@5:20 - No we don't need story or a narrative or a fictional world - Space Engineers is good because it's a Sandbox and the stories come from yourself and how you and your friends live in Multiplayer, building things. The story comes from the players. Story from the Devs or game itself would ruin the product.

Artillery has much more DPS with the same resources. And the design of this battleship is just smart picture. Normal ship without any furniture and decoration will severely damage it in the first combat

15:40 Oh. OH NO. No you CANNOT skip steps like that!

Got a dreadnought in nms and the sheer beauty of it made me want to bother to learn space engineers for console just so i can build a dreadnought of my own design but i dont think itd be worth it without being able to use it for combat

Mash No Man's Sky, Space Engineers, From the Depths, Avorion and Empyrion together until something works.

indeed

Those railgun turrets reminds me heavily of the ultimate expression of the blueprint-only Tillman Battleship....specifically the Tillman IV

this desrves 5 mil views after 9 months

Cool stuff. "Getting so close to an enemy ship never made sense to me. Even WW2 Navy carrier battles were fought beyond the horizon and hundreds of miles apart.. even Battleships fought over the horizon. Some battles were fought where you could actually see the enemy, but everything was moving in 3 dimensions. Up-Down (waves and swells), left-right and forward-backwards. Even then they had to fight against ships on not where they are at the moment, but where they will be in the near future (leading a target). In space you now have to add gravity, light speed and 'time'. Ever read "Forever War"? Their space battles were light minutes or even light hours apart. The first ship to spot their enemy fires lasers, projectiles, missiles and such, where the computers believe the enemy ship will be X mins ago or a few hours. So they are essentially fighting each other in each others past. The people in the ships strap into space suits and are emersed in a liquid vat that dampens their molecules from being blown apart due to the g-forces the ship will be under making themselves harder to hit by randomly changing speeds and directions.. It is a battle between AI, math and physics. Humans would have very little input at all unless they are literal genius at spatial math and physics. That is for example 5 light minutes apart.. (the Sun is like 8-9 minutes away). You see the enemy where it was 5 minutes ago.. you will never see it how it is unless you get as close as your video. You fire a laser at it.. the laser won't hit for 5 more minutes (that's 10 minutes since spotting the enemy). You shoot some railguns at it or missiles, and they won't reach the target for hours or even days... or weeks even. If you decide to move closer to get more accurate shots, it works both ways, and the windows get more narrow. I found these battles interesting as hell. If they spotted you first by 5 minutes, your ship will be under laser fire before you even knew the enemy was there." - / geek - me

I can't even imagine how it will slow down on my GTX 1660

The missile knows where it is at all times.

You see a dam. I see a planetary clang drive.

Space engineers (1) is at the height of what is possible with it and the reason is simply that the engine is already stretched to its furthest. There is simply a point where it is not cost effective anymore to improve an engine, especially because it will always have a lot of legacy costs. Some things the engine does are simply not compatible with more modern technologies and rewriting it piece by piece will take longer and therefore cost more than just building it up from the ground. This way, you can even get rid of some longer running bugs that are simply too deep inside the engine to fix anymore. Therefore, I really support them building a new engine, to make a possible SE2 with it. Also, SE is feature complete for years now. They did everything they promised and more. That they further improve the game at all shows how dedicated they are to their game and the community. They don't have to and do it anyways (probably because they didn't have anything else for many years [let's ignore Medival engineers], but that doesn't deminish their work)

*anger inducing

*<<Monarch. You use the name of a king, but what do you rule over, the dead?!>>*

Lame

This is why I tend to like weapon core weapons unless you build the ship it's probably broken. and that's honestly the worse for blue prints by someone else, hard to find a ship that's been set up right so when you print it it prints the set up too.

