I saw a similar fly through, using a green screen. The girl was reading a book in the library, and looking over her shoulder the right hand page was simply a sheet of green paper. The video then zoomed into the page and an another video opened up showing her walking through campus. As I recall in the end, there is a reverse fly through showing her reading the same book. Do you suppose you could put together a video like this?
I've seen credits for TV and cinema where the credits are in 2 columns. First column may show something like "Cinematography" which is right justified, and the second column uses smaller type any may list 4 names who were on the crew. This column is left justified. Can you create a part 2 of this video showing this more complex format?
Thanks Very Much! I'm producing my chroma backgrounds on blender for adding 3D animated Objects on top of Videos. So didn't have all of the problems of recording in front of a green screen. But I was not succeeding on trying to have perfect masking just with chroma key advanced. The Despil Effect saved me and solved the problem. Thanks very much again! Cheers From Brazil 😉
I did the same thing in Shotcut (except the preset by default was fast, not veryfast so the exporting time cutoff was WAY more drastic). I noticed no difference in quality, but did notice that the video file size was way larger, I think it's because the faster your preset is, the less compression is applied to the export, and compression is time consuming for computers so the rendering is faster but there's less compression so file sizes end up being larger. The opposite happens with slower presets, where it takes much more time to render due to the heavier compression, but file sizes end up being smaller, so if you have some space to spare and want to export videos faster, this is a pretty good way to do it, but if you run low on it, don't make the switch.
I was using both until I bought my Canon R7 over a year ago. I ended up using DT since then. My main reason was RT was not reporting exif data correctly and DT was quick to include R7 support with noise profiles etc. I love DT for my use. RT may have more demosaic control compared to DT, but I don’t miss it really. DT is more actively developed and it is nicely featured- no need to look at LR etc
A better way of adding an outline to a vector or a paint layer is to left click the layer that you're working on and click Layer Style and adding a stroke from there.
Thank you for this. This was very helpful. One question though. I have a UGEE S640 and when I first started using it had tilt functionality, for some reason that and the pressure has stopped working. Thanks to you, the pressure is now working again but I don't know how to get the tilt to work again. Any Ideas?
I love using this editor, but that all seems like a pain in the ass😂 there’s no quicker solution to this is there? Even like maybe two or three steps faster.
f I am correct DigiKam cannot see the photos where they already are but has to import them - which means copying them in another place. It is totally unusable if you have already organized your photos in some hardrive because you have to copy them ALL again...lightroom does a better job because there is no need to copy
Thank you for the comment! #DigiKam will allow to add collections from your computer, from external drives, and networked computers (without having to copy them somewhere else). It walks through it in the documentation here - docs.digikam.org/en/setup_application/collections_settings.html - There are also built in processes for importing from Scanners, Cameras, and other media devices. For best performance, it recommends indexing all the images in order to make them easier to work with and search through. Hope that helps!
Hello Photolearningism, for some reason I cannot see the sound waves in the audio tracks which make it very annoying to work with audio. I have the latest version of the software. Any idea of what's going on?
Hi! Just as a thought, it might be that the setting to show it was tweaked off. Under Settings -> Configure Kdenlive -> Timeline, check under "Thumbnails" if the setting for "Separate audio channels" and "Enable for Audio" is marked on. Both of these should be enabled for the audio waveform to appear in the timeline. Hope that helps!
@@Photolearningism Thank you so much! I just had no idea these were called "thumbnails" 😅. English is not my first language but I have the app in english as most tutorials are in that language! Thank you again for such a swift and thorough response. Bless you.
Hi Nate! Thanks for the tutorial. I tried this effect out with a video I took with my phone of someone explaining something in a busy fair. So lots of (louder than on your video) background noise. In my case it does effect/distort the quality of the main voice. I tried to adjust the levels (I'm on version 24.02.2): VAD Threshold; VAD Grace Period; Retroactive VAD Grace Period, but the sound remains distorted. Any Ideas? Thanks!
Hi MMIEU 11! It can get tricky when there is lots of competing audio with overlapping frequencies. I'd suggest trying to isolate your voice using Equalization and place it first in the effects stack (above noise removal). It sounds like the noise filtering is biting into your voice a bit and if you can distinguish the frequencies of your voice, it may help to smooth it out. Hope that helps!
Thank you for the feedback! I agree - During this video (and a few others) I was learning how to balance background audio and have made some progress on this in later videos. Thank you so much for watching!
@@Photolearningism No need to thank me. It is great to hear how enthusiastic that you are about E.G. Kdenlive - but your so called tutorials about same holds little else. They are like so called reviews of films that you need a deeper perspective into - but all the 'reviewer' is expressing is how awesome the film is. I have now seen some four or five of your 'tutorials' and it has been a complete waste of time since it provides nothing of value just to be a witness to your sense of awe. It should have been a warning to me that your low Q videos express very little use of the techniques they should inform about but I guess I must accept the punishment for not listening to my intuition. If you are serious about creating a community about learning video editing around you channel, you should scrap the lot and start over. At least the first five videos about Kdenlive - regretfully I did no longer feel any inclination to continue watching when the outcome from it was so low end !! SORRY !!
This seems like a really useful feature - hope it's not over my head and can understand how to use it. In my film days, I used to organize into scenes, so this might work similar? Thanks so much, Cheers
Hi Texpat OTG! You are correct in how the sequences can be used to create scenes. Using Sequences allows you to make individual edits of media, then use that whole sequence as one object in a "master" timeline. Ultimately, the end result is the same if all the pieces had been edited in the same timeline, but using Sequences gives a lot of control over organization and is much easier to adopt changes to a scene into a master timeline. Hope it helps!
@@Photolearningism Thanks for quick reply. This helps a lot. Am going to do some testing on some footage from an abandoned project to see how it works. This could be a significant improvement over working with long projects -- I had been making scenes by rendering projects in pieces -- this was very tedious and might affect quality -- not sure about that. This sure could be a big league improvement. Thanks much!
