جايك جايك يا هوكو موكو و ماروكو و ناروتو و غراندايزر و سبيد ليزر و جونغر و ساسوكي ساااا🎵سوووو🎵كي آآخلادارملتكم😜🤪😜🤪🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😭😭نااااا🎵هرد باباها غير نغسموها بالسيارات ناحي من رأسك آآ🎵ساعدي فارحي بابنتي لعزيزة زينااا🎵 تاعي ماروكي شركات🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️
If this is real, costs about as much as a top end RR this could mean something really important for technology development in the future, nuclear is the key people we need to start seeing that
No! Germany did not! Frank Whittle's UK patent of 1930/31 predated that of Hans von Ohain by several years. Whittle's patent was published and distributed to both industry and technical institutions in Germany by the Patent Office in Berlin in 1931, and it is quite possible, therefore, that von Ohain may have seen it. In any case, a Belgian by the name of Maxime Guillaume was granted a French patent for a crude form of axial flow jet engine in 1921. Heinkel's He178 first flew for six minutes with von Ohain's engine in August 1939. It was certainly the first true jet aircraft to fly, but the engine could only be run for a few minutes at a time: it certainly wasn't airworthy by British standards. Frank Whittle's W.1 engine, in the Gloster E.28/39, did not fly until May 1941: however it was airworthy and, after an uneventful first flight of seventeen minutes, the aircraft was put into its hangar with no attention given to the engine. The W.1 was very conservatively cleared for 10 hours of flight, which it comfortably achieved and, on inspection, the one small defect observed was a small crack in a combustion chamber. Having been replaced with the improved W.1A, engine, the W.1 went on to do many more hours of ground running, before suffering a turbine failure. The engine is still to be seen in the Science Museum in London. You may be interested to know that, in 1944, the Jumo 004B in the Me262 had efficiency, performance and fuel consumption figures that were inferior to those of the W.1 in 1941. The handling of the 004B was also abysmal: any rapid movement of the throttle could induce a surge and flameout. At the end of the war, the British centrifugal engines were significantly superior, in terms of both performance and reliability, to any axial flow engines in existence at the time. It took until the end of the 1940s for axial flow engines to supplant centrifugal engines. Even then the Klimov VK-1, a reverse-engineered Rolls-Royce Nene, which powered the MiG-15, was competitive with the axial flow GE J-47, which powered the F-86 Sabre. The VK-1 was marginally less efficient, with slightly less thrust, but was significantly lighter than the J-47. The Sabre was a better fighter plane than the MiG because it was superior aerodynamically, not because it had a better engine.
Great news, however should have been funded by the uk government with no american or qatar involvement or other foreign actors. British owned, British built. Be more like Australia
More small reactors rather than fewer large ones will just create more terrorist targets. Please use actual engineering units to describe area, not the size of a football pitch which is pretty meaningless to those of us who have no interest whatsoever in football.
Now that most 4 engine jets are gone from passenger service, I carefully plan air travel to fly Airbus planes with Rolls Royce engines when at all possible. I have no doubt they are the crown jewel of quality & precision
