Wolfcat Wildcat I'm usually fine with furries, but the **[action]** in asterisks or parentheses drives me over the edge! Like what the fuck do you accomplish by describing your actions? Nobody here gives two shits. Just say what you want to say and move on! Jeez.
Why the heck is this in my recommended tab all of a sudden? *_[EDIT 22.06.17]_* How the heck did this stick to the top comments, most of all as the first. _Oh well, let's take advantage of this and tell people to give an ear to what I create. (Jk)_
Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse, animal neglect or animal cruelty, is the infliction by omission (neglect) or by commission by humans of suffering or harm upon any non-human animal. More narrowly, it can be the causing of harm or suffering for specific achievement, such as killing animals for entertainment; cruelty to animals sometimes encompasses inflicting harm or suffering as an end in itself, defined as zoosadism. A malnourished horse eating at a veterinary clinic Chest X-ray of a cat that has been shot. White spots are shotgun pellets. Divergent approaches to laws concerning animal cruelty occur in different jurisdictions throughout the world. For example, some laws govern methods of killing animals for food, clothing, or other products, and other laws concern the keeping of animals for entertainment, education, research, or pets. There are a number of conceptual approaches to the issue of cruelty to animals. Some think that the animal welfare position holds that there is nothing inherently wrong with using animals for human purposes, such as food, clothing, entertainment, fun and research, but that it should be done in a way that minimizes unnecessary pain and suffering, sometimes referred to as "humane" treatment.[citation needed] Others have argued that the definition of 'unnecessary' varies widely and could include virtually all current use of animals. Utilitarian advocates argue from the position of costs and benefits and vary in their conclusions as to the allowable treatment of animals. Some utilitarians argue for a weaker approach which is closer to the animal welfare position, whereas others argue for a position that is similar to animal rights. Animal rights theorists criticize these positions, arguing that the words "unnecessary" and "humane" are subject to widely differing interpretations, and that animals have basic rights. They say that most animal use itself is unnecessary and a cause of suffering, so the only way to ensure protection for animals is to end their status as property and to ensure that they are never used as a substance or as a non-living thing. Contents Definition and viewpoints Edit Main articles: Animal welfare and Animal rights vte Worldwide laws regarding the formal recognition of nonhuman animal sentience and suffering National recognition of animal sentience Partial recognition of animal sentience1 National recognition of animal suffering Partial recognition of animal suffering2 No official recognition of animal sentience or suffering Unknown 1certain animals are excluded, only mental health is acknowledged, and/or the laws vary internally 2only includes domestic animals Throughout history, some individuals, like Leonardo da Vinci for example, who once purchased caged birds in order to set them free,[1][2] were concerned about cruelty to animals. His notebooks also record his anger with the fact that humans used their dominance to raise animals for slaughter.[3] According to contemporary philosopher Nigel Warburton, for most of human history the dominant view has been that animals are there for humans to do with as they see fit.[1] René Descartes believed that non-humans are automata - complex machines with no soul, mind, or reason.[4] In Cartesian dualism, consciousness was unique to human among all other animals and linked to physical matter by divine grace. However, close analysis shows that many human features such as complex sign usage, tool use, and self-consciousness can be found in some animals.[5] Charles Darwin, by presenting the theory of evolution, revolutionized the way that humans viewed their relationship with other species. Darwin believed that not only did human beings have a direct kinship with other animals, but the latter had social, mental and moral lives too. Later, in The Descent of Man (1871), he wrote: "There is no fundamental difference between man and the higher mammals in their mental faculties."[6] Modern philosophers and intellectuals, such as Peter Singer and Tom Regan, have argued that animals' ability to feel pain as humans do makes their well-being worthy of equal consideration.[7] There are many precursors of this train of thought. Jeremy Bentham, the founder of utilitarianism, famously wrote in his An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789):[8] "The question is not, can they reason nor can they talk? but, can they suffer?" These arguments have prompted some to suggest that animals' well-being should enter a social welfare function directly, not just indirectly via its effect only on human well-being.