as one of the "he'll never get his career off the ground" commenters, i had no idea he would come with THIS level of quality. i think it was fair to assume that another burbank house wouldn't do it, but i'll admit i was wrong. he came through, and it all makes sense now. laced up is easily one of the most interesting songs and visual projects i've ever seen, and i'll NEVER doubt soren again !
I think to me its less of him wanting to get a career off the ground, and it’s that the entire goal of the project is just to make stuff how he wants to as an art form!
I really dislike these types of titles of "Im gonna do this so you don't have to". It makes it seem both like you're wanting people NOT to go listen to it and to rely on your input rather than experience it themselves. It also gives the connotation that it's BAD and you don't want to subject them to it. I get you're prob tryna follow that classic youtube "nostalgia critic" vibe but it always feels a liil eh.
exactly, that’s why I made the video haha although if my opinion was the opposite i’d still make the same video, I just would’ve been reinforcing dogpacks points
At the beginning you basically said people who are calling out Mrbeast for his wrongdoings are clout hungry. You should have talked about how Mrbeast made a website and told his fans to harrass employees for feastables in the back for them to put on the shelves. In the video dogpack made, he talked about how Mrbeast ran illegal lotteries and his chocolate had a Qr code on the back basically a lottery for children “Gambling”. And why did you not talk about Mrbeast Rigging results of challenges, you could have focused on more of the important things. You barely scratched the surface of the whole video, also this video feels like you’re trying to shield Mrbeast.
I didn’t say that 😭 also, I love the way you framed it as harrassing employees as if that’s how he put it I also said in the video I’m not gonna shield him, if I believed he was guilty I’d get just as much clout from a video the video is 4 minutes but you need to pay attention, I went soft as hell and basically played a skeptical role rather than critical if I believe an hour video is 90% unimportant filler and 10% content, I don’t need to make more than a 4 minute video to address his claims which are essentially all public information or his direct words there’s nothing to really go in depth about when most of his video is essentially all anecdotal you’ve clearly got your bias too 🤷 apologies for going so hard but most of the comments are just as dumb when my video is soft criticism at best 😆
@@ROOKIETHESTARI liked Mrbeast before this all came out, Im not being biassed, im not trying to hate on Mrbeast just to hate on him or say he is evil, Im just listening to the evidence and dogpacks points. A lot of the video is important information people should know about Mrbeast. You saying that if you were more clout hungry it would be a perfect time to make a video about what he allegedly did, really feels like you are saying people who are now talking about it are just clout hungry and not giving their true imput.
Yeah, I understand that almost all is fake in all his videos and that almost all of mrbeast's claims are lies. And that he should address his fraudulent statements and also about the horrible beast game allegations. But even when it is proven that MB is a fraud. I dont think it is his downfall. Ive seen so many videos about this and its the same stories from that one video. MB is such a huge youtuber with greater suscribers and I doubt he'll just go out like that.
ALLEGATIONS. So, zero proof of criminal activity, besides the WHORIEST WHORE OF INFLUENCERS making comments on podcasts. Who hasn't Tana had inside her? Lets stop throwing around allegations of crimes with NOTHING to back it up but tweets and podcast clips. K? Good talk.
It’s surprising to see such criticism of Dogpack’s video, especially given the substantial evidence he presented about MrBeast. Rather than debating Dogpack and his arguments, we should recognize this video as highlighting a deeper, more significant issue. While Dogpack is relatively new to making videos, he did a commendable job of shedding light on serious concerns. The focus should not be on nitpicking minor points or criticizing his presentation style but on the major issues he uncovered. Dogpack addressed significant allegations such as ıIIegaI lơtteries, forgıng signatures, and making kids addıcted to gämbling. These are the points that deserve attention, not the trivial criticisms. A good journalist examines the core issues, disregards the presentation, and identifies the real problems. For instance, the RU-vidr “JustAOrdinaryGamer” succinctly addressed the major allegations without getting bogged down by filler content. It’s not about the video, Dogpack, or his arguments. It’s about what MrBeast did wrong, and Dogpack exposed it. Even if the video portrayed MrBeast positively for example, the exposure of wrongdoing remains. We shouldn’t focus on why Dogpack thinks something is good or bad. Instead, we should concentrate on what was exposed. If the exposed issue is bad, it stands on its own merits. Ignoring thorough research and the most significant points leads to missing crucial details. MrBeast, during a live streams, said, “Büy in the next 5 minutes for a chance to win $5k,” but then forgot to pick a winner. This resulted in over 2000 people buying within 5 minutes, effectively scämming them. Such actions could ruin a career quickly (normally). Another example is the “I’ll put your picture on the moon for $10” scäm, where tens of thousands of people lost money without getting what was advertised. You probably forgot that he even did the moon thing. Yes, you remember it now, but when making the video, you likely didn’t even consider it because it seemed like a minor point. For him, it wasn’t a big deal, but for me, this is a Logan Paul-type scam. "Coffeezilla made a whole exposé video about how he didn’t refund people the millions of dollars he got" type shı t. And that’s the thing-no one is talking about this yet, but in a few weeks, they will probably get to the bottom of it. This is a fact, plain and simple, but it’s just one sentence in his lengthy video. This is the problem-you need to look closely. Whether these actions are ıIIegaI isn’t the main concern. It’s about ethics and the integrity of promises made. Dogpack highlighted these points, which underscores the need for real journalistic work. Dismissing his entire video because of minor subjective disagreements is not constructive. Instead, we should delve deeper into the significant issues he has brought to light.
