The Sustainability Council is an academic leadership unit that works with all faculties to spark learning, discovery and citizenship for sustainability.
With sustainability in your studies, you're ready to help shape a better world. Join a growing community of educators, researchers and changemakers who are making the world greener, resilient, inclusive and more just.
Great adventure. Except i think this was illegal in EU... Every motorized vehicle must be registered and insured. This is not bicycle anymore. And you could not register this neither as bike (it is not anymore), neither as moped as it is not factory made like this, without expensive and complicated analysis and expert testing report that it is safe for the streets. Thing is - i built just like yours a week ago for very rural gravel roads and would like to make it street legal. And that is as much info as i gathered so far
Hello, I am a regular viewer of your RU-vid Channel. Your content is really amazing, but your channel has an SEO problem so, you are not getting more views, likes, comments
There's a realm In the virtual world So much pain in there But so much inspiring If we design, can A better version With all the best features So much pain from nature So much inspiring
Irony? Stephanie is one of the richest Economist from United States. According to our analysis, Wikipedia, Forbes & Business Insider, Stephanie Kelton's net worth $5 Million. (Last Update: January 13, 2024) Ms. Kelton has pockets loaded with capitalist dollars while she champions socialism for profit. Socialism is a political and economic system wherein property and resources are owned in common or by the state. MMT is socialism with a fresh coat of paint. We are players in an international finance game board and there are dire consequences to printing.
...the other way around .... no one can 'afford' 20 nations (mostly the usa/eu) out of 200 abusing, over consuming 80% of the world's resources, air, water, soil, food, energy, plastics, suvs, private jets, ocean cruisers, timber, metals, oil, anything ....
@bernardwatts5339 ...don't lie to yourself ... 1 ton of imported steel uses 100-200 tons of water from the country it is imported from ...similar numbers for everything else ... you should check on your crass ignorance, racism & hatred ...hate kills, inside & out ...
The Science Meets Design series had a really cool episode about this recently: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DGRmng1KZMA.htmlsi=ZFZuFPyaVBkiADGX
Hi Sayem and Sadat -- thank you for developing this podcast! Your discussion of different approaches to construct new buildings was interesting, but also raised a few questions for me. For example, you seem to take the position that automation of construction (e.g., through 3D printing) could bring cost-savings through a reduction of the labour force. This may be true, but does raise the question of whether such practices wold be socially sustainable. Similarly, you mention that mass timber construction can have environmental implications due to the harvesting of trees for fibre; this is also true, but ignores the idea that trees are a renewable resource (i.e., they grow back), and that wood products (like dimensional lumber and mass timber products, like laminated wood) store carbon for as long as the buildings stand. These are two important benefits of wood construction that could be considered. Thank you for the thoughtful discussion -- you definitely got me thinking!
Thank you Howie for providing the support and guidance we needed from the conceptualization phase to the completion of this project. Sayem and I had the privilege of learning about real estate through the lens of sustainability in a way that was unique when compared to our usual classroom structure at university. I would agree that there is definitely a question raised when it comes to social sustainability as 3D-printed construction becomes more prevalent. I would say our hope for the future is that the labour force is generally able to pivot to needs in the market as growing technology will always cause shifts in any industry. I also appreciate your mention of how trees are a renewable resource that stores carbon, a point that would have aided our discussion and goes to further support growth of mass timber!
There is NO Currency 'ISSUER'. The idea is just misleading garbage based on a very poor understanding of the situation. (maybe there have been in history but they are following the President Idi Amin Dada 1970's idea that ruined the whole economy of Uganda) Government does Not issue currency because it only borrows currency from the reserve bank (Federal Reserve in the US). The real explanations are found on the sites like those of the Bank of England and those of the Parliament of Canada who explain what happens with money creation being the private banks creating most money and the reserve banks creating mush less.
Max Planck was right. New ideas generally take hold only after the folks clinging to the old ones finally pass away. Neo-liberalism not only failed to deliver on its promises (Market stability, 'all ships rising', etc.) but it brought catastrophe to the global economy. Yet Washington just won't let it go. I think you all have the right approach. Talk directly to the electorate.
No - you are wrong. Where is the basis for comparison in your idea that neo liberalism failed? Failed in comparison to what? It is clear you don't know what happened in the GFC if you think capitalism or neo liberalism failed more than any other system.
@@jones1351 Exactly where I should have been very skeptical of what policies were being put forward with a resultant string of deficit budgets which were eventually going to result in something bad. I was unaware of the earlier decisions of the earlier administration's actions which had brought into existence sub prime loans which never would and should have existed.
@@Rob-fx2dw Those 'policies...being put forward with a resultant...blah, blah, blah' were put forward by - wait for it - Neo-Liberals. They deregulated the banks. They entered into NAFTA and other 'free trade' agreements which decimated the working class. They blocked and then exiled Brooksley Born for daring to do her job. I.e., calling for Wall Street's 'exotic financial instruments' to be more transparent. Instruments which went on to crash the global economy. All that, and more, happened on Neo-liberalism's watch. As for deficit budgets, what are they? The difference between what the U.S. government spends (creates) into the economy minus what it takes out (taxes, bonds). It's actually the amount of money that Uncle Sugar LEAVES in the economy. As Prof. Kelton points out. U.S. govt. deficit = private sector surplus. I remember Thatcher saying there is no public money, only private money. Oh really, Maggie? What happens when someone in the private sector decides to print their own money? They spend the next 20 years afraid to pick up the soap. Every dollar in existence got its start in the U.S. government and her agents. The KEY is productive capacity. That's the true Wealth of Nations.
@@jones1351 First point :- You say " They deregulated the banks.". Are you making a case that deregulation caused the sub prime crisis and GFC? Why did it not happen in other countries if deregulation caused the sub prime crisis and GFC ?. Second point:- If NAFTA decimated the working class how did that happen worldwide i.e. the GFC is the Global Financial Crisis when it made an increase in jobs in those other countries outside of USA? Third point:- you say "As Prof. Kelton points out. U.S. govt. deficit = private sector surplus.". so what if he says so. he can't supply any independent evidence that his sectoral balance theory is valid. His only justification is that he said himself in his Minsky explanation which shows the introversion of the whole idea:- a theory based on an idea he concocted himself. . Fourth point: you say " Every dollar in existence got its start in the U.S. government and her agents. " Who are the agents? They are Not the private banks because the private banks are not agents in any real or legal sense at all. Agents are independent entities who do not create the goods or services that the sellers or buyers supply or receive. The evidence of their operations is they create money at their own will according to their own risk criteria and make profits from it or losses. They don't get from anyone else including the Federal Reserve or government itself. The government does not supply them any money to lend. The private banks are not entities who facilitate transactions between two different participants but they are actual creators of the service they provide- creating and lending money and getting the money paid back with interest for doing so. It seems you are frightfully ignorant of the role of agents in the economy and ignorant of the money creation process but have swallowed the misleading information of MMT pushers because of this.
We needed a lot more saves in the Dead BBB, than just Climate!!! Millions of us were Counting on All the Deeply Needed Social Safety Nets that were in there, and the Updating of Antiquated Eligibility CAPS, Etc., that were ALL, Completely GUTTED From it, the Most Important Parts...What a Screw You to the Struggling American People!!! Now, they want our #VOTES! Jeez! And what's worse is, on the other "side," #RepubliCONS, it would be even worse. PRIVATIZATION, AUSTERITY, Trickle Down...DON'T Work!!! And, #DemRepubs...#PaidToLOSE???!!! Hmmm!!!