Magic the Gathering decks, reviews and product openings! The official channel for MTGGoldfish. Visit us at www.mtggoldfish.com.
Upload schedule for Major Series: Sunday: Meme or Dream? Monday: Budget Magic, MTGGoldfish Podcast Tuesday: Arena Series with Crim Wednesday: Against the Odds Thursday: Arena Series with Crim Friday: Much Abrew About Nothing Saturday: Arena Series with Crim
For ubiquitous, simple cards, perfect. Lightning not? 3 damage to anything. BOOM. Easy. Everyone knows it. Cards like questing beast? No. I don't even know what the thing does when it's *on* the battlefield, let alone textiles.
Been playing since Battle for Zendikar. Only one I remember seeing is lightning bolt. Only one I have I got recently: lightning bolt. And Elesh Norn phyrexian text. I'm fine with them, especially if well known cards like Cyclonic Rift, blasphemous act, or Doubling Season: wouldn't even need to look them up. Others like Jaxis I only heard about last week. I do not remember what it does, it'd take a minute to explain, and I wouldn't want to have to look it up to know or tell someone what it does. So I say it works on popular cards. And simple cards. Not so much on others.
Doesn't matter rules are the only thing to follow making up your own little rules and deals mean nothing. Player B learned a lesson but really in the end if he had not agreed the same result would of happened
Why is unsportsmanlike behavior not a disqualification reason? The guy should habe just disqualified and officially warned that if it happens again he will be banned from participating.... In any other sport, this type of behavior will get you disqualified...
I know Ulamog seems like such a big really good creature to put, but I just feel like something could be put at this place. Not sure what, but it felt dead a lot of the time except maybe the last game ?
The best quotes that explains timeless, 8:51 "Am i safe to go outside without a leyline?" & 9:02 "This is what happens when you go outside without a leyline!"
if at REL .. i think any player who chooses play a "functionally text less" card is MANDATED to have a Moxfield page link (or similar) ready to provide to their opponent & we should institute some type of "chess clock" that is A.I. driven to track APNAP (like on Arena) and the "functionally text less" player is docked like .. 5[min] or something to account for all the extra reading their opponent is now stuck enduring
All agreements should be made with two or more judges present to validate the agreement to prevent events like this from happening. The second a player offers an agreement a judge should be called, and that judge should be the determining factor in how the aggrement should go forth.
Ah yes, the combo of drawing a playset of a card in your opening hand whilst your opponent needs to keep a 7 with a fetch and use it on their turn one...
I've been using this deck for a little while, too, and I found that white works as a much better splash than red because of Homestead Courage, which flashes back in case you don't draw another targeting card.
Scummy. I do not play with people who break deals. You get one chance at my table, I catch you breaking an agreement, you're done. You will not be invited back.
I do think that reminding your opponent of their triggers is good sportsmanship. HOWEVER, it isn't a necessity or should be considered cheating. As a matter of fact, I do the same thing as kibler all the time. I play around the board state of my opponent. I still don't understand how people could consider that cheating.