this is insanely long lol this situation is not nearly as insane as you’re stating and I watched the whole video in its entirety and simply disagree, I’m not trying to focus on the unimportant rather, 80% of the video is unimportant unrelated criticism with 20% of big claims without enough concrete evidence to back it, it’s basically all anecdotal and not factual in law, even if something is true there is required cross examination
@@ROOKIETHESTAR Exactly! We share the same opinion. The video is cluttered with unnecessary content. So, why waste time discussing the irrelevant parts when there are crucial points to address? Sure, you can say that only 20% was worth watching. But isn’t that missing the point? Creating extra content to spotlight the unnecessary bits diverts from the necessary bits. No one really knows who “Dogpack” is or cares about his opinion. We’re here for the significant allegations, for Mr.Beast. We should focus on the important stuff first. If there’s time left, then maybe touch on the irrelevant parts. But the priority is to dive deeper into the key points, ask more questions, and generate meaningful discussion around them. You’re raising excellent points and topics. Instead of just commenting about; why not make a whole video? Why make a Video about a unnecessary stuff if you clearly have an opinion about the necessary stuff?
honestly I feel like I covered the major points presentation is important and if your video is 80% reaches it reallt discredits the other 20% I think that last 20% are “big allegations” but not a lot of concrete evidence, if the giveaways end up being faked I’ll be sure to make a video on it, but we’ve got to hear both sides as I mentioned there are plenty of people who claim their giveaway rewards were fulfilled as for the rocket, can we really blame him if the rocket exploded lmfao, if he put all the pictures on it, whats he supposed to do, make another rocket? I think this should be addressed and something new should be done in its place for sure, but gotta give him time to address it as its technically not his fault lol My video is just short because I have a job & only do this as a hobby haha, but I did address all of the major points I’m also responding to you so I’m not trying to create some false narrative or hide nothing! just disagree
@@ROOKIETHESTAR true like i watched the old mrbeast videos their very funny and legit good he does do good stuff but the gambling part is pretty messed up other than that theirs nothing wrong with him
You missed the main arguments about gambling. The video does have many points that do hate on Mr. Beast for the simple fact that the former employee does not like him. I agree that, those points are weak and are nothing burgers. However, faking signatures, hosting illegal lotteries, and promoting gambling to children is something that should be addressed. Those points are valid as he has a fanbase that are primary children. They are manipulate towards children. Do I think his Carrer should be over? No. He did some stuff that he should learn from and he should be transparent from now on. He should stop with the gambling promotion and refund people for the shirts that he sold. (Where he claimed he personally signed them) . Will this affect his view ship? Yes as there is now a wall of mistrust as people will question jimmy's content as a truly real and good. With all the other allegations coming after him. Its only time before his whole "I'm here to help the world" character will be put into question, especially when you see him taking money from kids to give to his rich friends. (Who in my opinion should never have been in the show or should have been pointed out to be employees )
I’m just curious whats different between this and sweepstakes between brands like Danimals and Poptarts doing sweepstakes for prizes/cruises, etc. As far as I’m aware he is fulfilling give aways (with examples in the video) He himself said he’s not a lawyer and I doubt a company as large as MrBeast’s isn’t going to be breaking the law so blatantly on a livestream The forging signature clip is weird at best, but he’s doing it on a livestream with a smirk, could’ve simply been trolling to see if anyone noticed on the team Any of the strongest points in his video don’t really have backing outside of a pretty surface level inspection imo, he was also let go of the company and replied to the mrbeast employee with “now hide this because you’re guilty” *it wasn’t hidden lol Is it possible there’s some out of order things from MrBeast? Sure, but that video is not the big expose piece everyone is making it out to be