The game has to improve or at least match what there is today, the construction system looks much nicer than SE or Empyrion but it requires survival, attacking bases, hostile fauna, technologies that you can research or obtain somehow. such as in assaults on enemy bases or exploration, collision damage, realistic physics such that if your engines break on one side it will be difficult or impossible to fly straight, and above all support for mods that can solve problems and add content. I'm still hoping for an Empyrion with collision damage and parts of a ship to not be left floating in the air "stuck to the rest of the ship" after taking damage.

Come play Eve online ,we have had drones and rails for years and would love to use them on you

This channel could create a great sci fi game or movie fr.

Did they improve multicrew mechanics? I remember when you logged out, you will spawn on the position relative to the space position of the ship instead of inside the ship. You cant also walk while the ship is moving. Enemy AI and animations are also clanky last time I played.

I love realistic ships

i hope it doesn't end up like ksp 2

Star Wars the clone wars

They need to ramp up development or Starcitizen will take all the players for sure.

I love the tank engine green it also looks very soviet faded green like you see in abandoned cities and towns. One of my fav colors and even got my old Subaru WRX painted what was called "british racing green" is a very nice color. You really sold me on this game mentioning even coffee on the ship like showing the daily life on this metal monster! Liked and subbed!

Keen might not run the extra mile in their updates but one is sure, this company respects its customers much more than AAA Studios. Leaving Medieval Engineers was sad but SE has the brighter future. After 10 years the average player count 24h is 6,745. Thats solid! 5€ for supportive DLCs is a good deal for both. SE is finished and still maintained... I totally with a full price SE2 (even early access, since keen prove they can create amazing stuff)

People that got hit 'Bruh why can't the ship move 'realises' Oh s**t m********k! '

as someone who makes insane fighters, I can confirm that this ship is insane, but will not stand against 2 of my fighters,

Spanj probably sums it up best - Space Engineers is the better simulator, Empyrion is the better game. SE is for creating solutions to hypothetical problems, Empyrion is for having fun.

only thing I would change would be to add a progector at the front of the train so that if the track is broken the train can repair it

But is the speed limit still 100m/s?

if a six foot human turned into a 40ft wide crater, the word 'tiny' would not come outta you.

Above all else, I want this game to be far less buggy than the first, with a reasonably high PCU limit.

I want pve. Dont care about much else at all.

Thy shall not blaspheme against Clang!

I WANT THIS SONG!!!

Recreations of the Star Citizen Valkyrie, Scorpius, Nova, C2, I think the interior of the 'C2' is actually more useful than in SC. There seems to be a Hammer Head in the back as well. :)

Lovely video! Do note, you will NOT be able to see enemies behind corners in a reflection. as Screen-space reflections imply, you can only see what's on the screen. You can't see anything behind objects :(

Спасибо, было интересно. Очень жду добавление ИИ ботов и компаньонов.

What DLCs do i need for this?

Ive got about 4000 hours in this game i love it no idea why id start being a hater online for any reason, im not owed anything from these people, theres more to life than being an annoying consumer online, though i have personally 'begged' Marek for a VR camera mode enabled

If they release a 2nd one. Most people, I feel would be pissed, you pay 15, sometimes 25 dollars for the game, and if you want dlc, for all of them, 65$, a new game, new dlcs.

That's some Ace Combat shit right there lol

What's up with the .44 a-grav?

I feel like on a smaller scale, being a solo player building small, underground is a great way to play. but for BIG groups... having a mobile force that act as a "fleetl" and relocate often is, in my belief, more secure and fun.

Love the game but yeah, the lack of activity after building a base is a issue regarding a play through longevity and if SE 2 doesn’t add more substance to gameplay it’ll be the same situation with a new coat of paint

Will it ever be VR playable......

Oh, you can make aesthetically pleasing spinners, especially on larger ships. For example disguised as on of those mast radars we often see on real ships, or if your ship is designed like those sci-fi colony ships from various movies and games

Now if you launch a rock and not a warhead, you can probably get away with it, if your persuasion level is high enough. "No Admin sir, this rock was probably just a high speed debris result from an earlier explosion somewhere!"