@@Scoubidou-if1of but it literally is, that’s why i said it was there’s no reason it can’t be all three things, even if very few people can manage that
Well, it isn't, some of Liszt's hardest pieces are practically unreachable to play in tempo (like 12 grand etudes or Beethoven symphonies transcriptions)
Unless you've seen the whole concert on medicitv or on stage-plus, , try not to make a hasty comment about this artist. The boomerang eventually comes back to yourself.
You should take down the video. The poor audio quality of this snippet only gives a wrong idea of the pianist’s whole performance. Read this comment section to see what I mean.
@@QuocBinh-us7lb u must be smoking Crack when u said it's a boring climax finale. It's one of the reasons why I fell in love with this Exhibition. Didn't care for others since I found it quite a boring piece. But I realized there's a whole drama with this work! And Yunchan was the one who opened my eyes and ears to the masterpiece. What a grande majestic Gate!
he rearranged the piece himself. Some parts were from Horowitz's score, some parts from the original, and some parts he added himself (like the glissandi in this video).
Of course it isn’t! He followed in the tradition of the great Horowitz, for which we should be thankful. There are other pianists who can play the original score. Yunchan brings his own fire and genius to it!
@@douglaskurz8578 Personally I'm not a fan of this approach. If you want additions, listen to the Ravel orchestration. The piano version should stay as Mussorgski wrote it.
@@karstensandleben3666it's not a piano competition... since the beginning pianists were used to improvise over any piece (read some Liszt facts, during the peak of this, not counting the ancient times)... It's all about personality!
He’s amazing AND there are a lot of wrong notes in the octaves. Maybe slow it down to gain more control. Even Horowitz hit plenty of wrong notes. It’s not a bad thing. I’d say it’s noticeable here.
I’m sure I’ll get hate for this. But I don’t like the sound he is producing, i guess it’s hard to tell due to the quality of the recording but he is pounding the piano. Technically astonishing but he doesn’t need to whack the piano so brutally.
@@UUpianoman everyone else judging it favorably seems to be viewed as judging it just fine based on this recording. It's only the criticism that is being discounted. It's an interesting double-standard.
@@georgealderson4424 It’s his way of making his own music. You might prefer others interpretations but don’t call his performance anything other than music. You’d be wrong
I don't disagree. I think the Baba Yaga was too much. I'm sure there are other movements in the larger work that he makes special, but this particular movement is not my cup of tea in his hands (at least in this video). Part of it could be the quality of the recording, but I don't think that's it. There are different levers to pull to make music exciting other than speed and volume. It's a careful balance.
@@user-mr3cz5vt6n nobody is forcing u to listen to this. If u don't like it, go listen to ur type of Exhibition. There are many ppl who were knocked out by this masterpiece performance. I'm one of them. Can't wait to listen to him Live playing this in few months!
하르트만의 그림은 아래에 닭발이 달린 시계 모양을 한 바바야가의 오두막을 묘사하고 있다.’ 바바야가는 러시아 민담에 자주 등장하는 마녀이다. 변덕스럽고 광포하면서도 익살스런 악상이 빗자루를 타고 이리저리 날아다니는 마녀의 모습을 묘사한다. 이 악장에서 단절없이 바로 ‘10곡 키이우의 대문'으로 이행된다. Wiki dictionary
@@paulvandenberg9588 of course I can, but criticism is supposed to be with arguments, not just sterile sentences based just on our taste like as if they were the absolute truth. Not interesting for u? Well just don't write anything and save time for u and us to read such sterile comments...
@@mattiadamiani9812 I gave you my argument but you didn't get it. And yes, music is based on taste and very little else. If you think that there are absolute truths in music, make them known.
Please wisely use your divine talent to create great scenes of musical pictures that audiences can easily enjoy and resonate with your music. Get your musical ideas from GIANT like Gilels and Richter to reach a higher level of artistry. Looking forward to your future success.
This is absolutely horrible. He can play much better than this. This is pure spectacle and clownery. These are not the paintings of Mussorgsky’s dear friend who died so young of an aneurism, this is sheer bombast at its worst.
