I wonder how many matches this 3-G trigger has won and how many competitive shooters are running this every day? Maybe your next video content subject? I too love the SSP’s and SSA’s but the 3-G is a go fast yum yum!!!
Official Army report on Gen 3 Pmag static1.squarespace.com/static/597679b68419c2bc1f2f8ef1/t/5983944f414fb5bec61d2711/1501795423281/Tech+Report+ARWSE-TR-12012%2C+redacted.pdf
I'll take the Lancers that are solid black (not the translucent ones like you have) every day of the week. I have, and use, both, but prefer the Lancers ... especially when they go on sale. As far as military testing, well, explain your logic to the Sig M17/18 vs Glock people and see what happens.
I never shoot mine without the stock fully extended anyway, so I put my favorite stock on it the B5 systems Bravo. I use a Sig Romeo 5 for a red dot it's not long at all and works great, I also always put Ergo low profile rail covers on all my unused picatinny rails so no way they can get buggered up.
Winning a military contract doesn’t mean it’s the best. It means they are “good enough”. Are PMAGs the best? They might be, and they might not be. But a military contract doesn’t automatically mean they’re the best. Similar to mil-spec ARs. Just because a BCG is mil-spec, doesn’t mean it’s the best. It means it’s “good enough”. There are BCGs out there that aren’t mil spec but are much better quality than mil-spec. And don’t even get me started on the Glock vs Sig thing. We all know that if military contracts meant they were getting the best product, they would have chosen the 19x. 🤷♂️
@@FloridaMan762what metric is used to say something is milspec? Milspec means something is designed a certain way, made of certain materials, and tested a certain way. If a BCG undergoes more refined testing and made of better materials, it could be better than milspec.
What is the point of that? It doesn't cycle the next round any faster. You got an extra round in the gun, that's all, while introducing a possible malfunction