Astrophotography, Nature, and other science stuff.
Also check out my website. It goes a bit more in depth about Astrophotography and has some great info. It's also got a bit more about my other projects.
This is one of my big things too. Making GIFs with my Jupiter images with my 5" Maksutov. This next few years Saturn will be doing the same due to the ring plane being edge on. Got my gear all ready. All i need now is for you lot to send some of that hot weather over to us in England. Everybody please turn your air-con to the East. :)
Nice! It should be prime time for Eclipses and transits on Saturn during near edge-on too! And be careful what you wish for 😅. We're all burning up. The hurricane and cold front brought things down a little bit though.
Damn you had nobody there to help you? Hit me up next time I’ll definitely help you out and experience the eclipse with you. I went alone to Vermont it was amazing
You have telescope wobble, perhaps from wind blowing on the scope. This object is not wobbling The transit of Venus by NASA shows a nice dark circle with no wobble. Your object also shows a nice dark circle. Unless you triangulate them or use radar, you cannot tell the height of any object or cloud. Any people stating otherwise are only guessing unless the object passes in front of a distant building or tree. You have a nice transit of a balloon across the sun, taken with your wobbly telescope. Good work and nice presentation
Could you maybe take pictures of more distant galaxies? Or is it at least possible. Im thinking about getting this telescope and a dslr to do some decent DSO galaxy astrophotography.. this is a great video, i was so happy to watch it. Thanks
You can, but smaller/more distant is harder. Realistically, you'd probably want an Equatorial mount if you are going deeper. Typically the more magnification your using in DSO Imaging, the more expensive things tend to be. If your interested in automated telescopes, the seestar seems able to get similar results with way less effort
Would you reconsider planet. Would you agree everything that exists in wavelength.... Would you consider there are frequencies we cannot perceive such as octaves we cannot hear and light waves we cannot see. If all matter exist in frequency then it is more likely than not there is an innermost planetoid that with the additional mass of the most recent plasma ejections from the sun this innermost planetoid is gaining enough energy to begin phasing into the sphere of visible and audible frequencies that we can perceive. The evidence for it exist right in your explanation of why it cannot. It is accounted for mathematically, it obeys conservation of energy, it expresses electrical attraction and accounts for mass and gravity. It also fits with expansion theory. I'm also a stone mason so if my philosophical physics are wrong or I am mistaken on names or principals then please don't be relentless in criticism. It's just a thought experiment to consider. I'm not saying I'm correct.
I think we fundamentally disagree on a few things which is leading to the different analysis. I do not agree that everything exists in wavelength. All Radiation does, but not matter (unless your referring to the Wavefunction, but that's different from wavelength). There is certainly radiation that our eyes can not see, but we have sensors that can work WAY further into the IR and UV parts of the spectrum. There would technically be parts that even our equipment can not measure, like a radio signal with a wavelength of billions of miles, but our equipment is damn good. And even so, objects tend to emit broad signals and evidence in multiple ways. On the subject of an inner planet, it would have to be HUGE to correspond to my observation. And a huge planet would have gravitational impacts on Mercury which we do not see. The position of Mercury matches predictions made by Einstein's theory of relativity. That matching was actually one of the experiments that played a huge role in validating the relativity model. So it doesn't align mathematically with the observation. (Unless it has only JUST RECENTLY happened, in which case we will see Mercury acting strange in the near future). But I think it's a much more reasonable explanation to think that my observation is not special, especially since there were probably others filming at the same time who would've also seen it if it was not a local object (i.e. Balloon or Satellite to a lesser degree.) It sounds like you have have bought into the electrical universe theory, which I don't find very credible. There are better people to explain why the model fails in certain areas. I would encourage you to dig into some of the holes in the electrical model. So we disagree, but all and all I wish you the best.
Yes! I saw it and immediately went back to check my footage for something similar lol. Couldn't find anything obvious though. His film camera multi-exposure was awesome!!!
Thanks Kyle! I've done a few planetary animations and I literally have you up on one half of the screen throughout the whole process. Pause, play, pause, play as you guide me through it. This video is sooooo helpful!
Oh tiny world! I was actually just watching your ISS video the other day. Keep it up! And thank you very much for the super and glad your finding the video helpful!
Not if the media is told not to tell us so we dont panic knowing certain annihilation is hurtling toward us. Nowadays with internet itd be much more difficult to hide from us
The scary, uneasy feeling you mentioned about totality is real. I remember the uneasy feeling in my stomach in totality in 2017 and hoping the sun would return. Even this April 2024 eclipse I felt similar overwhelming emotions of excitement, awe, and a little bit of anxiousness. The darkness fell much faster this time compared to 2017 probably because I was further from longest duration in Vermont (vs Texas where I was originally going to be) where the shadow was moving 2 times faster. AMAZING EXPERIENCE! And I'm thankful for people like you that photograph the eclipse so I am free to live in the moment.
