Think about scalar EM waves Lori. A straight line pulse proturbation must reflect the transvers spacial sine-wave. It's the "non-spacial" conjugate. Dan Winterr says, that if you have magnetic or electric of opposite phase, they collapse perfectly and become non-spacial scalar energy information. Imagine energy on a mathematical line, that is expressed as longitudinal pulse, along the line, as a standing-wave, going back and forth along the line, physically quasi not manifested. It can change to a spacial since wave, that is when permanent, an EM-pulse oscillations standing-wave. The energy, saved in a non-spacial line containing a pulse-proturbation could also be seen as a flat surface, which is still spacially unmanifested, but only from a specific point of view. I think this is the blochwall of a permanent magnet. This is the "line", or "flat surface". I don't know which one will fit better if you'll try to model it. The "pulsing-line" is the permanent electrostatic-potential, the transverse EM pulse-oscillation the permanent magnetic. Change from one into the other occurs through electric charge/discharge. Just some thoughts ;) Maybe it inspires.
As soon as I saw those points swapping, I made the connection to vacuity and density waves, swapping, continually in this case. Very cool. As well as the correlation to his model. I don't think I agree with all the nuance of his work, but I've been looking at it and it's quite good. Anyway. Don't mind me. Just providing engagement and playing the role of an obsever.
3:14 Pretty unrelated overall but I found it interesting that the pyramid of giza's dimensions (440x280 cubits) encodes 11/7 ie 1/2 of 22/7 which is an approximation of pi (giving 3.142). So it's one phase of a wave, half a cycle / circle... makes me think of an oscillator or transducer for some sort of macroscale clock function. Its dimensions specify the wavelength (230.33 meters, 1301.578 KHz), maybe a relevant field geometry and orientation relative to the stars as well.
@Poison_Prophet It is. The word "LAMB" also encodes the output of 22/7. L = 12 = 1+2 = 3 A = 1 M = 13 = 1+3 = 4 B = 2 3.142 "Lamb of God" "Followers of the Lamb" Etc.
@Poison_Prophet By "it is" I was agreeing that it was interesting. They also tell us that the radius of the moon is 1080 miles, for a diameter of 2160 miles (the sum of angles on a cube), drop the 0 it's 216, the 6th cube number. And that Earth's orbital speed is 66,616 mph. Etc. Yes, I'm aware that numbers can be nudged and or fabricated.
You ought to look up Chantal Roth's quaternion quantum mechanics page, she has done a lot of work on this and has much more nuanced simulations. The problem with your representation is that its not chiral :) your electron and positron are the same thing. Electron spin is a unit quaternion, which is a bivector (or symmetric 2-tensor), which is a rotor. Rotors are inherently left or right handed.
@@FunkyDexter my quaternions are counterclockwise for the standard quaternion and clockwise for the conjugate quaternion. If electron is counterclockwise, then positron is the clockwise conjugate of the electron.
@@FractalWomanThere is more to it than just sense of rotation, because that can easily change by looking at your simulation from another perspective. As it appears in the video, the wave can be transformed smoothly into its conjugate by a rotation. You need to think not only in terms of bivectors, but In 3D volume elements (a trivector).
@10:46 this animation looks like the pendulum wave effect. "This entire electric process is completely demonstrated on just one cycle of the electric current. One cycle is the centripetal journey of a pair of divided units from their zero cathode to its multiplied amplitude, where pairs are united, and the return centrifugal journey to their cathode for rest. That is all there is to the creative process. That process is the same whether in microcosmic or macrocosmic scale. There is not one process for atoms and another for stellar systems. That same process is repeated in every action-reaction of Nature, whether it be the lifting of an eyelash or the explosion of tons of dynamite -or whether it be one's breath cycle, or casting a fishline into the sea. Our first step is to depict that simple process which has no variation in Nature, whether its vibratory frequencies are six billion frequencies per second or one frequency in fifty billion years." ~ Atomic Suicide; Dr. Walter Bowman Russell
Would echo my warning, quaternions can violate commutative properties and vectors can violate associative properties. Framing his thoughts in the quantum field would be better than Spacetime since mixing dimension will introduce a hyperbolic rotation because gravity cause the rate of the clock to change.
I agree. Ether needs to be included. In my opinion (and in the opinion of John Macken), Ether is the FOUNDATION of everything. No one would build a house that survives for extended periods of time without first building a foundation. The universe without a foundation is unthinkable.
12:24 I find it interesting that you get the artifact or effect when you don't do the multiplication follow up with the complex conjugate. This double multiplication is called a sandwich rule in Geometric Algebra. It is suppose to be related to the idea of spin and why you see a factor of two in equations related to spin. A I understand it twice the angle is being applied in the math. Thank you for sharing you code and your experience.
