So many wasted opportunities in this video. The assumed age of characters is not used in ai generation at all. In addition to that the absolutely most debated characters in both 2020 and 80's versions, the navigators,are not in this video even they are described in the books. This is interesting but could have been done a lot better.
Got to love the standard AI slop - Dorothy's cold, dead eyes. The cowardly lion being a literal lion. The tin man's axes bending like it's made from rubber. AI art truly is art.
honestly, i thought the producers got it dead on or if not, then pretty dang close to the book descriptions. Except Rosalie. Everything they did to alter the actress who plays Rosalie in effort to make her fit the role, just made it worse. Everyone else I though was bang on :)
First of all, the vampires are all way way too dark. That's like, the easiest part to do right. 😆 I remember reading the books and being obsessed with the idea of the movies coming out cuz I adored the books. And I also remember being incredibly disappointed in the actors cast for Edward and Jacob cuz they weren't at all as I had been picturing them to be for months as I read. I liked Alice and Carlisle the most, they looked the closest for me. And I initially thought Bella was really close to the book Bella until I watched her for about 2 minutes. Looks weren't bad though. 😆
This is terrible. "EXACTLY as described in the books?" Many of the descriptors used here are simply made up. Tolkien never tells us the color of Pippin's or Legolas' hair, for example. Nor does he ever say that Hobbits had huge feet. These are movie inventions.
Despite the fact that i never liked twilight movies, i just read thd book description for Edward... Pattison is the exactly opposite of the description x'D