He believes to be better than Mr. Mussorgsky in writing piano music maybe, so he decided to add a glissando... A good F1 top qualifying lap, but art is another thing
If you want to hear a perfect presentation of the piece, you’re better off training an AI. It will sound leagues better than anything any musician has ever played. But if you want to hear a musician’s music, you’re better off understanding that this is completely acceptable and has been for the last 300-400 years.
That's what interpretations are called. You certainly don't want to listen to cookie cutter works of the composition, bec it'd be quite boring to play by the textbook. Yunchan is quite known to add his personal touches in not just that piece, but mostly all the works he plays. For example, he added his personal interpretations in Rach 3 live concerts with the ossia. Horowitz added extra notes to the works, and I understand why Yunchan loves Horowitz so much.
@@dionysus4778 interpretation is quite different than add personal non requested notes, sorry. And if even... You need to be able to. That's not the case
@@alexmandelli3994 Music is a form of art, not science where 1 + 1 will always equal to 2. He's an artist, just like Horowitz. You just have to get used to these interpretations, bec that's what Yunchan is quite known for. If it's not your cup of tea, then don't listen to him. Nobody is forcing you. Simple as that.
@@dionysus4778 you don't need to teach me what art is for sure. There's a huge difference between interpretation and bad interpretation. Same between running on a keyboard and playing. That's it.
@@theclassicalarchive what does it matter? It's an art, not science where facts are facts, not like in art where freedom of expressions is what make it to be an art. Again, if u didn't like it, go listen to the ones u like. Nobody's twisting ur arm to listen to him.
이번 임윤찬의 연주를 뭐라고 표현해야 하나.. 순전히 주관적인 의견이지만 전람회의 그림을 알고 듣는 청중의 입장에서 임윤찬의 해석이 원곡의 느낌을 파괴한다는 느낌이 들 정도로 과도하다는 생각이 들고 무소르그스키 전람회의 그림을 너무 테크닉적으로 연주한다는 느낌이 들어서 전람회의 그림을 연주하는 게 아니라 리스트의 초절기교 에튀드를 연주하는 느낌이 드네ㅠㅠ 새로운 것, 신선한 것 또는 연주자 본인이 생각했을 때 재미있을 만한 것들을 너무 많이 시도한 것이 오히려 이질감을 들게 해서 이번 연주는 좀 거북한 느낌이 든다..ㅠㅠ
저두 이번 실황 갔었는데 비슷한 생각을 했었어요! 추후에 윤찬군 인터뷰 보니까 본인이 "해야 하는 연주"랑 "하고 싶은 연주"를 나누어 둔다고 하더라구요. 무소륵스키는 하고 싶은 연주라고 언급하기도 했고요. 그래서인지 이번에 1부 사계나 무언가는 오히려 너무 얌전한 느낌(해야만 하는 연주) 이었고, 반대로 2부 무소륵스키는 너무 브레이크를 풀어버린거 같긴했어요ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 키예프의 대문 포함해서 전체적으로 연주가 굉장히 묵직해서 푹 퍼져버린거 같은 느낌도 받았고.. 저도 전람회의 그림 너무 좋아하는 곡인데, 감동보다는 감탄? 신기해서 웃음이 나더라고요. 재밌기도 하고.. 정석적인 연주였으면 오히려 눈물이 났을텐데 말이죠ㅎㅎ..
그쵸. 청자의 주관적 해석이 있겠죠. 그런 의미에서 저도 주관적 해석을 하자면 차콥의 사계는 단순하더라도 원작의 시적 느낌을 살려야하는게 어려운거고, 전람회의그림은 죽은 친구의 그림 전시에서 느낀 상상력을 토대로 만든 곡이기때문에 후세의 피아니스트들이 연주하면서 창작의 창작이 얼마든지 가미될수 있는 종류의 음악이란 생각이 들어서 저는 놀랍던데요~
these japanese fellows are certainly amusing.What they lack in technique they certainly make up for in enthusiasm! Alas he needs to apply himself to practice more and work on his sound.Any damn fool can play loud with terrible tone.