[9] Many countries have now formally recognized animal sentience and animal suffering, and have passed anti-cruelty legislation in response. Forms Edit Animal cruelty can be broken down into two main categories: active and passive. Passive cruelty is typified by cases of neglect, in which the cruelty is a lack of action rather than the action itself. Oftentimes passive animal cruelty is accidental, born of ignorance. In many cases of neglect in which an investigator believes that the cruelty occurred out of ignorance, the investigator may attempt to educate the pet owner, then revisit the situation. In more severe cases, exigent circumstances may require that the animal be removed for veterinary care.[10] Industrial animal farming Edit Main article: Intensive animal farming File:Killing - Harling Farm.webmPlay media Footage of a 'Quality Assured' pig farm in England File:East Anglian Pig Co. Exposed - Animal Equality Undercover Investigation.webmPlay media Cruelty in a pig farm. Egg laying hens in a crowded cage. A chicken egg production facility. Farm animals are generally produced in large, industrial facilities that house thousands of animals at high densities; these are sometimes called factory farms. The industrial nature of these facilities means that many routine procedures or animal husbandry practices impinge on the welfare of the animals and could be considered as cruelty, with Henry Stephen Salt claiming in 1899 that "it is impossible to transport and slaughter vast numbers of large and highly-sensitive animals in a really humane manner".[11] It has been suggested the number of animals hunted, kept as companions, used in laboratories, reared for the fur industry, raced, and used in zoos and circuses, is insignificant compared to farm animals, and therefore the "animal welfare issue" is numerically reducible to the "farm animal welfare issue".[12] Similarly, it has been suggested by campaign groups that chickens, cows, pigs, and other farm animals are among the most numerous animals subjected to cruelty. For example, because male chickens do not lay eggs, newly hatched males are culled using macerators or grinders.[13][14] Worldwide meat overconsumption is another factor that contributes to the miserable situation of farm animals.[15] Many undercover investigators have exposed the animal cruelty taking place inside the factory farming industry and there is evidence to show that consumers provided with accurate information about the process of meat productions and the abuse that accompanies it has led to changes in their attitudes.[16] The American Veterinary Medical Association accepts maceration subject to certain conditions, but recommends alternative methods of culling as more humane.[17][18] Egg-laying hens are then transferred to "battery cages" where they are kept in high densities. Matheny and Leahy attribute osteoporosis in hens to this caging method.[12] Broiler chickens suffer similar situations, in which they are fed steroids to grow at a super-fast speed, so fast that their bones, heart and lungs often cannot keep up. Broiler chickens under six weeks old suffer painful crippling due to fast growth rates, whilst one in a hundred of these very young birds dies of heart failure.[19] To reduce aggression in overcrowded conditions, shortly after birth piglets are castrated, their tails are amputated, and their teeth clipped.[5] Calves are sometimes raised in veal crates, which are small stalls that immobilize calves during their growth, reducing costs and preventing muscle development, making the resulting meat a pale color, preferred by consumers.[12] Animal cruelty such as soring, which is illegal, sometimes occurs on farms and ranches, as does lawful but cruel treatment such as livestock branding. Since Ag-gag laws prohibit video or photographic documentation of farm activities, these practices have been documented by secret photography taken by whistleblowers or undercover operatives from such organizations as Mercy for Animals and the Humane Society of the United States posing as employees. Agricultural organizations such as the American Farm Bureau Federation have successfully advocated for laws that tightly restrict secret photography or concealing information from farm employers.[20] in conclusion he did not get his salmon treat
Your FBI agent doesn't really pay any attention to you unless you look up things that raise a red flag. Like explosive compounds made from readily available over the counter items etc.
Usually it's NSA agent, but they go by complex algorithm used by evolving AI. Someday these things are going to get so good, they can predict our behaviors completely.