We were just discussing spin 1/2 and John Macken's work in the QM email discussion group, and then I found your video on it, great work! I think it is awesome that more and more people are "getting" it - in case anyone is curious, I did a talk on this and have a bunch of animations on this topic (using quaternions as well, with unity 🙂) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1KXpkUYvbGo.html (I can give the software to anyone for free in case there is interest, but it does require quite a good computer :-)) Maybe we should start our own discussion group to put our heads together to advanced with this. (My name is Chantal Roth, not obvious from the youtube tag)
Chantal Roth, GREAT to hear from you. I have watched this video several times and was trying to get in touch with you about your software, but didn't have any luck. If you look through my video channel, you will see that I have my own way of representing complex numbers and quaternions that is not standard, but very simple in terms of a teaching tool and in terms of implementing on a computer. I love the idea of starting a discussion group. I co-authored a couple of papers with Jeff Yee and I noticed you mentioned him in one of your videos. He would be a good person to have on the team. I am a computer scientist with expertise in the field of medical imaging, in particular, 3D Ultrasound. Here is a link to my ResearchGate profile and all the papers I co-authored with my team at Robarts Research Institute: www.researchgate.net/profile/Lori-Anne-Gardi This is basically my resume. I am very glad you got in touch with me. A great start to a great day.
@@FractalWoman Thanks for reaching out! I tried to reply on youtube multiple times, but I guess my comments didn't make it, probably because I had put in my email and some links :-). I have sent you an email today :-).
Lori, Eric Dollard has talked about Fortescue polyphase as versor algebra. I have seen in the past you have reviewed his versor algebra. Any chance in the future you might be able to do a video on Fortescue's Method of Symmetrical Coordinates applied to solution of polyphasenetworks using your matrices? Thank you.
Here is something I found that applies quaternions to electrical systems. www.realp.unb.br/jspui/bitstream/10482/35443/1/2019_VictordoPradoBrasil.pdf It is someone's thesis dissertation. I will read it and see if the matrix implementation of quaternions offers any insights.
Thank you. If you are interested in electrcial engineering research I recommend Master Ivo on RU-vid. i primarily follow Eric Dollard and his work. Ivo's latest video tuning resonant system is very interesting. You kind of have to watch some of his videos to get the idea of what is he is doing but he has essentially created a Tesla Magnifying Tranformer utilizing 3 bifilar pancake coiis with one coil used as a capacitor for voltage, middle coil for Tesla's extra coil and the third coil used as a coil for current and to have all in phase. In earlier videos he shows that this created displacement currents that can be used as propulsion system. Also, in his videos he is getting more output than input. Besides Dollard and you, Ivo is the only other one that I watch. Thanks again
of course it can. If it has a real-time clock on board, it can measure the time it takes for a certain loop to execute, then divide the number of ticks the known instructions in that loop take, by the actual time difference from start to end of the operation. It's as similar way that a game calculates its frame-rate. Knowing the clock frequency of the fabric of spacetime beyond the Planck time, however, is something completely different, because we don't necessarily have an independent real-time clock which tells us 'the actual time of the simulation outside our system', whatever that might be by analogy with the world inside a computer program and the real world outside of it. We might as well have expended 123 'outside the simulation' years to get from one Planck instant to the next... we would never know.
Lori, I hope you're very well and very content, I've just watched a short featuring Professor Brian Cox talking about cosmic background radiation, and it prompted rather a surprising question from me. Now I've understood what this is for years, but suddenly I thought hang on, what if it's not evidence of a big bang, but simply evidence of ether? I grew up in an era where TV went off at a certain time and all we were left with was that hissy noise and a white fuzz on a black screen, so I kinda get it. Is it possible science has been looking for ether in the wrong way? This might be slightly out of your wheelhouse of thought or a silly question question on my part, because part of me thinks why would ether cause any interference at all if it's purpose is to convey signal, i.e light, radio signal from a station. I mentioned before in another video of yours that I thought "this is how how consciousness does it" and you agreed. So, to some degree we're on the same page lol, it's just when I think of meditation it's very difficult for consciousness to do nothing and not produce something, is it possible that when ether isn't carrying a signal, like a meditative mind, it still has to produce something and we detect that something as static on tv or cosmic background radiation? Can ether literally and actually do nothing?
This is not out of my wheelhouse at all, in fact, I have been thinking about this a lot lately. Here is my line of thinking. The CMB doesn't come from the big bang. At least, not from the standard model thinking of the big bang. It is my opinion that the universe began at the opposite end of the thermodynamic spectrum at absolute zero. At this temperature, the whole universe is a superfluid and/or Bose Einstein Condensate. As the universe spins up (for whatever reason yet to be determined) quantum vortices are formed in the universal BEC. As more vortices are formed, the temperature of the universe increases. When the universe reaches a certain temperature, approximately 2.7 degrees K, there is a phase transition which is what we perceive as the big bang where all the charged particles (electrons and protons etc) are formed. That is why we have a CMB. That is the temperature of the universe at the moment of the Big Phase Transition which we perceive as the big bang. This idea has precedence in actual BEC experiments which experience similar phase transitions at similar temperatures. The background vortices that form in the BEC make still exist. This is the medium for the propagation of light. This is difficult to explain in one comment, but hopefully I did it justice.
