Hi, my name is Wim and welcome to my art channel. I give you painting techniques, art tips, and since I use a lot of photos to inspire me, you can find here photography tips as well.
So basically, this channel is about painting, photography and drawing.
I have a D3100 and want to upgrade, I also have a number of lenses I love using in my D3100 so would love a camera I can keep using them on, which I'm sure I can do with a D7500? I'm an enthusiast learning my craft with photography, would you say the D7500 is a good step up to keep learning and improving? Thanks, really enjoyed the video
Thanks. The D7500 has better ergonomics, higher resolution, better autofocus than the D3100. In short, a more complete camera. But remember, the camera is just a tool, you improve with practice and looking at what other photographers make.
Yes, I would pick up the 50-250mm. I have had and used the 300mm PF but that lens is way overpriced imho. Unless you need that f/4 and the extra 50mm reach, the kit zoom performs well over its price point. I sold the 300mm PF.
I am a "woman of a certain age" (old), and I sold/gifted/donated my "real" photography equipment a few years ago. After all, as someone who's in my seventh decade of life, why would I need all of this stuff? My iPhone Pro Max was just fine. A few filters, a gimbal, and I was on my way. And then the opportunity to do some serious traveling came up, and I decided to splurge and just get a real camera and lens again. I haven't traveled yet (it's scheduled!) but I purchased a Nikon D 7500 and this lens. I also purchased a 35 mm prime lens. as I "relearn" old skills, I can't wait till my travel starts. While I love the results I've gotten from my iPhone, even I know that it won't be able to measure up to a Nikon, and being able to use a moderate telephoto while looking at elephant seals on the beach will give me that little bit extra I need to make my photos stand out.
I have this lens on a D7100, with a 2 year old grandson this is the perfect tool for family photos in and outdoors. This is most defeatedly a lens that works well under the "f/8 and be there" mantra.
I have a Nikon D3100 and it has served me very well. But I am considering upgrading to the D7500 but I am wondering if the 7500 can use the same camera lenses as a D3100.
Such an amazing truthful review, you've convinced me to purchase this lens. I've always been passionate about photography, but never really got into it until recently. I started doing food photography, and then everything else. I will order it, at the moment I am using the D5000, I'm sure this will pair well with that. Thank you
Can you compare it to the 18-140mm, please? I wonder why those lenses are kit lenses, but it seems that those kits are much better than the main kit 16-50mm. I mean A LOT. Even when I use the Nikon Z 12-28 DX, the image quality is wow. Are these really kit lenses?? So much better than the main one.
I haven't got the 18-140mm z, but had the f-mount version. This 50-250mm is way better than that f-mount version. One downside of these kit lenses is the low aperture. Other than that, this lens is highly recommended!
I have 3 pro DSLRs the D700, D810 and D500. They were great when I bought them and nothing has changed. I have a Sony A7iii which I use for video, which I am likely to sell in the foreseeable future. It is better for video, no question about that, particularly video autofocus and the video format options, but it isn't better for stills, at least not in terms of picture quality. The d500 is also superior in autofocus in tricky lighting for stills. People rave about the Sony autofocus, but put it in tricky lighting and it hunts and gets confused. Outside of maybe the latest Fuji flagship cameras and maybe the canon r7, I still don't think there is a better APS-C option than the D500. Which in today's money is less than half the price. There are always rumours of a z90 lurking but it will be very expensive. I mostly shoot Product and Macro; with some headshots and models. But my hobbies also include nature/wildlife/landscape and Astro. And my DSLRs do an excellent job for both paid work and hobbies. I'd sooner be buying more speedlights/flashes, softboxes and studio equipment than switching everything to mirrorless. I have an extensive array of f-mount lenses covering 60 years of lens development, really got no intention of trading it in for a new system, even for a tax write off.
I love my D500 as well. Bought it shortly after it was released in 2016. Upgraded from a D300S. I keep hearing that Nikon will release a Z90 mirrorless to replace it in that APS-C space.
Wim, do you think the D7500 is elderly compared to the Z series of cameras, or does it hold up just fine against them? Never mind video, I mean just for photography.
@@WimBals So, the Z glass really is better/sharper than the DX lenses? One reason I am looking at a Z camera is to be able to use my three DX lenses, one of which is a fairly sharp 35mm prime. But, the DX lenses are noticeably better than this? This leaves me pondering. The cost of replacing that glass is still a consideration, though.
I also used my 'old' f-mount glass with an FTZ adapter. The problem is that with this extra adapter extra length is added to the lens and is therefore no longer in balance with the light z-bodies. The newly developed lenses are significantly improved in terms of chromatic and longitudinal aberration, distortion, colors and sharpness. I am currently working on making a video about the 24mm f/1.7 DX z-lens. A fantastic light and cheap lens that easily beat the 35mm f/1.8 FX on a full frame (D610). I also have a review on my channel of the 50-250mm lens. In addition to Nikon glass there are also other manufacturers that release new lenses for Z cameras such as viltrox and Sigma.
