On my channel I am testing different computer hardware and software.
When you click on links from video description or community posts and make a purchase, this can result in me earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network and AliExpress Partner Program.
Is it possible to order the modified case you have somewhere? What are the dimensions of your modded case? Can you recommend any other cases for SFF builds? Preferably on Aliexpress... What's the smallest you can go with X99 and what about decent X99 mini ITX motherboards? In Thailand the cheapest and smallest SFF case for a budget Machinist or Zsus (PR9/D4) goes for about $19 (623 baht) and is 360*160*285 and will fit both a mATX MB and PSU. Similar dimensions as the Metalfish S5 Max or ZZAW B3.
If it's so cheap in Thailand then why do you need something else from AliExpress? There are no X99 mITX boards, only some rare expensive branded options or the pathetic X99i-Server.
Hi, I just installed windows 10 but somehow it is so laggy and cpu always in 30-50% after using and it says system consumes it. This is my specs: 2x Intel xeon e5 2680 v4 14 cores 2.4hz X99-F8D dual cpu motherboard Zotac Gtx 1070 mini 8gb SSD NVMe 512gb samsung 128gb DDR4 750w PSU Updated intel drivers and tried everything on the internet. Im so tired of being with it for a week. Please suggest anything if you know . Thank you
These must be coming down relative to your local currency? I believe we had chatted about them in the comments early in the year and you said they were still quite expensive where you are. I love my Skylake xeons in my server (2x 6138) and the cascade lake one in my gaming machine (W-3235). Definitely not as strong as brand new chips obviously, and single thread performance is a bit less than the consumer chips of the same generation. There are 2 things that keep me working with xeons, having more PCIE lanes, and the raw stability, for this I can sacrifice some performance that I don't feel is an issue with even a 3080.
No, the prices are still unreasonably high, especially for the motherboards but I got bored with LGA 2011-3 and decided to spend (waste) the money and buy an LGA 3647 set.
Sir, why not test the Xeon’s for what they are designed for, mainly computational scientific analysis and compiling. Also, I can tell you that with a slight overclock of the Socket 2066, Intel I9-7980xe. 9980xe and 10989xe high core count processor (18), you can easily achieve 26000 in CB23. That is even more than the Xeon W 3265M. Granted the i9-10980xe is still high in the used market, I have seen the 7980xe for under 300usd. Motherboards (Socket2066) are also to be had around 300usd. FWIW, I work in geophysics, and contemplated upgrading my system to Socket3647 with the Xeon W-3200 series, however the numbers do not justify such an expensive system. And the Ice Lake Xeon W-3300 on the 4289 Socket is exponentially more expensive than the 3647 Socket systems. Testing in games does not make sense. At least with CB23 and 24 benchmarks take advantage of the AVX512 features that no consumer processor has. FWIW
Cinebench, Geekbench, Blender are hardly gaming benchmarks. I tested a bit of both worlds. AM5 Ryzen CPUs support AVX512 and the price is very comparable to LGA 2066 while AM5 is much newer and much more energy efficient.
Because Intel decided to increase the L1/L2 cache capacity that is unique per CPU and that is good for lots of small isolated tasks running in parallel, for example web-hosting.
To reduce manufacturing costs and fit more cores into the same area. Most server workloads don't benefit much from the extra L3 cache (some do, hence the release of AMD's EPYC X3D CPUs, but the majority don't), compared to putting the area saved towards adding extra cores. As Miyconst says, server workloads usually benefit more from slightly larger L1 and L2 caches than from much larger L3 caches, and adding a few KB to L1 takes up much less area than a few MB of L3.
Because Intel decided to increase the L1/L2 cache capacity that is unique per CPU and that is good for lots of small isolated tasks running in parallel, for example web-hosting.
@@Miyconst oh ok that weird man i was going to use these for crypto mining but u need more l3 cache then what comes with this cpu thats y ive been mining on a dual x99 mother board
To reduce manufacturing costs and fit more cores into the same area. Most server workloads don't benefit much from the extra L3 cache (some do, hence the release of AMD's EPYC X3D CPUs, but the majority don't), compared to putting the area saved towards adding extra cores. As Miyconst says, server workloads usually benefit more from slightly larger L1 and L2 caches than from much larger L3 caches, and adding a few KB to L1 takes up much less area than a few MB of L3.
These CPU for gaming, but gaming doesnt look bad at all on it. Plenty FPS to enjoy games on a side. While having all performance for work and productuvity and multitasking, just one problem they still hold price quite high once it drops to cheap price it will be nice optiom, but finind motherboard for good price can be challanging
1650v3 are still the most fun to tinker with due to their overclocking ability. Maybe someone will get lucky and find a golden silicon chip that hits 5ghz with all 6 cores lol
I'd probably go with the e5-2687w v4 due to it having 12 cores and 30MB of L3 cashe plus i already have a 2687w v3, so it would interesting to compare the performance and gaming abilities between the v3 and v4 since the v3 in on 22nm and the v4 is the first line of 14nm cpu's to hit the market
hi sir! this pr8 work with 3 ram sticks? or with only 4? i have 2x8 and i got another 8gb ram but the system doesn’t work when i put the 3 sticks…. i was thinking about got another one stick and will be 4 sticks, using full 4 slots! all my 3 8gb sticks are absolutely the same type! it will work?
E5-2690 v4 or 2680 v4, base clock speed a little more on the 2690. Both have 14 cores 28 threads. I have both and can verify that 2690 real workload improvement is barely perceptible. 2.6 GHz vs 2.4Ghz base and 3.5Ghz vs 3.3Ghz turbo. 135watts vs 120watts.
@@MiyconstThis particular CPU is waiting for me to find a bit of time to complete another Xeon setup (for gaming mostly). I'll be very intrested in your assessment of E5-2643 V4.
Hey!!! I just bios modded my T5810 thanks to your guides!!! Thank you so much! Mine has a E5 - 2698 V3, that 3.6 boost speed is awesome, but man, it hits that 135 watts fast, even with your undervolt. Fun fact, you can overclock these with throttlestop using the E5 16XX V3 CPU's!
@Miyconst I know, since you mentioned the E5 1650 in this video, thats what made me put the notion out there. That being said the E5 1650 V3 that came in my dell is the worst overclocking X99 processor Ive seen in my life. It couldn't do 4.3 no matter what. 1.4 volts on an EVGA X99 Classified couldn't get it to boot to windows at 4.3, major silicon lottery loser. Going to see if I can add Rebar to my T5810 bios with your other guide, not that it needs it, just want to see if I can do it.
between just the ones you showed i think i would either choose the 2667 v4 (i even use one in my gaming pc), or the 2687w v4, but i think the best one would have to be the 2690 v4 because when gaming it basically stays at 3.2 ghz just like the 2687w v4 but has 2 more cores... 2689 v4 in paper is a monster but in one of your comparisson videos it had mediocre performance... maybe the one you have is the engineering sample version? if it doesn't show it's full name on cpu-z on the top name bar, it uses a worse memory controller and will perform bad. the original ones on aliexpress are too expensive tho so i think it's not worth it.
well, the 1650 v4 is a 6/12 cpu that stays at 3.8 ghz basically all the time when playing games, but it still loses 9 times out of 10 to the 2680 v4 which is a 14/28 cpu with 2.9 ghz when gaming. i'd say it's bacause it has more cache but maybe more cores do help in some way. idk, it's an interesting topic tho.
