I been playing the vanikey version which is my favorite version. But i might go back to playing drytron with magician of black chaos max (turn skip) because i haven't done well with the new support. I also main feather storm always because in case you get hit with droll and you need to survive a turn with fucho.
OUUUH i feel you a lot on the card your playing. Drytron IS a huge combo deck. But the win con is easy to understand, Ruler + back on board, GG game 2. Nothing else is really needed indeed. But, i still don't agree with the 3 Nova. Yes the card is good. Yes the card give you access to a lot of ressource. But when you have it twice in your hand that sucks (same goes for any other drytron card) And when you already have commit most of your combo, having it in hand serve nothing... + it's searchable, and when you see how quickly a drytron can kill, you never use more that 2... If you do, you are already in the grind game with your opponent, and with a deck like drytron, that is, most of the time, a losing battle. Over Denko senka, you said that this card win you the game... I don't really get it to be fair, because denko don't let them set card, but he still let them direclty activate them if he don't set them... Meaning he can still goes pewpew with his huge amount of quickspell from hand... I get it for the stun part, but not for the control part... I understand the choose for access, and now get it more why you don't go over natasha in the main deck, since her insane power get in perfect sync with the borrelsword. I still think that when you beat the board of the opponent, but still havn't got anything on your own, natasha doing the cleaning job is the way... win me too many game.
Drytron Nova is the only 1 card starter in the deck, and I believe it’s a mandatory 3 in this deck. Denko sekka is usually way better going 2nd. I usually choose to go 2nd in the stun matchups because I side cards such as Denko and evenly matched. Natasha is definitely a lot better if you’re relying on your engine to break boards, but I play a lot of non engine cards, which usually mitigates my opponent’s ability to setup too much of an oppressive board, and the drytron engine can usually play very well into weaker boards and break them with ease with the big drytron rituals and Zeus.
@@Goku-zu3rk We need more. And I agree to it. But that does not mean that we need to increase the number of brick into the deck... Multiple drytron in hand are not useless, you can use them for reborn other or just at rituals material. Two drytron nova that you can search is useless in the hand. Even if we need more, don't forget that a correct hand in drytron only need two of them, so you can deal with up to 4 brick. Which is huge for a deck like this one that play already a lot of them. No need to had more...
@@b.gabriel7621 then just use Where Arf Thou? and Jack in the Hand and add Droll while you are at it. Then you have for searchers for your names each 2 times in your deck.
@@b.gabriel7621Then just use "Where Arf Thou?" and "Jack in the hand" and add droll or d.d. crow while you are at it. This will give you 4 different searchers for drytron names with "Where Arf Thou?" being not once per turn and being able to search for droll or crow to function as handtrap or to normal summon them to make Mu beta. You could run each of those at 2 and end up with 8 searcher if you wish to.
I was playing foolish at one point as an additional name, and my deck was 43 cards, but I felt like the deck was consistent enough with drawing names, and I didn’t feel the need to keep playing foolish. So I cut it to bring the deck size down so I can have a higher chance of drawing non engine. Foolish burial also loses very hard to bystials. Called by is good too, but I’d rather just play other non engine cards.
I played 7 rounds total. In Swiss I played against 1 voiceless voice, 1 purrely, 1 runick stun, 1 snake eye, and 1 tenpai, which was my only loss in Swiss. In the top 8, I played against Snake Eye, and in the top 4, I lost to the same tenpai player I lost to in Swiss.
The way I play the deck, I never need it in the main deck. I played tons of matches with it in my deck, and it hardly ever came up most of the time. It was a card I never wanted to draw and just would rather it be something else. It contributes to nothing I’m trying to do, it’s just a brick most of the time. However, if you really want to maindeck it, you can play my list and just go to 43 and play Natasha. I’d just rather have it on the side deck.
@SonFtw_ fair enough very understandable i just think shes really amazing going 2nd she helps with accesscode climb also and like u said helps with time also
I do think Natasha is better if you’re playing a strategy where you’re playing less non engine and mainly relying on your engine to break boards. Natasha definitely shines when it comes to breaking boards and going for OTKs. But in my version, since I’m playing a lot of non engine cards, I usually get into more grind games, so a lot of the time when I go 2nd, I usually try to break my opponent's board with the big drytron rituals or Zeus, and then I try to establish vanity’s ruler afterwards and try to take over the game from there.