@@ROOKIETHESTAR There are many differences between a company doing a sweepstake and Mr. Beast's giveaway. First off, Mr. Beast ran an illegal giveaway. You cannot refute that notion. The video shows you the law, and examples of Mr. Beast breaking it. It's Illegal what he did. Does not matter if he gave the prizes, it's illegal and he should have consulted someone on how to run a legal sweepstake. Mr. Beast did something illegal and it should be pointed out. Other companies do giveaways and it's ok because they follow the law. An example like Microsoft would be a great example. They run sweepstakes for their users of Bing. (I participate in them but never win) They have an option to sign up for free AND have a 3RD party make sure they are following the lottery to be fair. Mr. Beast DOES NOT. He does it when he feels like and it even lets the Chanllers family win, which is also illegal because family and friends cannot win or participate in sweepstakes. He is wide open to lawsuits and scummy as its not fair to everyone who buys the shirt. Second, forging the signature clip could be a troll attempt. We don't have evidence of either fact, however, the fact that it was shown that HE DID IT, put into question every other shirt. You can no longer trust him at his word that he did it. It takes years to build trust but only minutes to break it. How do we know that every other shirt was signed? How do we know that every other thing was fair? The fact that he may have lied about that one shirt, puts into question everything. With your last point, I agree. There may be things wrong at the company, "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". He has done dumb things that he NEEDS to address and change before he can go into proper TV shows like with Amazon. Mr. Beast needs to be held accountable for his "mistakes" if he truly wants to "do good for the world". Or are we to believe that he use that money to get his rich friends, richer? It needs to be fair. I know the claims are complicated, but they are valid to the channel and who Mr Beast is as a showrunner. They need to be fair, not tipped to the scale. If another company did what Mr. Beast did, they Would have been sued to hell. Also Mr Beast is a company, not him only. He should have the contact of at least one lawyer, He is not the Jimmy of 100k subs. He has millions of fans and million of dollars. Also, we can see that he can lie. This was shown in the Ava situation, he said he had no knowledge of his actions, however, there is new evidence (it has been confirmed to be him in the chats) of him talking inappropriately in a group chat with minors, with Ava. He can lie about the ava, he can lie about shirts. What else can he lie about? That's the issue with this, what can we believe as the audience? So far, nothing.
mrbeast def needs to respond to everything but I personally still don’t believe that this random kid who prefaced his video with “I’m not a lawyer” is enough evidence shown to convince me the entire operation is illegal as law is typically very complicated lol as for the ava situation, there’s a 3rd party investigation that should reveal all I have no reason to defend mrbeast, making a negative video would get just as many views and attention but tbh, I just don’t believe dogpack404 made a strong enough case that can’t be refuted, although most people have already drawn conclusions that mrbeast needs to be held accountable
I don’t really get why people say the back half is anticlimactic. Mona Lisa and Is There No Happiness are both upbeat songs. I could maybe see this argument with Everything to Me. But it’s really pretty (kind of reminds me of Beck’s Sea Change era). Like Happiness feels like the climax and Everything to Me is like the slow outro during the credits. I dunno it doesn’t feel that out of place to me.
It kind of obvious that his videos are not 100% fair, I dont see a problem with that all he wants to do is make content that's "cool" in some perspective, he even proved that one of his videos were staged and "haters" were just silent and Mr Beast fans just absolutely POGGERS i don't see a reason to hate on him because of what Ava/Chris had done but I saw a video and "allegedly" MrBeast was having a call with Kris about his genitals not 100% true but Mrbeasts voice sounded like the actual him, keep in mind that the voice sounded like him in 2018 so I don't think it was AI generated it was in a Discord call it didn't show anyone's face in the clip but the person who was recording all this was a "minor", did Mrbeast know a minor was in the call? Probably not, but it was some strange things to be talking to around a supposedly minor.
this. it's obvious beast changes the rules, messes some people/teams up, and somewhat rigs the competition to make the video more interesting. if all the videos are 100% authentic, not nearly as much people would watch his videos.
I mean, at the end of the day… it’s just entertainment. But then again I only watch mrbeast videos if i have nothing else to watch… sooo why should I even care about these claims??
