrid 153 or standard uninc 156? 10.5 boots. I own 157 hybrid and 156 old jackpot. Looking for stability and more maneuverability on bumps and intro to tight tree riding. Thanks guys
Not sure because you didn't include your weight and height but both should have quicker turn initiation than the 157 Hybrid. I think if you want the same but more turny go 153 Hybrid. If you want less of a tapered directional feel go 156 Standard Uninc but it will be in between the 157 Hybrid and 153 Hybrid for what you want.
Hard to help you based on the info I have about you. If you want legit advice hit me up here so I can learn a lot more about you. thegoodride.com/snowboard-binding-and-boot-advice/
Thanks! They are both great for different types of riders or riding moods. If you are all about powder and really directional groomer riding go PYL Uninc. If you want a one board quiver to ride centered on groomers and set back in pow or just don't like the tapered feel go Standard Uninc.
Review is coming but you trade dampness you get with the regular Atlas for a stiffer/more responsive base plate with the Atlas Pro. If you are ok with that then it's a great fit.
It fits his size 12's really well actually. This is a much wider ride than you would think by looking at the waist. Check the in depth review on the site. He is a little heavy for it but not by as much as you would think and he does prefer smaller rides for his size.
