@@AstonishingSodApe because my husband wanted to watch it, so we did but I left right before this scene and wanted at least some payoff. I still think the movie is dumb, tries to reach Braveheart status and missis by a planet. I know I’m in the minority.
That scene is so funny when you know the original book. Marlowe in the books is quite large (1.88 meters). Bogat was quite small. If you think that even Sylvester Stallone had to cheat looking larger in his movies, then you can appreachiate Bogats honesty.
Errrr how retarded. So basically if the lights keep getting blown out you cant see anything hence no jumpscares. Talk about biting the hand that feeds...🙄
I was 12 when I saw this in theaters. My friend and I had no idea what we were going into. We never heard of it, or seen any trailers. It was either this or some kids film, so we chose this. I shat my load. Came out feeling like I got my bang for my buck though. Masterpiece of a film.
The US probably cut the ending to make it seem like she escaped is because the US movie industry romanticizes “happy” endings. But for people who believe in the afterlife, there’s no better happy ending than the original UK version. She dies and reunites with her daughter, that IS a happy ending. Death is part of life after all, why can’t death be a happy ending after suffering one big trauma after another in life?
Never underestimate a man with a Claymore and a desire to seek revenge. And yes while I'm familiar with the Claymore being a large Scottish Highlands sword, it's translation means (great sword). Just like people calling the graphite in a pencil "lead", Rob Roy's sword could also be called a Claymore as well. It is normally a two handed sword, but with a strong wielder, can be used single handed.However, since it is heavy, it cannot be wielded say as swiftly as a Toledo Steel "rapier" type sword. Rapiers have the advantage of speed, but make shallow cuts. A Claymore with the right wielder can cut a man in half. And as well trained as Rob Roy's opponent was, it made him deadly with a thin and light sword. That was until Roy found a moment of weakness and maximized his Claymore with an absolutely brutal slice right into his opponent insuring both a slower and excruciating death. This is more the Scottish way of fighting. Make it count, despite the disadvantage of tech or numbers.
Una escena memorable el odio en Liam Nisson la fria tan repulsiva de Tim Roth, escalofriante dos actores esxpectaculares,geniales una lucha muy real la màs dramática que he visto, en Scaramouch se disfruta toda esa destreza entre Stewar Granger y Mel Ferrer pero tiene más atractivo es màs artística tie ne mās fantasía pero esta genial,tan real...inolvidable👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏♥️♥️
Is “disappointed kong” or whatever it is called, supposed to be a meme? I think I’m six years late to it tho. Still great game I will never forget playing this when I was younger.
Forget the memes and the stupid generation who invented them, we were happier back in the nineties with our simple and fun entertainment than they will ever be with their overabundance of content and stimulation and no true friends.
One of the many great things about this scene is the big question about Robs fighting style, was he really that tired or was it an act? See how Rob's character is betrayed as being very smart and thinking ahead through out the movie I like to think of it as so; Rob knew he was facing a professional that would be better skilled and eventually get an advantage. He also knows that Archibald is extremely cocky, over confident and has no respect for the sword fighting ability of anyone in that part of the country. Roy decides to give Archi what he expects all the way up to the end, when he does something unexpected that was not taught in his French fencing school. IMHO.....
1) the US sucks for going with the other ending. This one is far more compelling 2) yet another example of why physical media is superior to streaming. My DVD copy has the OG ending, whereas what’s being streamed on Tubi and Amazon is the watered down ending
There are no actual monsters in the movie. The main character is suffering from oxygen deprivation in the cave mixed with her ptsd. The main character was hunting her friends the entire movie,she just doesn’t understand. They were completely alone the entire time
The thing that always bugged me about this was how K focuses on him running down a cephalpoid afterwards making it seem like they didn't even think he did well on the tests. Made it confusing whether the tests were intended for him to do the things he did or not.
In reality, fire is much less efficient in zero-G than it is on Earth, because there is no displacement of the air created by the rising heat. Hot air doesn't rise without gravity, which inhibits the flame's ability to pull in more oxygen. It won't create waves or anything close to it. Instead of burning upright like a flame, it creates more of an orb centered on the object burning.
I'm glad to see in the comments that I'm not the only one who truly appreciated Ermey's improvised "This is not even my desk." I appreciate Fincher keeping it in the final cut.
The US ending absolutely sucks! The US ending has a very cheap and stupid look and feel about it.Studio executives always have to interfere and botch a film.There was no need for a cheap and worthless sequel.The sequel only diminishes the quality and impact of the first film.