Agree, I like mixing with half on some run out but we can do 1/3. Anyway Ev regret is very small here. Be careful not falling into solver trap sizes where both option or an other lines capture close to the same amount of EV.
But with the 10% turn sizing IP (last hand) the hands OOP is meant to call are indifferent ( 0 EV)... So theoretically he could just pure fold them for no EV loss? How are you making extra EV against a 0 EV call?
No it's not how it works. It's 0 ev if he calls these hands at this frec. It's 0 ev if it's optimal against optimal. If you start over folding and under raising, then I can exploit that, and despite my opponent not calling/raising 0ev hands he will start loosing money, as they begin to print to call/raise against a 10% bet frec too high.
@@_MMWWMM_ it's impossible to say because we need to compare our EV on the average river run out . I will say this line is simply superior in EV by not a small margin
It's needed. I didn't succeed to put it and because i play these limits for educational purposes I dont really care. It's sub optimal not to have vpip pfr 3b limp number of hands
@@6mikros9 this is typical ego reg comment who only comments when they see a what seems a mistake to say you did X so you're Y. I usually don't answer this as this comment is mainly motivated by unkind behavior, going for the classic "you need to accept criticism" after . I have 0 ego in poker whatsoever , still going to answer, it's adding value to people. 1rst EV regrets is near 0 compared to only 1/3 strat. Yes I should have known low flush card didn't have half pot, I thought so. 2nd him raising flush is really good for me as he is probably going to under defend against river agression 3rd calling is a blunder simply because my perceive range is too strong. He is never raising less than flush (rare str8 can be there, barely have the odds) 4rd my range in perceive as an unknown player is simply too strong, and most people will never find the Qdx bluff region, I just can't call here, flush is here way too often, and I don't even have the odds against set and str8. On 4 to flush most people will not call enough small raise. In order to call here we have to over weight in his range bluffs (it's not gonna happens) over weight str8 and sets (might happen but not realistic) and under weight flush (he could just call but when they take this line is often flush I have 14% against and no implied). Pool range is different from the solv here
You playing 500z, of course some of the regs in the pool will find some bluffs here. I don’t know if specific opponent will tho….you are playing regularly high stakes online?
