YHM 5.56MM TURBO® Integral Suppression System - SHOT Show 2020 

Have you got yours yet?? Ordered my back in june

Bobby Alan ok, PSA is making a handgun that looks like a Glock and is completely compatible with Glock parts, and they’re making Ak’s. Nothing new or innovative there... And it’s my opinion sooooo, I can say the YEET cannon is the coolest thing. Doesn’t really matter.

Seriously. When I hear "optics ready" I think shitty $400 AR.

It's filler when their shit products don't actually have anything new or compelling to offer

That's like a car salesman saying, " All of our cars have wheels, just in case you want tires."

Might as well say, "Our guns are ready to shoot bullets!"

Jesus lovesb you too.

neither...I won't judge...

The $1500 price that he stated IS for just the upper.

@@bigd7861 ohh

Carl Reeves 10.5” if I remember the press release correctly.

Carl Reeves: It's quiet, not deadly. You want both, get a knife.

Doesn't matter. Use the $1500 to get a better bolt, a better barrel, a better can, AND a whole shit load of ammunition instead. 👍

Carl Reeves I agree with Big D. Get you a good 16” mid barrel for $200-250, pair it up with an AMTAC CQB-M, for about $750, then use the rest on ammo or optics.

Woodrow Call I have a few of those I was just curious how long the barrel was I already have a mk 18 clone as well it was just a question because the video didn’t specify. Thank y’all for your advice though.

@Eric @Eric @Eric I don't suspect it would be pickier about ammo than any other AR without an adjustable gas system. I got the impression that it's not adjustable. Other integrally suppressed ARs cycle fine with most ammo and don't have or need an adjustable gas system to fiddle with for different ammo. If you really like fiddling, then an integral may not be the way to go. A lot of the appeal is that it's all ready to go. In the best cases, it's better than a suppressor attached to a gun designed to be shot without one. But tinkerers who want to adjust the gas precisely and shoot the latest and greatest in silencer technology would probably be happier with detachable suppressors. Some of these integrals are worse at being suppressed rifles than some rifles with detachable suppressors mounted to them. Also, I'm so often disappointed by the numbers as I was with this video. Not quieter. Not better than competitors already on the market. Why bother. The manufacturer in this video didn't even bother to justify his product's existence because apparently he's bringing nothing to the table and his customers could do better than his product. YHM has been around a long time, but brand shouldn't be the selling point. Performance should be. There are other respected brands in the field. Like Daniel Defense, Gemtech, and Spike's Tactical. On reputation alone, I'd rather go with those companies. They've been making rifles like this for years and the positive reviews are in. Their high testing standards are well known. Confidence in their integrally suppressed guns has been established, so why try a new gun that doesn't do anything better from a company that doesn't have a better reputation? Why, why, why? Gemtech's Integra is a good example of an actually notable integrally suppressed AR, notable for what it is rather than who made it. They came up with a clever and different "bore evacuator" gas system for less gas coming out the ejection port, offered the quietest suppressed AR ever in it's chamberings at the time of release, built and tested it to be able to withstand realistic combat situations (it will hold up if you rapidly fire the hundreds of rounds of ammunition a combatant would carry into a firefight), and they sold the gun as an upper as well as a rifle. In other words, they had some real selling points that made them stand out, which is why I remember the name of that gun and have already forgotten what this YHM also-ran is called. The other companies I mentioned are also memorable since they also have reputations for high standards and their guns came to market early enough to be landmarks in the industry, back when guns like this were few, niche, and new. At this point, it would still be a big deal if Ruger came out with an average integrally suppressed AR, but not YHM. Kel-Tec came out with an integrally suppressed rifle this SHOT, their SUB2000 CQB. I like it better than the older, non-integral versions of the gun. It has features that make it more useful and attractive than a non-integral SUB2000. And Kel-Tec is a big enough company that it means something that they're getting into suppressors. As did Ruger already with a creative integrally suppressed 10/22 Takedown a few years ago (it had an "8"-shaped barrel reminiscent of an over/under shotgun). I love seeing widespread industry acceptance of silencers, integral or detachable. They deserve it and I look forward to the proliferation of both as it will be a boon for us shooters. Integral suppression clearly can be superior to rifles with detachable suppressors mounted, and offer exclusive features, but shooters are better off with a great detachable suppressor on a great AR than a mediocre integrally suppressed rifle.

you can't open an RC2 and the guys with their dicks in the dirt popping tangoes with them overseas don't seem to mind

AKlover Quietest AR I own is an 18” with an Amtac CQB. People just don’t love the long rifles anymore.

The entire point of this product is to make the OAL as short as possible without requiring a tax stamp for an SBR.

Yes, but only one, instead of a stamp for short barrel and another for the silencer.

I think he said 11.5"? Don't quote me.

10.5"

suppressors

The point of an integral suppressor is so that you don't have to have a pistol/SBR.

@@gebeme11 You're still running around with what is effectively a full length 16" barrel, and having a 12" integrally suppressed barrel would still make it a lot handier.

@@futuresonex yes, and also louder...

But it's a Glock mag, in what world is it not the best

It stopped being annoying 5 videos ago. It's moved straight into goofy nonsense now.

Lol. Wanna know how I know that you don't own any silencers?

@@chopinbloc Lay it on me, big daddy.

@@thetawind6908 guy who invented them named it a silencer.