I found your channel on YT roday morning and I'm watching now movie after movie. I think that this channel is one of the best channels about photography that can be found on yt. Great work!
I'm starting to upload street photography videos. I'm from Colombia and I hope to grow and continue learning. You did a good job, I congratulate you bro. I hope to have the support of a community like yours. Everyone is very respectful and kind.
Dude this is the first video I saw of you and I loved it every second, since the intro through the final best chapter possible. Sad that you couldn't be here living it with us. PD: I'm trying to go out in weekends and practice this style because I find it interesting but I'm really feared of what they can say and I live in a small town, anxiety thoughts I believe... Saludos desde La Pampa, Argentina! Abrazo grande y de dónde sos vos locon? No esperaba el español 💙🤍💙
Great work! More than imitative the background of each photographer, their inspirations and the interpretation of their work stands out. Thank you! Regards from Mexico…
RU-vid help me to find your channel …. Getting back to do some casual photography. I think your channel is great. It’s a homage to all the artists and photographers you mentioned here in this channel. Keep on the good work👍👍👍
I think you video is very inspirational to other photographers like myself. I do a lot of street shooting, now I am going to look at other obscure compositions rather than the normal, CHEERS!
I like your channel and find your work very inspiring. It's very instructive how you analyze other photographers' images. Unfortunately, this time you didn't do a good imitation. I can well understand the effort it takes to take photos as boldly as Bruce Gilden. The essence of its style, regardless of the object, is to hold the camera 30.. 40cm in front of the face. This means invading the other person's privacy without their permission. Bruce Gilden's justification is: It is public space and anyone who uses it has to expect to be photographed and it is just a photo. I can well understand that you couldn't bring yourself to penetrate other people's private zones like that, I couldn't do it either, but without that - you can't imitate Bruce Gilden's pictures.
This is a gem. Like hearing your favorite song for the first time and listening to it 3x in a row, that’s how great this video is. Hell yeah, man. Thanks
So what happened? Was it an accident? I was filming riots in Greece over 10 years ago, and got brutally beaten by local police. I also got my camera trashed. Not really mood to film that kind of stuff anymore. Specially when Im not into politics anyway.
Great video ! great job ! I think A. Titarenko stacked several photos with different exposure times (from a few seconds to several minutes perhaps). I'm talking about some photos from his most famous series. Because if it was a single photo, everything would be blurred... you wouldn't see details (the hands for example). He stacked and masked certain parts of certain photos. What do you think of this?
Thanks! I don't think he did any stacking. I think it all comes down to different rates of motion. Hands and feet stay in place longer than the body, hence are less blurred.
I especially like Saul Leiters snow picture with the women and the red umbrella. But it's not just the contrast of the red vs black and white that makes this picture interesting. Your imitation in my opinion doesn't deliver the same feeling. Which is of course due to the different setting OR artistic choice you've med (with the curved line for example). Which doesn't really make it an (at least not an exact...) imitation. His picture has got diagnoal lines (with the rim being "black") in the upper and lower picture that frame the diagnoal white part of the picture which itself frames the middle part with the again "black" diagonal line (which is due to the foodprints in the snow). And on this black line in the middle we have our object with the popping red umbrella. There is NO distraction in this picture. And a clear guidance as to where our eyes are supposed to go. In your picture however seeing it the eyes have many things to see (distracting) like the tree branches, the lantern and lantern post, the rocks (I guess)... And while we have a nice curved line (if I only see the lower part of the image) it doesn't really add anything to the effect of the actual image since the popping orange umbrella will be seen BEFORE this line can guide as in any way. (because we are used to read from left to right and high to low). So I guess I would try to erase the distracting elements and probably turn the picture somewhat. Anyhow it won't be possible to get the same effect as the framing is vastly different. And while I am giving this feedback it all sounds so negative. I really enjoyed the video and many of the pictures you have taken!
Have you heard of the Spanish photographer Txema Salvans? Very interesting! It is certainly interesting to take a closer look at his techniques and subjects.