Thank you for this review. I just ordered this lens for my Z7 as a lightweight travel telephoto... it will let me carry a much smaller and lighter bag.
As a photographer using the Nikon D5100 and D3300, I have been considering upgrading to either the D7200 or the D7500, given their comparable prices in my region. After much deliberation, I am leaning towards the D7500, primarily because I find mirrorless cameras less appealing. Mirrorless cameras often suffer from lag and slower response times, which can be frustrating. Additionally, the AI-driven features in many modern mirrorless cameras can sometimes feel like they take control away from the photographer, causing further delays due to rendering times. In contrast, DSLRs like the D7500 offer more immediate feedback and greater reliability in various shooting conditions. Even smartphones, despite their advanced software, cannot match the quality of a DSLR's objective lens, which is crucial for capturing high-quality images. In summary, while mirrorless cameras are advancing, they still have a way to go in terms of performance and user control. The Nikon D7500 stands out as a robust and reliable choice for photographers who value quick response times and traditional DSLR advantages. This review by Wim Bals provides a thorough exploration of the D7500's features, helping photographers make an informed decision about their next camera purchase.
Great video Wim, the two "kit" lenses may not be the fastest lenses in the world but they are surprisingly good performers and an absolute bargain bought as a two lens kit
I regularly interact with the man who designed this lens, Sato-sensei. It has a complex field curvature, which some describe as akin to a "sombrero." This gives it a quite unique rendering, there is nothing else quite like it.
With dslr cameras falling out in value or atleast thats what ive been told , how hard is it to find parts to reair the camera or getting a lens serviced if need be , sence everything is going to mirrorless?
I think Nikon uses the idea that they can repair devices for up to 10 years. You will probably still be able to find spare parts. For example, a while ago I ordered new rubbers for my D810 (from 2014) that I could get without any problems from Procirep, the company that is responsible for repairs here in Belgium and Luxembourg.
This lens has made me keep my DSLRs ( DF and D4s ) It is my favorite lens. It seems to have a new life when using it on my mirrorless Nikon ZFs. It seems to focus more accurately than it did on my DSLRs. It's probably my favorite lens! So versatile and so much character.
Thank you for sharing your technique. As I have a shop and cut and prep all the panels for my spouse, I have a few questions if you are willing to answer. Thank you in advance. I’ve watched maybe 30 videos now on panel preference and preparation. There seems to be a prefered material for both oil and acrylic, namely hardboard panels. For archival quality, most artists stay away from mdf. I have a lot of it leftover in my shop. The ones who do use it all indicate using a sealing agent like GAC100 before Gesso application. This isn’t a criticism of your preparation. I’m just curious. My wife’s mentor even states that Baltic birch and Masonite hardboard should receive a sealing agent to stop SID. So any insight here would be nice.
Beautiful work, certainly one of the most beautiful I've seen from you. The explanation is very much appreciated, the viewer can of course add something, but I don't think I could have found what you said. Hopefully you still have a lot of 'time' to make beautiful things. Highly appreciated :)
I just bought a D500 used in May of 2024. I love it. So much better than the D7200 it replaced for me. Love the 10 fps RAW. Love the focusing system. Very reasonable too.
An equally fast but more flexible alternative I use for zoo animals is the 80-200 F2.8. Ok, I may need a massage after carrying it around all day, but oh the results!!
Thanks Wim for sharing this video, I found it quite informative. I do have Sigma art lenses (28/1.4, 105/2.8 macro) and I do recognise your points. They have exceptional optical quality while being a monster. However, for me the 50mm focal length represents the general purpose EDC use case in which I am looking for the optimum of the size&weight, IQ and price factors. Recently I recognized that Nikkor 50/1.8G is the best compromise for that use case. In fact, after purchasing it I realized how good it is for landscapes having its sweet spot at around f11-13 as opposed to f4-5.6 that most of the lenses have. Yes, it does have to be AF fine-tuned, but that is a simple, 10min protocol. Some users noted how horrible the lens to lens optical variation is of this lens, but so far I did not get any significant disappointments beyond the strong CA below f4.
Hello, I have had this camera for 7 years and I love it!!!! Since I've used it a lot, it's already very worn out and I've dropped it several times, but it still works. Now in 2024 I want to buy it again, although mirrorless ones are in fashion now, I am in a strong dilemma whether to buy it again or buy a mirrorless one? I think the mirrorless ones are going to continue selling, but the D7500 may be the last chance I have to get it again. But yes this camera, I love how it takes videos and photographs.
Thanks for sharing your experience. I also have a Z50 because of the fact I can mount the great z lenses and f lenses. I found the color rendering of the z50 more accurate than the d7500.
@@WimBals Hello ! Thank you very much for the advice. I was meditating and came to the conclusion that for now I want to buy the D7500, because DSRL cameras are going to disappear. And anyway, the mirrorless ones are going to continue to be on sale because they are now the new model. And in a few years when Reflex cameras no longer exist, buy the mirrorless one. I'm afraid I'll regret not buying it.