"why should I even care about these claims" Hmm, maybe because of illegal lotteries, rigging and staging videos, selling fake signitures, having his employees pretend to be randoms and the biggest example is Mack which worked with another content creator before faking videos and doxxing a pilot while completely lying about him. Not to mention that Mr.Beast wanted to work with that Mystery-Box scam company to scam little kids out of their money but he got talked out of it. It was the scam Jake Paul did back in the day, no wonder why Mr.Beast keeps Logan Paul around since both of them are alike. Mr.Beast getting kids hooked on diabetes lotteries which is the main reason the chocolate sells in the first place while pretending to care so much about "health". You might care once you are old enough. Mr.Beast build his entire imagine around being authentic, giving people the oppertunity to win money but that is all a farce. It's obvious that random subs won't be invited and that "sub and like to get..." doesn't actually get you anything but his 99,99% kids audience doesn't know that.
“It’s entertainment” is the same statement always used. The fact is yes it’s entertainment but it’s also deceptive when you have people believing the videos are 100% real when there just not. Once people know it’s not real it becomes less entertaining. He also chose to keep out some very key facts in this video, such as Mack being an employee living in a mansion where he acts as a contestant, and the illegal lotteries plus fake signatures. It’s clear that’s a lot of sketchy stuff going on behind the scenes here.
@@jopcy3900few things: - its not fake just because there’s a small handful of people who know mrbeast in the challenges, hes done that since long before and it doesnt make it less real - in the lottery situation dogpack404 even says himself he’s “not a lawyer”. sweepstakes such as buying a product for a raffle has happened many times - poptarts, etc. so I need to see a better in depth analysis because I doubt a company this massive isn’t breaking the law this blatantly - signature thing looks weird, but hes doing it ON CAMERA smirking, could just be the guy trolling seeing if mrbeast or someone will notice all of these points in the expose video are honestly super speculative and outside of the giveaway legality are really not a big deal imo
Very interesting for him to step away from day-to-day actions but not completely. He has always been obsessed with money so it makes sense he wants to keep profiting off the company - potentially they also have a contract that's hard to break. The Try Guys only were able to get Ned out through careful litigation because he was an owner, it might be even harder when there's only 2 owners. Cody's obsession with wealth is actually what caused me to stop watching him - I transitioned from watching his main channel to then only his fitness channel and podcast. He was so proud he invested in liquid death and made millions. Then, while Kelsey was pregnant, he joked that he literally knew nothing about babies. They were around 5 months out from delivery and his incompetent husband jokes alongside Kelsey's genuine educational responses. He's always been a Silicon Valley Frat Tech Bro and didn't hide it as well on his other channels. I hope his wife, kid, and cats are doing okay.
The thing is, we don’t even know if these allegations are even TRUE or not, there needs to be a deeper investigation on this case. I wish we had a more fair justice system here in America. As of right now, I am not for or against Kody until I see more proof!
it is totally fair to wait until both parties have spoken up, although it doesn’t look good considering there are witnesses but he deserves to respond!!
His lack of response is confirmation he did it. And Gaby Hanna confirmed it ages ago. The stories line up. If you just like Cody and don’t care, then say that. But this nonsense.
he still should be given the chance to give a personal statement, if he never responds thats one thing but for example, the kwite situation was proof that sometimes a response takes a month or two
@ROOKIETHESTAR ROOKIETHESTAR This is unrelated, but I just wanted to know, did u ever see my rock album requests on the Ice Spice video you did just recently? 🙂
I personally came to know about his work from "Everything Goes On" which has been my favourite song from the moment I heard it. I like his other work decently well too, but to me, the go to song to listen to for any real situation is literally just that one song; I'll have it on loop for hours and not get bored, I'd play games, read books, or even just think while it was on.
This is more of a „this person is no longer with the company“ statement then a responds in my opinion…. At this point we might never see an ACTUAL responds from Cody himself, but only time will tell.
I really liked "Perfect Pinterest Garden", the Oh-Oh vocals hit so hard, i also agree with both "Mona Lisa" and "Is There Really No Happiness?", the singles packed the punch while the album brought feelings
I feel like the anti-climatic end is intentional, since he says that the biggest problem of nurture is that in the end it felt like he had figured things out and that he could finally have fun with music (cheerleader and kyoXD) but really, we are always finding ourselves in new problem and situations that really shows that there’s no happy ending or epic finale moment in life. The best we can do is acknowledge what makes us ourselves (everything to me), stop “smiling :D” and be happy :)
@@ROOKIETHESTAR I did listen to like (Deluxe) and Y2K after I Finished listen to Y2K the second it drops when I mean second I mean second. After I finished my listen 1 hour later I found out my chair broke…
@@ROOKIETHESTAR I loved I the album. The Album is Good. I over hearing dancing and Jamming to the album till in BB BELT she said that line. “I’m his poopie like I smell”