You're wrong in so many ways. They are not cat dogs. They aren't half cat half dog. They're a completely separate species from both of them entirely and can't be treated as either.
AnimusAeternus I hope you meant fox=/=cat because a fox is absolutely not a cat, should not be treated as a cat, and if you attempt to own a fox and treat it as a cat you will have a destroyed home and an unhappy animal.
Just put fire everywhere it sure got rid of my fox problem...and any other animal actually...and the shed...and my neighbours...I actually live in a box I'm writing this using wired potatoes (Couldn't have an exclamation mark as I ran out of potatoes)
Riot, Cavern Guardian is a rather tricky optional boss. You don't get any loot for beating him, either. His main pattern revolves around coming slightly out of his den, doing some swipes at you (that are easier to dodge-roll than most attacks) and making rubble fall around you to block your movement. After dealing enough damage, he moves onto the second phase, where he heads back into the den and the exit is blocked. At this point, you have to follow him inside, where he'll do a variety of tail swooshs (that *need* to be dodge-rolled) and more paw swipes, which now deal more damage. After his health bar is completely drained, he'll run past you, dig out the exit, and run away, letting you leave as well.
You clearly have no idea of how to look after a fox. They are very delicate animals and this one is very distressed. He is hiding under the shed because it is a reminder of the dream he had of one day opening up his own shed store and selling sheds to all the other animals.
@@raylenn4444 "so what if she is" shut yo stupid anime profile pic looking ass up, probably watch anime all day and dont take showers head assssss. Im on your ass nigga
I want to borrow from my favorite abridged series. Me: you can’t do that Fox: pretty sure I can Me: yeah but you shouldn’t Fox: you make a good point but I’m still going to based on the grounds that I want to
This video is faked. She didn't say, "Swiper no swiping" 3 times. Edit: I think my comment started a war...😶 Edit 2: Guys this war has lasted 6 months cmon now. Don't make me destroy what I created (this comment)
“You can’t tell a fox he can’t” Little do you know I am a fox. Therefore you cannot tell me that I cannot tell a fox he can’t, therefore he can. Hooray for fox loophole. I am going back under your shed now
The Fox I think you can buy quick cement that comes in a bucket you just add water and mix it with a long stick or anything really then pour it in the whole won’t be pretty but it won’t cost more then $35
Licitt excuse me I will have 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 foxes and arctic foxes HOW DARE YOU SAY I CANT HAVE THEM AS PETS
Plot twist: She had actually put the fox in the cage in order to see if he performs well under pressure as part of an FBI training program for bomb diffusing foxes. #StayWoke
I'm pretty sure every house in existence has those exact broken bricks. My parent's house sure had them, so did my grandparent's. I'm just waiting until they spontaneously appear in my apartment one day, then I can call myself a real man
OP has a fox as a pet. O.o OP is not happy fox dug a burrow under shed. Foxes dig burrows. Pet fox working as intended. Maybe if the shed was sitting proper on a poured concrete slab instead of the do it yourself brick ghetto foundation this would not be an issue.
Sant You cannot get a fox in a "pet shop" they are not, and shouldn't be domestic animals for people's entertainment. The only reason to have a pet Fox/Squirrel/hedgehog etc is if it has been rescued for some reason.
MsMilano actually foxes are close enough to dogs to be easily domesticated and often live longer in captivity. You can't keep them inside but if you have the right enclosure and food it is fine. In some places you have to have a license to own one. Keep in mind that a fox is very expensive and the enclosures and food will cost a small fortune (they can't eat dog food) always research before buying
Love how even before she gets the camera to the other place the foxes head is already looking out and each time before she even gets there the fox is always faster
FarZeroDark Animals have no concept of gender so they should be referred to their biological sex. Let's not start this. I probably bit the bait but oh well.
He spent a lot of time and effort to dig his way under that shed. Did you really think he was going to give it up immediately just because you said to?
