70 RAILGUN SUPER CARRIER - MSI Crescendo - Space Engineers 

Thanks for the review Arron, your vids in the past have all helped me on the way to this culmination so it means a lot to me :)

Look Aaron..... I never get tired of seeing the same ships blow up. You gotta show us the turrets destroying something. It's a rule, nay, a law! If you show us big fuck-off turrets, you have to show it destroy something.

Ok. but... and hear me out here. What if... we added another rail gun?

This thing fly in gravity ? Yes For how long ? It does.

You NEED to fill this thing with fighters and see the destruction!

Gravity drives are exactly how UFOs would move aswell if you think about it, creates a bubble of zero gravity which makes you weigh nothing, just need energy

If you come from behind then it's completely venerable. That cuppled with the vulnerability of the bridge I'd give it's tactical design a 4/10

When you only need... just the tip.

yeah without a pcu limit.

PHENOBLABLA

This is an armored core boss hahaahaah

Survival friendly yea you and what army 😂

“Ok chief we’ve installed 7 railguns, no enemies will outstand that!” “Give me 10 times more railguns”

I guess you could call it a Railationship

Holy shit that ships got more railguns on its front than my crius class has in total, and its got alot of railguns

dislike because you teased us with a big weapon system but we didnt see any effect on enemy ships like in the past

Its like if a UNSC war ship and a Venator class had a baby, good lord.

I never build a ship without a main engineering/reactor room. I love a good reactor room.

"You see that ship in front of us?" "Yes, sir!" "I no longer want to."

Some ships really seem to be designed without the concept of a "main battery". This ship makes up for all of them. The "pulse drive"... thing kind of terrifies me. It gives me a feeling of using forces of nature in unnatural ways, where even a small mistake can spell utter devastation. I don't really like the way the "artillery pods" look, compared to the rest of the ship they look kind of blocky and clumsy. They do carry a lot of firepower, though. Overall, I really like the design of this ship. It's meant to be intimidating, and it does it very well. I prefer when ships are not only functional, but also take into account the crew areas etc. I would very much have liked to see the "gravapult" launch a small ship, and of course the weapon systems at work against some other large ship or a base.

See that planet cadet (Yes) I DONT WANT TO

These carriers with massive arnaments should be called battlecarriers. Especially this one, it looks like it could take out a capital ship itself with that many turrets

Wow that carrier is awesome and I like the little details on it

Now imagine shooting that thing down above your base and it wipes you out

I deem this vessel "Sublimation" after the effect it has on vessels foolish enough to face it head-on

"Oh Big ba-da-boom!"

I am DEVASTATED that we didn't get to see you truncate a red ship with those rail guns.

Hands down this is the best build ive seen. AARON leran about singular and plural ...

Spawn a second and blow it up!!

Hi I have a question if you aren't to busy with anything... how do I make a ship that is able to enter and leave the atmosphere of any planet?... because I have been having a hard time trying to figure out how it always falls back into the atmosphere and not reaching to space

it loooks good but it is a glass cannon there are many giant holes, exposed gyros and how long will it last anyway with all those hydrgen thrusters gussling fuel

WOW, it looks a bit like a Farragut Class Capital Ship from Elite:Dangerous

Aaron, please. Open a thesaurus and find another word for "detail".

so where are the quarters for the hundreds of crew and pilots that it would need to operate? probably ought to go in that big gap, since that is a massive design flaw even if it is cool looking. or whereever the ammo is for all the guns that a supercarrier shouldn't have, or the lift engines....

it looks perfect for spreading SWEET LIBERTY

Something like this should be launching Veritech Fighters.

this carrier borders more on the line of true battle carrier and i love it O_O

Croscendo (Kruh-shen-doh) - the highest point reached in a progressive increase of intensity. Accurate name for sure.

ships impressive but bros pc is a beast to handle that thing.

took me a moment to realize the small thrusters were large thrusters

Something interesting I noticed, the gyros on the outside are enabled, I wonder what the point of putting them on the outside is then, 'cause using them as armor means your turning speed is going to reduce as you take damage, and althought that's not much of a problem considering the amount of turrets it's got, the artillery pods only have one axis of movement, and the raiguns are completely static.

Love your content

What are you lot doing with your aircraft carriers that would require that many guns??? And why does it have ANY rail guns?

Crescendo? More like Descendo. Any ship that's caught in its sights would descend into the dirt, or a fine mist

There is no such thing as "too much" in Space Engineers... The Crescendo - "Are you sure about that, I am all excessive." Like the damn thing has a hangar for a freaking cruiser on it. Not to mention the guns, propulsion drives... I just.... I need it.

That Salvo looks better than the rail gatling

Despite what it may seem, this is a really piddly amount of railguns for a ship of this size. Having them all explosed like that is a big no no as well

But how much ammunition can it carry, without being resupplied. 70 railguns could be firing a quarter of a million rounds a minute or more!!!!

I don't mean to tear this beauty down, but having a firing range not sanctioned off from the lounge would cause a lot of workplace violations. Just a simple wall and door would do quite a lot

My only issue with ships like this is the bridge is vulnerable. It should be buried in the core of the ship. You loose the bridge, you loose the ship.

Holy moly that’s incredible wow.

captain jack just uploaded the same ship lookover video.......do i smell a video stealer?????

doesnt look very protected... (its very thin armored)

god... what a hellload of thuster....

That landing bay is about to get obliterated by those thrusters

If I tried building something like that on the server where I play I'd get kick off because the server would melt otherwise.

Looks like a great way to get kicked off a server fast

Nice video! Why are most of the gyros on this ship on the outside? I'm relatively new to the game. Just wondering why they are not near the center of mass of the ship and why on the outside with no armor plates in front? Would appreciate an answer.

I would absolutely make internal bridges if the camera to display script just worked

0:01 It’s pronounced [krɛʃɛndo] not [krɛsɛndo].

you dont often see meda ships of that size

D:

Can you land on the planet below you or is it just for display?

Not sure how the gravity assisted launch is supposed to work. From my experience, artificial gravity only affects the player and items dropped, not grids or sub-grids.

then some random guy with a MK3 grinder does the funny

Where do I go to pee?😮

Thanos is comming

As impressive as it is. Grinder man still beats it.

You must be a fellow Garand Thumb fan :)

No explosions!!!???

ughhh why? servers are limiting you to 12k blocks or 100k pcu per player thats acros all your grids , almost no rotors or subs.. and best case senario 5-10 welsers and same for production..where are you going to use this?

Well, right off the bat I guess I'm gonna stop calling the supercarrier I've been working on a supercarrier. Only 43 docks, none with gravity launch, no disco hall, barely even 16 railguns... Pathetic really. 😂 In fact I think there may only be one thing the IFV Mariposa has over the MSI Crescendo... Bathrooms connected directly to the bridge to reduce the amount of time doody officers spend off-duty.