@@FractalWoman wow that's very interesting. Thanks for the reply, more than good enough for my dim self lol, but I'll have to learn a bit about BEC now. Much appreciated.
@@areyouavinalaff This also relates to John Macken's model since he also points to the BEC as an important feature of his theory. I am planning on doing a livestream with him in a couple of weeks which should be interesting. So brushing up on the BEC wouldn't be a bad idea.
@@FractalWoman Thanks for the heads up about the live, I'd sure like to catch that. I've learned a little about BEC, but do need to do more. So, on the formation of these vortices, would that be anything like if BEC all has the same energy state, is balanced in it's own way, there's no spin, like everything is yin, then somehow a bit pops into a higher energy state creates an imbalance where there's now a bit of yang but still a lot of yin and suddenly there's a chain reaction of BEC going into higher energy state causing it all to spin and maybe polarise?
@@areyouavinalaff Yes. Something like that. The BEC itself doesn't like change (Yin). So in the BEC experiments, a BEC does not "want" to spin. When you try to spin one, it converts all of the angular momentum into tiny quantum vortices. So the background BEC (Yin) still exists, but the tiny vortices (Yang) form IN the BEC. More spin equals more vortices. Before the Big Phase Transition, these vortices spread out evenly in the background BEC creating a medium in its own right. This is the medium for the propagation of light. Matter (electrons and protons) are formed at the Big Phase Transition. These new vortices cause an imbalance in the collection of quantum vortices which are imbedded in the universal BEC. The quantum vortices surround the unbalanced charges (electrons and protons) in an effort to neutralize them. This is what we perceive as the electric (and magnetic) field. I talk about that a bit in this paper: www.researchgate.net/publication/313515057_A_Medium_for_the_Propagation_of_Light_Revisited
I believe so yes. I prefer to refer to the Ether as a medium. The term "field" should be reserved for mathematical representations of a medium and not the medium directly. In my opinion.
Lori, do you think ether is compressible? Magñetic fields have regions of different flux density, which could be considered as regions of varying compression, would ether do the same or is its density more uniform spatially regardless of masses being present or not? Another question i have is, when physicists talk about space-time and einstein, they always point to bowling balls on a stretchy fabric and use smaller ball to depict an orbit. Is space-time, as they call it, just bending or is it compressing and varying in density based on distance from central mass? Curiously, they only ever show one layer of fabric bending down, because thats what gravity does to the experiment / demonstration, but surely there must be an equal opposite bending of fabric upwards from the mass and orbiting masses are trapped between the downward curve and the upward curve.
Is Ether compressible? That is a good question. If Ether is compressible, then longitudinal waves (compression waves) are possible. If Ether is not compressible, then the question becomes, what ELSE can Ether do to create waves? That is where Ether circulation comes into play. Ether can move in circular motions. This is what causes magnetic fields.
@FractalWoman so because circulation diminishes with distance, magnetic fields weaken with distance . Light, however, just keeps going. /head scratch.
@@areyouavinalaff Light and magnetism are not that different. Light is a wave that propagates in a medium. The further you are away from the a light source creating the waves, the weaker the signal intensity. IN a similar manner, the further you are away from the object creating the magnetic field, the weaker the intensity of the magnetic field (smaller circles). Light does not keep going at the same intensity. The intensity decreases over time. In other words, a detector farther away from an emitter is going to detect a weaker signal than a detector closer to the emitter. In a similar manner, a magnetic detector (another magnet or ferrous object) is going to detect a weaker magnetic field farther away from the magnet. Hope this helps.
meanwhile im here, random dump = 30% of formulas for Scumann resonace peaks are utter nonsense. I have the reason-formula why the peaks are what they are. #everythingisalie
@@FractalWoman It’s a channeled material by a supposedly hyper-advanced extraterrestrial being, and they basically give a dissertation on the metaphysics of the universe. Very interesting stuff.
@@lookupjackkruseonyoutubetalk of channeling and extraterrestrials can't ever bear fruit. All too easy to fake and mislead the gullible. While consciousness is amazing and capable of things many do discount, channeling aliens is a bit fanciful. The universe doesn't need to produce aliens, there's enough mystery without them. I believe, if aliens exist, they will be in a different branch of this fractal universe, wondering the same things we are and enjoying a completely other reality which neither we, or they, are able to cross.
This supposed paper is to be published in a shitty journal, it is not even in arXiv. Of course, from a publication in a bad journal you'd expect that the paper is trash, which is precisely what it is. The fact that you didnt realize that and reviewed this paper says a lot about your research capabilities, really sad.
